×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,528 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Polcompball Wiki
2,528Articles
  Recent changes
in:
Pages using Tabber parser tag, Self-Insert, Ideologies,
and 12 more

Zeroism: Difference between revisions

VisualWikitext
Line 172: Line 172:
The vision to establish lower-stage Communism serves as a crucial stepping stone, a foundational blueprint for the society of equality and shared prosperity. Yet, beyond this monumental achievement lies an even grander aspiration: the pursuit of higher-phase Communism. In contemplating the timeline for this transformation, the proposal to achieve higher-phase Communism within a span of 500 years emerges as both ambitious and pragmatic.
The vision to establish lower-stage Communism serves as a crucial stepping stone, a foundational blueprint for the society of equality and shared prosperity. Yet, beyond this monumental achievement lies an even grander aspiration: the pursuit of higher-phase Communism. In contemplating the timeline for this transformation, the proposal to achieve higher-phase Communism within a span of 500 years emerges as both ambitious and pragmatic.


The choice of a millennium as the timeframe for this endeavor is not arbitrary; rather, it reflects a profound understanding of the complexities inherent in societal evolution. Over the course of a millennium, societies can undergo transformative changes, rewriting the narrative of history. Within this expansive timeframe, the world can witness the gradual but steadfast spread of socialist ideals, permeating cultures, nations, and hearts. The era that follows the lower-stage Communism revolution becomes not just a period of waiting for Communism, but a proactive phase of building, nurturing, and expanding the roots of equality.
The choice of a Half-millennium as the timeframe for this endeavor is not arbitrary; rather, it reflects a profound understanding of the complexities inherent in societal evolution. Over the course of a millennium, societies can undergo transformative changes, rewriting the narrative of history. Within this expansive timeframe, the world can witness the gradual but steadfast spread of socialist ideals, permeating cultures, nations, and hearts. The era that follows the lower-stage Communism revolution becomes not just a period of waiting for Communism, but a proactive phase of building, nurturing, and expanding the roots of equality.


A thousand years provide the luxury of time, allowing for comprehensive reforms, education, and the dismantling of deeply entrenched socio-economic structures. It offers room for trial and error, learning from successes and failures, and adapting strategies to diverse global contexts. This extended timeline fosters the cultivation of a global community bound by the principles of solidarity, empowering individuals to advocate for social justice and workers' rights.
A half-thousand years provide the luxury of time, allowing for comprehensive reforms, education, and the dismantling of deeply entrenched socio-economic structures. It offers room for trial and error, learning from successes and failures, and adapting strategies to diverse global contexts. This extended timeline fosters the cultivation of a global community bound by the principles of solidarity, empowering individuals to advocate for social justice and workers' rights.


Moreover, the millennium-long journey towards higher-phase Communism embodies patience, recognizing that deep-seated change requires persistent effort and a generational commitment. It acknowledges the complexities of cultural, political, and economic diversity across the globe, allowing for organic growth and adaptation to unique circumstances.
Moreover, the half millennium-long journey towards higher-phase Communism embodies patience, recognizing that deep-seated change requires persistent effort and a generational commitment. It acknowledges the complexities of cultural, political, and economic diversity across the globe, allowing for organic growth and adaptation to unique circumstances.


In essence, the 500-year vision for achieving higher-phase Communism embodies a profound optimism in human potential. It envisions a world where the legacy of shared progress is sown meticulously, ensuring that the seeds of equality take root and flourish. This ambitious yet pragmatic approach stands as a testament to the enduring belief that through concerted and sustained efforts, a future of true Communism can be realized, illuminating the path for generations to come.
In essence, the 500-year vision for achieving higher-phase Communism embodies a profound optimism in human potential. It envisions a world where the legacy of shared progress is sown meticulously, ensuring that the seeds of equality take root and flourish. This ambitious yet pragmatic approach stands as a testament to the enduring belief that through concerted and sustained efforts, a future of true Communism can be realized, illuminating the path for generations to come.

Revision as of 02:21, 29 October 2023


Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent Kosciuszkovagr's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

This page is from a user that always comes back
"I always come back" - William Afton



Hoodism,is a left-wing ideology inhabiting around the Far Left of the Authoritarian left quadrant. It is a left communist ideology. It is also partly(Mostly) a Self Insert of Kosciuszkovagr. It closes to De Leonism

(///)

Believes

Hoodism is a variant of De Leonism that rejects State Socialism in favor of self-managing industrial unions,factory organizations, and a Council Government.

