Volkssozialismus (Fictional)

LARP Self-Insert "I am definitely a Bible believing Christian and not an occult pagan." - Christian Identity This self-insert is a LARP made by Kalivyah and their actual ideology is Neo-Leninism. It's probably best if you take this with a grain of salt, and this page most likely does not represent the actual political views of the user.

Volkssozialismus (People's Socialism; Folk Socialism)
"PEOPLE, TO ARMS!"
Basic Information
Aliases	National Socialism (by itself) True National Socialism (also by itself)
Alignments	National Socialists  AuthUnity  Ethnonationalists  Ultranationalists  Third Position  Culturally Centrist  Culturally Alternate Modernist
Greatest achievement	None. Fucking loser.
Ideological Influences
Influenced by	National Socialism Strasserism Traditionalist Progressivism
Character Information
Song	We Call Thine Wolves! The Workers' Nationale Raise up the Flag!

"Socialism as the final concept of duty, the ethical duty of work, not just for oneself but also for one's fellow man's sake, and above all the principle: Common good before own good, a struggle against all parasitism and especially against easy and unearned income."

— A.H.

Volkssozialismus (People's Socialism; Folk Socialism), which refers to itself as National Socialism, is an  AuthUnity, economically  Third Position ideology which claims to be the purest form of National Socialism, an ideology which it claims to have been distorted by Hitler and the later Nazi Party. It takes ideological influences from Strasserism and to a lesser extent National Bolshevism. It believes in a strong, authoritarian state similar to National Socialism, but it rejects the Fuehrerprinzip and wishes for a total nationalization (thus socialization) of the means of production, as opposed to the Hitlerist doctrine of allowing the existence of private property. Culturally, it is much more moderate than orthodox National Socialism. It still believes in Alternate Modernism and is generally conservative/traditionalist, but it rejects full-on Reactionaryism and is much more accepting to Homosexuals and Transsexuals.

Ideological Beliefs

Economics

Economically, he takes inspiration from both National Socialism and Strasserism in his economics. He subscribes to a statist form of Guild Socialism as well as National Syndicalism in order to give workers control and say in industry and the means of production. Unlike Orthodox National Socialism, he believes in a total nationalization of all industry. He also doesn't reject class conflict in its entirety; remaining firmly skeptical of the international bourgeoisie while affirming that the national bourgeoisie can be socialized and reformed under Folk Socialism.

He is firmly Anti-Capitalist, more so than he is Anti-Communist.

Environment

As a panentheist, he believes that God and the environment are literally synonymous; that nature and the universe is not just inseparable from God but that God is literally nature and the universe. Subsequently, he believes in strong environmental measures as well as animal rights, near identically to National Socialism in the real world. He supports animal rights, nuclear and green energy, as well as environmental protections. He doesn't want a return to agrarian or agricultural living, however- instead preferring eco-cities, or green cities- to outright devolution.

Social/Cultural

He's Alternative Modernist in culture, and remains rather conservative on most issues, but he is more progressive than his contemporaries through his acceptance of LGBT people, insofar as they respect the rest of the nation's cultural values. He is religious in nature, and strongly rejects atheism, but he doesn't specifically care about the specifics of religion, nor does he care about a state religion or anything like that. He remains Maternal Feminist in nature, quite similar to the feminism of Nazi Germany. He is also pro-Nuclear Family.

Curiously, while he is racialist, he is anti-racist: believing that all races are inherently equal (but that they should remain separate from one-another; not out of a delusion of "inferiority" or "superiority", but because ethnic mixing results in both races losing what made them special and great). Subsequently, he strongly rejects White Nationalism or Racial Nationalism in all of its forms, deeming them as delusionist revisions of National Socialist thought.

Civics/Government

To us state and race are one.

- Adolf Hitler

The basis for government and the existence of the state is that of the Folk, or the race. The race is the foundation for government, for society, and for ownership.
Quite similarly to the Marxist concepts of the Dictatorship of the Proletariat and Bourgeoisie, we propose a "Dictatorship of the Race"- in which the creating race of a state (whether it be Germans for Germany, Russians for Russia or French for France) pursues their own interests regardless of the interests of other races.

