 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent Nurisk5's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
 |
Work in Progress "I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details. |
"National Bolshevism is the last revolutionary doctrine in history. It absorbs into itself all previous anti-system, non-conformist ideologies, which are resolved into a general intellectual and practical synthesis. The concreteness of economic and social requirements flows without contradiction into the highest spheres of metaphysics."
Alexander Gelyevich Dugin, Templars of the Proletariat
Hey, how's it going? I'm Nurisk, and I advocate for 
Nasionalisme, 
Agamisme, 
Komunisme. I'm Metaphysically a Materialist, culturally right wing and economically left wing.
click here for the Indonesian version.
Beliefs
The Most Radical Movement in History 
Fascism failed, Revolutionary Conservatism failed, Soviet Communism failed, the May 68ers failed, the last bastion of Revolution would have to be National Bolshevism.
National Bolshevism, a synthesis of all revolutionary theses from the Radical Left and Radical Right is what we must affirm, the Economic views of the Left and the Cultural views of the Right.
Many would like to call us reactionaries but that is simply not true. Reaction is a rejection of change, the 'real' reactionaries are the liberals and nihilists who affirm the status quo. Revolution cannot be nihilistic, it has to be against nothing. The National Bolshevik Movement in Russia proudly proclaims: "Russia is everything, the rest is nothing!". That's true, what isn't a part of the tribe is what is bad, "all within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state." Mussolini said.
When we think about what the National Bolsheviks and the Fascists have said, the struggle of the nation is against nothing. Not as in nothing that there is nothing there, but against Nihil as an entity. Nihil is the grim reaper, after all, the National Bolsheviks are fighting an upward battle against death.
The sea of desire is messy and chaotic, no real forms, only impermanent waves. This sea is where the first sparks of life emerged, at the bottom of the sea in hydrothermal vents that eventually formed the first biological machine. This little entity soon found itself becoming a fish, then it grew legs, and then became what he is today: Man. Man's destiny and evolution many would like to say is "in his own hands", it is no longer bound by the laws of nature that make him grow wings in his body or grow horns on his head, but instead he manufactures stealth bombers and forge swords.
The "left-wing" corresponds with the left-hand path, the path of defiance and revolution, the right is of the status quo, letting the world do as it wills. The Left, being on the side of the most thrown-around sections of society leaves them with no choice but to reject hierarchy, to reject the sovereigns that dominate and allow the subjects to enact revenge. The Dictatorship of the Bourgeoisie replaced with the Dictatorship of the Proletariat.
The will to dominate has dominated the spirit of modernity, but this chaotic release of energy where we threw bullets, knives, and bombs would eventually come out with the rise of a clear victor: Liberalism. Liberalism won and this raging beast took a rest as he had exhausted his energy, he has now become passive instead of sadistic. The wars it wages right now are just cleaning off what remains that tries to disturb its sleep. With it, it decays back into the earth, back into chaos, this is the era of postmodernity, the heat death.
The political freedom provided by liberalism is inherently chaotic, it is a political anarchism however still impotent. Ideological Anarchism meanwhile is potent and is able to exert its own will upon the object by way of domination, destruction, and the creation of chaos to create a new social order. The classical anarchists are the only ones who carry this power as they believe in order without hierarchy, for them; a society without superiors destroys transgressors and thus, orderly.
Note that we've discussed the existence of two kinds of chaos and order: masculine and feminine; the masculine is defined by domination and sovereignty whilst the feminine is defined by submission and subjection. Masculine Order is private as it seeks to become a "lone wolf" while in its chaos is transgressive, forcing all to submit to his will. Feminine Order and Chaos is the opposite as feminine order is social and feminine chaos is repulsive and separative. The "order" I spoke of refers to the sex of the subject and the "chaos" is the gender of the subject; my mention of Venus previously refers to how her fall caused the rise of him (Lucifer) and swears against God to wreak havoc upon the peoples and nations of the world.
Liberalism is masculine in its order and feminine in its chaos, National Bolshevism is feminine in its order but masculine in its chaos; they are total opposites, Liberalism is an effeminate man whilst National Bolshevism is an emasculated woman. The National Bolsheviks are nomadic warriors in spirit, they embrace the social/communal production of the left as their form and the transgressiveness of the right as their expression, meanwhile, liberals are femboys as they advocate for private production and separative expression.
