×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,528 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Polcompball Wiki
2,528Articles
  Recent changes
in:
Pages using Tabber parser tag, Pages with broken file links, Self-Insert, Ideologies
Revision as of 17:21, 11 November 2024 by Nebeler (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "File:Progconf.png" to "File:Progcon.png")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent Dr. Occo's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

In Development
"I'll stop reading eventually." - Left Communism

This page is still in development due to ongoing reading by Dr. Occo, multiple things may change drastically.


“Neither Reform nor Revolution is, on its own, the perfect means to defeat an unjust System. A mix of revolutionary Determination and reformist Pacifism is the solution.”



“Electoral Politics are to be treated as an end, not a means.”


Leerderism is the current ideology of polcompball contributor Dr. Occo. It is an East Frisian Nationalist ideology, holding in itself a belief that the Frisian people in East Frisia should have a right to self-determination. On other matters, it is a democratic and (mostly) reformist leftist ideology, expressing the belief that the current system of Neoliberalism is fundamentally flawed and needs restructuring into a more socialist economy and more traditionally localist society.
I would advise anyone not to spend too much time or effort on interacting with this page, since I‘ll probably change my views in the near future when I start to read more theory.

Beliefs

Overview

I am a General Center-Leftist, mostly aligned with Agrarian Socialism and Market Socialism. Smaller influences on my ideology are Local Patriotism, Frisian Cultural Nationalism, Progressive Conservatism, Reactionaryism, and Cosmicism. I am opposed to any form of Dogmatism and Campism, as well as Black-and-White worldviews, and I do not believe that people can be inherently good or evil. My ideology is flexible, since I do not want to sacrifice my values for being ideologically consistent, and I take influence from many different ideologies, while also questioning everything so I do not fall into an echo-chamber.

Government

Economy

First: Capitalism is a blight and should be abolished. It accelerates climate change and gives an unfair amount of power to unelected lobbyists and industrialists, not to mention that it makes everyone under it a pawn in an exploitative game against the poor. Capitalism enables the exploitation of any and all workers, allowing the owning class to basically steal the surplus value that workers create from them. In a conventional company, the Capitalists have complete control, and are immune from the consequences of their actions. If they mismanage something, and the company loses money, they are never the ones whose money is taken away. No, the low-rank employees, the workers, they are the ones being punished for what managers and company boards decided. After a possible revolution, or through intense reforms (in government and out of it), I would propose the installation of a highly decentralized, localist market socialist economy. Farms and businesses should be seized and their means of production redistributed to the workers, but the government should not directly control the economy. Instead, it should be regulated and controlled by workers' guilds, institutions that cooperate with the government, but are made up of the workers of different small businesses. This system has many similarities to forms of Corporatism , which would be a good compromise position between the current system and my ideal, however still has its own problems, especially when Class Collaboration gets in the way of the Workers' cause. I am also in favor of Workplace Democracy for specific workplaces that have to contain a power structure for whatever reason, which would likely be found out in the process of transition between economic systems.
Second: I am a Left-Protectionist. This means I oppose economic globalization, because it is the biggest contributor to climate change and exploitation. Everything that can be manufactured or harvested in the homeland, must be harvested, manufactured and consumed therein, not only to keep emissions low and prevent unfair practices, but to strengthen National Unity and Community.
Third: Local Markets must be strenghthened. This is the most "reactionary" part of my ideology. A farmer should not have his potatoes shipped off to Egypt, but directly distributed to his own community through local markets, which would strengthen community bonds and reduce emissions from transport. We know this system "works", because it has been in place for aeons before globalization was even possible. Obviously, some products can not be grown or manufactured locally, and those products have made society way better. But this system obviously wouldn't be universal. A country that can not, by using its own goods, manufacture life-saving medicine, should be able to import the materials for that medicine from other countries, so that the people don't die needlessly. This sytem has also been in place for as long as there was humanity, and despite the problems it did create, it has generally improved living standards whereever its effect was felt. So, I would be pro-worldwide distribution of resources, just not in this system and not nearly as much as we do now.

Welfare

I am a staunch welfarist. While I recognize that financial stability is very important in the long run, it is equally important not to leave the helpless and vulnerable in the mud just to get ahead.
Firstly, while working must obviously still be rewarded with more money, the people who are not able to work should still be able to live a good life. A good way to achieve this would be a Universal Basic Income, a certain amount that everyone, no matter if employed or not, would be guaranteed. This would simultaneously eliminate many peoples concerns about poverty and create an easy frame for workplaces to set their wages.
I also want a significant boost to efforts of integration of neurodivergent, disabled and similarly disadvantaged people. Since I myself am neurodivergent, this should not be surprising. It would be great if we could create a framework where any workplace is ready to accommodate for anyone who might not have the same capacities as other workers, or has special needs that need to be met.
Our public sector needs funding, all parts of it. No healthcare office, no post office, no care facility, no hospital, no library, no theater, no museum should be ignored. Especially institutions that preserve history and identity are more important than they first may seem.

