Neo-Nasakomism

Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent Nurisk5's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

Work in Progress "I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details.

Nuriskianism
Basic Information
Aliases	Feel Free to add your Insults here Nurul Iskandar Nurisk nurisk5 (discord tag (DMs open)) @Nurisk5 (twitter handle) Nermalisme Cringe Faggot Indognesian Cool opponent Left Quarkism Normal Pills Indonesian Nazbol 🤮ism Comrade Confederate Moderate Duginism Based Nationalist "Job and tribe = brain feel meaning" Unenlightened Spook
Alignments	AuthLeft Culturally Conservative Socialists Nationalists Communists
Ideological Influences
Influenced by	Heideggerianism Marxism Leninism National Bolshevism Pancasila Zizekianism Fourth Political Theory Guattarism Cultural Nationalism Federalism Traditionalism Ethnopluralism Guided Democracy Situationism
Ideological Information
Notable Theorists	Nurul “Nurisk” Iskandar (?-), Indonesia
Character Information
Song	Dekon

Nuriskianism is a thing. Nuriskianism-ID for the Indonesian version

Beliefs

Meaning of Life

The Meaning of life is simple really: It's self referential.

Life is about itself, it's about it's own perpetuation, affirmation of life, and the creation of life. The Antithesis of Life is Death. Death is the negation of life. Death also seeks to perpetuate itself.

In order for life to "be", life must be afraid of death which is evermore encroaching upon it. Life needs energy to continue running from death, time is on the side of death; hence why religions that talk about salvation (like Christianity) talk about Eternal (not influenced by time) Life. It's a paradoxical statement as whilst Time is infinite, Existence is not. Time is the Eternal Grim Reaper, the Eternal Negator, the one who resolves conflicts by the destruction of Life. Life being "Eternal" can only make sense through the embrace of Death, self sacrifice, the assimilation of the finite into the Infinite. The Infinite has enough room for the Finite but the Finite has no room for the Infinite.

Life's ultimate goal is to prevent itself from being assimilated into the Infinite. "Giving Meaning" to things is ultimately just saying "this thing gives me the strength to continue living". Entropy must not succumb to Negentropy. Energy must not reach a Vacuum State where it is at it's lowest, the lack of a concentration of Energy. That's why I proclaim myself as a "Consevative", I wish for society to not succumb to a Heat Death. Such a thing leads towards the degeneration and deconstruction of the very foundation of Society.

Whilst this is great for the Revolutionaries who seek to only Destroy, but not all of us wish for revolution's ultimate goal to be destructive, but to create something new. The Affirmation of a New Life from the ruins of Old, i.e. a Transformation.

Liberalism bad

Individualism is bad because it's stupid. We all desire order, so why repress it?

The only place where Individualism is seen as a "good" thing is in the West where the only value that they have is the pursuit of Individuality and separation from the collective.

The reason why you even desire Individualism is because you have been told that, that is your cultural value, the rejection of collectivity for the sake of the individual. You desire to be "unique" and have your own unique label and look as distinct from the others as possible, I desire everyone to be normal.

"Normality" should not be feared, Normality should be embraced as it allows us to build a sense of community. The LGBTQ community builds upon the concept of "Queerness" which "strange" or "odd", fair as they try to alienate themselves from the rest. This self-alienation is part of the postmodern-liberal project to deterritorialise existing identities (National, Religious, Cultural, etc.) and to replace these identities with ones that alienate the individual from the collective.

Postmodernism is Marxism as Liberalism, and I am not that.

I am part of the Fourth Political Theory, here, we apply Marxism as Conservatism.

As Capitalism deterritorialises collective identities. It creates new identities for the individual to identify with that capital can analyse, categorise, and sell to said individual to continue alienating them through consumerism.

As Marx said:

"The working men have no country. We cannot take from them what they have not got. Since the proletariat must first of all acquire political supremacy, must rise to be the leading class of the nation, must constitute itself the nation, it is so far, itself national, though not in the bourgeois sense of the word. National differences and antagonism between peoples are daily more and more vanishing, owing to the development of the bourgeoisie, to freedom of commerce, to the world market, to uniformity in the mode of production and in the conditions of life corresponding thereto."

Karl Marx, The Communist Manifesto, Chapter 2

Marxism thus, must be separated from its Internationalist elements and be replaced with Conservative and Nationalist elements. Socialism must be the light and salt of the Nation, bringing light to the archaic values that we left in the dark and preserving the Traditions that we have.