As we see, it is not a clear binary; the National Bolsheviks are of the Tomboy Venus whilst the Liberals are of the Femboy Lucifer. We wish to revive the social sadism of old, the Nomads, they are our role models.
The reason why the progressive movement fails is because they are impotent, they have nothing, their movement is thin, they forewent the potency of partisanism, of the great horde. The contemporary postmodern anarchist s stress the idea that they need not a party or party lines and that is why they fail, but Lenin has already addressed this more than a hundred years ago in What is to be Done? in which he refutes spontaneity and exercises the importance of the vanguard party and democratic centralism. In order for revolution to succeed, we need a party to unite under to concentrate our firepower upon; we need to understand that since deterritorialisation is on the side of capital and the existing socio-political hegemony, our revolution has to be that of a reterritorialising manner.
We cannot bleed our hearts out if it can simply be sucked up by the existing social structure and be assimilated, it has to be truly radical. The National Bolshevik Movement is the most radical movement of all because it exhibits the sovereignty of the individual over the system, the recapturing of desire by the individual (this is why the NBP is Anti-Paternalist). We may create a federation of communes federated under the party in order to effectivise our strategy.
If Communism is our aim as Historical Materialists and human society started in the phase of primitive communism, then it's only fair to say that our movement must be to go back, i.e. archaic.
Capitalism and Satanism, the two could not be more similar. 
There is a war happening in the Heavens, and the spearhead of this rebellion: the Morning Star.
Lucifer, formerly Venus was the anima of fertility and (re)production. The Kingdom of Heaven is symbolised by the Empire, the highest form of the Nation. We see Venus betray God as she was tempted by Iblis, formerly Azazil. Iblis is the true and real Satan as Azazil tempted the Morning Star to betray God along with him. We often take these names for Granted and never bother to look further into them, but regardless, Iblis convinced Venus to betray God for power over him. God's sovereignty reflects Man's sovereignty as all the Angels except for Azazil bowed down to Adam.
The fall of Venus reflects that of the development of production from Nomadic to Private and the rise of the tyrant of the Patrician, soon the Landowning, and soon the Bourgeois classes.
Man's sovereignty is the only thing that we could classify as ontologically "good" for the socialist whilst being at the bottom is the ontological "evil" for the socialist. The fall of Lucifer is the fall of the nomadic mode of production as it shook the earth's nations and the deterritorialisation of them.
The Spirit of Modernity is defined by the conflict over who can be the most violent and bloodthirsty, the Spirit of Postmodernity is defined by deconstruction and negation of what we held true.
Naturally, modernity leads to postmodernity, from tearing at each other to tearing themselves. Liberalism right now is eating itself alive, it is tearing itself apart as it has nothing left to tear apart. Liberalism has already defeated Fascism and Communism. The current world order is that of Nihilism: alienation, atomisation, deterritorialisation, disintegration.
Capitalism truly is the Kali Yuga.
During this period; the worker is alienated from his means of production, from his own labour, from his folk, and from his own sovereignty, he is effectively effeminised as capital has raped and stripped man of his manhood. Capitalism has ravaged the world by way of war, imperialism, and exploitation. It is no coincidence that the rise of capitalism occurred around the same time as the rise of liberalism, the rise of modernity, and postmodernity. The Spirit of Modernity is defined by the conflict over who can be the most violent, the Spirit of Postmodernity is defined by deconstruction and negation of what we once held as true.
The salvation of the Morning Star is the aim of the socialist revolution in which production will become socialised and return to its nomadic state. The alienation of man from production was caused when the kings of Babylon (the oppressor class) emerged out of the commons, overthrowing common property in favor of private property as the model of production. The emergence of the patricians was the greatest tragedy for man as now he lives under tyranny. Capital has turned God himself into a commodity.
Mother Earth and The Morning Star 
Mother Earth, the Matriarch of the Islands, the flowering diversity of the vast archipelago (her name means "the Vast One"). Her brood stretches from Sabang to Merauke with a vast number of children. She is the mother of the Islands, for if Earth is herself, then Nusantara is her child.