Environment

My position on the Environment is pretty simple: I believe it is of the utmost importance to preserve it at all costs. There are many tactics that should, and really need to, be used:
Environmentalist Economic Policy - (Much of this I already discussed in the "Economy" section.) In the Economy, Environmentalist goals should mostly consist of reduction of emissions through less international trade, strong environmental regulations and the promotion of explicitly Environmentalist workplaces over regular ones.
Environmentalist Laws - In the government, environmentalist laws must be passed. This includes high luxury taxes on especially eco-unfriendly expenses, subsidies for environmentally friendly workplaces (which would NOT be transferrable, what a fucking stupid idea) and, in extreme cases, outright bans on things like Cruise Ships, country-internal flights and the other critical polluters.
Climate Protests - The first of a pair of tactics, the protests of groups like Fridays For Future should continue. While I have my doubts about specific protests, they are a net positive and should continue, especially if continued with strikes and popular unrest. Which brings me to...
Insurrectionary Action - Ooh, spicy. This is pretty simple, but radical: Environmentalist action units, who conduct attacks on polluting infrastructure, are doing purposeful work, and this type of unlawful conduct should not be overly discouraged (as long as it stays non-violent and does not target the livelihoods of poorer people, obviously).
National Identity - The nature of the nation is often a strong point of pride among patriots. This sense of Nature as a part of National Cultural Identity should be strengthened in all people, and should form a motivator for environmentalist change.

Nation

Let me move on to my favourite talking point: National Cultural Identity. Yes, I am a Cultural Nationalist. I believe that a National Cultural Identity, a Shared collection of cultural views and traditions, should form the backbone of a nations society. Since the multicultural principle of different and separate cultural groups in the same society often leads to parallel societies, isolated cultural outgroups with little connection to wider society, which are a breeding ground for crime, especially when they are neglected by the government. Immigrants should still be welcome in East Frisia, as long as we can physically provide for them without sacrificing the well-being of our own citizens, but they should not form a Split-off parallel society hostile to the dominant one. This could be encouraged by the government with good and well-thought out welfare benefits for struggling immigrant families as well as an effort to guide them into becoming fully functional members of East Frisian society and at least being willing to accept its culture. If migrants prove to be completely unwilling or unable to conform to East Frisian Culture, they need to be dealt with effectively, and if necessary, they need to be expelled from the country before they become a liability.
Plus, Culture is just nice to have, and it strengthens the community.

Diplomacy

I despise Hegemony, and hold the view that autonomy is a nations highest right. I believe in the concept of the right to self-determination of all peoples, and I would want it to be applied to every people with an identity of their own (for example: Kurds, Basques, Frisians). I am also not willing to brutally invade other nations with little legitimization to impose my arbitrary beliefs on them, as the US and Russia like to do. Of course, I want my nation to intervene in wars, for example by shipping supplies to the better side, since I do not want to passively support Imperialist great powers. But all in all, I am mostly for Non-Alignedism.
I am also not a fan of the overly idealistic and liberal-ideological foreign policy that much of the West has adopted over time. The biggest offenders by far have to be the Schröder and Merkel administrations, who somehow believed (or claimed to believe anyway) that by buying the gas of Putin’s pet company Gazprom they could democratize Russia, which has predictably led to Germany being caught off-guard by the Invasion of Ukraine. Now, the people who need gas to survive are rightfully angry, and the new government (with Merkels former finance minister in charge) is struggling to handle this crisis as well as all the other crises that have cropped up. While I am not supporting Machiavellian Powerplays to achieve German supremacy, I am very much in favor of a more realistic and pragmatic approach to foreign policy. Sometimes, it is better to immediately make hard choices than to endlessly kick the can down the road, especially if that road leads to catastrophe.