Again, quite similar to the Leninist (hence Marxist) idea of the Vanguard, we too wish for a vanguard; not of classes, but of race. We too wish to abolish class; not in the service of a cosmopolitan people but to destroy the barriers within Folk. The state is a vanguard of culture; of economics, of the race as a whole. Its purpose is to uphold the interests of our Folk in all means.

We wish for a system in which the Folk rule themselves, and only members of the Folk may rule over the Folk. We wish for a system not of liberal democracy, in which anybody regardless of their qualifications may run for office, but for true democracy; "rule by the people", where candidates will be chosen by Folk not out of bullshit campaign lies but out of their own personal qualifications. Hitler indeed once spoke of this; in which when the race has been developed enough, and when the scum and filth which cling to the sides have been surgically removed, that the idea of 'democracy', as simply that, an ideal- an illusion- can take place as material fact.

The state, as not only the representation of the Folk but the embodiment of the Folk capable of enacting its interests through authority, acts on the interests of the Folk. Its goals are synonymous with the Folk- and the goal of all Folks is undoubtedly the preservation of its identity and culture- the very essence of their being.
Let us take, for example... a random culture which over a couple of decades has, through outside pressure and forces, became increasingly more cosmopolitan. If a Folkish state were to take power, and since it is in the interests of all Folks to preserve their identity, customs and culture, the state would first take aim to destroy the cosmopolitan (hence foreign) elements that linger within the Folk, hence restoring the true culture and identity of the Folk.

Diplomacy

Humanity is a species of many distinct races, peoples, and Folk. This has been true since the dawn of civilization and perhaps will continue to be true, so long as cosmopolitans don't somehow successfully unify Earth in our future.
We don't reject human nature through the rejection of the diversity of Man; we embrace human nature, we embrace diversity, and we have always believed that Man is best organized in independent nation-states.
As we are first and foremost interested in the Folk and the interests of the Folk above everything else, we likewise find that the Folk can never find itself healthy without existing in a state explicitly dedicated to the Folk. A Folk in a foreign nation can never truly be happy, never truly prosper if surrounded by aliens. He may get along with the foreigners, even accept and perhaps adopt some of their customs; but he will always remain first and foremost a member of his Folk- and he will always remain deep down inside discontent for as long as he is separated from his Folk.

Is it not therefore in the interest of all Folks that they remain separate from one another, never antagonistic of one another and respectful of their traditions, but accepting that they are beautiful the way they are and that they do not need to adopt cosmopolitan ideals or adopt the culture of other cultures because of some abstract moralism of a 'united world'? Is it not in the interest of all Folk that they stay in their countries- stay in their Volksgemeinschafts?
We want a cooperative world; we do not war or suffering or conflict between the Folk of the world. We wish for their cooperation, not in the moralistic cosmopolitan spirit of a "united earth" but instead but for the individual development of nations; to make each country and Folk strong, to be able to develop their culture and Folk to the fullest ability.

We are the true vanguards of diversity; the true vanguards of the natural order. We say therefore, "YES!" to segregation; to separation of Folks, not because we believe that one is inherently better or superior to another, but because we know that the beauty of them is expressed most purely through their native cultures, languages, and customs. We detest the destruction of any cultures or languages- any atrocity made in the spirit of eradicating one of God's creations from this Earth- and we find that just as the destruction of a people may come through the sword that it can come through more subtle means of cosmopolitanism and internationalism.

READ THEORY!

National Socialism - is it socialism?

There is a most common saying online- that National Socialism wasn't actually socialist- or that it was socialism, but this "socialism" is more or less a pejorative used by morons who have no idea what "socialism" means. So, which is correct? Is National Socialism actually socialist, or is it just one of those things where it slaps on things to make it seem like what it's not?

- Short answer: Yes. Yes, it is socialism. - Long answer:

Before we can even remotely begin to touch the subject of whether or not "National Socialism" is socialism, we need to define what "socialism" means anyway:

In short, "Socialism" does not refer to any singular ideology, but simply refers to a variety of different ideologies which believe in some form of collectivism and social ownership over the means of production. "Social ownership" is described as a system in which the means of production are recognized to belong to society as a whole, rather than individuals or groups. It should be noted that social ownership does not necessarily mean that private property cannot still exist, but more often than not when private property is retained, "social ownership" breaks down and reverts back into private ownership.