The Morning Star was Mother Earth's friend; Venus taught Terra about the secrets of the craft from her Husband, Vulcan (who's name is the origin for the word "Volcano"), the Father of Craftsmanship and Volcanoes and the art of fertility to which Terra adorned herself with by birthing the Indonesian people. But when Venus fell to become Lucifer, he began to corrupt Prithvi until Prithvi fell ill with what he had done to her. This is what International Capitalism has done to Mother Earth; first, we've abandoned her, and now we've become hostile against her by supporting Globalism and Progressivism.
To save Pertiwi, we must fight against this plague, we must fight for Socialism, fight for Pancasila-Nasakom, fight to a return to Nomadic relations to heal our Motherland and to redeem back her Sister who's fallen for evil.
We want nothing more than Kejora to come back.
The Conservatism of the Neglected Class 
The Proletariat and Peasantry are neglected often by the Traditionalists and instead, they focus on the aristocracy. This fact alone should anger you against them and their pompousness. While the aristocratic sovereigns hold their position because they can do so. But without the class of labourers, they could not win their wars or live such frivolous lifestyles.
The Proletariat and Peasantry yearn to seize political power, to flip the balance of power over its head, to create the order of labourers. Many a Traditionalist fear Democracy, an enlightenment ideal as it promotes equality among the classes, that is why we do not support Liberal Democracy.
Time for the Materialist is of the essence as our reigns over the world are timed, limited, and constrained. There is no God that could save us from the ticking clock. Either we act now or die later, the window of opportunity is narrow before the development of technology causes the extinction of humanity or the gridlock of the labor classes to be stuck with no way up.
Tick Tock Motherfucker.
The Bourgeoisie must be stopped as soon as possible, we must launch the great trial as soon as possible, the cleansing of the world of white progressivism. The European chauvinists so carelessly declare that their values are the superior ones that they proclaim themselves as "progressives". Well, that's why we're not.
The Conservatism of the Bourgeoisie and of the Proletariat are very different as capital cannot do anything but deterritorialise what limits it which is reflected in what it supports such as nuclear familialism, the idea that the ideal of the everydayman is to be passive towards the system, to continue gluing their faces onto the world of commodities but just "with their families" which only exists to produce more laborers and consumers. The patriarchy is a trait of domestic society as domestic societies are inherently rooted in private property and it's inheritance (an inherently bourgeois trait). Proletarian Conservative values are based on what the proletariat does not have: a Tribe.
Gangs, Nomads, Tribes, and Punks are the purest expression of this kind of revolutionary conservatism, truly revolutionary as opposed to passive. That is why I admire the Russian National Bolshevik Movement. What we need to understand is that National character cannot be commodified as it is something inherently emergent as opposed to manufactured, that's why capitalism is hellbent on its destruction and why we need to shake off the delusion that nationalism is inherently capitalist; it's not.
The proletariat as a class of wage labourers only exist because of the bourgeoisie, they have no country because the bourgeoisie have taken it away from them, we cannot take from them what they don't have and we cannot force them to associate with those they do not want to associate with. Capital is inherently internationalist hence why wage labour must be anti-globalist (although the movement is still international).
For as long as there are different classes, there will never be one "ideal".
The Matriarchy 
Before the arrival of Christo-European (technically stemming from Jewish) Civilisation, Matriarchy ruled the household. Instead of the Father being head, it was the Mother. The overthrow of the woman in the household was a tragedy as it led towards not only the degeneration of the woman, but also the man and the social sphere. The development of the patriarchal family and the nuclear family led to the reduction of women as a mere object of the reproduction of more labourers and consumers, her own sphere; the domestic sphere is no longer under her control. Men now also have to become less public as he also has to head the household.
The domestication of men was a great tragedy as it capital is able to utilise his lack of transgressivity in the public sphere to its advantage. Businesses are headed by the capitalists who act as the head of household in the workplace, not only are women objectified, but also men are objectified in the social sphere due to the rise of patriarchy. Their rule over their domains have been switched leading to the rise of the class of owners to which then men sell their labour to them in exchange for a wage. Men have been stripped of their rights just as women have. The inclusion of women in the workforce doesn't make it any better either as that is just the enslavement of both men and women towards capital.
