×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,496 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Revision as of 18:32, 8 October 2023 by Hava Nagila (talk | contribs)


Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent Kosciuszkovagr's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

This page is from a user that always comes back
"I always come back" - William Afton



Hoodism,is a left-wing ideology inhabiting around the Far Left of the Libertarian left quadrant. It is one of the more Decentralized Socialists. It is also partly(Mostly) a Self Insert of Kosciuszkovagr. It closes to De Leonism

(///)

Believes

Hoodism is an Ideology, Which I believe It can best be considered has De Leonism.

Summary

Economics

Universal Welfare
Socialist Industrial Unionism

  • Workplace democracy

Diplomacy

Proletarian Internationalism
Anti-Imperialism
Anti-colonialism

Government

Dictatorship of the Proletariat

Culture

Moderate Progressivism

Why I believe in socialism

Why Revolution is Need for Socialism

Revolutionary Ideas, Today are mostly been rejected by most people, cause it will hurt people. But a few sacrifices, for a Greater cause is good, Jesus did it, Lenin did it, hell even the soldiers of the allied army were. Am a Revolutionary democratic socialist cause Reform is simply not possible, at least in modern times, cause of capitalism control. I was once a reformist, it I now a realize it is impossible. A revolution can’t be stop by a rich man rigging an election or stoping a reform, the bourgeoisie cannot touch a revolution unless they join it cause it is against them. “We Socialists are not reformers; we are revolutionaries.” - De Leon


My Underlining Fear

I don’t like the CIA, Cause am a Revolutionary, those too things are People they hate. They were created to stop the spread for socialism, who to say they not doing now or gonna do it, that is my fear, has if I become a political activist or Politician I will have a huge roadblock in my path, the American government, has for anyone that hates a government, they will be persecuted, happened in Rome with Christians, happened in Russia with bolsheviks, and America with the Revolutionaries, I could go on and on, about that. But like too talk about something more real than anything that I said, that us Socialist(Mrnonosense, Jefbol, Borker, etc) are in big trouble if we get some popularity if we want to go into politics in the future, cause of the government. cause politics is a chessboard, but your fighting a Pro and your a amateur.

Cofano Model

Welfare Anyone?

1000 Year road to Communism

The vision to establish lower-stage Communism serves as a crucial stepping stone, a foundational blueprint for the society of equality and shared prosperity. Yet, beyond this monumental achievement lies an even grander aspiration: the pursuit of higher-phase Communism. In contemplating the timeline for this transformation, the proposal to achieve higher-phase Communism within a span of 1000 years emerges as both ambitious and pragmatic.

The choice of a millennium as the timeframe for this endeavor is not arbitrary; rather, it reflects a profound understanding of the complexities inherent in societal evolution. Over the course of a millennium, societies can undergo transformative changes, rewriting the narrative of history. Within this expansive timeframe, the world can witness the gradual but steadfast spread of socialist ideals, permeating cultures, nations, and hearts. The era that follows the lower-stage Communism revolution becomes not just a period of waiting for Communism, but a proactive phase of building, nurturing, and expanding the roots of equality.

A thousand years provide the luxury of time, allowing for comprehensive reforms, education, and the dismantling of deeply entrenched socio-economic structures. It offers room for trial and error, learning from successes and failures, and adapting strategies to diverse global contexts. This extended timeline fosters the cultivation of a global community bound by the principles of solidarity, empowering individuals to advocate for social justice and workers' rights.

Moreover, the millennium-long journey towards higher-phase Communism embodies patience, recognizing that deep-seated change requires persistent effort and a generational commitment. It acknowledges the complexities of cultural, political, and economic diversity across the globe, allowing for organic growth and adaptation to unique circumstances.

In essence, the 1000-year vision for achieving higher-phase Communism embodies a profound optimism in human potential. It envisions a world where the legacy of shared progress is sown meticulously, ensuring that the seeds of equality take root and flourish. This ambitious yet pragmatic approach stands as a testament to the enduring belief that through concerted and sustained efforts, a future of true Communism can be realized, illuminating the path for generations to come.

Another World is Possible

How to Achieve my Goals in my movement

Debate

  • This is we’re you can debate about what I believe with me
  • General Dick Thought - What would you do, if you lived in my Ideal Government?
    • - Kill you for the sake of humanity and Nationalism, No world nation needs to exist.
  • Neo-Glencoeism- I honestly don't think that South Florida is culturally part of Dixie(I say this as someone who lives here), it has more in common with Latin America and New York than Dixie at this point.
    • - sorry bud but it’s in Florida, which is a southern state. So yea you would be in my Dixie just like it was in the last one
  • Neo-Glencoeism- Copying General Dicks question what would you do if I took over the US?
    • - Total Glencoe Death
      • Neo-Glencoeism- understandable considering the same would happen to you
        • - Never, Also I proposed if I do get in power in Dixieland or more over win an election in the usa. I advise moving.
          • - I would heed you advice but alas just like my parents I have the personality of a bulldog so no. Also if you become president of the US and my hypothetical movement has a lot of power expect a lot of riots and perhaps a revolt

Relationships

This is a review of Ideologies not your personality.