In National Socialism, the "Volksgemeinschaft" - the racial community, people's community- is upheld as the nation- the society. It is the organism of the nation as a whole. To National Socialism, the means of production belong to the Volksgemeinschaft and subsequently, society as a whole. It is the ownership of the means of production by the people's community and the people's community alone, not by foreign nations, or foreigners, or community aliens. In this extent, it is the purest form of socialism- socialism not only of economics, but socialism of the mind- of the race. It in of itself is a cultural revolution, which seeks to redefine what "society" means.

We, however, should stress the fact that National Socialism is not Marxian Socialism. It indeed is true that National Socialism is "not socialism" when we speak of Marxian Socialism. Marxian Socialism- Marxism, whatever you would wish to call it, is only one interpretation of socialism. It is "scientific socialism" as one would describe it, and while many of its tenets are true, it ultimately fails in its worldview. Marxianism and National Socialism are at odds with one another- the former wishes to establish a stateless, classless, and currencyless society. In a sense, we wish to do the same, in a way. We wish not to abolish the state but to bring it into the hands of the Volksgemeinschaft. We wish to transcend class barriers and abolish class all-together through the Volksgemeinschaft. We wish to establish a society in which money is not king, but fraternity, work, and happiness is. We both, in a way, have the same goals- but we go around it in different ways.

In this, we find that National Socialism is more authentically socialist than so-called "scientific socialism"- or Marxian socialism. Marxian socialism does not seek to hand the means of production over to society as a whole, but merely the 'proletariat'- the working class. It only hands one section of society control and ownership of the means of production rather than society as a whole. It does not seek to abolish class distinctions, it only seeks to create a system in which one class dominates all others. In this sense, Marxian socialism does not solve the issue of classes, it only exacerbates it: it implies the solution lie with the force and subjugation of one class over others. The bourgeoisie were at one point the proletarian; are we not to assume that the proletarian will also not at some point become the bourgeoisie and a new class shall fill their place? The solutions which Marx and Marxists present to the problem of class are redundant; they do not solve the problem but only create new ones. National Socialism does not seek the domination of one class over another; its interests are not with the bourgeoisie, or the proletarian, or even the peasantry. It is with all the members of the Volksgemeinschaft, regardless of their class. The Volksgemeinschaft belongs to no class: there is no "dictatorship of the proletariat", or the "dictatorship of the bourgeoisie". It belongs simply to the people. The Volk; the centerpoint of our ideology, which transcends class and other unnecessary descriptions to create a whole and unitary organism. A socialism which divides its people will never truly be authentically socialist. It is, simply put, socialism of one class and capitalism of the others. It solves no problems- it only creates new ones, which is the exact opposite of what socialism should attempt to do.

In conclusion: Is National Socialism... socialism?
Answer: Yes. But it's not Marxian Socialist.

Yes, we are racialists- but we are not racists.

In the modern era National Socialism has been unfortunately taken over by a group of people who have virtually no understanding nor conception of the term "race" as the NSDAP defined it. "Rasse" refers not to our modern understanding of race- that being of skin color, but of nations, of "tribes", in a sense. Not tribes as in fire stick, club... caveman, but simply- well, nations. It is a simple matter of truth that humans can be, and have always been, divided into different "races"- tribes, nations, and this still rings true today. These races all have their own distinct characteristics- traits, whether fixed and or hereditary. This is not on the basis of skin color- as after all skin color only defines how much melanin you have in your skin- but it is on the basis of blood, of ancestry.

"Race" as we know it is incompatible with the beliefs of white supremacy, nationalism, or any racial nationalism for that matter. We do not uphold the idea of a "white race", let alone a "black race" or an "asian race". Race in that regard is so fluid that a distinct boundary between the races cannot be made. Sure, when it comes to the Nords and the South Sudanese, the difference is... well, one can literally say it is night and day. But in-between this is... less obvious. If the Italians, who are mostly darker skin and olive, are white, then should this not apply to the Levantine Arabs as well, who share the exact same skin tone? Or the Berbers, or the entire population around the Mediterannean as a whole? In this regard we find that "race" is... stupid. There is no "white race". Successes attributed to 'white nations' are not because they are 'white'. Excellence is not because of skin color. When the modern Neo-Nazi speaks of "WPWW" or the 14 words, I simultaneously laugh and stare in disgust- for they have twisted the idea of National Socialism to a cartoonish extent.