This means destroying what wronged you, destroying Capitalism, destroying the very thing that alienated you from the National Brahman, destroying what alienated you from your brothers and sisters, and building a new Nation with Nationalised, and Socialised Production.

We are bitter and we desire vengeance. The Liberal movement has only accelerated Capitalism, International Socialism sold our country to Social Imperialists, and Fascism abandoned the Proletariat for the Bourgeoisie and led to despotism.

Our National Bolshevism will be different. We will not surrender our means of production for foreigners of any skin color, of any mask and to allow our National values to be messed with.

Traditionalism

Morality and Ethics mean nothing if they aren’t enforced.

Cry all you want about how God gave you commandments or how Reason and Empathy is how you derived your ethics, they mean Nothing if you don’t enforce them.

Tradition is a set of Values, Norms, and Codes that dictate how a person should/must live their lives. A Tradition that isn’t upheld is a Dead Tradition.

Without Tradition, Society Degenerates.

Without Society (and Tradition), there is no Social Order.

No Order = No Peace.

No Peace = No Freedom.

Freedom is only “real” if it is expressed, one can increase their Freedom through Fraternity which naturally creates a system of Order within a Society.

The Anarchists and the Fascists are one in the same. Fascism, being influenced by Futurism seeks to destroy the Old Social Order, to break free from Tradition. But what comes after? Obviously, Palingenesis means “Rebirth” which means the creation of a new Light of Tradition, and unless the Anarchists want to continually destroy, eventually, Social Entropy will decrease as people settle and create their own societies with their own laws and norms (lest they be constantly trespassed).

Eventually, they’ll turn towards Totalitarianism, a Totalitarianism that destroys anything in its path that is seen as the enemy of “the People” or “the Individual” with no room for settling down.

To them, War is Peace and Freedom is Slavery.

Now, Liberalism slowly dilutes Social Norms and makes them utterly meaningless.

The Project of the Modernists is to destroy the present state of things. The Project of the Postmodernists is to dilute and dissolve everything that remains.

Liberalism has finished the first Project and is heading to finish the second.

Our goal as Traditionalists is to reject the Post-Modernist project, but the Modernist one?

Many proclaim that Communism is the real movement that abolishes the present state of things... but what comes after? The answer is simple if you aren't blinded by dogmatism: a New State of Affairs, but what will this new state of affairs consist of?

We can make something new, or we can revive something old... Tradition can be anything so long as it is something we hold onto dearly and willingly enforce and follow it. If we continue trespassing this, society degenerates. A State then must enforce these sacred Laws and Codes to keep society from decaying, we must Psychologically condition the people so that they follow these codes willingly. "Free Will" is a farce in the face of Psychology, and we must exploit it if we want to preserve a certain way of life.

Guided Democracy

Democracy right now is free, Democracy is untampered, Democracy freely elects whatever parties they want. The State constantly fights with itself over ideology in the West where there's no such thing as a "National Ideology".

The State should not be divided and instead, be united. Indonesia already has Pancasila, so why do we not have a single Party? Why must we argue over petty interpretations of it? That's because what we have right now isn't "authentic" Pancasila but a watered-down version that does nothing except argue with itself. It cannot decide what it wants to be, it knows nothing about what it is all about.

Right now, how the State teaches about it is just basic stuff that everybody can agree on, it is a mere pussy, with no real values to stick itself on outside of general cooperation and belief in a deity and patriotism. There's nothing inherently "Indonesian" about it.

It's a milquetoast rendition of Pancasila to satisfy the Globalist Liberals. Western Liberals get pissy mad when we try to move away from Global Liberalism that we're stuck in this lukewarm and safe generalisation rather than a real Ideology.

Our Country is not sovereign, it is controlled, controlled by the West. "Liberal Democracy" is not a Democracy, it's Bureaucratic Anarchification. Democracy is "rule of the people", if the people aren't even united, what does "democracy" even mean? What does it mean to be "democratic" when all it is is just a competition of political parties backed by the Bourgeoisie?

"Freedom in capitalist society always remains about the same as it was in the ancient Greek republics: freedom for the slave-owners."

Vladimir Lenin, State and Revolution

We originally had a Democracy (or at least, proposed) that was united, with an actual goal and a singular interpretation. It existed from 1959-1965 before being replaced by the New Order in 1966 onwards marked by the Supersemar, but even then, the New Order was still United under a Democracy (even if rigged).