Social Policy

„Inclusion, not Diversity.“

Socially, I fit comfortably in the progressive Anti-SJW, Inclusionary, or Moderately Progressive, whatever you want to call it, territory. I want all forms of discrimination by identity, skin colour, orientation or sex to end, and I think that, in an ideal world, we would never even feel the need to discuss our identities to define ourselves. After all, being a gay Autist is not really something I should take pride in, because neither did I choose it nor can I change it. In the same vein, a white straight cis man should not take pride in his identity, since he did not choose to be born into such an advantageous position. Instead, I would much rather everyone take pride in their accomplishments and values.
However, I do not like many of the tactics the liberal left uses today, from Cancel Culture, over Multiculturalist Identity politics they ripped from the US even though that makes zero sense or File:Neotribe.png Neo-Tribalism, to the annoying arguments about things like Quotas (which I will discuss in more detail later) or Gendersprache, which I personally find ridiculous. You can argue in favor of trans rights without calling the 80-year old grandma a bigot for not knowing how to use neopronouns correctly, that is very much possible.
Overall, my goal is a United and Inclusive nation in which everyone can feel welcome, and no one has to endure judgement based solely on their belonging to a certain social group.

Culture

As explained in the „Nation“ paragraph, I believe in the concept of a unifying National Cultural Identity. This Cultural Identity would be one of traditional Frisian culture. The Frisian and Low German languages are a part of it, as is a strong communitarian bond, some typical regional food and drinks like cabbage, beans or tea, and a general quiet rural atmosphere.
I am heavily opposed to cultural Artifism, Futurism and Foreign Cultural Hegemony, specifically that of the USA. Their art, their sayings, their culture have been exported to the entire world, oftentimes threatening to change local cultures not through conquest, but through gradual Americanization. This all must be opposed if we are to preserve our own cultural heritage.

Religious Policy

I am generally in favor of Religious freedom and tolerance, as long as religions stay out of government. The separation of church and state is extremely important.
All people should be free to practice whatever religion they believe in. I can understand how it may be hard for someone to accept that other people believe in different religious concepts than themself, but that does not make religious supremacy or terror against other religious groups okay. In fact, if there exists a religious community that is based on preaching hate, like, unfortunately, many already do, the state should have the authority to investigate them. We can not accept Cult-like behavior or zealous bigotry to grow in our society and form the dreaded parallel society.
Personally, I was raised by a Catholic mother and a Protestant (but very irreligious) father, I was baptized in the Catholic Church, I am mostly Atheist and I philosophically align most with Pastafarism and Lovecraftianism. I also like the Old Cultural implications of original Paganism. But none of those tendencies should be mandated for anyone but me. I am perfectly comfortable with the personal religious identity being completely separate from the National Cultural Identity.

Religious Philosophy

If there is a god, and they are all-knowing, all-powerful and all-loving, it logically follows that we must live in the world that god considers perfect. This means that any argument about the state of things which involves the notion of „gods will“ must be obsolete, since god must always will every situation exactly as it is. If this is not the case, surely god can not be all-knowing, all-powerful and all-loving all at once, because if they were, and the situation were not as they desire, they would have changed that situation with their all-power before it even was perceived by us. Either this, or the gods that exist must do so on such a different level that their thoughts and plans are not even imaginable by the human mind. The Gods would be such alien and unknowable entities that even a second-long glance at their perceptions would drive any person mad. In the first case, why should we base our life on the essence of a fallible god instead of an equally fallible, however more tangible human, in the second case, arguing about the will of the gods is pointless, since the will of the gods can not even be understood, let alone acted on, by us.

Military

Justice System

I mostly believe in restorative justice, however, a functioning society, no matter the system, still needs a notable punishment for crimes committed in it, since even a hypothetical society without material or social discrimination will still be made up of people, and without dystopian re-education programs, people will never behave in the exact ways any society needs them to.
This means that the Justice system must be just threatening enough to disincentivise crime, but not so powerful that it ruins the lives of anyone who comes into contact with it. The Death Penalty should stay illegal in the country, even for the worst offenses, so should overly long prison sentences for relatively minor crimes like posession of drugs or petty theft, and the prisons we do have should be less miserable holes for prisoners to rot in, and more schools for the inmates to get a perspective on life and learn to become a valuable meber of society.

CULTURE WAR!!!!

