| Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
==={{BoldText|[[File:Songun.png]] Military and Defense [[File:Antiimp.png]]}}=== | ==={{BoldText|[[File:Songun.png]] Military and Defense [[File:Antiimp.png]]}}=== | ||
[[File:Bbbbbbbbbbbbbb.png]] Distributist Reactionaryism holds that the [[File:Mil.png]] [[w:Military|military]] should be one of the first and foremost focuses of the state, in order to ensure the defense of the nation, and the spread of the counterrevolution. It espouses the | [[File:Bbbbbbbbbbbbbb.png]] Distributist Reactionaryism holds that the [[File:Mil.png]] [[w:Military|military]] should be one of the first and foremost focuses of the state, in order to ensure the defense of the nation, and the spread of the counterrevolution. It espouses the policy that the state must "arm the entire population, fortify the state, educate every soldier to become a party cadre, and modernize the military". | ||
Along with this, [[File: | Along with this, [[File:Bbbbbbbbbbbbbb.png]] Distributist Reactionaryism believes that the military should be heavily politicized in order to ensure ideological loyalty and fervor among each soldier and officer. Political commissars should make up a middle portion of the officer corps. This ensures the [[File:Unitary.png]] [[Centralism|centralization]] of military within the state's control, and cuts down on disloyalty within the military. | ||
To defend the nation from external threats via [[w:Deterrence theory|deterrence]], the state must develop nuclear weapons as quickly as possible. | To defend the nation from external threats via [[w:Deterrence theory|deterrence]], the state must develop non-nuclear weapons as quickly as possible. | ||
=={{BoldText|[[File:TradPrgess.png]] Technological Views [[File:AntiReact.png]]}}== | =={{BoldText|[[File:TradPrgess.png]] Technological Views [[File:AntiReact.png]]}}== | ||
Revision as of 06:30, 8 October 2023
 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent Luís Miguel2680's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
 |
Work in Progress "I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details. |
Hi 
Jreg, I still hate your content😈!!!!
Distributist Reactionaryism, or Neo-Miguelism, is the political ideology of User:Luís Miguel2680, after he stopped being an 
Absolutist. He is now a 
Christian Democrat, deeply influenced by 
Distributism and 
Reactionaryism It is a 
very internationalistic ideology, just like the real reactionaries, for the world, and 
deeply religious as well, believing in 
Catholicism. He believes in a 
authoritarian Brazilian state, modeled efficiently and as a 
corporate state, and still belives in a form of Distributism, although a rather statist kind.
-Table of Contents-
- 5 Principles of Distributist Reactionaryism
- Political Journey
- Government
- Economics
- Social Views
- Cultural Views
- Foreign Policy
- Technological Views
- The Nation
- Random Opinions I Have
- How to Draw
- User Test
- Relations
- Aesthetics
- Gallery
- How I Would've Voted
- Movements
- Comments
- Navigation
5 Principles of Distributist Reactionaryism
Reactionaryism
Anti-Nationalism
Catholicism
Distributism
Corporativism
Political Journey 
- 2009-2018/2019
I didn't care about politics at that time, because I was still a child and generally ignored political things. - 2019-2020/2021
At that time, because my mother was a Bolsonarist, I was too, another reason I was a Bolsonarist was because I didn't know that capitalism was incompatible with conservatism and reactionism - 2020/2021-2023
At that time I supported absolute monarchy, until one day I realized that absolute monarchy came after feudalism, and that was bad. - 2023-
When I discovered that the church supported Christian democracy I stopped being a supporter of absolutism
Government 
Distributist Reactionarism upholds the principles of 
monarchist government, while considering 
republic as nothing more than a 
revolutionary institution that offers little to the people apart from draining resources for so-called "National unity" centered around a figurehead president. It advocates for efficient government operations, depicted in Distributist ideals, Additionally, Distributist Reactionarism supports various reforms within the 
brazilian congress, aimed at restructuring the Brazilian state into a new 
feudal state.
Congress Reforms 
In the pursuit of realizing the 
ideal of the feudal state, a comprehensive reform of the Brazilian Parliament (Brazilian Congress) is imperative. Among the reforms advocated by Distributist Reactionaryism is the division of the parliament into three distinct chambers, thereby establishing a tricameral structure. These three chambers comprise the Chamber of commoners (Câmara dos plebeus) as the lower house, composed of representatives elected by the members of people, and the middle house known as Chamber of Clerics which is made up of clergy who are ordained and the upper house known as Chamber of nobles (Câmara Dos Nobres) which is made up of nobles who receive the titles of nobles . And parliament has its separate chambers, unless in case of emergency
Economics 
Distributist Reactionaryism asserts that the economy should embrace 
the nationalization of all companies that were privatized in order to reverse the liberal capitalist nonsense and create state-owned companies in sectors of interest to the state And extinguish state and private companies that use things that harm nature and the environment, and adopt business-based organization, drawing inspiration from Distributism principles. Distributist Reactionaryism contends that the profit-driven nature of the bourgeoisie inherently conflicts with interests of the church and God, necessitating their separation from the nation. syndicates, representing every industry and worker, would be given a autonomy from the state, though still held tightly to prevent inefficiency or dissent. Within the syndicates, the unions would have their interests and strikes would only be allowed if there was justification, if not...