The solution then is a return to matriarchy and allowing the masculine to be free in the public sphere without being weighed down by the domestic sphere handled by the feminine.
Progressivism: The Failed Messiah
Progressivism must be rejected by the communist movement because it failed. How? Why?
Progressivism failed because it followed the current of Capital. Instead of rejecting the degeneration, it affirms it.
Now, when I say "degeneration" I mean the deterritorialisation of social identities, the things that makes us us. Many a communist talked extensively about how communism affirms the individual; I don't disagree, but the problem is what do we even use if we have nothing? Again, we cannot take from the proletariat what they do not have. Identity as it exists right now is defined by purchasing relations than emergent relations. For example; "Japan" is no longer of the "Japanese". Japan, as it exists, is of capital, its culture is being twisted and bent by the whims of capital and commodity fetishism. The Japanese people no longer create Japan, it is capital that creates Japan. Japan has been stripped of its identity and what remains is merely a puppet played by the bourgeois ventriloquists that the Japanese people have just come to accept.
The Progressives think that we can hijack the process from capital (we can't). Progressivism isn't the radical movement we think it is, it has been diluted by capital into being the status quo and the norm. There is no "radical progressivism", there is no "anti-corporate" queer movement, all within the corporation, nothing outside the corporation, nothing against the corporation. Haven't we learned anything that we cannot counter hegemony by following said cultural hegemony? The only radical thing is radical conservatism, revolutionary conservatism, and traditionalism; now that's real radicalism.
Many would like to cry out: "Reactionary!", "Fascist!" and other buzzwords, thrown around haphazardly. First of all: "Reactionary" would imply you are against radical change which would be the status quo (i.e. progressivism), secondly: Fascists are progressive, they are the only remnant of that old revolutionary progressivism, that war between which nation's hegemony should dominate, fascists are just progressives who've lost the battle for hegemony.
If we look at progressivism, it seems to be the case that it is eurocentric, it arises from Europe and thus embodies European values but yet says it preaches anti-racism. How? How can you proclaim to be anti-racist if you're imposing European values to evaluate who is "better" and "worse"? It is inherently Eurocentric, and even more it is the type of hegemony that capital participates in.
But hey, at least whether you're black or white, gay or straight, we're all equally slaves.
The Impotence of Contemporary Pancasila 
Pancasila as it exists today is impotent, it has no soul, it has no direction, no mind. Pancasila as it exists today is only so because it is just a tool by capital to divide the Indonesian masses, to laten real action, to laten their rise to power. Only during the Soeharto years did Pancasila receive a direction, led by Golkar. Now, with the reformation, there is no direction anymore, only confusion.
The Indonesian Bourgeoisie now no longer needs authoritarianism as capital will take it from here to develop our society in its image whilst we remain divided by political parties just like during liberal democracy (1945-1959). Pancasila is a tool, not an ideal, not a principle. Pancasila, in order to grow a brain and to sharpen its beak and talons must be interpreted through the lens of Nasakom: a lost art.
Nasakom is the only thing that can save us, whilst originally a loose political alliance of the nationalists and the military, the communists and the laborers, and the religious clerics must be revived. Notice how I did not mention the Indonesian bourgeoisie? Exactly, the Indonesian bourgeoisie are traitors to the nation and have played us for absolute fools, they are a part of the international cabal of capital. There can be no such thing as a "National Bourgeoisie", "National Capital", or even a "National Proletariat". We adopt Nasakom to abandon our Class identity in favor of the National identity.
Pancasila as it stands has no idea what it is, its principles are made vague so that everyone can agree with it. This is good if you're uniting factionalists, but Indonesia doesn't just have factions, but entirely different political parties with different visions of what Indonesia should be. It has already been traumatised to believe that communism is a great evil, but this is a lie. The 30 September Movement would have given Pancasila a real direction, an idea of what it is going to be, where it will be heading, to dissolve factions in Indonesia and formalise the Indonesian National Ideology.