Friends of the Southern Revolution

Miss guided

Serbian “Socialism” - While you call yourself a socialist, you support markets which is not communist or socialist in the slightest. Moreover you’re a Nationalist which goes against “The Workers have no nation” thing. You are a heavy miss guided fool.

Enemies

Balls of the walls

Legacy

How I Would’ve Voted

  • 1788-1789 - - Washington (Independent)
  • 1792 - - Washington (Independent)
  • 1796 - - Jefferson (Democratic-Republican)
  • 1800 - - Jefferson (Democratic-Republican)
  • 1804 - - Jefferson (Democratic-Republican)
  • 1808 - - Madison (Democratic-Republican)
  • 1812 - - Clinton (Democratic-Republican/Federalist)
  • 1816 - - King (Federalist)
  • 1820 - - Abstain
  • 1824 - - Adams (Democratic-Republican/Adams-Clay Republican)
  • 1828 - - Adams (National Republican/Anti-Masonry)
  • 1832 - - Clay (National Republican)
  • 1836 - - Van Buren (Democratic)
  • 1840 - - Van Buren (Democratic) Reluctantly
  • 1844 - - Clay (Whig)
  • 1848 - - Van Buren (Free Soil)
  • 1852 - - Scott (Whig) Reluctantly
  • 1856 - - Frémont (Republican)
  • 1860 - - Lincoln (Republican)
  • 1861 - - Davis (independent) Reluctantly
  • 1868 - - Grant (Republican)
  • 1872 - - Greeley (Liberal Republican)
  • 1876 - - Cooper (Greenback)
  • 1880 - - Weaver (Greenback)
  • 1884 - - Butler (Greenback)
  • 1888 - Streeter (Union Labor Party)
  • 1892 - Wing (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1896 - Matchett (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1900 - Debs (Social Democratic Party)
  • 1904 - Debs (Socialist Party)
  • 1908 - Debs (Socialist Party)
  • 1912 - Debs (Socialist Party)
  • 1916 - Reimer (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1920 - Debs (Socialist Party)
  • 1924 - Johns (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1928 - Reynolds (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1932 - Foster (Communist Party USA)
  • 1936 - Browder (Communist Party USA)
  • 1940 - Thomas (Socialist Party)
  • 1944 - Thomas (Socialist Party)
  • 1948 - Thomas (Socialist Party)
  • 1952 - Hass (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1956 - Hass (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1960 - Hass (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1964 - Hass (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1968 - Mitchell (Communist Party USA)
  • 1972 - Jenness (Socialist Workers)
  • 1976 - Hall (Communist Party USA)
  • 1980 - Hall (Communist Party USA)
  • 1984 - Hall (Communist Party USA)
  • 1988 - Fulani (New Alliance Party)
  • 1992 - Fulani (New Alliance Party)
  • 1996 - Abstain
  • 2000 - Nader (Green Party)
  • 2004 - Calero (Socialist Workers)
  • 2008 - Moore (Socialist Party)
  • 2012 - Alexander (Socialist Party)
  • 2016 - Sanders (Democratic)
  • 2020 - Hawkins (Socialist Party)

Parties I support

America

  • Socialist Labor Party

Turkey

  • Party of Greens and the Left Future

How to Draw

Color Name HEX RGB
White #0000 0, 0, nil
Maroon #800000 128, 0, 0

1. Make a ball
2. Paint it Red
3. Add a star
4. Add eyes
5. Add a Dixiecap (optionally)
(Alt Design)
1. Make a ball
2. Paint it Red
3. Add The The state that are in the flag
4. make them yellow
5. Make it have a ML hat (optionally)

Literature

Have Read

  • - Syndicalism

Reading

  • - Fascism: 100 Questions Asked and Answered

Plan to Read

  • - The Communist Manifesto
  • - Social Democracy Versus Revolutionary Democratic Socialism
  • - A New View of Society

Books I Want to make

  • Introduction to Libertarian Socialism
  • Meridionalist Manifesto

Suggestions

  • Feel free to add whatever book you'd like me to read here!