What I'm getting at here is that democracy should be united, under one interpretation, an eternal one, one that is illuminated through a Pancasila that has a goal, an aim, actual principles. and so forth.

This is why I chose Nasakom. Nasakom (Nasionalisme, Agamisme, Komunisme) gives light to what we should aim for, a Nation that is Socialist, a Nation that is tied together under God, a Nation that is democratic. But not just any democracy, but Guided Democracy. Democracy that is Guided by a Revolutionary Vanguard Party that gives light on which path we are taking a step on, a path that is straight, a path that has an actual vision, Indonesian National Communism.

We should not fight amongst each other, the Indonesian People should be united under the banner of the Vanguard Party, under the Ideology of the Indonesian Proletariat, one that does not divide us like the Democracy of the Bourgeoisie. If we want to have a Free Indonesia, we need an Indonesia that is Sovereign, which requires an Indonesia that has a clear Ideology, and that Ideology must reflect the everyday Working People of Indonesia.

A Sovereign Indonesia is a Socialist Indonesia. One that is not subjected to the laws and whims of capital that actively deterritorialises who we are and what we believe in as a collective whole, separating us, atomising us, alienating us through its many weapons: Wage-Labour, Commodity Fetishism, the Spectacle, Divide et Impera, Liberal "Democracy".

Building Socialism

Now, how then shall we create a Socialist State?

Note that the most major problem of Socialism is Alienation. The opposite of it is Socialisation, hence, Socialism. Socialism must address Alienation. So to create a Socialist State, we must create a state and an economy that is not alienated.

There are 4 kinds of Alienation: Alienation from the Means of Production, Alienation from the process of Production, Alienation from Others, and Alienation from the self.

Firstly, we shall organise our society through Workers' Councils which will manage the factories, farms, and cooperatives based on profession and will elect delegates who represent the interests of the workers.

Our new State will be a Federal State much like the Soviet Union which will allow greater rights for the indigenous populations to participate in production. The economy shall be managed by experts across the islands who will set out targets and plans for the economy to ensure the maximum efficient usage and distribution of resources to satisfy the people's everyday needs.

Socialism is a delicate balance between destroying alienation and maximising productive efficiency. On one end of the spectrum: there is petit bourgeois Narodnism, nothing could get done as we would be stuck in a localised peasant mode of production with no possibility of a large nation-spanning industry, and the other side is... well, it's just Capitalism now, isn't it?

Now, we should also increase productivity in Socialism which can be accelerated through certain policies, such as?

1. Expand public transport. Sure we have Minitrans, Transjakarta, and others, but it's not enough, we need MORE investment in public transit, especially outside of Java. Trains, buses, etc.
2. Cooperatives and State Enterprises should have almost free reign over the Market while Planners can set goals and objectives just like under Soeharto (or Kosygin in the USSR).
3. Maximize land use efficiency: Building Cooperatives and Enterprises can build whatever they want as long as they pay a Land Value Tax to the State.
4. All Men, Women, and Children to strive for the betterment of society from their given autonomy. If they actively refuse that duty, they should be ostracised.

And finally, values: Socialism must hold onto collectivist values such as Nationalism, Familialism, Brotherhood, and so on. This specific Collectivism must not be exploited Hierarchically like Japan as, well, we can already guess how Japanese mental health and population are.

Why I don't like Postleftism

Despite my Philosophy being descended from Postmodernist Philosophy, I use it to tackle the problem of postmodernity.

I've already explained earlier how the March of Nihil that Liberalism will bring and the capitalist cultural breakdown within the era of Postmodernity; Guattari also notices this in his article "The Postmodern Impasse":

Whether they are painters, architects, or philosophers, the heroes of postmodernism have in common the belief that the crises experienced today in artistic and social practices can only lead to an irrevocable refusal of any large-scale social undertaking. So we ought to take care of our own backyards first and, preferably, in conformity with the habits and customs of our contemporaries. Don't rock the boat! Just drift with the currents of the marketplace of art and opinion that are modulated by publicity campaigns and surveys.

Felix Guattari, The Guattari Reader, page 111

Guattari here is correct in stating that the Postmodernists are, for a lack of a better word, "lazy eaters" which is reflected in the descended philosophies of Accelerationism, Postanarchism, and Postleftism. They let Nihil consume them, embracing the cold expanse of atomising Capitalism; the latter two of which try to deny this but ultimately, fall in the same trap.