As I see it, the Culture War is not something the left should be very involved in. I see the Culture War as a fight between Progressive Liberals and Alt-Lite Conservatives, that mostly works on Capitalist and Liberal assumptions about what is good and fair. The Left should not discuss if there is a lack of female representation in, for example, corporate boards, because this would undermine the left's efforts to get rid of those same boards.
Of course, this does not mean we should abandon minorities that are under attack by conservatives and their allies. The attack on civil rights is real, and it needs to be opposed, however, I don't think we should be playing in the Alt-Right's[1] field, by engaging in the Culture War, but make clear that we do not condone the frivolous nonsense that Liberal "SJWs" and the Alt-Right are spouting. I mean, seriously, there are more important issues than the non-existent genitals of a toy potato or the skin color of a Disney Princess.
So, whenever we notice an attack on any civil rights, we should call it out, and if it is veiled, we should uncover it for the world to understand, and we should even be willing to sacrifice our own peace and comfort for this, however we should never let ourselves get baited into petty discussions on who is the stupider side, or which Popcultural Staple is now a black lesbian because of some corporate pandering. Never fall for the Alt-Rights trick, they want you to seem petty and arrogant.
I especially dislike the tendency on both sides to use the word "they" to refer to some kind of nebulous group of people that disagree with them. I have seen this many times online, and mostly in leftist circles (which is because I almost never visit right-wing circles), however I have also witnessed it whenever I visited PCM. This tendency often leads to conflating groups of people that are actually pretty diverse, which is most often noted by leftists who despise being conflated with liberals, but they themselves often think that the Manosphere, the Alt-Right, Conservatives and Libertarians all share the same beliefs. (Of course, they also use the word "fascism" so loosely that I'm surprised it hasn't come off and fallen right out of their vocabulary.)

Implementation

I want to practice for a fusion of Utopian and Pragmatic thinking. While my goals may be utopian and unrealistic, I do not think I should take drastic steps to achieve them as soon as possible, but instead use them as a lens through which I can see the problems and conflict of the present. So, while I would want East Frisia to secede from Germany, I do not argue for an immediate secession, instead I argue for more local projects, cultural and infrastructural, which will directly help East Frisia, which will hopefully lay the groundwork for a secession, that will happen when the time is right. The same is generally true with everything else in my ideology. I do not want to immediately install an Agrarian Socialist state, I want to bring about Socialism through reforms and worker action over time. I do not want to immediately convert everyone to traditional styles of living, I want to argue that they are the superior system. Etcetera. Revolution is just too big a risk to be the only plan for reaching the utopia of Communism, and history has shown that it does not work. Most communist revolutions either fall apart, get co-opted by power-hungry authoritarians or more centrist figures, or result in a totalitarian hellscape which eventually crumbles due to pressure from outside and inside. I don't think a revolution can work without significant reformist action happening before it, since establishing a new government best suited to bringing about the preferred system will always be easier when there is less pushback from a radically opposed government and parts of the populace.