Government and economics

I believe that a De Leonist government is a system rooted in the ideas of Daniel De Leon, a prominent figure in the American labor movement during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.I believe Marxist principles, advocating for the transition to a classless society. In this system, the head of the state and government is the Industrial Congress.

The Industrial Congress serves as the highest governing body in my government, representing the interests of the working class. This body is responsible for making decisions on economic, social, and political matters. Members of the Industrial Congress are elected by workers and are held accountable to their constituents.

Economically, My views prioritize the collective ownership of the means of production. This means that factories, farms, and other essential industries are collectively owned and operated by the workers, rather than being in the hands of private individuals or corporations. The goal is to eliminate class distinctions and create a society in which the workers collectively control their own labor and the wealth it produces.

Industrial unions play a crucial role in my economic system. These unions are responsible for organizing workers across various industries and ensuring their interests are protected. They negotiate labor contracts, advocate for workers' rights, and help manage the day-to-day affairs of their respective industries. The Industrial Congress collaborates closely with these unions to establish and enforce economic policies that promote the welfare of the working class.

In my system, the profits generated by industries are distributed among the workers and society as a whole, rather than being concentrated in the hands of a few. This redistribution is intended to provide everyone with a fair share of the benefits produced by their collective labor.

Socially, I envision a society without the exploitation of one class by another. It seeks to eliminate the power dynamics between employers and employees, creating a more equitable and just society.

Diplomacy

Culture

Why I believe in socialism

Revolution

Why Revolution is Need for Socialism

Revolutionary Ideas, Today are mostly been rejected by most people, cause it will hurt people. But a few sacrifices, for a Greater cause is good, Jesus did it, Lenin did it, hell even the soldiers of the allied army were. Am a Revolutionary democratic socialist cause Reform is simply not possible, at least in modern times, cause of capitalism control. I was once a reformist, it I now a realize it is impossible. A revolution can’t be stop by a rich man rigging an election or stoping a reform, the bourgeoisie cannot touch a revolution unless they join it cause it is against them. “We Socialists are not reformers; we are revolutionaries.” - De Leon


My Underlining Fear

I don’t like the CIA, Cause am a Revolutionary, those too things are People they hate. They were created to stop the spread for socialism, who to say they not doing now or gonna do it, that is my fear, has if I become a political activist or Politician I will have a huge roadblock in my path, the American government, has for anyone that hates a government, they will be persecuted, happened in Rome with Christians, happened in Russia with bolsheviks, and America with the Revolutionaries, I could go on and on, about that. But like too talk about something more real than anything that I said, that us Socialist(Mrnonosense, Jefbol, Borker, etc) are in big trouble if we get some popularity if we want to go into politics in the future, cause of the government. cause politics is a chessboard, but your fighting a Pro and your a amateur.

Welfare Anyone?

500 Year road to Communism

The vision to establish lower-stage Communism serves as a crucial stepping stone, a foundational blueprint for the society of equality and shared prosperity. Yet, beyond this monumental achievement lies an even grander aspiration: the pursuit of higher-phase Communism. In contemplating the timeline for this transformation, the proposal to achieve higher-phase Communism within a span of 500 years emerges as both ambitious and pragmatic.

The choice of a Half-millennium as the timeframe for this endeavor is not arbitrary; rather, it reflects a profound understanding of the complexities inherent in societal evolution. Over the course of a millennium, societies can undergo transformative changes, rewriting the narrative of history. Within this expansive timeframe, the world can witness the gradual but steadfast spread of socialist ideals, permeating cultures, nations, and hearts. The era that follows the lower-stage Communism revolution becomes not just a period of waiting for Communism, but a proactive phase of building, nurturing, and expanding the roots of equality.

A half-thousand years provide the luxury of time, allowing for comprehensive reforms, education, and the dismantling of deeply entrenched socio-economic structures. It offers room for trial and error, learning from successes and failures, and adapting strategies to diverse global contexts. This extended timeline fosters the cultivation of a global community bound by the principles of solidarity, empowering individuals to advocate for social justice and workers' rights.