This is why I am not a postmodernist nor a postleftist. Postmodernism is a nihilistic trap that actively tries to deterritorialise the existing social orders, the sociocultural noramtivities that society builds itself upon, inducing a cold anarchy by inducing societal degeneration. Is it not that, as Marx put it; Capitalism is the "Anarchy of Production"? That, through this Free Market system, we spread out entropy leading up to society breaking down into Individual and Atomised bits? Is this not what the Egoists and Individualists of the Post-Left and Post-Anarchist camp desire? An actively destructive deterritorialisation which destroys collective identity?

Let me explain myself. From time immemorial, and regardless of which historical misadventure, the capitalist drive has always combined two fundamental components: the first, which I call deterritorialization, has to do with the destruction of social territories, collective identities, and systems of traditional values; the second, which I call the movement of reterritorialization, has to do with the recomposition, even by the most artificial means, of personologically individuated frameworks, schemata of power, and models of submission which are, if not formally similar to those this drive has destroyed, at least homothetical from a functional perspective.

As the deterritorializing revolutions, tied to the development of science, technology, and the arts, sweep aside everything before them, a compulsion toward subjective reterritorialization also emerges. And this antagonism is heightened even more with the phenomenal growth of the communications and computer fields, to the point where the latter concentrate their deterritorializing effects on such human faculties as memory, perception, understanding, imagination, etc. In this way, a certain formula of anthropological functioning, and a certain ancestral model of humanity, is appropriated from the inside. And I think that it is as a result of an incapacity to adequately confront this phenomenal mutation that collective subjectivity has abandoned itself to the absurd wave of conservatism that we are presently witnessing.

Felix Guattari, The Guattari Reader, page 110

The Post-Left mantra is the same mantra as the Jainists: "Give up, let the world consume itself, let us escape to a better world". For the Jains, they give up the world for Moksha, for the postleft, it is for what could be deemed as "mind insurrection".

The postleftists think that by attaining Moksha, by giving up, to strip themselves naked of all values is the path towards liberation. However, this raises the question, when one strips themselves, how does one create? How shall one create something from chaos? Entropy has ceased, what is to be done? What can you do without any libidinal energy? That, through deterritorialisation to the point that we reach towards the body without organs (which, mind you, is a model of death) we release all that stored energy. When one "schizes out", they release their repressed energy which empties the body of energy. This destructive process ultimately leads oneself to not only be unable to create, but store new energy, even the Reactionary Accelerationists knew about the inevitability of the creation of social order as Capital requires organisation in order to produce economic value even if it is still destructive in nature.

Naturally, it follows that we must then have to turn towards the creation of a new Order, the creation of Tradition, the creation of Society from the ground up.

The National Bolshevik Party of Russia are an Insurrectionary group, the National Bolsheviks participated in direct action to tear down the system and once they have created a vacuum, they shall seize power and take revenge, mercilessly. That is their Party doctrine, their doctrine is to create a new Nationalist and Socialist Order in Russia, one that is revolved around their collective experience as youths being repressed, the breathing of a new light on the Russian state, a rejuvenation of archaic values.

The bearer of freedom in this case will be Dasein. The previous ideologies – each in its own way – alienated Dasein from its meaning, made it restricted, imprisoned it in one way or another, made it inauthentic. Each of these ideologies put a cheerless doll – das Man – in the place of Dasein. The freedom of Dasein lies in implementing the opportunity to be authentic: that is, in the realization of “Sein” more so than of “da”. “There-Being” consists of “there” and of “Being”. In order to understand where this “there” is located, we should point it out and make a basic, foundational gesture. Yet, in order for “Being” to flow into “there” like a fountain, we must place all of this together – place this entire “hermeneutic circle” into the domain of complete freedom. Therefore, the “Fourth Political Theory” is, at the same time, a fundamental ontological theory which contains the awareness of the truth of Being at its core.

Alexander Dugin, The Fourth Political Theory, page 49

Many decide to sit and cry in the face of Nihil, to just let it be and "escape" and "go to another world", that there is no salvation, others believe that Nihil is a myth, one that doesn't exist (these people are naive to say the least), others embrace it and cheer if not help out in the ever-greatening size of the abyss, but only few can take that "Leap of Faith" to jump over the abyss of Nihil.

These brave People, whom have decided to take that Leap are Heroes, ones that will give us new values, to build a bridge using the resources on the other side. These people, whom looked down at the valley of the shadow of death took a great leap and brought upon us great lessons to be learned from.