The Galli Market, East Asia, And Dystopia

User Alignment Test of Ultimate Destiny

  • Civic Axis
    • (Deliberate) Chaosist (+5)
    • Egoist (-10)
    • Anarchist (+10)
    • Minarchist (-5)
    • Libertarian (+5)
    • Moderate/Mixed (+20)
    • Statist (+10)
    • Dictablanda (-5)
    • Authoritarian (-10)
    • Totalitarian (-15)
    • Orwellian (-20)
  • Type of Rule Axis
    • (Anarchist) Anti-Democracy (+10)
    • Direct Democracy (-15)
    • Semi-Direct Democracy (-5)
    • Representative Democracy (+20)
    • Authoritarian Democracy (-10)
    • Totalitarian Democracy (-20)
    • (Authoritarian) Anti-Democracy (-15)
  • If none above apply...
    • Organic Centralism (-10)
  • Economic Axis
    • Marxist Communist (+5)
    • Socialist (+20)
    • Welfarist/Gift Economy (+5)
    • Moderate/Mixed (+15)
    • Liberal Economics (-5)
    • Capitalist (-10)
  • If none above apply...
    • Third Positionism (-10)
    • Anti-Economy (+5)
    • Non-Marxist Communist (+10)
  • Economic Freedom
    • Anti-Economy (+5)
    • Dirigisme (-15)
    • Regulationism (+15)
    • Moderate/Mixed (+20)
    • Liberal Economics (0)
    • Free Market (-10)
    • Laissez-Faire (-20)
  • If none above apply...
    • Central Planned (-15)
    • Decentral Planned (+10)
  • Diplomatic Axis
    • Autarchy (+5)
    • Autarky (+15)
    • (Alter-) Globalist (0)
    • World Federalist (-15)
    • Cosmopolitan (-5)
    • Internationalist (0)
    • Moderate (+5)
    • Patriotic (+10)
    • Nationalist (+10)
    • Chauvinist (-15)
    • Racial Nationalist (or similar broad category) (-20)
    • Ethno-Nationalist (or similar narrow category) (-10)
    • Universal Nationalist (+20)
  • Geopolitics
    • Western (-15)
    • Western Adjacent (-5)
    • Non-Aligned (+20)
    • East Adjacent (-5)
    • Eastern (-20)
  • Social Axis
    • Revolutionary (-5)
    • Progressive (+10)
    • Inclusionary (+20)
    • Moderate/Mixed (+5)
    • Conservative (-5)
    • Traditionalist (-10)
    • Reactionary (-20)
  • Cultural Axis
    • Anti-Culture (-20)
    • Artificial (-10)
    • Progressive (-5)
    • Moderate/Don't Care (+5)
    • Traditionalist (+20)
    • Reactionary/Palingenetic (+15)
  • Technological Axis
    • Primal (-20)
    • Primitivist (-15)
    • Pre-Industrial (0)
    • Deceleration (+10)
    • Moderate (+20)
    • Acceleration (+5)
    • Automated (0)
    • Transhumanist (-5)
    • Posthumanist (-20)
  • If none of the above apply...
    • Post-Civilization (-10)
    • Archeofuturism (-5)
  • Environmental Axis
    • Human Extinction (-20)
    • Radical Environmentalism (+20)
    • Eco-Fascism (+5)
    • Ecocentrism (+5)
    • Environmentalist (+10)
    • Moderate (0)
    • Post-Industrialism (-5)
    • Industrialist (-15)
    • Anthropocentric (-15)
    • Anti-Environmentalism (-20)
  • Neurological Axis
    • Anti-Praxis (-20)
    • Utopian (-5)
    • Dogmatic (-15)
    • Idealist (0)
    • Moderate/Mixed (+20)
    • Realist (+5)
    • Pragmatic (+15)
    • Rational (0)
    • Dystopian (-20)
    • Anti-Theory (-5)
  • War Axis
    • Pacifism (+10)
    • Non-engagement (+10)
    • De-escalation (+20)
    • Intervention (-15)
    • Irredentism (-10)
    • Revanchism (-15)
    • Jingoism (-20)
  • If none above apply...
    • (International) Class Warfare (-5)
  • Praxis
    • Insurrectionism (0)
    • Revolutionism (+5)
    • Moderate/Mixed (+20)
    • Reformism (+10)
    • Stagnationism (-10)

Post your results here:

Relations

Heel wat besünners

  • Communitarianism - A politicians responsibility is first and foremost to the community.
  • Environmentalism - One of the core principles of my ideology. Nature is our friend!
  • Peasants' Republicanism - The German Peasant Uprisings failing was one of the most tragic events in history, in my humble opinion.
  • Eco-Socialism - We‘ve seen what Billionaires have done to our world, it is now time to fix that!
  • Eco-Nationalism - Two based things make one ultra-Based thing.
  • Cosmicism - What can I even say? The quotes speak for themselves. „The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage far.“
  • Libertarian Market Socialism - Pretty much me, I just don't know exactly how Libertarian a country can practically get.

Mooi

  • Environmental Globalization - The only good kind of Globalization. Stopping something that could harm the whole world is a priority for the whole world.
  • Meritocracy - A very worthwhile way to determine who is fit to govern. Though I did not forget what the ancient Chinese Emperors did while this system was in place there, and I also maintain that the name „Meritocracy“ sounds ridiculous.
  • Agrarianism - The Great Tradition of my homeland, my people and even my family. Some Agrarians can be annoyingly conservative, and big rich farmers are bad for almost everything, but all in all this is based.
  • Agrarian Socialism - Land Reform! Land Reform! Land Reform! This is the best type of Agrarianism.
  • Progressive Conservatism - Based cultural compromise.
  • Liberal Socialism and Capitalist Communism - Based economic compromise.