Moreover, the half millennium-long journey towards higher-phase Communism embodies patience, recognizing that deep-seated change requires persistent effort and a generational commitment. It acknowledges the complexities of cultural, political, and economic diversity across the globe, allowing for organic growth and adaptation to unique circumstances.

In essence, the 500-year vision for achieving higher-phase Communism embodies a profound optimism in human potential. It envisions a world where the legacy of shared progress is sown meticulously, ensuring that the seeds of equality take root and flourish. This ambitious yet pragmatic approach stands as a testament to the enduring belief that through concerted and sustained efforts, a future of true Communism can be realized, illuminating the path for generations to come.

How to Achieve my Goals in my movement

Debate

  • This is we’re you can debate about what I believe with me
  • Neo-Glencoeism- I honestly don't think that South Florida is culturally part of Dixie(I say this as someone who lives here), it has more in common with Latin America and New York than Dixie at this point.
    • - sorry bud but it’s in Florida, which is a southern state. So yea you would be in my Dixie just like it was in the last one
  • Neo-Glencoeism- Copying General Dicks question what would you do if I took over the US?
    • - Total Glencoe Death
      • Neo-Glencoeism- understandable considering the same would happen to you
        • - Never, Also I proposed if I do get in power in Dixieland or more over win an election in the usa. I advise moving.
          • - I would heed you advice but alas just like my parents I have the personality of a bulldog so no. Also if you become president of the US and my hypothetical movement has a lot of power expect a lot of riots and perhaps a revolt

Relationships

This is a review of Ideologies not your personality.

Friends of the Revolution

  • Marxism - I quite like you, the true worker’s revolution will becoming soon, your work’s we’re not in vain.
  • Jefbol Thought - Jefbol, your profound political influence on me has been transformative. It led me to move beyond market socialism, guiding me towards embracing De Leonism. Your well-articulated views are a testament to your deep understanding of Politics, and I consider you a true torchbearer of Marx's legacy.
  • Voidvill Rajandeep - WIP

Miss guided

  • Serbian “Socialism” - While you call yourself a socialist, you support markets which is not communist or socialist in the slightest. Moreover you’re a Nationalist which goes against “The Workers have no nation” thing. You are a heavy miss guided fool.
  • Pantheonism - World Federalist GANG but You’re still a libtard 😔
  • Neo-Anthony Bax Thought - WIP
  • Dokevism - WIP

Enemies

  • Neo-Majapahitism - WIP
  • Capitalism - You are all that is wrong with the world! you fall it is inevitable!
  • Brazilian Liberalism - Disregarding your past actions, it is evident that you embrace a bourgeoisie perspective. Liberalism, in my view, stands as the curse of capitalism, perpetuating a system that fails to enrich the lives of the majority. This ideology, I argue, does not pave the way for greater liberty as it claims. Instead, it fosters a socioeconomic structure that hinders progress, trapping people in cycles of inequality. Capitalism, under the influence of such liberalism, fails to deliver the promised improvements in the quality of life. It becomes imperative to challenge this paradigm and explore alternative paths that truly prioritize the well-being and freedom of all individuals, unshackled from the constraints of capitalist exploitation.
  • Israeli Democracy - Kill Yourself NOW
  • Distributist Reactionarism - Since you’re new am not gonna hit on you to hard but Jesus, You’re beliefs are has bad has capitalism or even worse and too add on too that marx didn't say that communist have to be homophobic to be 100% marxist! Also you’re not a real Reactionary, not racist enough and you're aa supporter of democracy? Well you're revisionist
    • - True reactionaryism is Catholic and the church condemns racism, furthermore, the ultraconservatism that you attack is just an ideological scarecrow, it is not truly reactionary, you revisionist Marxist
      • cope all you want, also when was I attacking ultraconservatism? Didn't even mention it.
        • - but ultraconservatism and reactionarism are the same
  • Agricoetism - National Syndicalist But Pagan.
  • Argentinian Nazbolism - WIP
  • Christian Theocracy - God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?