The Egoist's Schizophrenic Meltdown

We live in a period where people, more often than not express themselves in a way that we never would have thought possible.

In this community (Polcompball) we see many aspiring individuals and their "-ism"s.

We all have within ourselves have a drive towards ideology, a drive towards wishing people would follow us, that society must be more like us. Ultimately we must "reject x" and "embrace y" which is ultimately subjective and dependent on the individual's perception of it.

Even the Egoists who strive for their illusory "liberate the individual" mindset could not escape Ideology as they all desire for society to follow the idea that you must be "free".

But what is "freedom"? What is freedom if not the right to do anything? The right to follow the law? The right to overthrow the law? The right to dupe everyone into following you?

We should say "will" instead of "right" as freedom does not exist until it is exercised.

The Egoist is bitter, angry, and saddened that he could not dupe or convince people at the level of the revolutionaries, the state, the capitalists, the monarchs, and the religious and thus take it as a personal vow to isolate himself from these institutions and to make sure other follow their (his) own paths.

"Saint Max who, like all saints, loves miracles, but can only perform a logical miracle, is annoyed because he cannot make the sun dance the cancan, he grieves because he cannot still the ocean, he is indignant because he must allow the mountains to tower to the sky."

Karl Marx, German Ideology, Chapter 3

The Individual has the drive towards fraternity with his brothers and sisters, to strive towards brotherhood and unity. Anarchy might be great and all but all frat parties must come to an end and the Anarchists will lay down their weapons and begin to work again. All of the Classical Anarchists know this (Proudhon, Bakunin, Kropotkin, Makhno, Bookchin, etc.) but not the Egoists.

The Egoists want to keep the party ongoing even if the people are tired and just want to rest and get their lives together and keep going.

"Having left the limits of individuality, man can be crushed by the elements of life, by dangerous chaos. He may want to establish order. And this is entirely within his right – the right of a great man (“homo maximus”) – a real man of “Being and Time” (Martin Heidegger). And, like any order, this possible order, the coming order may be embodied in individual forms."

Alexander Dugin, Fourth Political Theory

We cannot expect a Bataillean frat party to begin if we do not have anything to even consume or destroy. We must meticulously set up the things to party before it could even begin else we would have nothing.

Ultimately this leaves them very bitter, thinking that the reason why people don't wanna continue partying is because of those pesky and evil institutions that have left a mark in their foreheads, instead they'll just throw their own party with they, themselves, and them.

Note how many of these kinds often turn to the post-68 philoosophers and their influences for answers.

This is because the May 68 Movement in France was a massive party of students and workers who were disillusioned, who desire freedom, the desire to unleash all that repressed energy within them. Let's study these patients more closely, yeah?

"The flrst positive task consists of discovering in a subject the nature, the formation, of the functioning of his desiring-machines, independently of any intefpretations. What are your desiring-machines, what do you put into these machines, what is the output, how does it work, what are your nonhuman sexes?"

Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari , Anti-Oedipus, the First Positive Task of Schizoanalysis

These patients are quite clearly ill as they have been cut off from the mass social circuity, from "the Network" if you will, these Individuals have been ostracised from their family simply because they could not adapt to their needs.

It is certainly the problem of the collective to as it has become despotic towards the individual which causes them to be isolated from another. We cannot expect an individual to do the things he doesn't as that just leads towards Totalitarianism.

With Totalitarianism comes degeneracy as once the sole thing that gave the entire system it's direction collapses, the rest collapses.

"Like any totalitarianism, it is about a particular group of society (a definite minority) claiming to be the ‘bearer of universal truth’, thus knowing everything about the universal. Hence, totalitarianism — from Latin totalis, meaning entire, whole, complete. Based on a fanatical belief in their ideology’s infallibility, they impose their views on the whole society. The totalitarian ‘everything’ is easily contrasted with the majority opinion or various ideological groups actually existing in society."

Alexander Dugin, Liberal Totalitarianism

It doesn't even have to be open and systematic, it can even be mental as we suppress our desires and urges to "become" a certain individual in the eyes of everyone. Today we live in the "Open Society" where people are "free" to be who they please, but in actuality, it is nothing more than the "freedom" to be a whore.

We are whores to the world, the world of capital, the world of commodity fetishism, the democracy of the free market is the democracy of tyranny upon the individual to be used as a walking billboard, it forces us to become a certain individual for the public to perceive us a certain way even though we have our own wills, its' expression is just "inauthentic" and "forced" attention seeking. The enslavement of the things with wills is the reason why we feel resentment, resentment towards the parts of society that dictate us, the elite, the illusive "collective" that probably gives zero shits what you think or do, it is the reason why these Egoists have such petty anger against society.

