×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,524 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Zeroism: Difference between revisions

Line 222: Line 222:
*[[File:Gamerist.png]] [[Gamerism]] - Common Edelexian Coal, got to admit some of it’s funny. Also on another note individualism isn’t just meh no free markets. Sending Trans people like me to concentration camps is why I will Rhape you.
*[[File:Gamerist.png]] [[Gamerism]] - Common Edelexian Coal, got to admit some of it’s funny. Also on another note individualism isn’t just meh no free markets. Sending Trans people like me to concentration camps is why I will Rhape you.
*[[file:Egosyndpers-alt.png]] [[Ego-Syndical Personalism]] - We’re do I start on the vileness of your ideology? First I must say whatever the fuck “socialist industrial union of egoist” is, isn’t a real concept and never will be. Second you’re a syndicalist. You probably guess my opinion on those idiots. Your ideology has and always be incomprehensible. You are horribly confused with many topics I feel. Of course you haven’t wrote much except for relations, but what you have wrote you don’t seem to know much just saying thing’s in a perceived “smart way”. Has you described egoism, it seems very vile also you’re a market “socialist”… still? Back to the to the topic of socialist industrial unions. It doesn’t encourage hierarchy. The representatives could recalled for any bad decision they did. Still a nice guy despite your faults.
*[[file:Egosyndpers-alt.png]] [[Ego-Syndical Personalism]] - We’re do I start on the vileness of your ideology? First I must say whatever the fuck “socialist industrial union of egoist” is, isn’t a real concept and never will be. Second you’re a syndicalist. You probably guess my opinion on those idiots. Your ideology has and always be incomprehensible. You are horribly confused with many topics I feel. Of course you haven’t wrote much except for relations, but what you have wrote you don’t seem to know much just saying thing’s in a perceived “smart way”. Has you described egoism, it seems very vile also you’re a market “socialist”… still? Back to the to the topic of socialist industrial unions. It doesn’t encourage hierarchy. The representatives could recalled for any bad decision they did. Still a nice guy despite your faults.
*[[Libertarian D4shism]]
*[[File:D4shismIcon.png]] [[Libertarian D4shism]] - you're like me before I was a Leftcom, am really tired rn so yra


===Void===
===Void===

Revision as of 09:02, 24 November 2023


Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent Kosciuszkovagr's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

This page is from a user that always comes back
"I always come back" - William Afton



Hoodism, is a left-wing ideology inhabiting around the Far Left of the Authoritarian left quadrant. It is a left communist ideology. It is also partly(Mostly) a Self Insert of Kosciuszkovagr. It closes to Council Communism

(///)

Believes

Hoodism - a variant of Council Communism that rejects State Socialism in favor of Socialist industrial unions,factory organizations, and a Council Government

Government

Soon… probably not

Economy

I believe that industry should be organized for the proletariat and are interests. Market’s should cease to exist, the very of essence of markets are capitalist. But am not here to rant about market socialism maybe I’ll do that some other time. Abolish Wage labor terrible system which doesn’t give the workers what the deserve for their work. Under communism the workers get what they make back. So who decides what should be given what is needed? The Industrial Congress, which is the highest head in the new industrial government it will decided how much meat is needed, how much chairs, etc. The workers will be organized in socialist industrial unions. So in each workplace, the workers will determine work policies and elect a committee to decide the what the workplace should do, overall. This is not syndicalism, be it might seem it is. Everyone in society will get an award, nonworking or working and all the workers get to elect not just the “syndicated” ones.

Diplomacy

Culture

We need to destroy the culture of the past, build a new one entirely, not held back by the shackles of the past. A futurist culture that destroys the past bourgeoisie culture. We’re individuals can express themselves by art. Reject conservatism Embrace Futurism.

Why I believe in socialism

Socialism, A great evil to many. most people see it has a ideology that slaughtered and killed millions, but those previous regimes of so called “socialistic” character weren’t that, they were still bourgeois dictatorships, nothing changed. They still had markets(and for other reasons), Marx would have hated them entirely. Socialism in my eyes is individualistic unlike capitalism which hordes people into factories to work endlessly for cash. Socialism in short will change the state of things. But why believe it? Because it allows the proletarian to be free no longer held captive by capital. Creativity to roam free. Freedom. This one word is socialism. Liberal democracy doesn’t allow freedom just the illusion of it, in liberal democracy the bourgeoisie gets the vote that counts, you the proletarians don’t. Thus I believe in socialism a system were freedom can prosper.