Moreover, Alstūdism advocates for substantial expansion in Brazil's vital industries, particularly those currently reliant on 
foreign imports Over time, the goal is to gradually reduce foreign imports, incrementally boosting domestic industries until achieving complete 
autarky.
Regarding 
farming and agriculture, Distributist Reactionaryism believes that feudal principles should be applied entirely with the only differences being more up-to-date technology, robots working as peasant serfs, and peasant serfs would receive wages that were enough to support them. The ultimate aspiration is to achieve complete self-sufficiency in food production.
Social Views
In its social views, Distributist Reactionaryism self-identifies as a blend of Ultraconservatism, and the characterization is completely accurate as it retains all 
traditionalist elements and beliefs. The ideology embraces 
the view of women in the home, stating that women should be taking care of the children and the home if she is a believer in the church. Distributist Reactionaryism defends the full inclusion of women in education up to high school and in jobs that ''are'' women's due to tradition. However, it rejects the inclusion of women in men's activities since the governance of Distributist Reactionaryism adheres strongly to a traditional approach
Distributist Reactionaryism wants to end 
LGBTQA+ And to limit corruption of the public prohibitions apply, such as Any form of 
Pride celebration is prohibited and organizing such events can lead to legal consequences. Homosexual marriage is illegal, and the death penalty by burning must be applied to LGBTQA+ people except if the LGBTQA+ criminal wants to become truly straight and cis
Transphobia characterizes Distributist Reactionaryism stance on transgender individuals. The ideology opposes gender transition, and if a person wants to stop being cis and become trans and turned trans, they will suffer the death penalty unless they repent.
As for 
heterosexuals, Distributist Reactionaryism emphasizes the promotion of traditional marriage[1] and encourages couples to have more children. Social benefits are provided to alleviate the financial responsibilities associated with raising a family. Distributist Reactionaryism does not support legal abortion under any circumstances and if someone wants to have an abortion or has had an abortion they must suffer the death penalty The ultimate objective of these policies is to augment birth rates, fortify the nation, and ensure its enduring survival.
. Finally, Distributist Reactionaryism strongly opposes the dissemination of 
pornography or sexually explicit materials for any purposes in society. This is rooted in the belief that viewing such content is a sin which consequently makes society more sinful as a whole.
Cultural Views 
Distributist Reactionaryism believes strongly in 
national rebirth, Brazilian culture is being perveted by enlightment and 
Progressivism and 
leftism, being forced to accept evil values and evil systems. For this to be remedied, 
Brazil has to return to tradition, to let it's culture resurge, and the state also has to take charge of making the nation return to tradition and good customs. One of the foremost matters Distributist Reactionaryism believes in is reviving Catholic Theocracy as it is a more authentic Brazilian religion than 
lack of religion, which were and are being imposed on the nation today. Now, this would involve heavily suppressing any religion other than the Catholic variant of Christianity, offering incentives to the public to convert and centering more social activities around Catholic Christianity, and finally introducing religious doctrine into schools to ensure that the new generation is more inclined to faith. Along with this, Halloween should be replaced by All Souls' Day. The reasoning behind this is similar to the opposition to Atheism, that it is a foreign element, with Halloween being adapted from the 
English world, while All Souls' Day is a more authentic form of Brazilian and is Catholic.
Foreign Policy 
The new Brazilian state The new Brazilian state must remain neutral in most conflicts because of ideological differences with the 
West and the 
East, but if Donald Trump or a Trumpist president is elected, Brazil will support the West. as both are 
liberal 
Reformist Maoism and orthodox statist conservatism. However, in the case that similar-minded states arise, Distributist Reactionarism would be very willing to show solidarity with them against the two revolutionary blocs, and engage in equal dealings with these states.
Military and Defense 
Distributist Reactionaryism holds that the 
military should be one of the first and foremost focuses of the state, in order to ensure the defense of the nation, and the spread of the counterrevolution. It espouses the policy that the state must "arm the entire population, fortify the state, educate every soldier to become a party cadre, and modernize the military".
Along with this, Distributist Reactionaryism believes that the military should be heavily politicized in order to ensure ideological loyalty and fervor among each soldier and officer. Political commissars should make up a middle portion of the officer corps. This ensures the 
centralization of military within the state's control, and cuts down on disloyalty within the military.
To defend the nation from external threats via deterrence, the state must develop non-nuclear weapons as quickly as possible.
Technological Views 
Alstūdism holds that for the nation to advance and 
maintain sovereignty, 
technological progression must take place, and must be heavily developed by the state. However, it does not want to advance 
automation enough to cause mass unemployment. Most of the technological advancement should be in terms of military, 
medicine, and 
power, to keep the nation on the same playing ground as other nations.