We, indeed, are racialists. We believe that every human, one way or another, belongs to their own distinct Volksgemeinschaft- racial community: that every person should have the right to belong to a Volksgemeinschaft. But we are not racists. We do not believe in the supremacy of one race or another based solely on skin color. We uphold that some races, indeed, have been responsible for more important things than others, but we also uphold that it does not mean that those other races are "subhuman". We are not "Pan-White".

Okay, but what is race?

Rather frequently in this article, I will be using the term "race" frequently, although sometimes I will be swapping it out with "nation" or "people". I do not use this term to describe race as we orthodoxly understand it- that being of distinguishing groups of people based on their skin color. Our understanding of race is based on nationhood and the Volksgemeinschaft. We uphold that "race" is not based on skin color, but on blood: ancestry, culture, and genetics. We uphold that man does not belong to any one group just because he is of a particular skin color, but because of his ancestry. A Frenchman is not French because he is light-skinned! He is French because it has coursed through his family's blood for centuries!

We are against the idea of racism. We uphold that every race is separate and that they are not necessarily equal when it comes to their accomplishments, but we are not racists. Blind racism- of screaming obscenities and foolish things such as "white pride", paraded by the degenerates of the likes of the Ku Klux Klan- is something that National Socialism shall always, and forever be, opposed to. We are not edgelords. We do not seek to create a "white ethnostate", or to "genocide the Negroids".

A "People's Socialism"

Socialism is indisputably the natural state of affairs for human society- it is society, it is engrained in our biology and in our spirits. We are all biologically encoded with a sense of camaraderie among our community. In this regard, socialism is human nature- selflessness is human nature, sacrificing one's personal gain to the greater good is human nature, and subsequently the rejection of socialism is the rejection of human nature.

But "socialism" cannot simply be economic. Sure, one can simply give the workers control over the means of production, and even create a classless, currencyless, and stateless society as Marxism seeks to do. But what one will receive in the end turns out to be nothing more than a half-hearted attempt at socialism. Socialism cannot be solely "economic"- it cannot be based solely on class. It is true indeed that working people of every race have many things in common, but it does not mean that they can be grouped together. They are similar, but separate- united in their struggle against cosmopolitan Judeo-capitalism, but unique. They are equal, but they are not to be grouped together. This is the failure of Marxism- its rootless cosmopolitanism dooms itself to the establishment of only a half-hearted attempt of socialism.

There is an extent to which pan-nationalism, which seeks to unite like-minded races of the world in a beautiful chorus of love and fraternity, turns into rootless cosmopolitanism. Races can get along- they can even agree with many things and perhaps share much in common. But that does not mean that they can be grouped together. If one can actually get a Turk and a Greek to get along, then one should by now have also colonized all the planets in the solar system. If one can actually get any of the Yugoslavs to get along, humanity shall have conquered the stars. The truth is that we are all distinctly a part of our own Volksgemeinschaft- we always have been. Socialism, subsequently, should not reject human nature by prodding around beliefs such as the idea that "humans all share a common identity" or the idea that "race" is irrelevant. We celebrate diversity of Humanity! We welcome it and cherish it. But our respect and celebration of the differences between each race of Humanity cannot be mistaken for cosmopolitanism or internationalism. "International Socialism", subsequently- is not true socialism. As we spoke at the start of the article, socialism is human nature, and human nature is socialism- and thus the rejection of human nature is the rejection of socialism as a whole.

We speak of "socialism of the race" - socialism not only of economics, but of the race- of the Volksgemeinschaft. This is the people's socialism, service to one's nation, to one's people. As I quoted A.H. in the start of the article:

“I understand socialism to mean the highest service to my people, the abandonment of personal advantage in the interests of the whole ... The benefit of the whole is the essence. In the end, the term nationalism means nothing more than devotion and love for my people.”

— Adolf Hitler

Relationships

Parents

• National Socialism - We of course consider ourselves not only National Socialists but the truest form of National Socialism.
• Hitlerism - We appreciate your contributions to National Socialism, but many of them were problematic and ultimately went against orthodoxy.
• Strasserism - Hitler is who led National Socialism to power and victory in Germany. Strasser is who never let down the true National Socialism; the Orthodox National Socialism.