Up Stee

  • Nationalism - Nationalist policy is important, the state is the nation after all, but this can quickly change into more sinister stuff.
  • Cultural Nationalism - Preserving National and local culture is important, as is preventing dangerous parallel cultures from forming. But suppressing other cultures is ultranationalist garbage, and this ideology sadly often leads to exactly that happening.
  • National Agrarianism - Nationalism? Quite Based! Agrarianism? An important part of Frisian Culture and Economy! Extremely xenophobic sentiments due to rural areas being generally more conservative? Uhm. Okay that should maybe be looked into.
  • Civic Nationalism - Definitely a better qualifier than race or ethnicity, but not as good of one as culture and language. I believe that citizenship is the only true requirement for nationality, but I also believe that Immigrants must be pressured to integrate, lest they form a subculture that breeds crime or radicalism, and you can‘t do that without a good signifier for true nationality.
  • Noocracy - It is broadly agreeable to say that the wisest people should rule. Though this ideology tends to focus too much on philosophy, and it is often used by Autocrats and Monarchists, so it‘s not a completely unproblematic proposal.
  • Civil Libertarianism - Do Civil Liberties include the Liberty to own a Private Jet? Or go on a Cruise Ship? Because that is a hard no from me.
  • Interculturalism - Cultures coexisting while interaction between them is encouraged, that's exactly my ideal. But the melting pot model is even worse than Multiculturalism. Since it originated in the US which did not have a native culture (that wasn't exterminated), it's not shocking that it leads to multiple cultures fusing together into one distinct new culture, and it's fine when applied to the US and other colonial nations, but in nations that have an indigenous culture, it is a catastrophic practice.
  • Eurocommunism - Good economic and civic policy, however I am skeptical of this ideologie because of its potential ties to Eurofederalism.
  • Anarcho-Communism - On paper, the best and most moral system. But I personally think it's pretty much impossible to achieve, and way too idealistic. I'm just going to be taking that idea of decentralized economy
  • Anti-Fascism - Look, Antifa guys, I want to stand by you, but could you please stop labelling people who aren't fascists as fascists? I know you have your reasons, but it's not good or helpful.
  • Isolationism - I used to really like this, and its economic variant should be pursued as much as realistically possible, but without international cooperation, war and extreme hegemony would almost certainly be unavoidable.
  • Poldermodel - Seems good, but too moderate and corporate to be a goal in itself. Could be a step in a longer journey from corporate capitalism to Guild Socialism.

Bitje Good, Bitje Slecht

  • Left-Wing Populism - Makes generally good points against the Right, but can be extremely hyperbolic. Also, this ideology is very broad, which often makes parties with it as their main ideology fall into leftist infighting, like we saw with Die Linke.
  • Social Democracy - It could be so great, if it were not for that capitalist infiltrator. SCHOLZ RAUS!
  • Agorism - Black Markets are an important method to counteract unfair corporate and government practices in times of crisis, but are of course still a type of illegal, highly capitalist system that must be counteracted when the economy of the country is doing well, as well as a breeding ground for more destructive crime, an example being murder to prevent the toppling of a well-functioning black market crime empire.
  • Traditionalism - If people could accept that preserving Tradition does not have to entail excluding people, that would be great.
  • Eco-Conservatism - Quite based for a conservative. Kretschmann is a complete hypocrite, and most Conservatives are too corrupt to give a shit about the environment, but in general it would be good if this very logically consistent ideology would become more widespread.
  • Individualism - Being able to empathise with other people as individuals is good, selfishness is bad.
  • Collectivism - Working together and helping each other is good, generalizing is bad.
  • Intersectionality - Don‘t get me wrong, I get the argument for this, I really do, and yes, overly tribal activism has its problem, but if all leftist movements just become essentially the same movement through extreme intersectionality, they all can be attacked in the same way by extreme right agitators, and scare away people who aren‘t 100% progressive. I do not want Fridays For Future to talk about LGBT issues, or the Near East conflict, I only want them to talk about the climate.

Har leper kunt

  • Green Liberalism - "Don't worry guys, we'll achieve climate neutrality in 39795683 Years, we just have to make sure the Coal CEOs don't get angry. Meanwhile, why don't YOU try to stop climate change? Because boy, let me tell you, we're not getting rid of private jets and cruise ships in this economy."
  • State Socialism - This doesn't have the best track record in history, to say it lightly. I prefer Guild Socialism and Classical Social Democracy. The State controlling the economy just lends itself too much to tyranny.
  • Multiculturalism - Yes, all cultures should coexist. But not in this way! Parallel Societies in the same country are a stupid and dangerous idea, instead we should respect the cultural integrity of every nation.
  • Industrialism - DAMN BIG BUSINESS POLLUTING THE PLANET AND DESTROYING LOCAL ECONOMIES! THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION AND ITS CONSEQUENCES! ...Unfortunately, Industry is necessary for our society, and made the lives of many people better in the past.
  • Neoluddism - Terrorism is bad, and we really need some post-Industrial Revolution stuff to live longer, but the outlook on development has some good points.