Revolution

The Individualism of Socialism

Why Revolution is Needed for Socialism

Revolutionary Ideas, Today are mostly been rejected by most people, cause it will hurt people. But a few sacrifices, for a Greater cause is good, Jesus did it, Lenin did it, hell even the soldiers of the allied army were. Am a Revolutionary democratic socialist cause Reform is simply not possible, at least in modern times, cause of capitalism control. I was once a reformist, it I now a realize it is impossible. A revolution can’t be stop by a rich man rigging an election or stoping a reform, the bourgeoisie cannot touch a revolution unless they join it cause it is against them. “We Socialists are not reformers; we are revolutionaries.” - De Leon

My Underlining Fear

I don’t like the CIA, Cause am a Revolutionary, those too things are People they hate. They were created to stop the spread for socialism, who to say they not doing now or gonna do it, that is my fear, has if I become a political activist or Politician I will have a huge roadblock in my path, the American government, has for anyone that hates a government, they will be persecuted, happened in Rome with Christians, happened in Russia with bolsheviks, and America with the Revolutionaries, I could go on and on, about that. But like too talk about something more real than anything that I said, that us Socialist(Mrnonosense, Jefbol, Borker, etc) are in big trouble if we get some popularity if we want to go into politics in the future, cause of the government. cause politics is a chessboard, but your fighting a Pro and your a amateur.

500 Year road to Communism

Soon……maybe or not

How to Achieve my Goals in my movement

Debate

  • This is we’re you can debate about what I believe with me
  • Neo-Glencoeism- I honestly don't think that South Florida is culturally part of Dixie(I say this as someone who lives here), it has more in common with Latin America and New York than Dixie at this point.
    • - sorry bud but it’s in Florida, which is a southern state. So yea you would be in my Dixie just like it was in the last one
  • Neo-Glencoeism- Copying General Dicks question what would you do if I took over the US?
    • - Total Glencoe Death
      • Neo-Glencoeism- understandable considering the same would happen to you
        • - Never, Also I proposed if I do get in power in Dixieland or more over win an election in the usa. I advise moving.
          • - I would heed you advice but alas just like my parents I have the personality of a bulldog so no. Also if you become president of the US and my hypothetical movement has a lot of power expect a lot of riots and perhaps a revolt
  • Zaiko Dokev - What is your opinion about the Israel-Hamas Conflict?
    • Venatrixism - I am nether for the Israelites or the Palestinians, I am

For the Proletarian, class war. I do not take sides in a petty war

Relationships

This is a review of Ideologies not your personality.

Friends of the Revolution

  • Marxism - I quite like you, the true worker’s revolution will becoming soon, your work’s we’re not in vain.
  • De Leonism - First real branch of Marxism, Criticized Reformism, Marxist-Leninism, and Syndicalism. Socialist Industrial Unionism is a great idea, gives power to the workers, The orchestra of Industry. I do have some problems with you especially on the peaceful revolution idea, This is terrible stupid Parliamentarian talk, America is not different from the rest of the western world. The same class conditions, you can’t just do a peaceful revolution in America. If you can’t do it anywhere else.
  • Post-Jefbolism - Jefbol, your profound political influence on me has been transformative. It led me to move beyond market socialism, guiding me towards embracing De Leonism. Your well-articulated views are a testament to your deep understanding of Politics, and I consider you a true torchbearer of Marx's legacy.
  • Voidvill Rajandeep - Post-Post-Post 'tism is you, which is kinda based ngl
  • Conorism - so hecking Based and Wholesum
  • Council Marxism -

Miss guided

  • Serbian “Socialism” - While you call yourself a socialist, you support markets which is not communist or socialist in the slightest. Moreover you’re a Nationalist which goes against “The Workers have no nation” thing. You are a heavy miss guided fool.
  • Pantheonism - World Federalist GANG but You’re still a libtard 😔
  • Neo-Anthony Bax Thought - Look your Ideology is unique and councils are based but you’re a bit cringe mate
  • Neo-StockMarketCrash Thought - Some of your Philosophy is Good, like Nietzsche.(I used his god is dead quote for Christian theocracy). Your antis are pretty based, I agree with most of them except for the anti-globalist one, you politics are, not the best to say the least. Only thing I liek is Anti-Humanism and you seem to be a individualist.
  • Nurulisme - The Libertarian Shit is kinda cringe, Stratocracy is and Fourth Political theory was made by some schizophrenic guy. But Everything else is mostly baste

