×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,528 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

National Wodenism: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
(36 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 34: Line 34:
[[File:Messard2.png|link=Messardism]] [[File:LBubble.png]] Aussieman from Aussieland [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
[[File:Messard2.png|link=Messardism]] [[File:LBubble.png]] Aussieman from Aussieland [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
[[File:Occo.png|link=Leerderism]] [[File:LBubble.png]] Benevolent Fascism [[File:RBubble.png]]<br>
[[File:Occo.png|link=Leerderism]] [[File:LBubble.png]] Benevolent Fascism [[File:RBubble.png]]<br>
[[File:16384ism.png|link=16384ism]] [[File:LBubble.png]] National Woodenism [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>[[File:KKKonor pixels2.png|link=Conorism]][[File:LBubble.png]] farGOD[[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
[[File:KKKonor pixels2.png|link=Conorism]][[File:LBubble.png]] farGOD[[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
[[File:Wignat.png|link=White Nationalism]][[File:LBubble.png]] Homosexual Communist with Racist Tendencies [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
[[File:Wignat.png|link=White Nationalism]][[File:LBubble.png]] Homosexual Communist with Racist Tendencies [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
[[File:Hydra.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]] Retarded Nation State Political kind Modernist Globohomo Multiculturalist [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>[[File:Tsumugikotobuki8814ism.png|link=MugiKotobuki8814ism]][[File:LBubble.png]] [[File:(((FargothGares))).png]] Literally 1984 with Globohomo Jew sionist capitalist degeneracy [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
[[File:Hydra.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]] Retarded Nation State Political kind Modernist Globohomo Multiculturalist [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>[[File:Tsumugikotobuki8814ism.png|link=MugiKotobuki8814ism]][[File:LBubble.png]] [[File:(((FargothGares))).png]] Literally 1984 with Globohomo Jew sionist capitalist degeneracy [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
[[File:PollereIcon.png|link=Neo-Whiggism]] [[File:LBubble.png]] Mosley's gay pagan disowned child ( in the best way possible <3 ) [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
[[File:PollereIcon.png|link=Neo-Whiggism]] [[File:LBubble.png]] Mosley's gay pagan disowned child ( in the best way possible <3 ) [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
 
[[File:Acanidiot.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]] vargoth [[File:RBubble.png]]<br>
[[File:Nurisk.png|link=Nuriskianism]] [[File:LBubble.png]] [[File:FagGar.png]] FaggotGares [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
{{Alias|NCtheory.png|National-Communitarian_Theory|Fargie}}
|alignments =  
|alignments =  
{{Info/AuthLefts}}<br>
{{Info/AuthLefts}}<br>
Line 48: Line 50:
{{Info/Ultranationalists}} <br>
{{Info/Ultranationalists}} <br>
{{Info/CultRights}} <br>
{{Info/CultRights}} <br>
{{Info/CultAltMod}} <br>
{{Info/CultAltModGreen}} <br>
{{Info/Futurists}} <br>
{{Info/Pagan}} <br>
{{Info/Pagan}} <br>
{{Info/Fyrnsidere}} <br>
{{Info/Fyrnsidere}} <br>
Line 57: Line 60:
{{Info/FolkishSyndicalists}} <br>
{{Info/FolkishSyndicalists}} <br>


| influences   =
|influences =
<tabber>
<tabber>
Main=
Main=
[[File:Fash.png]] [[Fascism]]<br>
[[File:Fash.png]] [[Fascism]]<br>
[[File:Natsynd.png]] [[National Syndicalism]]<br>
[[File:Fashsynd.png]] [[National Syndicalism|Fascist Syndicalism]]<br>
[[File:BritFash.png]] [[British Fascism]]<br>
[[File:Cball-AngloSaxons.png]] [[Seperatism|English Seperatism]]<br>
[[File:Volknat.png]] [[Volkish Nationalism|English Nationalism]]<br>
[[File:Volknat.png]] [[Volkish Nationalism|English Nationalism]]<br>
[[File:RevNat.png]] [[Nationalism#Revolutionary Nationalism|Revolutionary Nationalism]] <br>
[[File:RepubNat.png]] [[Republicanism|Republican]] [[Nationalism|Nationalism]] <br>
[[File:PagNat.png]] [[Religious Nationalism#Pagan Nationalism|Pagan Nationalism]] <br>
[[File:Sansepolcrismo.png]] [[Fascism|Sansepolcrismo]] <br>
[[File:RamiroLedesmaRamos.png]] [[Falangism|JONSismo]] <br>
[[File:Juche.png]] [[Juche]] <br>
[[File:BritFash.png]] [[British Fascism|British Fascism]] <br>