Blixen

  • Capitalism - Call me ungrateful all you want, but I think that climate change, child labor, slavery and poverty are bad.
  • Kakistocracy - I hate idiots!
  • Liberalism - A system whose prime has long since passed. Today, it is only standing in the way of better conditions.
  • Ultranationalism - Yes, I like my Nation. And so do others with their nations. That is precisely why nation supremacy is a harmful and frankly terrible ideology. Why can‘t you just accept that your nation is not so important that you have to kill for it?
  • Neoreactionaryism - We share a similar outlook on reactionaryism, but that's it. Feudalist scum must go.
  • Liberal Feminism - Simply not the right answer. I don't think the endgoal of feminism should be to integrate women into the male-dominated system, effectively just feminizing the patriarchy, instead of building a system that has no patriarchy. Also, Hillary Clinton was weapons grade cringe and needs to be blamed for Trumps victory, Kathleen Kennedy defiled Star Wars, and JK Rowling is a genocide supporter.
  • Revolutionary Progressivism - Fuck off. Go light a picture of Ben Shapiro on fire or whatever it is you do. I will not give up my Culture to suit your diluted ideas of equality.
  • Aristocracy - It had its time and place, and Aristocrats were often important to balance out the power a king held, but when the nobles got too much power in Frisia they turned it into just another Feudal State. The fact that I am named after one of those nobles does not make it better at all.
  • National Liberalism - How‘s Brexit working out for ya? Also, I think Nationalism and Liberalism are contradictory, seen how Liberalism is culturally left (so pro-immigration) and supports the free international market.

De Düvel van Kaar offallen

  • Nazism - May you suffer eternally in the darkness of the infinity, you wretched, vile, monstrous piece of garbage.
  • National Capitalism - Please refer to the point above.
  • Racial Nationalism - The Even more retarded version of Ethnonationalism. Builds on the worthless concept of „Race“ instead of Ethnicity, and is also the go-to ideology for murderers, terrorists and cultists.
  • Dissident Right - Angry, pathetic, braindead scum.
  • Eugenicism - Gien en hau sien Kinner dood!
  • Imperialism - LEWER DUAD AS SKLAV!
  • Anationalism - Ik werd ji Spraak net proten! Ji mogen net bös sin, man dat Konzept van ji Ideologie is en van de duumst Blixen-Tüj wat ik je seen hab.
  • World Federalism - No.
  • European Federalism - Neoliberal, growth-obsessed nonsense that would absolutely never work.
  • Third Way - Infiltrators must p a y . This theory is responsible for the death of leftist politics in the west. Other than that, it's just Liberalism which more Social Programs, but also more Drone Murder.
  • Neoliberalism - I think I have made my position on this quite clear.
  • Neoconservatism - Hello FreePCB, my name is Mr. Occo, and today I want Total Hawk Death. Kill Hawks. Behead Hawks. Roundhouse kick a Hawk into the concrete. Slam dunk a Hawk into the trashcan. Crucify filthy Hawks. Defecate in a Hawk’s food. Launch Hawks into the sun. Stir fry Hawks in a wok. Toss Hawks into active volcanoes. Judo throw Hawks into a wood chipper. Twist Hawks’ heads off. Report Hawks to the KGB. Karate chop Hawks in half. Crush Hawks in the trash compactor. Exterminate Hawks in the gas chamber. Cremate Hawks in the oven. Lobotomize Hawks. Vaporize Hawks with a Raygun. Kick old Hawks down the stairs. Feed Hawks to alligators. Slice Hawks with a katana.
  • State Liberalism - An extremely unfunny strawman of everyone who is not culturally conservative, made by the rightist side of the dreaded culture war. And for the real-life ideologies that come closest to this: They are imperialist, corrupt scum. No, it‘s not legitimate to bomb a country because the people there are bigoted.
  • American Model - Quit jacking off to the Founding Fathers. You don't see germans legitimize their beliefs by saying "It's what Bismarck would've wanted". And please keep your culture to yourself, Imperialist scum.
  • Radical Feminism - Geez, no wonder nobody likes you. I recognize Patriarchal structures in Society, but The Patriarchy isn't a secretive club of evil men that sends Trans women to sexually assault """real""" women. You're just misandry with a mask. And some of your acolytes are straight-up genocidal. For more information, see this video.
  • Marxism-Leninism - Dictatorial, Repressive, Industrialist, Cruel, Imperialist, backstabbing, Delusional and highly deadly ideology. Having to deal with MLs makes me almost sympathetic to Capitalists.
  • AfDism - The AfD is a cult of reaction, existing only to complain about everything the government and the left are doing, while being extremely bigoted and close to some Neonazis and their groups. They have become so extremely Anti-Greens that they disapproved a project to build Wind Turbines that everyone wanted to pass, for no real reason except "Greens bad". The worst thing is that they are steadily indoctrinating more and more common people through intense campaigns of fake news.