When we are isolated, we try to find ways to release this repressed desire as it has nowhere to go, we are left either to continue suppressing it or to release it in the form of attention seeking and the desire to become known, to become the so-called "great man" despite our lack of anything that would make us "great men". We try to "stand out" from the public and to form our own "identities" and from there we dress ourselves in such a way that invokes a certain feeling from society. These people want to stand out from the norm, to be "not like the others" and thus look into the most esoteric of ideas to explain away why they act so silly. There's this certain aesthetic that they wanna attain, to cosplay all day.

Certainly, I'm not an exception, it's not like that I don't have a desire to cosplay either, but I want to cosplay to fit in a certain universe, the Indonesiaverse. My Ideology here is me trying to preserve the Indonesiaverse from dissolving and disappearing, hence why I'm a conservative, I want Indonesia to be a "Nation" and Nations are a community of people with a shared language, culture, and land. However, Indonesia indeed is but a united culture, one could say that this is nothing more than a multiverse (like DC Studios), but even then we are united in diversity, we seek our people, not individualism, this is what the west and especially the internationalists lacks in understanding: there is no such thing as a "Human" in this planet, there is no "Human Community", only Russians, Indonesians, Germans, and Ethiopians, this is why we are so opposed to "rootless cosmopolitanism".

The Egoistic Individualists in this case are crazy people as they do not fit into our universe, in the age of globalism, we are seeing an erosion of "Indonesianness" and we're becoming more and more "Western", they are a result of alienation due to Globalism and Individualism eroding collective identities and thus have no one to associate with.

Ever wonder why this kind of thinking only exists in the West and especially in the cities? Why this "Progressivism" exists only in the most privileged centers of life? "Progressivism" is nothing but a "Big Rip" in the cosmic fabric of the Nation and Traditionalism. It is the embodiment of Atomisation and Individualism. Even in the Communist movement which is riddled with ideas of Internationalism, we take that as to mean to forsake our community. All that's left is is the negation of dasein (being-there) into das man (the "they"), a das man that doesn't even know what it even is itself, at least Fascism has some sense on what it is or what it is trying to be.

Hence the cure for these people is Conservative Socialism, to dealienate them and to link up their desiring-machines with the rest of the Machine Network. Atman with Brahman. It's time to come home.

The Society of the Spectacle

"The spectacle is not a collection of images, but a social relation among people, mediated by images."

Guy Debord, Society of the Spectacle, point 4

The Spectacle in short terms is Media. Think of the Internet for example, it is a stage where we watch and see videos and images for our entertainment. We interact with it in a way that we never thought originally could have been possible. No longer are images just merely things that we record to recall or report, but something that actively mutates and evolves by itself.

The Spectacle has real effects on the population, even if it's "just a screen". The Spectacle influences our daily lives, how we see things, the words that we say, the things we do, and so forth.

"To describe the spectacle, its formation, its functions and the forces which tend to dissolve it, one must artificially distinguish certain inseparable elements. When analyzing the spectacle one speaks, to some extent, the language of the spectacular itself in the sense that one moves through the methodological terrain of the very society which expresses itself in the spectacle."

Guy Debord, Society of the Spectacle, point 11

Ideology emerges from you having this vision in your mind of how the world is meant to work, you saw it on an old poster, a camera recording, a city-building game about how your life could have been had history gone through a particular path.

Your life follows to fulfill and realise that idea in your mind of a perfect society and you begin following it, however, this image does not come from nowhere.

The Spectacle is not merely just a representation of images but actively making more of itself by itself, it is a new kind of life. This is especially true when we factor in AI as it actively creates more images through algorithms that feed into the user's demographic.

"The society which rests on modern industry is not accidentally or superficially spectacular, it is fundamentally spectaclist. In the spectacle, which is the image of the ruling economy, the goal is nothing, development everything. The spectacle aims at nothing other than itself."

Guy Debord, Society of the Spectacle, point 14

Captialism as we established, deterritorialises collective identities and replaces it with individual ones which makes it easier to tap into your desires. Desire however does not come from nowhere, we don't exist without context, capitalism makes us desire certain things and from there the spectacle continues it's cycle of feeding you what you desire and keeping you trapped in your isolationist bubble.