|-|
|-|
Line 79: Line 87:
|-|
|-|
Government=
Government=
[[File:Totdem.png]] [[Authoritarian Democracy|Organic Democracy]]<br>
[[File:OrgDem.png]] [[Authoritarian Democracy|Organic Democracy]]<br>
[[File:FashParti.png]] [[Particracy|One-Party State]] <br>
[[File:Republicanismpix.png]] [[Republicanism]]<br>
[[File:Republicanismpix.png]] [[Republicanism]]<br>
[[File:Parl.png]] [[Parliamentarianism]] <br>
[[File:Parl.png]] [[Parliamentarianism]] <br>
[[File:Technocracy.png]] [[Technocracy]]<br>
[[File:Technocracy.png]] [[Technocracy]]<br>
[[File:Fyrnsidu.png]] {{PCBA|Norse Theocracy|State Fyrnsidu}}<br>
[[File:Fyrnsidu.png]] [[Norse Theocracy|State Fyrnsidu]]<br>
[[File:Corptism.png]] [[Corporatism]]<br>
[[File:Corptism.png]] [[Corporatism]]<br>
[[File:Unitary.png]] [[Centralism]]<br>
[[File:Unitary.png]] [[Centralism]]<br>
|-|
|-|
Society & Culture=
Society & Culture=
[[File:FreeCol.png]] [[Collectivism]]<br>
[[File:FreeCol.png]] [[Collectivism]]<br>
[[File:Anglofut.png]] {{PCBA|Norse Futurism|Anglo-Saxon Futurism}}<br>
[[File:Anglofut.png]] [[Norse Futurism|Anglo-Saxon Futurism]]<br>
[[File:AngloRev.png]] [[National Palingenesis|Anglo-Saxon Revivalism]]<br>
[[File:AngloRev.png]] [[National Palingenesis|Anglo-Saxon Revivalism]]<br>
[[File:Menslib.png]] [[Men's Liberation]]<br>
[[File:Menslib.png]] [[Men's Liberation]]<br>
[[File:Fem.png]] [[Feminism]]<br>
[[File:Fem.png]] [[Feminism]]<br>
[[File:DroppingT.png]] [[Progressive Conservatism|Mildly Pro-LGB]] <br>
[[File:TradPrgess.png]] [[Progressive Conservatism|Progressive Traditionalism]]<br>
[[File:TradPrgess.png]] [[Progressive Conservatism|Progressive Traditionalism]]<br>
[[File:NatRevBork.png]] [[National Palingenesis]] <br>
[[File:NatRevBork.png]] [[National Palingenesis]] <br>
[[File:Lingcon2.png]] {{PCBA|Linguistic Conservatism|English Linguistic Purism}}<br>
[[File:Lingcon2.png]] [[Linguistic Conservatism|English Linguistic Purism]]<br>
 
 
|-|
|-|
Diplomacy=  
Diplomacy=  
Line 106: Line 113:
[[File:Ethplur.png]] [[Ethnopluralism]]<br>
[[File:Ethplur.png]] [[Ethnopluralism]]<br>
[[File:Uninat.png]] [[Universal Nationalism]] <br>
[[File:Uninat.png]] [[Universal Nationalism]] <br>
[[File:Songun.png]] [[Juche|Songun]] <br>
|-|
Philosophy=
[[File:Gentile.png]] [[phil:Gentilianism|Actual Idealism]] <br>
[[File:Existentialism.png]] [[phil:Existentialism|Existentialism]] <br>
[[File:Hegel.png]] [[phil:Hegelianism|Hegelianism]] <br>