Enemies

  • Alstūdism - WIP
  • Neo-Majapahitism - WIP
  • Capitalism - You are all that is wrong with the world! you fall it is inevitable!
  • Marxism-Leninism - WIP
  • Brazilian Liberalism - Disregarding your past actions, it is evident that you embrace a bourgeoisie perspective. Liberalism, in my view, stands as the curse of capitalism, perpetuating a system that fails to enrich the lives of the majority. This ideology, I argue, does not pave the way for greater liberty as it claims. Instead, it fosters a socioeconomic structure that hinders progress, trapping people in cycles of inequality. Capitalism, under the influence of such liberalism, fails to deliver the promised improvements in the quality of life. It becomes imperative to challenge this paradigm and explore alternative paths that truly prioritize the well-being and freedom of all individuals, unshackled from the constraints of capitalist exploitation.
  • Israeli Democracy - Kill Yourself NOW
  • Distributist Reactionarism - Since you’re new am not gonna hit on you to hard but Jesus, You’re beliefs are has bad has capitalism or even worse and too add on too that marx didn't say that communist have to be homophobic to be 100% marxist! Also you’re not a real Reactionary, not racist enough and you're a supporter of democracy? Well you're revisionist
    • - True reactionaryism is Catholic and the church condemns racism, furthermore, the ultraconservatism that you attack is just an ideological scarecrow, it is not truly reactionary, you revisionist Marxist
      • cope all you want, also when was I attacking ultraconservatism? Didn't even mention it.
        • - but ultraconservatism and reactionarism are the same
  • Agricoetism - svvn,,,
  • Argentinian Nazbolism - GOYass ideology, This is literally isism, Duginian stupid ass.
  • Christian Theocracy - God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?
  • Meowxism - being a futurist doesn't make you're ideology better, still a ml.
  • Necro-Anarchism - Coming in 40000 years
  • Timocratic Neocameralism - Nigger, you are the niggest. Read any Marxist theory, you’re critique of me was just that “Uh oh no markets and gonna cry” here you need to real some Marxist theory Gotha and Fundamental Principles of Communist Production and Distribution
  • Dokevism - Syndicalist Social Democrat, Sound about right. All of Capitalism is bad not just neoliberalism and neoconservatism. Social Democracy is probably the worst! It makes the Proletariat feel that capitalism is a good system which is isn’t you cannot reform capitalism to make it better you’re just making it indirectly worse for the future generations.
  • Gamerism - Common Edelexian Coal, got to admit some of it’s funny. Also on another note individualism isn’t just meh no free markets. Sending Trans people like me to concentration camps is why I will Rhape you.
  • Ego-Syndical Personalism - We’re do I start on the vileness of your ideology? First I must say whatever the fuck “socialist industrial union of egoist” is, isn’t a real concept and never will be. Second you’re a syndicalist. You probably guess my opinion on those idiots. Your ideology has and always be incomprehensible. You are horribly confused with many topics I feel. Of course you haven’t wrote much except for relations, but what you have wrote you don’t seem to know much just saying thing’s in a perceived “smart way”. Has you described egoism, it seems very vile also you’re a market “socialist”… still? Back to the to the topic of socialist industrial unions. It doesn’t encourage hierarchy. The representatives could recalled for any bad decision they did. Still a nice guy despite your faults.
  • Libertarian D4shism - you're like me before I was a Leftcom, am really tired rn so yra