Void

Legacy

How I Would’ve Voted

  • 1788-1789 - - Washington (Independent)
  • 1792 - - Washington (Independent)
  • 1796 - - Jefferson (Democratic-Republican)
  • 1800 - - Jefferson (Democratic-Republican)
  • 1804 - - Jefferson (Democratic-Republican)
  • 1808 - - Madison (Democratic-Republican)
  • 1812 - - Clinton (Democratic-Republican/Federalist)
  • 1816 - - King (Federalist)
  • 1820 - - Abstain
  • 1824 - - Adams (Democratic-Republican/Adams-Clay Republican)
  • 1828 - - Adams (National Republican/Anti-Masonry)
  • 1832 - - Clay (National Republican)
  • 1836 - - Van Buren (Democratic)
  • 1840 - - Van Buren (Democratic) Reluctantly
  • 1844 - - Clay (Whig)
  • 1848 - - Van Buren (Free Soil)
  • 1852 - - Scott (Whig) Reluctantly
  • 1856 - - Frémont (Republican)
  • 1860 - - Lincoln (Republican)
  • 1861 - Abstain
  • 1868 - - Grant (Republican)
  • 1872 - - Greeley (Liberal Republican)
  • 1876 - - Cooper (Greenback)
  • 1880 - - Weaver (Greenback)
  • 1884 - - Butler (Greenback)
  • 1888 - Streeter (Union Labor Party)
  • 1892 - Wing (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1896 - Matchett (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1900 - Malloney (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1904 - Corregan (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1908 - Gillhaus (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1912 - Reimer (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1916 - Reimer (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1920 - Cox (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1924 - Johns (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1928 - Reynolds (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1932 - Reynolds (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1936 - Aiken (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1940 - Aiken (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1944 - Teichert (Socialist Party)
  • 1948 - Teichert (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1952 - Hass (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1956 - Hass (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1960 - Hass (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1964 - Hass (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1968 - Mitchell (Communist Party USA)
  • 1972 - Jenness (Socialist Workers)
  • 1976 - Hall (Communist Party USA)
  • 1980 - Hall (Communist Party USA)
  • 1984 - Hall (Communist Party USA)
  • 1988 - Fulani (New Alliance Party)
  • 1992 - Fulani (New Alliance Party)
  • 1996 - Abstain
  • 2000 - Nader (Green Party)
  • 2004 - Calero (Socialist Workers)
  • 2008 - Moore (Socialist Party)
  • 2012 - Alexander (Socialist Party)
  • 2016 - Abstain
  • 2020 - Hawkins (Socialist Party)

Parties I support

America

  • Socialist Labor Party

Turkey

  • Party of Greens and the Left Future

How to Draw

Color Name HEX RGB
White #0000 0, 0, nil
Maroon #800000 128, 0, 0


Soon but not really

Literature

Have Read

  • - Syndicalism
  • - The Principles of Communism
  • - The Futurist Manifesto

Reading

  • - Fascism: 100 Questions Asked and Answered
  • - The Communist Manifesto

Plan to Read

  • - Social Democracy Versus Revolutionary Democratic Socialism
  • - A New View of Society

Books I Want to make

  • De Leonist Manifesto

Suggestions

  • Feel free to add whatever book you'd like me to read here!

Finished Suggestions

Gallery

  • Old Verison (Drawn by fargoth gares)

    Old Verison (Drawn by fargoth gares)

  • First Design (Drawn by .Dotdotsam)

    First Design (Drawn by .Dotdotsam)

  • Whatever this is (Drawn by HEW) (Outdated)

    Whatever this is (Drawn by HEW) (Outdated)