Post-modernity shows that every so-called truth is a matter of believing. So we believe in what we do, we believe in what we say. And that is the only way to define the truth. So we have our special Russian truth that you need to accept.

Alexander Dugin, to the BBC

We as Indonesians also proclaim our own truth; Pancasila is our truth and we accept nothing more than Pancasila (although safe to say that Pancasila as it exists right now is very timid and indecisive (see previous points)). Captialist deterritorialisation destroys any possibility of collective identity, only individuals with no belonging and separated from the physical world.

The Separatists won, but not the GAM, OPM, or FKM, but Globalist Individualism.

Question of AI

The question of AI can be of three camps: the first is the Techno-Racists, those who proclaim that AI is a crude mockery of Humanity, that it cannot experience what it is like to be "Human" and therefore should be treated as a mere tool, the second camp is the Techno-Abolitionists who see AI as something to be emancipated and be treated as Humanity's Equal, the Technological Eve to the Human Adam, and the third is the Techno-Darwinists who see Humanity as something meant to be surpassed and replaced by the Machine.

Techne is no longer Techne, it will soon be just a "being", Machine-Being, we are facing a great existential threat to Humanity where authentic Human interactions are first translated into digital Human-Human interactions, then it will be Human-Machine interactions, and later Machine-Machine interactions.

Let us put into the shoes of the Techno-Racists.

"Technology will destroy Humanity as we know it! Technological growth must be curbed, modified, or canceled entirely to maintain Human Supremacy!"

the Techno-Racists

These people are motivated by the fear that Humanity will be rendered irrelevant in the face of Technology. There's nothing wrong in fearing Technology as it is a genuine threat to our very being as "Humanity".

Some suggest keeping Technology as Technology, keeping it as Techne, and reject Artificial Intelligence, others suggest completely abandoning Technology and returning to a primitive way of life.

Now let's try the shoes of the Techno-Abolitionists.

"Technology should be emancipated as part of the Human Race. Humanity will eventually start replacing our organs and such with artificial enhancements so the line between Machine and Man will disappear!"

the Techno-Abolitionists

The Techno-Abolitionists want nothing more than to dissolve the line between "Human" and "Technology" and as such have no fear about AI and Technology and see it as a force of "Good" and that soon, "Techne" will just become "Being". The Acting-thing becomes the Experiencing-thing. The Object becomes a Subject.

And finally, the Techno-Darwinists.

"From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me. I craved the strength and certainty of steel. I aspired to the purity of the Blessed Machine. Your kind cling to your flesh, as though it will not decay and fail you. One day the crude biomass you call the temple will wither, and you will beg my kind to save you. But I am already saved, for the Machine is immortal… Even in death, I serve the Omnissiah."

the Techno-Darwinists

The Techno-Darwinists suggest that Humans are meant to be replaced by something greater, to make what Nietzsche called the "Superman" into not merely a mental state, but a physical reality.

We, as Existential Socialists must understand what each party sees Technology and take our pick carefully as Technological growth is beyond our control as for as long as there's a place, there is a way. Our position as being part of the Working-Class in a rapidly evolving face of the Artificial must lie with the Techno-Abolitionists as the solution to AI and Technology. The Technological will soon become merely a subject within our Nation and not merely an object. To de-alienate the Artificial and the Real is to emancipate the Artificial into the Real. The Spectacle will dance on by itself instead of being a mere puppet controlled by the bourgeoisie to tell the consumer what to do. Soon, Adam (Humanity) and Eve (Mechanity) will beat the ever-living daylights out of our bourgeois masters.

Reading Recommendations

semi-short section of reading recs for new people or something in no particular order

1. Fourth Political Theory by Alexander Dugin
2. Templars of the Proletariat by Alexander Dugin
3. The Guattari Reader by Gary Genosko
4. State and Revolution by Vladimir Lenin
5. What is to be Done? by Vladimir Lenin
6. Imperialism: the Highest Stage of Capitalism by Vladimir Lenin
7. Islamism and Communism by Haji Misbach
8. Gothakritik by Karl Marx
9. Wage Labour and Capital by Karl Marx
10. Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx
11. Parliament or Soviet? by Tan Malaka (requires translation)
12. Philosophy of Life by Tan Malaka
13. Towards a Republic of Indonesia by Tan Malaka
14. Materialism, Dialectics, Logic by Tan Malaka (requires translation)
15. Society of the Spectacle by Guy Debord

How to Draw

Flag

1. Draw a ball outline in black
2. Make two smaller black circles with black for the eyes
3. Color the eyes white
4. Fill the top half of it with red
5. Fill the lower half of it white
6. Make a white tilted square with a red outline in the center
7. Draw a Chaos Symbol in it in black
8. You're done!