|-|
|-|
People=
People=
[[File:RamiroLedesmaRamos.png]] Ramiro Ledesma Ramos  (1905-1936) [[File:Cball-Spain.png]] Spain <br>
[[File:RamiroLedesmaRamos.png]] Ramiro Ledesma Ramos  (1905-1936) [[File:Cball-Spain.png]] Spain <br>
[[File:OswaldMosley.png]] Oswald Mosley  (1896–1980) [[File:Cball-UK.png]] United Kingdom <br>
[[File:Mussolini.png]] Benito Mussolini  (1883-1945) [[File:Cball-Italy.png]] Italy <br>
[[File:Mussolini.png]] Benito Mussolini  (1883-1945) [[File:Cball-Italy.png]] Italy <br>
[[File:Nicola_Bombacci.png]] Nicola Bombacci  (1879-1945) [[File:Cball-Italy.png]] Italy <br>
[[File:Rossoni.png]] Edmondo Rossoni  (1884-1965) [[File:Cball-Italy.png]] Italy <br>
[[File:Rossoni.png]] Edmondo Rossoni  (1884-1965) [[File:Cball-Italy.png]] Italy <br>
[[File:OswaldMosley.png]] Oswald Mosley  (1896–1980) [[File:Cball-UK.png]] United Kingdom <br>
[[File:JorianJenks.png]] Jorian Jenks  (1899-1963) [[File:Cball-UK.png]] United Kingdom <br>
|-|
|-|
Users=
Users=
Line 161: Line 177:
[[File:Ingfarg.png]] Orwellian Wodenism {{Collapse|
[[File:Ingfarg.png]] Orwellian Wodenism {{Collapse|
*[[File:Ingsocf.png]] [[Ingsoc|English Socialism]]
*[[File:Ingsocf.png]] [[Ingsoc|English Socialism]]
*[[File:PanBrit.png]] {{PCBA|Pan-Anglicism}}
*[[File:PanBrit.png]] [[Pan-Anglicism]]
*[[File:Caste.png]] [[Caste System]]
*[[File:Caste.png]] [[Caste System]]
*[[File:Ethno.png]] [[Ethnocracy]]
*[[File:Ethno.png]] [[Ethnocracy]]
Line 192: Line 208:
*[[File:Ismism_Icon.png]] [[Ismism|Ideology Shopping]]
*[[File:Ismism_Icon.png]] [[Ismism|Ideology Shopping]]
}}
}}
[[File:TikFarg.png]] Tiiket Wodenism {{Collapse|
[[File:TikFarg2.png]] Tiiket Wodenism {{Collapse|
*[[File:Anfashf.png]] [[Libertarian Fascism]]
*[[File:Fashbert2.png]] [[Libertarian Fascism]]
*[[File:Natprim.png]] [[National Primitvism|National Luddism]]
*[[File:BudGreek.png]] [[Buddhism|Hellenist Buddhism]]
*[[File:Crusade of Romanianism.png]] [[Crusade of Romanianism]]
*[[File:AncapSynd.png]] [[Anarcho-Syndicalism|Right-Libertarian Syndicalism]]
*[[File:Cball-Australia.png]] [[Austrian School|Austrian Economics]]
*[[File:Cball-Australia.png]] [[Austrian School|Austrian Economics]]
*[[File:Jackanfash.png]] [[Homofascism|Donovanism]]
*[[File:Homofash.png]] [[Homofascism]]
}}
}}
|song = [[File:Cball-England.png]] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3mpgGMhpl4 Rose of England] [[File:Nati.png]]<br>
|song = [[File:Cball-England.png]] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3mpgGMhpl4 Rose of England] [[File:Nati.png]]<br>
Line 202: Line 220:
[[File:Cball-England.png]] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_n537ydcGU&ab_channel=Lutras England, Arise!] [[File:Soc-h.png]]<br>
[[File:Cball-England.png]] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_n537ydcGU&ab_channel=Lutras England, Arise!] [[File:Soc-h.png]]<br>
[[File:Cball-England.png]] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AUwB53iQnM&ab_channel=GOJI England Awake!] [[File:Ethnat.png]]<br>
[[File:Cball-England.png]] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AUwB53iQnM&ab_channel=GOJI England Awake!] [[File:Ethnat.png]]<br>
[[File:Cball-England.png]] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsLhNxzwK1Y Living on a Thin Line] [[File:Nati.png]]<br>
[[File:Cball-AngloSaxons.png]] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=361Xm5XMB4w An England Scorned] [[File:Ethnat.png]]<br>
[[File:Cball-AngloSaxons.png]] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDy2p2PKqbI Ballad of the White Dragon] [[File:Ethnat.png]]<br>
[[File:Cball-UK.png]] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCkGnQ0AZv0 I Vow to Thee My Country] [[File:Nati.png]]<br>
[[File:Cball-UK.png]] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCkGnQ0AZv0 I Vow to Thee My Country] [[File:Nati.png]]<br>
[[File:Cball-UK.png]] [https://youtu.be/S33BwLnMmsA?si=cs-S_NjIdPlaZmaF Goodbye to the Crown] [[File:Republicanismpix.png]]<br>
[[File:Cball-UK.png]] [https://youtu.be/S33BwLnMmsA?si=cs-S_NjIdPlaZmaF Goodbye to the Crown] [[File:Republicanismpix.png]]<br>
Line 207: Line 228:
[[File:TLeveller.png]] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DD_v-5q5xwA Diggers Song] [[File:Agsoc.png]]<br>
[[File:TLeveller.png]] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DD_v-5q5xwA Diggers Song] [[File:Agsoc.png]]<br>
[[File:Altmusical.png]] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bI78eYkIJw Stiff Upper Lip] [[File:Antimultcult.png]]<br>
[[File:Altmusical.png]] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bI78eYkIJw Stiff Upper Lip] [[File:Antimultcult.png]]<br>
[[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rd4ZCzXVwUw&ab_channel=scryl Revolutionary Fervour] [[File:Revolution.png]]
|likes = [[File:Fyrnsidu.png]] The Faith <br>
|likes = [[File:Fyrnsidu.png]] The Faith <br>
[[File:Ethnonat.png]] The Blood <br>
[[File:Ethnonat.png]] The Blood <br>
Line 214: Line 234:
}}
}}