Brilliant

  • Neosyndicalism - No matter how often you change ideologies, they will always stay based. I agree with practically everything on this your page.
  • Great British New Left - Best mate!

Good

  • Dankeism - You seem like the kind of leftist who got there by disillusion with the status quo, which is also how I would categorize myself. So the Discord would probably call you a liberal. Apart from you agreeing with Bax on "presentability", which I think does hold some cultural value, I think your ideology is okay. Hope your country doesn't get completely screwed by Milei, lol.

Alright

  •  Baxism - I like this page, however I have some problems with the ideology. While Nationalism and Socialism, along with many of your other ideas (/), are cool, your ideas of Revolution and especially the influences from a prominent Nazi and Robespierre are a bit problematic. Your utopian vision of a perfect communist future is not only highly idealistic and unpragmatic, but also uncomfortably reminds me of the Russian Revolution and how that went in the end. Also, Optimism, and its consequences of Eugenicism and Direct Democracy, are not my cup of tea, however I do not have any rational critiques of them. I just have a different view on things. All in all, this is a pretty good ideology that differs from mine on some details.

Middling

  • Brazilian Liberalism - What's this about Dengism? You're fine for a Liberal, since you're also a cultural nationalist and, at least on paper, an environmentalist, but you're also soft authoritarian, and have all the problems of Liberalism.
  •  Romantic Egoism - Good critique of capitalism, and a very good format for the article, which I appreciate. Your problems with Communal Anarchism, if not convincing, are at least clear and understandable if one considers your perspective. I just don't agree with the goals of Philosophical Anarchism and Egoism, which doesn't mean I think it is in any way a flawed ideology. I'd file you under "respectful ideological difference".
  •  Shellshocked Communism - I'm not that big a fan of Egoism or overly pretentious articles, but the text you wrote expresses ideas that, while very much opposed to mine, posess a value that I can understand. Additionally, we align on Nonpartisanism and Anti-Imperialism. Still, I disagree with frivolous cybernetics, belief in unlimited personal freedom and idealistic visions.

Inadequate

  • Distributist Reactionaryism - Localist Democracy is based as hell and the Economics are fine, but the rest is terribly weird and sometimes quite stupid. Especially that you said you don't like Republicanism, Absolute Monarchy or any of the two types of Constitutional Monarchy, is a bit of a head-scratcher. At least Brazil had a monarchy, so this isn't as delusional as American Monarchism, but still, Brazil is far too young for a cultural support for Monarchy to have developed. Oh also Luis likes Femboys!!!
  •  Neocarlism - Reactionary Moderate Eco-Socialism is good, but support for Fascism and Monarchy is bad. Believe it or not, I do not think that Republicanism is inherently better than Monarchy, I recognize its tendency for strife and division, I think Democracy is often a sham (especially under Capitalism), and I know that Republics have done some of the worst things in world history, but your reasoning for why Monarchy is better is not convincing. The Spanish Empire did monstrous things, I wouldn't say that it was a high point for anyone in Spain, except that the Monarchy and Traders got a lot of money (which is an odd thing for a socialist to find positive), and Wars of Succession were far from rare in Monarchical States, while modern day Spain, which is a Republic in all but name, is very peaceful and relatively stable.

Bad

  • National Wodenism - Benevolent Fascism is still Fascism.
  • Alstūdism - Benevolent Fascism 2: Norwegian Boogaloo.
  • Lankajori Thought - Fully Free Markets? Well I hope you like Lead in your water and Sawdust in your Salami, to borrow a metaphore from TIIKKETMASTER. I like all Agrarians, and it's good that you are a Non-Alt conservative, but Transphobia is cringe. Also, you are wrong on the whole "Conceivable/Inconceivable Taboos" thing, there were no gay people (the modern conception) in the past, the whole system of orientation was different before the modern age, which, by the way, also applies to Gender.
  • Neo-Glencoeism - Liberal but worse.
  • N.Cortexism - Liberal but even worse. Also probably LARPshit.
  • DECBism - Liberal but catastrophically stupid, idealist, and completely black-and-white thinking. Also, if the others are to be believed, a M*gi alt, so that's another minus point.

Disastrous

Components

State

Nation/Diplomacy

Economics

Culture

Philosophy

Misc

Gallery

Comments

  1. ↑ "Alt-Right" is used to the Alt-Right and their Allies.
  2. ↑ I view Nationalism, specifically Frisian Nationalism, as a necessity for Frisian self-determination, not as a point of xenophobia.
Retrieved from "https://pcbwiki.net/index.php?title=Leerderism&oldid=527793"