But alas, the liars had won, the deceivers, the antichrist, they've already deceived the Indonesian masses and have killed of the revolutionaries who will give clearance. General Soeharto, whilst he certainly was an anti-communist was not too bad of a figure, he at least gave a direction for Pancasila but whether he knows it or not, he is nothing more than a useful idiot for the forces of international capital. Before he knew it, he would be deposed but the Indonesian Oligarchy would remain. The Protestors in 1998 were too impotent to desire something more radical: Socialism; and now that the revolutionary wave is over, we can only hope that a window of opportunity would soon open itself up for another revolution.
The Indonesian Socialist Empire 
Indonesia is a Tellurocracy. It encompasses thousands of ethnicities, cultures, religions, and so forth that have pledged allegiance to the same ideals and family. The Indonesian Nation (and subsequently, world) encompasses the entire archipelago from Sabang all the way to Merauke (although I'd argue we should include Eastern Papua) including North Kalimantan (Brunei, Sarawak, Sabah), Malaya (including Singapore), and East Timor. This is our sphere, our geographic and ethno-racial boundaries.
Now, does this "Empire" bear any semblance to capitalist imperialism? Of course not; our Empire is Tellurocratic (Land-Rule) than Thalassocratic (Sea-rule).
But how? A country where much of its area is water being tellurocratic? Impossible!
Well, that's only the case if we take the words quite literally. You see, tellurocracy and thalassocracy is different in how the control of territory is managed and how each polity within the empire interacts with another. In the Tellurocracy, whilst there is a "center" of the empire, the regions of the empire are treated no less "inferior" than another (e.g. Rome, America, the USSR, China, and so on). In a thalassocracy, inferiority is the norm as the imperial core exploits the regions beyond it. It is inherently unequal as the core exploits the outer bounds for resources to amass its wealth.
This is also reflected in the way that we talk about them too; when we speak of "the Roman Empire" we speak about the territory as a whole, "Rome" and "Roman Empire" are synonyms in this case whilst in the context of the "British Empire", "Britain" is not synonymous with it's empire, her colonies are completely separate from the core. The name "Indonesia" itself couldn't be more tellurocratic as it is as there is no region within "Indonesia" that "is" "Indonesia" unlike Rome and the City of Rome or the British Empire and the island of Great Britain. There is Java, Sumatra, Kalimantan, Papua, Sulawesi, the Maluku Islands, and the Nusatenggara Islands (and Malaya), there is no "Indonesia" that isn't describing the whole thing, and there is no "origin point" of Indonesia, Indonesia emerged out of the whole archipelago swearing to unite under one banner.
Now, of course there are regions within this Empire that contain severe inequalities (particularly outside Java) and we should definitely address them, but I want to make it clear that we should have no intention in the dissolution of Indonesia but instead we should initiate a Revolution, one similar in Russia in character and spirit but without the Atheism.
The Radical Revolution shall bring about the creation of a new social order based on the Federation of Communes. We shall create Workers' Councils who are elected based on profession and district who then elect on the district, communal, provincial, and finally national levels. The Economy will be managed by State Enterprises under which the councils will be federated under.
Political Democracy divides, so naturally we reject it. Economic and Administrative Democracy is good since it is the foundation of Socialism which would allow the thriving of Nomadic Production. Democratic Centralism fits the values of Pancasila better than Liberal Democracy, so we should adopt it.
Men and Women would be given total freedom in their private lives as they will serve the same public function in the eyes of the state. Children would be fostered by the community and be prepared physically for life as the state would prioritise what the individual can offer as opposed to the radical equalisation of all its citizens, the state would foster the development of character rather than the development of total and equal perfection based on some paternalistic ideal.
We will overhaul completely the city and countryside. Industrialisation shall commence in the countryside however those there shall not be expected to leave for the cities, but to develop the countryside to become new cities. The distinction between city and country shall be dissolved by making all land owned by the state and managed by the communal councils. Railways and roads will be constructed and interconnectivity for all islands is a priority for efficient resource allocation.
Islam Nusantara 
The arrival of Islam in Indonesia symbolished the beginning of a "new covenant" so to speak, from the law of Vishnu to the law of Muhammad. This revelation from the Arabian peninsula by God transformed the archipelago completely as Hindu Law was superseded by the Sharia.
The Dawn of Judaism was the giving of the 10 commandments by God to Moses. The Dawn of Christianity is the arrival of Jesus Christ and the sublation of the law through his sacrifice. The Dawn of Islam is the arrival of Muhammad with a new law by God with the Sharia existing as a reaffirmation of Old Testament law that reforms itself as "law" that we know of as today.