Void

Legacy

How I Would’ve Voted

  • 1788-1789 - - Washington (Independent)
  • 1792 - - Washington (Independent)
  • 1796 - - Jefferson (Democratic-Republican)
  • 1800 - - Jefferson (Democratic-Republican)
  • 1804 - - Jefferson (Democratic-Republican)
  • 1808 - - Madison (Democratic-Republican)
  • 1812 - - Clinton (Democratic-Republican/Federalist)
  • 1816 - - King (Federalist)
  • 1820 - - Abstain
  • 1824 - - Adams (Democratic-Republican/Adams-Clay Republican)
  • 1828 - - Adams (National Republican/Anti-Masonry)
  • 1832 - - Clay (National Republican)
  • 1836 - - Van Buren (Democratic)
  • 1840 - - Van Buren (Democratic) Reluctantly
  • 1844 - - Clay (Whig)
  • 1848 - - Van Buren (Free Soil)
  • 1852 - - Scott (Whig) Reluctantly
  • 1856 - - Frémont (Republican)
  • 1860 - - Lincoln (Republican)
  • 1861 - Abstain
  • 1868 - - Grant (Republican)
  • 1872 - - Greeley (Liberal Republican)
  • 1876 - - Cooper (Greenback)
  • 1880 - - Weaver (Greenback)
  • 1884 - - Butler (Greenback)
  • 1888 - Streeter (Union Labor Party)
  • 1892 - Wing (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1896 - Matchett (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1900 - Malloney (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1904 - Corregan (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1908 - Gillhaus (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1912 - Reimer (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1916 - Reimer (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1920 - Cox (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1924 - Johns (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1928 - Reynolds (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1932 - Reynolds (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1936 - Aiken (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1940 - Aiken (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1944 - Teichert (Socialist Party)
  • 1948 - Teichert (Socialist labor Party)
  • 1952 - Hass (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1956 - Hass (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1960 - Hass (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1964 - Hass (Socialist Labor Party)
  • 1968 - Mitchell (Communist Party USA)
  • 1972 - Jenness (Socialist Workers)
  • 1976 - Hall (Communist Party USA)
  • 1980 - Hall (Communist Party USA)
  • 1984 - Hall (Communist Party USA)
  • 1988 - Fulani (New Alliance Party)
  • 1992 - Fulani (New Alliance Party)
  • 1996 - Abstain
  • 2000 - Nader (Green Party)
  • 2004 - Calero (Socialist Workers)
  • 2008 - Moore (Socialist Party)
  • 2012 - Alexander (Socialist Party)
  • 2016 - Abstain
  • 2020 - Hawkins (Socialist Party)

Parties I support

America

  • Socialist Labor Party

Turkey

  • Party of Greens and the Left Future

How to Draw

Color Name HEX RGB
White #0000 0, 0, nil
Maroon #800000 128, 0, 0


Soon but not really

Literature

Have Read

  • - Syndicalism
  • - The Principles of Communism
  • - The Futurist Manifesto
  • - The Communist Manifesto
  • - Critique of the Gotha Program
  • - Socialist Industrial Unionism - The Workers’ Power
  • - On Authority
  • - Industrial Unionism
  • - Reform or Revolution

Reading

  • - Fundamental Principles of Communist Production and Distribution

Plan to Read

  • - Workers' Councils
  • - Anti-Dühring
  • - Socialism versus Anarchism
  • - The Fundamentals of Revolutionary Communism
  • - The Democratic Principle
  • - Fascism: 100 Questions Asked and Answered
  • - Capital Volume 1
  • - Capital Volume 2
  • - The Doctrine of Fascism
  • - Man, Economy, and State
  • - Capital Volume 3
  • - Socialist Reconstruction of Society

Books I Want to make

  • Proletarian Party Manifesto
  • Southern defiance of America

Suggestions

  • Feel free to add whatever book you'd like me to read here!