Finished Suggestions

Gallery

User Tests

  • Civic Axis
    • Anarchist (-30)
    • Minarchist (-10)
    • Libertarian (+90)
    • Statist (+50)
    • Dictablanda (+35)
    • Authoritarian (+20)
    • Totalitarian (-10)
    • Orwellian (-1000000000000000)
  • Type of Rule Axis
    • (Anarchist) Anti-Democracy (-50)
    • Direct Democracy (+50)
    • Representative Democracy (+25)
    • Authoritarian Democracy (+10)
    • Totalitarian Democracy (-250)
    • (Authoritarian) Anti-Democracy (-500)
  • Economic Axis
    • Communist (+100)
    • Socialist (+50)
    • Welfarist/Gift Economy ** (-5)
    • Mixed (-10)
    • Liberal Economics (-50)
    • Capitalist (-100)
    • Darwinist (-105)
  • If none above apply...
    • Third Positionism (+20)
    • Anti-Economy (-100)
  • Economic Freedom
    • Anti-Economy (-100)
    • Dirigisme (-5)
    • Regulationism (+25)
    • Mixed (-25)
    • Liberal Economics (-25)
    • Free Market (-50)
    • Laissez-Faire (-100)
  • If none above apply...
    • Planned (+100)
  • Diplomatic Axis
    • Autarchy (-1000)
    • (Alter-) Globalist (+50)
    • World Federalist (-100)
    • Cosmopolitan (-5)
    • Internationalist (-1)
    • Moderate (+5)
    • Patriotic (+5)
    • Nationalist (-10)
    • Chauvinist (-100)
    • Racial Nationalist (or similar broad category) (-200)
    • Ethno-Nationalist (or similar narrow category) (-200)
  • Geopolitics
    • Western (-25)
    • Western Adjacent (-10)
    • Non-Aligned (+50)
    • East Adjacent (+100)
    • Eastern (+45)
  • If none above apply...
    • Anarchist (-25)
  • Cultural Axis
    • Revolutionary (+5)
    • Progressive (+10)
    • Reformist (+50)
    • Syncretic (-10)
    • Conservative (-25)
    • Traditionalist (-36)
    • Reactionary (-50)
  • Technological Axis
    • Primal (-25)
    • Primitivist (-25)
    • Pre-Industrial (-10)
    • Deceleration (-10)
    • Moderate (+25)
    • Acceleration (0)
    • Automated (+15)
    • Transhumanist (-1)
    • Posthumanist (-100)
  • If none of the above apply...
    • Post-Civ (-100)[and/or] Archeofuturism (?)
  • Environmental Axis
    • Human Extinction (-100)
    • Radical Environmentalism (+25)
    • Eco-Fascism (-25)
    • Ecocentrism (+10)
    • Environmentalist (+5)
    • Moderate (+0)
    • Post-Industrialism (0)
    • Industrialist (-10)
    • Anthropocentric (-25)
    • Anti-Environmentalism (-100)
    • New Mass Extinction (-500)
  • Neurological Axis
    • Anti-Praxis (0)
    • Utopian (+40)
    • Dogmatic (+5)
    • Idealist (+10)
    • In Between (+10)
    • Realist (+91)
    • Pragmatic (+50)
    • Rational (0)
    • Dystopian (-100)
    • Anti-Theory (-10)
  • War Axis
    • Pacifism (0)
    • Non-engagement (-5)
    • De-escalation (0)
    • Intervention (-25)
    • Irredentism (+100)
    • Revachism (+50)
    • Jingoism (-100)
  • If none above apply...
    • Class Warfare (+50)
  • Praxis
    • Insurrectionism (-10)
    • Revolutionism (+100)
    • Moderatism (+10)
    • Reformism (+0)
    • Stagnationism (-50)
8Values
91.6%


60.6%
39.4%

52.8%
47.2%

52.0%
48%

DozenValues
94.1%


66%
34%

40.4%
59.6%

56.9%
43.1%

54.4%
45.6%

45.4%
54.6%


Matches :

  1. De Leonism (100.0%)
  2. Syndicalism (99.7%)
  3. Libertarian Socialism (99.0%)
  4. Anarcho-Collectivism (98.8%)
  5. Council Communism (98.6%)
  6. Anarcho-Syndicalism (98.6%)
  7. Anarcho-Communism (98.6%)
  8. Libertarian Marxism (98.6%)
  9. Guild Socialism (98.1%)
  10. Democratic Confederalism (98.1%)

(90)
(95)
File:ELP.png (-590)
File:Philosophicism.png (-795)
Brazilian Liberalism (-19)
Dr. Occo (295)
Person #16384 (35)
Heredism (294)
Voidvill Rajandeep (19)
 Comrade Phil Thought (95)
Borker (205)
Levathonism (-720)

Movements I Would have Supported

  • The Second Spanish Republic
  • Syndicalist Movement
  • Mensheviks

Further Information