Family

• Neo-Nazism - Many of your ideologists have followed a path of revisionism that is inexcusable.
• Volksgemeinschaft - Man will never find himself truly happy living outside of his homeland.
• Ultranationalism - A dictatorship of the race; a vow to follow the will and wishes of the Folk first and others second.
• Cultural Nationalism - Always preserve your cultures; never let down your fight for independence.
• Deep Ecology - God is the Universe, the Universe is God. We must appreciate the Universe to the fullest in service to Him.

Friends

• Eugenicism - The development of the Folk requires the surgical removal of the undesirable.
• Ethnopluralism - We have found that Man is best organized when he is separated into independent nation states.
• Socialism - There is nothing inherently wrong with you; only that you have not concluded that the national question does not oppose socialism but rather helps and embraces it.
  • State Socialism - The state is a vanguard in which the Folk is to be developed and socialized.

Neutral

• Paetelism - A great and revolutionary social thinker who was among the first to realize that nationalism and socialism are not contradictory. Understandably had quarrels with Hitlerists over their support for private property, but clings too much onto Marxism.

Dislike

• Marxism -

“Socialism is the science of dealing with the common weal. Communism is not Socialism. Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning... Marxism has no right to disguise itself as Marxism. Socialism, unlike Marxism... involves no negation of personality, and unlike Marxism it is patriotic... We demand the fulfillment of the just claims of the productive classes by the state on the basis of race solidarity. To us state and race are one.” ... “The new Reich shall belong to no class, no profession, but to the German people. It shall help the people find an easier road in this world. It shall help them in making their lot a happier one. Party, state, armed forces, economics are institutions and functions which can only be estimated as a means towards an end. They will be judged by history according to the services they render towards this goal. Their purpose, however, is to serve the people.“ ... “'Socialist' I define from the word 'social'; meaning in the main 'social equity'. A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency. Our adopted term 'Socialist' has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not. Marxism places on value on the individual, or individual effort, of efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain.“

- A.H

• White Supremacism/Nationalism - The Folk of Europe, no matter how connected they may be, can never claim to be part of a singular Volksgemeinschaft. You are misguided.
  • Klansmanism - Unfortunately has hijacked our movement and has permanently placed our movement in the minds of millions as being a bunch of redneck hillbillies.
• Alt-Right - At times worse than him, mostly due to his complacency with accepting revisionism of true National Socialist thought.
• Esoteric Nazism - Your runes are interesting, but most of your beliefs boil down to pseudoscientific LARP.
• Fascism - We are not the same, as people may so believe. Mussolini believed that the state creates the people, that the people are subservient to the state. We believe the Folk creates the state and that the state is subservient to the Folk.
• Bolshevism -

“The Germany of today is a National Socialist State. The ideology that dominates us is in diametrical contradiction to that of Soviet Russia. National Socialism is a doctrine that has reference exclusively to the German people. Bolshevism lays stress on international mission. We National Socialists believe a man can, in the long run, be happy only among his own people. We are convinced the happiness and achievements of Europe are indissolubly tied up with the continuation of the system of independent and free national States. Bolshevism preaches the establishment of a world empire and recognizes only section of a central international. We National Socialists grant each people the right to its own inner life according to its needs and its own nature. Bolshevism, on the other hand, establishes doctrinal theories that are to be accepted by all peoples, regardless of their particular essence, their special nature, traditions, etc. National Socialism speaks up for the solution of social problems, issues and tensions in their own nation, with methods that are consistent with our common human, spiritual, cultural, and economic beliefs, traditions and conditions. Bolshevism preaches the international class struggle, the international world revolution with the weapons of the terror and the violence. National Socialism fights for the reconciliation and consequent adjustment of the difference in life and the union of all for common benefits. Bolshevism teaches the overcoming of an alleged class rule by the dictatorship of the power of different class. Naitonal Socialism does not attach importance to a only theoretical rule of the working class, but especially on the practical improvement of their living conditions and standard of living. Bolshevism fights for a theory and, for it, sacrifices millions of people, immense values of traditional culture and traditions, and achieves, compared with us, only a very low standard of living for all. As National Socialists, our hearts are full with admiration and respect for the great achievements of the past, not only in our own people but also far beyond. We are happy to belong to a European cultural community that has so tremendously embossed today's world with a stamp of its mind. Bolshevism rejects this cultural achievement of mankind, claiming that has found the beginning of the real cultural and human history in the year of birth of Marxism. We, National Socialists, do not want to be of the same opinion as our church organizations in this or that organizational question. But we never want a lack of belief in religion or any faith, and do not wish that our churches become club-houses or cinemas. Bolshevism teaches the godlessness and acts accordingly.”