Green Power 
Alstūdism believes that 
Norway should transition fully away from fossil fuel as quickly as possible, and towards more 
green and 
productive. 
Nuclear power, run on thorium, should be the mass source of energy until geothermal and hydropower is perfected. Wind and solar have proven to be inefficient in comparison to these methods, and Nuclear has been unfairly slandered in 
the media, mainly by those elements who would wish to keep fossil fuels in use.
The Nation 
A lot of this I share with and drew from Fargoth
Alstūdism defines the Norwegian nation as the following:
- The Native Faith, being
Ásatrú, rather than any religion imposed on us hundreds of year ago by foreign powers, that being 
Christianity. - The Blood, being ethnic Norwegians.
- The Soil, that being Norway, and our land currently held by
Just like 
National Wodenism, Alstūdism regards 
New World settler colonial countries to be unable to form a nation, as they are not connected to the land they reside on. Instead, the 
Native Americans and such are, and deserve the land, though that is not too feasible.
A New Era of Romantic Nationalism 
Norway didn't really get to experience an era of 
Romantic Nationalism like the rest of Europe did, as it was a colony to 
Denmark and later 
Sweden. Because of this, Norway didn’t get to fully experience it and the cultural development the period brought to other countries. For example, many Norwegian-born 
philosophers and 
artists were educated in 
Copenhagen and then assimilated into Denmark, thus robbing Norway of many talented individuals. To remedy this, a new Norwegian state must invoke another romantic nationalist era.
National Essence and Immigration 
Alstūdism follows the idea of "National Essence," as proposed by 
Giovanni Gentile. This concept suggests that you can have a profound connection to the 
cultural identity of a nation, 
like the Italian nation or Norwegian nation, even if you weren't born there. Alstūdism advocates for the repatriation of individuals who strongly identify with a specific nationality, as exemplified by Borker who, despite being born outside of Norway, identifies as Norwegian.
However, individuals would need to fulfill certain criteria, including demonstrating 
Norwegian heritage and meeting specific qualifications, in order to be eligible for repatriation.
Revanche! 
Alstūdism holds the beliefs that to work towards a renewed Norwegian nation the coming state must take 
Revanche against Sweden, and reform the nation partly through conflict. The specific territories that Alstūdism wishes to return to Norway are Bohuslen, 
Jemtland, 
Idre and Särna, and 
Herjedalen. These territories were all once part of the Norway, and until rather recently, 
linguistically and culturally Norwegian, distinct from the Swedes in the area. These Norwegians were assimilated into the Swedish population, in a form of cultural genocide. As this is clearly a result of the 
imperialism of the Swedish Empire, it must be cast off of Norway, as with every other form on imperialism and colonialism. This also works to expand the Norwegian population through the reincorporation of old lands into the State.
The Delusion of Racialism 
Alstūdism holds that 
Racial Nationalism and by extension race, are meritless categorizations that are based on outdated theories, with ethnicity being a far more accurate categorization, as race is often very fluid and ambiguous in it's interpretation, and also lacks a biological basis. Ethnicity, on the other hand, is more accurate because it is based on cultural, historical, and social factors rather than biological ones. Along with this, Alstūdism views Racial Nationalism as a form of 
Pan-Nationalism, and near internationalism, as it often posits that all people of a certain race should be under one state, which blocks individual nations from having their own self-determination, a principle Alstūdism strongly believes in.
"Race Mixing" 
While Alstūdism doesn't believe in race, it is still against "race mixing", or more accurately "ethnic mixing". It believes that for each nation to remain, they must retain their own ethnicity, believing that 
diversity inherently requires separation.
Random Opinions I Have
Alstūdism believes that the Svalbardian Ptarmigan should be introduced to the rest of Norway widely, and be the national bird. The reasons for this are:
- The Svalbardian Ptarmigan has adapted to survive in one of the harshest environments on Earth. Its ability to thrive in the extreme conditions of the Arctic symbolizes the resilience of the Norwegian people.
- The Svalbardian Ptarmigan is uniquely tied to Norway's Arctic heritage. It reflects the nation's historical and cultural connections to the Arctic region.
- It's objectively cuter than the White-throated Dipper.
- Alstūdism despises small round hearing aid batteries and wants them replaced.
How to Draw
- Draw a ball with a black outline.
- Fill with dark red.
- Draw a white gear in the top left, half cropped out.
- Draw a white Ásatrú eagle within the gear
- Add eyes.
- (Optional) Add a beret, with a golden sword badge.
- Done!
Literature 
Have Read
- Fascism: 100 Questions Asked and Answered- - The Doctrine of Fascism
- The Land and the People
- The Futurist Manifesto
- The 26 Point Program of the Falange
- File:Kropotkin beard.png - The Conquest of Bread
- Kurdistan, Woman's Revolution and Democratic Confederalism
- God and the State- File:Kropotkin beard.png - Mutual Aid
- - Statism and Anarchy
- Atlas Shrugged
- The Communist Manifesto- - The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte
- - The German Ideology
- The National Anarchist Manifesto
- Anarchy
- Leninism Or Marxism
Reading
- - Fascism for the Million
Plan to Read
Suggestions
- Feel free to add whatever book you'd like me to read here!