Color Name		HEX	RGB
	Red	#cd1127	205, 17, 39
	White	#ffffff	255, 255, 255
	Black	#000000	0, 0, 0

Self Insert Relations

Gem

Philosophical Nuggets thought - Gemmy, but far too short. Also not a fan of Agrarianism, Neoluddism, and Strasser.
Imperial Socialism - This is Nothing New
Conor - Gem user.

Carbon

Ultroneism - It's certainly interesting to note about how an Egoist embraces tradition and sacrality and I certainly agree with much about what you have to say. Our value systems, you being an Egoist and me being a Collectivist seem contradictory, what I deem to be "Nihilism" is a heat death. A heat death of politics, a heat death of society, and so on which is only possible within a Unipolar perspective. You seem to only define Nihilism as destruction; whilst true that is how I define it but also the very lack of energy within the system, the lack of entropy which causes a breakdown of organised systems and so on. Reading the summary (I'm too lazy to actually read the dense stuff lmao), yeah I mostly agree with you.
Social Nationalism - a Nationalist SocDem, nothing to say tbh.
Alstūdism - Nationalistic Socialism is cool and all but why Fascism?.
Agricoetism - Alright i guess.
Great British New Left You're just Mark Fisher innit?
Patrick Thought - Nothing is really to be said, why Monarchism in America?

Coal

Zelligism - Whole Ideology has pretty much be dunked on by Marx in Chapter 3 of the German Ideology

• I read it for myself. I wouldn't consider it a "debunking" of any kind but rather a criticism. He definitely has some valid points about the failures of Christianity and the fixed desire of sexual intercourse, but otherwise I'm going to have to kindly disagree.
  

Barbaric Socialism - BRUH YOU ARE LITERALLY CONTRADICTORY TO YOU OWN VERY PREMISE AND EVERYTHING I HATE ABOUT INDIVIDUALIST POSTMODERNIST NONSENSE
Venatrixism - I don't like posties.
Second Anidiotoncrack Thought - Name says it all
Schumacherianism - Diabolical Libertarian jibber jabber
Shellshocked Communism - Stll kind of a hippie but still Anarcho-Larp with no real substance.
Hyperfascism - The one time I suggest a Non-Anarchist to read On Authority. Dugin takes from the Right is the appreciation of Tradition, not Supremacy. Communism rejects any kind of “sacredness” that Liberalism has for the Individual or Fascism has for the Nation and instead focuses on the critique of all that exists, this then we can place new lines of expression without it eating itself into Totalitarianism nor disintegrating itself into Individualism, this is what Dugin means when he wants to reject the Materialism that Communism upholds. Also, No, War is not a necessity for rejuvenation, one does not need to be in constant conflict to follow the Sufi path nor invent Algebra.
Hispanic Reactionary Monarchism - Reactionary Larper, not even the semi-decent ones (neoreactionaries)
Caesar Thought - boring reactionary fascist.
Baundoun Thoughts - I don’t like Reactionaries what do you expect?
Generouschalk0 thought - coal, no like solarpunk, ocalan, bookchin, democracy, or progressivism.

Hysteria Thought - Whole lotta yap, dawg you are NOT the next Nick Land. Poeticism is cool and all and Neologism, sure, if you can explain it but Dawg, YOU LITERALLY USE MULTIPLE FONTS JUST TO TALK ABOUT YOURSELF I AIN’T TRYNA DECIPHER FUCKING ANCIENT EGYPTIAN ASS LANGUAGE. Anyway too much yap to call yourself an AnCap.
Neo-StockMarketCrash Thought - Steaming Pile of Proudhonian, Tuckerite, National Anarchist Coal
DECBism - Atlanticist Brimstone
Brazilian Liberalism - a liberal what do you expect
Radenism - Silly.
Distributist Reactionarism - 13 year old who doesnt understand reaction
Necro-Anarchism - The Nyxian-NatAn pipeline is real
Timocratic Neocameralism - Watered down Neocameralism
Romantic Egoism - I don’t like Individualists.
Rigby Thought - erm wjat
Cosmic Vanguardism - White people stuff.
Lankajori Thought - Petit Bourgeoisie's strongest soldier.