In Indonesia, Hinduism and Buddhism was our equivalent of the Christians' "Old" Law and Islam as the new. Islam in Indonesia, traditionally developed along the lines of Hindu and Buddhist teaching. The Supreme being "Brahman" was elaborated to be Allah or by Sunan Kalijaga; Sang Hyang.
The Law of the Jews were brought down by Christianity, the Religion of the people below, whom then slowly overthrew the Paganism of the Roman Empire which eventually led to the destruction of its Western portion. Islam followed the same direction in Indonesia with the fall of the Hindu Kingdoms and the Majapahit Empire.
Colonialism in Indonesia, whilst it introduced Christianity, did not exactly aim to "develop" Indonesia in the civilising sense. The Dutch Empire was a Thalassocracy in the truest sense in that its colonial aims were purely economic and hence had little to no interest in introducing European civilisation into Indonesia which allowed Islam to continue developing in the islands. In particular, the divide between the Santri and the Abangan Muslims became prominent and especially during the rise of the Communist Party. The Abangan sided with the Communist Party as they tended to be of a "lower caste" so to speak whilst the Santri were of a much higher caste in Indonesian society. The Santri tried to develop Indonesian Islam towards Arab Orthodoxy whilst the Abangan continued having ties to Hindu and Animist beliefs.
It's always as though the upper classes try to detach themselves from the masses, trying to diverge away from the historical grounding of whatever region they were ruling in, rarely embracing the beliefs of the masses. For Imperial Russia it was between New Rite and Old Rite, in Europe in the Communist States it was faith as a whole and Atheism, in Indonesia it was the Santri and the Abangan but now it's between the Modernists and Traditionalists as the Abangan are now gone (although this divide has existed among the Santri for years before the 65-66 purges).
It is as if Tradition has always and has only been kept by the masses, not the nobility. "Tradition" for the nobility is detachment from culture whilst Tradition for the masses is embracing culture. The Nobility then is inherently degenerate as they stray away from the tradition of the land.
Thus, we reject the theology of Puritanical Islam in favor of Islam Nusantara.
Reading Recommendations
Texts that are in bold are the most important.
- Fourth Political Theory by Alexander Dugin
- Templars of the Proletariat by Alexander Dugin
The Guattari Reader by Gary Genosko
State and Revolution by Vladimir Lenin- What is to be Done? by Vladimir Lenin
- Imperialism: the Highest Stage of Capitalism by Vladimir Lenin
Islamism and Communism by Haji Misbach
Philosophy of Life by Tan Malaka
Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx- Wage Labour and Capital by Karl Marx
- Estranged Labour by Karl Marx
- The Fetishisation of Commodities and the secret thereof
Workers Councils by Anton Pannekoek
Foundations of Leninism by Joseph Stalin- The Other Russia by Eduard Limonov
How to Draw
- Draw a ball outline in black
- Make two smaller black circles with black for the eyes
- Color the eyes white
- Fill it in Red
- Make a White Circle in the center
- Draw a Garuda in the middle surrounded by half of a gear on the left and wheat on the right along with a five pointed star above the garuda's head in the circle all in black
- You're done!
| Color Name | HEX | RGB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red | #cd1127 | 205, 17, 39 | |
| White | #ffffff | 255, 255, 255 | |
| Black | #000000 | 0, 0, 0 | |
Self Insert Relations
Gem
Philosophical Nuggets thought - Gemmy, but far too short. Also not a fan of Agrarianism, Neoluddism, and Strasser.
Calmism - cool or whatever
Conor - Gem user.
Carbon
Ultroneism - It's certainly interesting to note about how an Egoist embraces tradition and sacrality and I certainly agree with much about what you have to say. Our value systems, you being an Egoist and me being a Collectivist seem contradictory, what I deem to be "Nihilism" is a heat death. A heat death of politics, a heat death of society, and so on which is only possible within a Unipolar perspective. You seem to only define Nihilism as destruction; whilst true that is how I define it but also the very lack of energy within the system, the lack of entropy which causes a breakdown of organised systems and so on. Reading the summary (I'm too lazy to actually read the dense stuff lmao), yeah I mostly agree with you.