Finished Suggestions
User Test
Pick only one from each category :]
- Civic Axis
Chaoist (-25)
Anarchist (-5)
Minarchist (+0)
Libertarian (+5)
Civically Moderate (+5)
Statist (+15)
Dictablanda (+15)
Authoritarian (+50)
Totalitarian (+25)
Orwellian (-25)
- Type of Rule Axis
(Anarchist) Anti-Democracy (-10)
Direct Democracy (-15)
Semi-Direct Democracy (-10)
Representative Democracy (-5)
Authoritarian Democracy (+50)
Totalitarian Democracy (+25)- (Authoritarian) Anti-Democracy (-5)
- If none above apply...
Organic Centralism (+5)
Kultokratic System (+25)
- Economic Axis
Marxist Communist (+0)
Socialist (+20)
Welfarist/Gift Economy 
(+5)
Mixed (-5)
Liberal Economics (-50)
Capitalist (-50)
Darwinist (-100)
- If none above apply...
Third Positionism (+50)
Anti-Economy (-25)
Non-Marxist Communist (+20)
Fiscal Federalism (+5)
.png){kind=small}
- Economic Freedom
- Anti-Economy (-20)
Dirigisme (+10)
Regulationism (+0)- Mixed (-5)
- Liberal Economics (-25)
Free Market (-50)
Laissez-Faire (-100)
- If none above apply...
Central Planned (+50)
Decentral Planned (+5)
- Diplomatic Axis
Autarchy (-25)- Autarky (+50)
(Alter-) Globalist (+0)
World Federalist (-25)
Cosmopolitan (-10)
Internationalist (-25)- Moderate (-5)
Patriotic (+5)
Nationalist (+25)
Chauvinist (+25)
Racial Nationalist (or similar broad category) (-10)- Ethno-Nationalist (or similar narrow category) (+50)
- Geopolitics
Western 
(-100)
Western Adjacent (-10)
Non-Aligned (+25)
East Adjacent (+5)
Eastern 
(+10)
- If none above apply...
- Anarchistic Unaligned (+5)
- Cultural Axis
Revolutionary (-25)
Progressive (-20)
Reformist (-5)
Syncretic (+5)
Conservative (+10)
Traditionalist (+25)- Reactionary (-20)
- Technological Axis
Primal (-50)
Primitivist (-25)
Pre-Industrial (-5)
Deceleration (+25)- Moderate (+15)
- Acceleration (-5)
Automated (-10)
Transhumanist (-50)
Posthumanist (-100)
- If none of the above apply...
Post-Civ (-25) [and/or] 
Archeofuturism (+10)
- Environmental Axis
Human Extinction (-100)
Radical Environmentalism (+25)
Eco-Fascism (+50)
Ecocentrism (+10)- Environmentalist (+10)
- Moderate (-5)
- Post-Industrialism (+0)
Industrialist (-25)
Anthropocentric (-25)
Anti-Environmentalism (-100)
- Neurological Axis
Anti-Praxis (0)
Utopian (+50)
Dogmatic (-10)
Idealist (+30)- In Between (+5)
Realist (+10)
Pragmatic (+5)
Rational (0)
Dystopian (-25)
Anti-Theory (-5)
- War Axis
Pacifism (+5)- Non-engagement (+30)
De-escalation (+5)
Intervention (-50)
Irredentism (+30)- Revachism (+50)
Jingoism (+0)
- If none above apply...