- A.H

them.

• - (((them))) - Our opposition to the Jew has never been on basis of supposed biological inferiority or the belief that the Jew is even less intelligent or physically weaker than others. Our opposition has always been based in their character; in their distinctly egoistic and societally hostile culture which equivocally combines the national with the supranational if not international.
  

A race which does not only consider themselves the only chosen people of God, but the only people, the only 'true' humans, the only true descendants of Adam- who's lineage was forever cursed with sin to the point of having to be washed away mind you- is a deplorable one. If any other people were to have proclaimed themselves as such; not just "chosen by God" but proclaimed everyone else mere animals which fundamentally have no rights whatsoever, they would have forever been lambasted as nothing short of horrid and have been thrown in the dustbin of history. Yet because of their historical (and at times rightful persecution), they are given a free card- an ability to say the most outright disgusting and outlandish things because "they're protecting themselves", when everyone knows that in no way can the offense conducted by the Jews be considered defensive.
I believe that there is a Jewish culture worthy of respect just as the rest of humanity. It has been buried under centuries, if not millennia of egoism, chauvinism and hatred for humanity. Pray that perhaps one day it may return and we shall see the Jews return as another member of the Folk of the world.

• (((Capitalism))) -

"Our fight is with money. Work alone will help us, not money. We must smash interest slavery. Our fight is with the races that represent money."

-A.H.

• Judeo-Capitalism -

”... And if we ask who was responsible for our misfortune, then we must inquire who profited by our collapse. And the answer to that question is that 'Banks and Stock Exchanges are more flourishing than ever before.' We were told that capitalism would be destroyed, and when we ventured to remind one or the other of these famous statesmen and said 'Don't forget that Jews too have capital,' then the answer was: 'What are you worried about? Capitalism as a whole will now be destroyed, the whole people will now be free. We are not fighting Jewish or Christian capitalism, we are fighting very capitalism: we are making the people completely free.' ... It is only the international Stock Exchange and loan-capital, the so-called 'supra-state capital', which has profited from the collapse of our economic life, the capital which receives its character from the single supra-state nation which itself is national to the core, which fancies itself to be above all other nations, which places itself above other nations and which already rules over them. The international Stock Exchange capital would be unthinkable, it would never have come, without its founders the supra-national, because intensely national, Jews.”

- A.H.

• Democracy - Democracy, rule by the people, is not possible through liberal democracy.
• Liberalism - Our goals are simple; the abolition of the Liberalistic conception of the individual and the Marxist conception of humanity and the substitution of both with the Volksgemeinschaft.

If I add you here by myself, it usually means I have a lot to say about you.

Wunderbar!

Schön!

Gut.

Zulässig.

Enttäuschend.

Faul!

• Pantheonism - The path to righteousness is not too far, my friend. Ditch the last remnants of reactionaryism that remain.
• Hoodism - This is an expected position. I should not have to explain.
• Brazillian Liberalism - Liberal. Capitalist. Globalist. This is also not a surprise, and I should not have to explain.

Nein.

larpers

• mental sickness of an ideology.
  

See here: Volkssozialismus (Fictional)/Anidiotoncrack Thought
Another case in a history of thousands of random 16 year olds being manipulated by race baiters and 4chanite idpols into being an incoherent ramblement of "being edgy and hating everyone that isn't white is based".
Change and grow as a person. You will see that capitalism and white Nationalism are sides of the Jewish shekel.

• Agricoetism -

You're LARP. I'm sorry. I mean that most definitely in a way less negative way than the moron above you, but... you're LARP. You can't deny that.
Uhm. The uh, national syndicalism is pretty good. Homofascism is 'based'. I hate using that word. That's all I really have to say about that. Weren't you a Catholic?

• • Yep, it’s a larp, I won’t deny that, the ideology isn’t exactly 10000000% serious, just there to make it look interesting. :333

Also not really, I guess I was born into a catholic family, but never really considered myself very Christian.