Finished Suggestions

Gallery

User Tests

  • Civic Axis
    • Anarchist (-30)
    • Minarchist (-10)
    • Libertarian (+25)
    • Statist (+50)
    • Dictablanda (+30)
    • Authoritarian (+50)
    • Totalitarian (+30)
    • Orwellian (-1000000000000000)
  • Type of Rule Axis
    • (Anarchist) Anti-Democracy (-50)
    • Direct Democracy (-40)
    • Representative Democracy (-20)
    • Authoritarian Democracy (-15)
    • Totalitarian Democracy (-10)
    • (Authoritarian) Anti-Democracy (+60)
  • Economic Axis
    • Communist (+100)
    • Socialist (+50)
    • Welfarist/Gift Economy ** (-5)
    • Mixed (-10)
    • Liberal Economics (-50)
    • Capitalist (-100)
    • Darwinist (-105)
  • If none above apply...
    • Third Positionism (+20)
    • Anti-Economy (-100)
  • Economic Freedom
    • Anti-Economy (-100)
    • Dirigisme (-5)
    • Regulationism (+25)
    • Mixed (-25)
    • Liberal Economics (-25)
    • Free Market (-50)
    • Laissez-Faire (-100)
  • If none above apply...
    • Planned (+100)
  • Diplomatic Axis
    • Autarchy (-1000) The
    • (Alter-) Globalist (-10)
    • World Federalist (+100)
    • Cosmopolitan (+100)
    • Internationalist (+50)
    • Moderate (+5)
    • Patriotic (-10)
    • Nationalist (-100)
    • Chauvinist (-150)
    • Racial Nationalist (or similar broad category) (-200)
    • Ethno-Nationalist (or similar narrow category) (-200)
  • Geopolitics
    • Western (-25)
    • Western Adjacent (-10)
    • Non-Aligned (+100)
    • East Adjacent (+10)
    • Eastern (-23)
  • If none above apply...
    • Anarchist (-25)
  • Cultural Axis
    • Revolutionary (+100)
    • Progressive (+65)
    • Reformist (+24)
    • Syncretic (-10)
    • Conservative (-25)
    • Traditionalist (-36)
    • Reactionary (-50)
  • Technological Axis
    • Primal (-25)
    • Primitivist (-25)
    • Pre-Industrial (-10)
    • Deceleration (-10)
    • Moderate (+25)
    • Acceleration (+76)
    • Automated (+76)
    • Transhumanist (0)
    • Posthumanist (-100)
  • If none of the above apply...
    • Post-Civ (?)[and/or] Archeofuturism (?)
  • Environmental Axis
    • Human Extinction (-100)
    • Radical Environmentalism (+25)
    • Eco-Fascism (-25)
    • Ecocentrism (+10)
    • Environmentalist (+45)
    • Moderate (+0)
    • Post-Industrialism (0)
    • Industrialist (-10)
    • Anthropocentric (-25)
    • Anti-Environmentalism (-100)
    • New Mass Extinction (-500)
  • Neurological Axis
    • Anti-Praxis (0)
    • Utopian (+35)
    • Dogmatic (+50)
    • Idealist (+10)
    • In Between (+10)
    • Realist (+23)
    • Pragmatic (400)
    • Rational (0)
    • Dystopian (-100)
    • Anti-Theory (-10)
  • War Axis
    • Pacifism (0)
    • Non-engagement (-5)
    • De-escalation (0)
    • Intervention (-25)
    • Irredentism (-50)
    • Revachism (-100)
    • Jingoism (-100)
  • If none above apply...
    • Class Warfare (+100)
  • Praxis
    • Insurrectionism (+50)
    • Revolutionism (+100)
    • Moderatism (+10)
    • Reformism (+0)
    • Stagnationism (-50)
8Values
91.6%


60.6%
39.4%

52.8%
47.2%

52.0%
48%

DozenValues
94.1%


66%
34%

40.4%
59.6%

56.9%
43.1%

54.4%
45.6%

45.4%
54.6%


Matches :

  1. De Leonism (100.0%)
  2. Syndicalism (99.7%)
  3. Libertarian Socialism (99.0%)
  4. Anarcho-Collectivism (98.8%)
  5. Council Communism (98.6%)
  6. Anarcho-Syndicalism (98.6%)
  7. Anarcho-Communism (98.6%)
  8. Libertarian Marxism (98.6%)
  9. Guild Socialism (98.1%)
  10. Democratic Confederalism (98.1%)

(90)
(95)
File:ELP.png (-590)
File:Philosophicism.png (-795)
Brazilian Liberalism (-19)
Dr. Occo (295)
Person #16384 (35)
Heredism (294)
Voidvill Rajandeep (19)
 Comrade Phil Thought (95)
Borker (205)
Levathonism (-720)
Artelordism (344)
Hope "Not the KGBread" (866)

Movements I Would have Supported

What My Ideology would be in hoi4 Mods

Further Information

Recent changes

  • JAcket • 44 minutes ago
  • JAcket • 51 minutes ago
  • SocialistWorldRepublic • 1 hour ago
  • JAcket • 1 hour ago