- Class Warfare (+0)
- Praxis
Insurrectionism (+10)
Revolutionism (+50)- Moderatism (+0)
Reformism (-25)- Stagnationism (-50)
- Ethnic Axis
Optional
Chinese (-5)
Indian (-5)
Other Asian (+0)
Other Southeast Asian(+5)
Western European (+5)
Northen European (+25)
Celtic (+10)
Eastern European (+10)
Southern European (+5)
American (-5)
South American (+5)
African (-5)
Arabian (-5)
Jewish (-50)
Indonesian (+10)
Korean (+10)
- Religious Axis Optional
Original Paganism (+25)
Zoroastrianism (+10)
Buddhism (-5)
Hinduism (-5)
Orthodoxy (-5)
Catholicism (-5)
Islam (-5)
Judaism (-25)
Protestantism (-5)
Neo-Paganism (+0)
Wicca (-50)
Irreligion (-5)
Satanism (either atheistic or theistic) (+0)
Shinto (+5)
Syncretic (-50)
Post your results here:
- Borker - (525/525) With Optional Axes (575/575)
Comrade Phil Thought (340/575)
BERNHEism (-240/525)/(-250/575)
Forest Hermitism -40- Improved Citizenism - (410/575)
- TIIKKETMASTERISM - -295
Bordniga thought (185/525)/(190/575)
Dr. Occo - 150/525 With Optional Axes (105/575)
Voidvill Rajandeep (240/525)
Ganzism (165/525) (195/575)- Second_Anidiotoncrack_Thought (50/575) you're pretty based now borker
- Ukraiana (325/575)
Quark (-645/575)
Glencoe47(-165/575)
Relations
If you are the type who adds balls in relations to show your perception of their beliefs or a short summary, then use the following: (Code Stolen from Quark)
[[File:Alstudism2.png]] [[Alstūdism]] ([[File:Sansepolcrismo.png|link=Fascism]]/[[File:Natsynd.png|link=National Syndicalism]]/[[File:OrgDem.png|link=Authoritarian Democracy]]/[[File:NorseTheo.png|link={{PCBA|Norse Theocracy}}]]/[[File:Republicanismpix.pnglink=Republicanism]])
Which will look like this: 
Alstūdism (
/
/
/
/
)
Innerst (8-10)
National Wodenism (
///
/
) One of the biggest influences on me becoming a fascist, you are probably the most similar person to me ideologically on this site now. We believe in nearly the same thing, the biggest difference I can think of is that of me being a Revanchist, though that isn't really even a big disagreement. (10/10)
Inexistism (/
///
) It's hard to beg down a lot of your beliefs concretely, but from what I can tell you're rather cool, a fellow leftist economically, and governmentally statist, as well as rather conservative socially and culturally. And yes, Death to the West (8/10)- Improved Citizenism (
/
///
) Over the time I've known you, you've gotten way better politically, as if my memory serves me well, you used to a right libertarian. You seem to have went the same route that I did, though not as extreme, which is understandable. I agree with most of what I see here. (8/10) 
Messardism (
/
/
/
/) You seem pretty agreeable over all, I think we mostly differ in terms of social attitudes, but that’s rather negligible. The Nazi-Maoism is rather weird though, I don’t know much about it other than NazMaos are all schizophrenic. Left Fascism Gang though 💪🏻 (8/10)
Ziółkowskiizm (
//
/
/) While I think you are too moderate in some regards (economics), your social policy and governmental views are incredibly based. I think socially and in terms of nationalism is where we agree the most, and though I don't like your econ, at the very least you're not too capitalist, nor communist. I quite like your foreign policy as well, universal nationalism being something I like greatly. The Catholicism isn't ideal, but at least it's not Judaism or Islam, and speaking of Judaism, we are both haters of international finance . (8/10)
Assosiert (6-7)
Leerderism Pretty good overall, you're just too moderate when it comes to important issues, like reformism vs revolution (which is a really big one, as international finance will always work against nationalist movements), and too internationalist really (international finance again). Although I love the agrarianism and communitarianism, we probably agree quite a bit when it comes to that, and maybe nationalism, minus your internationalist tendencies. Overall (somehow ) more moderate version of Jonah. (6/10)- File:NNGM.png New North German Model Pretty much have the same critiques of your ideology as I do for Dr. Occo, that being too moderate, but you do lean better in some regards like being fully isolationist. Though, your governmental beliefs are rather middling, and your economics is something you don't really discuss (though fair enough really, econ sucks to read about), and Econ is rather important for me. Your definition of nationalism is wonderful though, and I have quoted it many times in explaining what I believe nationalism to be about. (7/10)
- Ganzism Fellow pagan and socialist, we just differ on technology and the state. I do think the reactionaryism is rather silly, but you do get more points than him for not being a white nationalist. (6/10)
Manipulism Really good, except much like some of the others in this tier, you are too moderate in your goodness, yours relating to economics and government. I don't have too much to say here, as most of this I find agreeable, though the Christianity I of course have problems with as a theocratic pagan. That being said, Paganism is not a larp, Christianity is a foreign, egalitarian, internationalist religion that was imposed on the Germanic peoples by an invading force. In trying to rid Norwegian society of any colonial remnants and imperialistic influences, Christianity must be done away with to embrace a more authentic Norwegian religion. (7/10)
Midtst (5)
Packetic09 Thought Can't really discern much of what you believe, but from our discord interactions and from what is on your page, you seem alright-ish, though as of recent you're been treading into really cringe territory. (5/10)
Neo-MugiKotobuki8814ism I don't find a lot of this page agreeable, even though we are supposedly both fascists and economic leftists. You're way too culturally progressive, and the weeb stuff is frankly gross albeit the whole calling me "Borker-Chan" has kinda grown on me, like your views of state-mandated courtship. I genuinely think though, that if you refine yourself past hate, and into actual ideals and ideology, that you can become very based, if you were to drop the Nazi and Weeb larp, and actually read some fascist literature. As is, a lot of your page I couldn't take seriously, though you have some good roots you just need to embrace. Also drop the "Catholic Paganism" thing, it doesn't make much sense mate (5/10)
CarrotsRppl2ism Listen, we are still homies and all personally, but ideologically with me no longer an anarchist, there is seldom we would agree on when it comes down to it. You are an individualist and libertarian, and I am now a collectivist and statist, though to be honest I do not hold the libertarianism against you, I can't suddenly pivot to hate something I once was. My biggest gripes with your ideology is really the individualism and all that stems from that, so ideologically you're not that bad :). (5/10)