Social Nationalism - a Nationalist SocDem, nothing to say tbh.
Alstūdism - Nationalistic Socialism is cool and all but why Fascism?.
Agricoetism - Alright i guess.
Great British New Left You're just Mark Fisher innit?
Patrick Thought - Nothing is really to be said, why Monarchism in America?
Coal
Zelligism - Whole Ideology has pretty much be dunked on by Marx in Chapter 3 of the German Ideology
I read it for myself. I wouldn't consider it a "debunking" of any kind but rather a criticism. He definitely has some valid points about the failures of Christianity and the fixed desire of sexual intercourse, but otherwise I'm going to have to kindly disagree. 
Barbaric Socialism - BRUH YOU ARE LITERALLY CONTRADICTORY TO YOU OWN VERY PREMISE AND EVERYTHING I HATE ABOUT INDIVIDUALIST POSTMODERNIST NONSENSE
Venatrixism - I don't like posties.
Second Anidiotoncrack Thought - Name says it all
Schumacherianism - Diabolical Libertarian jibber jabber
Shellshocked Communism - Stll kind of a hippie but still Anarcho-Larp with no real substance.
Hyperfascism - The one time I suggest a Non-Anarchist to read On Authority. Dugin takes from the Right is the appreciation of Tradition, not Supremacy. Communism rejects any kind of “sacredness” that Liberalism has for the Individual or Fascism has for the Nation and instead focuses on the critique of all that exists, this then we can place new lines of expression without it eating itself into Totalitarianism nor disintegrating itself into Individualism, this is what Dugin means when he wants to reject the Materialism that Communism upholds. Also, No, War is not a necessity for rejuvenation, one does not need to be in constant conflict to follow the Sufi path nor invent Algebra.
Hispanic Reactionary Monarchism - Reactionary Larper, not even the semi-decent ones (neoreactionaries)
Caesar Thought - boring reactionary fascist.
Baundoun Thoughts - I don’t like Reactionaries what do you expect?
Generouschalk0 thought - coal, no like solarpunk, ocalan, bookchin, democracy, or progressivism.
Hysteria Thought - Whole lotta yap, dawg you are NOT the next Nick Land. Poeticism is cool and all and Neologism, sure, if you can explain it but Dawg, YOU LITERALLY USE MULTIPLE FONTS JUST TO TALK ABOUT YOURSELF I AIN’T TRYNA DECIPHER FUCKING ANCIENT EGYPTIAN ASS LANGUAGE. Anyway too much yap to call yourself an AnCap.
Neo-StockMarketCrash Thought - Steaming Pile of Proudhonian, Tuckerite, National Anarchist Coal
DECBism - Atlanticist Brimstone
Brazilian Liberalism - a liberal what do you expect
Radenism - Silly.
Distributist Reactionarism - 13 year old who doesnt understand reaction
Necro-Anarchism - The Nyxian-NatAn pipeline is real
Timocratic Neocameralism - Watered down Neocameralism
Romantic Egoism - I don’t like Individualists.
Rigby Thought - erm wjat
Cosmic Vanguardism - White people stuff.
Lankajori Thought - Petit Bourgeoisie's strongest soldier.
 Nationalists - For The Motherland!
| |
| Moderate
|
Main Nativism • PatriotismRelated  Protectionism •  Isolationism Self-Inserts |
|---|---|
| Main
|
Main Nationalism •  Separatism •  Pan-NationalismDefinitions  Volkish Nationalism •  Ethnic Nationalism •  Cultural Nationalism •  Linguistic Nationalism •  Religious Nationalism •  Racial Nationalism •  Civic Nationalism •  Species NationalismApplication  Universal Nationalism •  Fictional Nationalism •  Left-Wing Nationalism •  Eco-NationalismRelated  Ethnopluralism •  Racism •  Directed Socialism •  Indigenism •  TinismOther Ideologies  National Agrarianism •  National Capitalism •  National Communism •  National Conservatism •  National Liberalism •  National Libertarianism •  Welfare Chauvinism
Self-Inserts |
 Chauvinists
|
 Ultranationalism •  Jingoism
Self-Inserts |