  • Hallo Borker, by Killer Kitty

    Hallo Borker, by Killer Kitty

User Tests

  • Civic Axis
    • Anarchist (-30)
    • Minarchist (-10)
    • Libertarian (+25)
    • Statist (+50)
    • Dictablanda (+30)
    • Authoritarian (+50)
    • Totalitarian (+30)
    • Orwellian (-1000000000000000)
  • Type of Rule Axis
    • (Anarchist) Anti-Democracy (-50)
    • Direct Democracy (+50)
    • Representative Democracy (+25)
    • Authoritarian Democracy (+50)
    • Totalitarian Democracy (-250)
    • (Authoritarian) Anti-Democracy (+60)
  • Economic Axis
    • Communist (+100)
    • Socialist (+50)
    • Welfarist/Gift Economy ** (-5)
    • Mixed (-10)
    • Liberal Economics (-50)
    • Capitalist (-100)
    • Darwinist (-105)
  • If none above apply...
    • Third Positionism (+20)
    • Anti-Economy (-100)
  • Economic Freedom
    • Anti-Economy (-100)
    • Dirigisme (-5)
    • Regulationism (+25)
    • Mixed (-25)
    • Liberal Economics (-25)
    • Free Market (-50)
    • Laissez-Faire (-100)
  • If none above apply...
    • Planned (+100)
  • Diplomatic Axis
    • Autarchy (-1000)
    • (Alter-) Globalist (-10)
    • World Federalist (+100)
    • Cosmopolitan (+100)
    • Internationalist (+50)
    • Moderate (+5)
    • Patriotic (-10)
    • Nationalist (-100)
    • Chauvinist (-150)
    • Racial Nationalist (or similar broad category) (-200)
    • Ethno-Nationalist (or similar narrow category) (-200)
  • Geopolitics
    • Western (-25)
    • Western Adjacent (-10)
    • Non-Aligned (+50)
    • East Adjacent (+100)
    • Eastern (+45)
  • If none above apply...
    • Anarchist (-25)
  • Cultural Axis
    • Revolutionary (+100)
    • Progressive (+65)
    • Reformist (+24)
    • Syncretic (-10)
    • Conservative (-25)
    • Traditionalist (-36)
    • Reactionary (-50)
  • Technological Axis
    • Primal (-25)
    • Primitivist (-25)
    • Pre-Industrial (-10)
    • Deceleration (-10)
    • Moderate (+25)
    • Acceleration (+76)
    • Automated (+76)
    • Transhumanist (0)
    • Posthumanist (-100)
  • If none of the above apply...
    • Post-Civ (?)[and/or] Archeofuturism (?)
  • Environmental Axis
    • Human Extinction (-100)
    • Radical Environmentalism (+25)
    • Eco-Fascism (-25)
    • Ecocentrism (+10)
    • Environmentalist (+45)
    • Moderate (+0)
    • Post-Industrialism (0)
    • Industrialist (-10)
    • Anthropocentric (-25)
    • Anti-Environmentalism (-100)
    • New Mass Extinction (-500)
  • Neurological Axis
    • Anti-Praxis (0)
    • Utopian (+35)
    • Dogmatic (+50)
    • Idealist (+10)
    • In Between (+10)
    • Realist (+23)
    • Pragmatic (400)
    • Rational (0)
    • Dystopian (-100)
    • Anti-Theory (-10)
  • War Axis
    • Pacifism (0)
    • Non-engagement (-5)
    • De-escalation (0)
    • Intervention (-25)
    • Irredentism (-50)
    • Revachism (-100)
    • Jingoism (-100)
  • If none above apply...
    • Class Warfare (+100)
  • Praxis
    • Insurrectionism (+50)
    • Revolutionism (+100)
    • Moderatism (+10)
    • Reformism (+0)
    • Stagnationism (-50)
8Values
91.6%


60.6%
39.4%

52.8%
47.2%

52.0%
48%

DozenValues
94.1%


66%
34%

40.4%
59.6%

56.9%
43.1%

54.4%
45.6%

45.4%
54.6%


Matches :

  1. De Leonism (100.0%)
  2. Syndicalism (99.7%)
  3. Libertarian Socialism (99.0%)
  4. Anarcho-Collectivism (98.8%)
  5. Council Communism (98.6%)
  6. Anarcho-Syndicalism (98.6%)
  7. Anarcho-Communism (98.6%)
  8. Libertarian Marxism (98.6%)
  9. Guild Socialism (98.1%)
  10. Democratic Confederalism (98.1%)

(90)
(95)
File:ELP.png (-590)
File:Philosophicism.png (-795)
Brazilian Liberalism (-19)
Dr. Occo (295)
Person #16384 (35)
Heredism (294)
Voidvill Rajandeep (19)
 Comrade Phil Thought (95)
Borker (205)
Levathonism (-720)

Movements I Would have Supported

Further Information

Retrieved from "https://pcbwiki.net/index.php?title=Zeroism&oldid=442614"