Jefbol Thought I know you probably don't rate me as highly as I do you, but there is little that I have problems with, like Carrot, that don't stem from one particular issue, yours being Marxism. (5/10)
Conorism You don't really have any beliefs so I can't rate you mate (?/10)
National 16384ism You have mostly fine takes elsewhere, but when it comes to economics you are pretty bad. Capitalism is at odds with nationalism, as the rich elite will always work against the interests of the nation if it would profit them. Other than that, the isolationaism is quite good, and you in power in the US would actually be ideal, as it would stop the US from intervening in any foreign conflicts like perhaps, a Norwegian Civil War. (5/10)- Comrade Phil Thought Like Mugi, you have a lot of good base assumptions, though you twist them in the wrong way. One thing that I find especially egregious about this is your opposition to reading and theory, and smart people in general, on the falsehood that Pol Pot was "Anti-Intellectual" (despite many accounts of him utilizing them in the state apparatus), and being anti-reading is just rather silly, it sounds like an excuse to not challenge yourself with new perspectives, or in your case, learn about the ideologies you espouse. While I am sympathetic to National Bolshevism (Paetelism), I realize that it's incompatible with my fascistic views, it being openly reactionary. On the other hand, you could then be a Limonovite National Bolshevik, but I don't think you'd like him too much, as he was openly a sexual degenerate, even self accounting that he performed fellatio on a black man. Main point here is really just "Read more and watch less Jreg". (5/10)
Kimno Thought Not too bad as Marxists, because you're not too culturally left-wing, though I of course still dislike the internationalism inherent in Marxism. Although your cultural views are rather vague currently, I find myself agreeing with 2/3 of it, and we both do believe in "Cultural Rebirth" though I suppose you have a different meaning than I do. Your philosophy is again rather vague, though again I find myself agreeing with a lot of it. The majority of our disagreements I would think lie in government and economics. (5/10)- Neoteric Communization Your page seems way more focused on philosophy than I'm used to, so I don't understand a good bit of it. When getting into your actual political beliefs, you just seem too moderate, though decent enough on civics, your econ is way too market oriented and captialist, which is vile. (5/10)
Meridionalism You've gotten better from your reformism and marketism, though you're still lacking civically and economically. You still seem to be rather globalist from what I can tell, and are weirdly more against ethnic nationalism than racial nationalism, which is kinda silly. Other than that, the only place you're still lacking is mostly economics and overall being too moderate. (5/10)
One of the better ones in this tier, mostly because you aren't as bad in your bad aspects as the other people here. World Federalism is obviously evil and impossible to achieve, and along with that you cling onto neutered reactionary institutes for some reason, that being monarchism. Your economics are your strong suit though, and are quite decent, if not based. (5/10)
Salvationism (
//
/
/
) Not sure why you have me rated highly all things considered, but compliment taken I guess. However, a lot of your beliefs seem very silly to me. How can you openly espouse nationalism for a nation that doesn't exist, America, and besides that, espouse globalism as well. Zionism as well seems very weird for a Marxist and a Christian to support, and Marx himself was against nationalism quite openly, not much up to interpretation there. However, I do like the left wing economics and statism, even if you weirdly balance it with libertarianism. I would also really like to hear how you define the nation, and believe that America is a nation if anything other than a civic nationalist. I will be writing more here as your develop your page. (5/10)
Trell (2-4)
BERNHEism Still pretty evil in a lot of regards, though now I do look on you more favorably. For one, your views of electricity and power I fully agree with, although with my own Borker spin of course, though looking through your page that's just about the only thing I don't dislike really. You're way to economically right wing, as well as imperialistic when it comes to it as well, though I do think your civics aren't the worst, and of course I love the environmentalism. And the laicism is rather bad, though I guess there's really no other good alternative native faith for America, so fair, which also applies to the interculturalism and the cuck nationalism. (3/10)- Jupiter Thought Better than the majority of ideologies in this tier, however you are a racialist and world federalist. the Hindu racial caste thing is also one of the worst things I can think of. So far the page is rather empty, so I will work on this as you work on your page. (3/10)
- Forest Hermitism Vile internationalist (white nationalist) and Hiterlite, which doesn't make much sense to idolize him as an anarchist. Overall average reactionary, though ig some of your beliefs aren't the most vile, like your environmentalist views (though even they border on cringe), and I still have some sympathy for anarchists. (3/10)
- Neo-Glencoeism Vile globalist and liberal, I don't believe we share much of anything in common other than authoritarianism. The neoconservatism and cuck nationalism really blow, as well as the economics. (2/10)
General Dick Thought Same as the above, except you're a Killer Kitty alt. (2/10)
Second Anidiotoncrack Thought Very contradictory and rather incoherent at times. Firstly, your capitalistic views do not mix with fascism. Fascism has always been a third position apart from Marxism Communism and Capitalism, and your views on wealth redistribution and socialism in general are very silly. You seem to be for consensual government and authoritarianism at the same time, as you state that "socialism is like taxation, theft, if you do not consent to having your money taken from you, you are being robbed". Other than that, your Islamist views on women are vile and reactionary, to say the least, totally unproductive. I think most of your views are just very anti-fascist and just make you some weirdly incoherent corporatocrat. (2/10)
Indonesian Nazism Another person on this site with a poor understanding of fascism. Reaction is not compatible with your supposed fascistic beliefs. Not a whole lot on your page, but from what I can tell, you're in the same league with him and him, that being someone who has not read the very basics of fascism.
Polianism Not too fond of NRx people, and NRx socialism sounds very silly and contradictory, other than that your page is mostly philosophy which I don't understand or dislike. (3-10)
Mishism We’re friends and all, but you and I have fundamentally opposed base beliefs and values, so I do not agree with you on most anything, except for maybe environmentalism and social views.
Nederst (0-1)
KillallJews1488 Thought Least obvious Killer Kitty alt. Anyways, evil and vile globalist, liberal, and progressive. I'm not writing a wall of text like I do for others, given the fact that all you wrote for me is "Fuck You!". (0/10)
Brazilian Liberalism Same as above, except you're actually worse. There's not a single thing good with your ideology, you're the very anthesis of what I believe in.
Tedcruzfan Thought Fascist in nothing but name, you're actually worse than a liberal. You masquerade as a fascist (where is the corporatism, modernism, and anti-capitalism, Ted?) probably because you're a 13-15 year old who get's their idea of fascism from /pol/ and left-wing sources ironically enough. Your whole ideology, if it isn't a larp, is just a reaction, you don't believe in being for anything, you're just against things. (0/10)
Brilliant
Good
Antanas Smetona Really good figure that I hold a lot in common with, namely the nationalism, corporatism, and agrarianism. Sadly too moderate on some fronts, but you were incredibly good for Lithuania, and led it wonderfully in a time were great leadership was needed.
Edmondo Rossoni Pretty much the ideal version of Mussolini, really good.
Alright
Benito Mussolini Had a lot of influence on me, especially in civics and economics, though you were too willingly to collaborate with the Nazis and Germans, and made compromises with the Monarchy.- Oswald Mosley Much like the above, though you were nearly a defeatist with your support for the Nazis. Still though, you were a great writer and pushed me finally into embracing fascism.
Middling
Inadequate
Bad
Disastrous
Gallery
-
![First Alstūdism Portrait, by Fargoth :]](/images/thumb/Alst%C5%ABdismPortrait.png/120px-Alst%C5%ABdismPortrait.png)
First Alstūdism Portrait, by Fargoth :]
-
A Good Book, made by Fargoth
-
My Political Journey
-
Borker with the NNS Flag
-
sorry i drew your ball, Made by Conor
![First Alstūdism Portrait, by Fargoth :]](/wiki/File:Alst%C5%ABdismPortrait.png)
-
DozenValues, 8/8/2023, 9/10
-
SapplyValues, 8/8/2023, 8/10
-
8Values, 8/10/2023, 7/10
-
EconValues, 8/11/2023, 8/10
-
AuthValues, 8/11/2023, 6/10
-
CulturalValues, 8/15/2023, 10/10
-
ThirdPositionValues, 8/20/2023, 8/10
-
HateValues, 8/24/2023, 8/10
-
PolitiScales, 8/27/2023, 9/10
-
RightValues, 9/20/2023, 8/10
-
LeftValues, 9/20/2023, 6/10
Test Values
8Values
8Values
LeftValues
RightValues
How I Would’ve Voted
- 1788-1789 -
- Washington (Independent) - 1792 - - Washington (Independent)
- 1796 -
- Jefferson (Democratic-Republican) - 1800 - - Jefferson (Democratic-Republican)
- 1804 - - Jefferson (Democratic-Republican)
- 1808 - - Madison (Democratic-Republican)
- 1812 - - Clinton (Democratic-Republican/Federalist)
- 1816 - - King (Federalist)
- 1820 - - Abstain
- 1824 - - Adams (Democratic-Republican/Adams-Clay Republican)
- 1828 - - Adams (National Republican/Anti-Masonry)
- 1832 - - Clay (National Republican)
- 1836 -
- Van Buren (Democratic) Reluctantly - 1840 - - Van Buren (Democratic) Reluctantly
- 1844 - - Clay (Whig)
- 1848 -
- Van Buren (Free Soil) Reluctantly - 1852 - - Scott (Whig) Reluctantly
- 1856 -
- Frémont (Republican) - 1860 -
- Lincoln (Republican) - 1864 - - Lincoln (Republican) Reluctantly
- 1868 - - Grant (Republican)
- 1872 -
- Greeley (Liberal Republican) - 1876 -
- Cooper (Greenback) - 1880 - - Weaver (Greenback)
- 1884 - - Butler (Greenback)
- 1888 -
Streeter (Union Labor Party) - 1892 -
Wing (Socialist Labor Party) - 1896 - Matchett (Socialist Labor Party)
- 1900 -
Debs (Social Democratic Party) - 1904 - Debs (Socialist Party)
- 1908 - Debs (Socialist Party)
- 1912 - Debs (Socialist Party)
- 1916 -
Benson (Socialist Party) - 1920 - Debs (Socialist Party)
- 1924 -
La Follette (Progressive Party) - 1928 -
Foster (Communist Party USA) - 1932 - Foster (Communist Party USA)
- 1936 - Browder (Communist Party USA)
- 1940 - Aiken (Socialist Labor Party)
- 1944 - Teichert (Socialist Labor Party)
- 1948 - Thomas (Socialist Party)
- 1952 -
Dobbs (Socialist Workers) - 1956 - Dobbs (Socialist Workers)
- 1960 - Dobbs (Socialist Workers)
- 1964 - Hass (Socialist Labor Party)
- 1968 -
Wallace (American Independent Party) - 1972 - Jenness (Socialist Workers)
- 1976 - Hall (Communist Party USA)
- 1980 - Hall (Communist Party USA)
- 1984 - Hall (Communist Party USA)
- 1988 -
Fulani (New Alliance Party) - 1992 - Fulani (New Alliance Party)
- 1996 - Abstain
- 2000 -
Nader (Green Party) - 2004 - Calero (Socialist Workers)
- 2008 - McKinney (Green Party)
- 2012 - Stein (Green Party)
- 2016 - Trump (Republican)
- 2020 - Hawkins (Green Party)
Sverdrup (Venstre) Qvam (Venstre) Qvam (Venstre) Steen (Venstre) Reluctantly
Unknown (Arbeidarpartiet) Unknown (Arbeidarpartiet) Unknown (Arbeidarpartiet) Hornsrud (Arbeidarpartiet) Nissen (Arbeidarpartiet) Nissen (Arbeidarpartiet) Knudsen (Arbeidarpartiet) Knudsen (Arbeidarpartiet) Grepp (Arbeidarpartiet) Grepp (Arbeidarpartiet)
Støstad (Communist Party) Furubotn (Communist Party) Torp (Arbeidarpartiet) Torp (Arbeidarpartiet) Egede-Nissen (Communist Party) Egede-Nissen (Communist Party) Løvlien (Communist Party) Løvlien (Communist Party) Løvlien (Communist Party) Løfsnes (Socialist People’s Party) Løfsnes (Socialist People’s Party) Solheim (Socialist People’s Party)
Gustavsen (Socialist Left Party) Furre (Socialist Left Party) Furre (Socialist Left Party)
No Leader (Samfunnspartiet) Solheim (Socialist Left Party)
Nærstad (Red Electoral Alliance) Trefall (Fatherland Party)
Bastesen (Kystpartiet) Waage (Kystpartiet) Vestå (Kystpartiet)
Litleskare (Democrats in Norway) Kasheikal (Democrats in Norway) Lysbakken (Socialist Left Party)Movements
- This is not a comprehensive list of movements and parties I like, this is only ones I feel strongly about
Comrades
Fasci Siciliani (Italy, 1889–1894)- British Union of Fascists (
Great Britain, 1932-1940) 
Fascist Italy (Italy, 1922-1943)
French Revolution (
France, 1789 –1799)
Irish Republican Army (
Ireland, 1969-1997)
26th of July Movement (
Cuba, 1955-1962)
Norwegian Communist Party (
Norway, 1923-)
People's Movement for the Liberation of Angola (
Angola, 1956-)
Pērkonkrusts (
Latvia, 1933-1944)- Provisional Irish Republican Army (Ireland, 1969-1997)
- Socialist Party of France – Jean Jaurès Union (France, 1933-1935)
Mixed
Bolsheviks (Russia, 1917-1922)
Revolutionary Catalonia (
Spain, 1936-1939)
Revolutionary Insurgent Army of Ukraine (Ukraine, 1918-1921)
Atrocious Knaves
- Democratic Socialists of America (United States, 1982-)
Nazi Germany (
Germany, 1933-1945)
Quisling Regime (Norway, 1942-1945)
Aesthetics 
Don’t call me a larper for this or I will cry
- Buildings
- Military
Comments
If you would like to be added to relations, add a comment here :3
   Technocrats - The experts are always right  
| |
| Epistocrat
|
 Noocracy
|
|---|---|
| Meritocrat
|
Meritocracy
|
| Technocrat
|
Technocracy •  Technoliberalism
|
| Scientocrat
|
 Scientocracy
|
| Cyberocrat
|
Cyberocracy
|
- ↑ Not Hydra's gross definition, which is child marriage. I mean marriage between 1 man and 1 woman, both adults and consenting