[[File:FargothJacobin.png]] '''National Wodenism''' or '''Fargothism''', are the politics of {{FargothGares}}. It is a [[File:Fash.png]] [[Fascism|Fascist]] ideology catered towards [[File:Cball-England.png]] [[Ultranationalism|English nationalism]] and [[File:Sep.png]] [[Separatism|separatism]], influenced by the [[File:RamiroLedesmaRamos.png]] [[Falangism|Spanish]], [[File:BritFash.png]] [[British Fascism|British]] and [[File:Classfash.png]] [[Fascism|Italian Fascists]] with its [[File:Technocracy.png]] [[Technocracy|technocratic]], [[File:Corptism.png]] [[Corporatism|corporatist]] and [[File:OrgDem.png]] [[Authoritarian Democracy|organic]] system of government. It is also [[File:Soc-h.png]] [[Socialism|economically far-left]], espousing an economy formed on [[File:Natsynd.png]] [[National Syndicalism|National Syndicalist]] principles. Its core goals are the creation of an [[File:Republicanismpix.png]] [[Republicanism|English Republic]] and a revival in [[File:Fyrnsidu.png]] {{PCBA|Norse Theocracy|Fyrnsidu}}. It stands staunchly opposed to [[File:Abunify.png]] [[Jewish Theocracy|Abr]][[Christian Theocracy|aha]][[Islamic Theocracy|mic]] [[Reactionarism|reaction]] [[File:Reactcross.png]] as well as [[File:Secular.png]] [[Secularism|Secular]] [[Progressivism|progressivism]] [[File:Violentprog.png]].
[[File:FargothJacobin.png]] '''National Wodenism''' or '''Fargothism''', are the politics of {{FargothGares}}. It is a [[File:Fash.png]] [[Fascism|Fascist]] ideology catered towards [[File:Cball-England.png]] [[Ultranationalism|English nationalism]] and [[File:Sep.png]] [[Separatism|separatism]], influenced by the [[File:RamiroLedesmaRamos.png]] [[Falangism|Spanish]], [[File:BritFash.png]] [[British Fascism|British]] and [[File:Classfash.png]] [[Fascism|Italian Fascists]] with its [[File:Technocracy.png]] [[Technocracy|technocratic]], [[File:Corptism.png]] [[Corporatism|corporatist]] and [[File:OrgDem.png]] [[Authoritarian Democracy|organic]] system of government. It is also [[File:Soc-h.png]] [[Socialism|economically far-left]], espousing an economy formed on [[File:Natsynd.png]] [[National Syndicalism|National Syndicalist]] principles. Its core goals are the creation of an [[File:Republicanismpix.png]] [[Republicanism|English Republic]] and a revival in [[File:Fyrnsidu.png]] [[Norse Theocracy|Fyrnsidu]]. It stands staunchly opposed to [[File:Abunify.png]] [[Jewish Theocracy|Abr]][[Christian Theocracy|aha]][[Islamic Theocracy|mic]] [[Reactionarism|reaction]] [[File:Reactcross2.png]] as well as [[File:Secular.png]] [[Secularism|Secular]] [[Progressivism|progressivism]] [[File:Violentprog.png]].
=={{BoldText|[[File:Historian.png]] Political Journey [[File:TimeCap.png]]}}==
=={{BoldText|[[File:Historian.png]] Political Journey [[File:TimeCap.png]]}}==
<tabber>
<tabber>
Line 267: Line 287:
==={{BoldText|[[File:Ethnat.png]] Defining the Nation [[File:Religious.png]]}}===
==={{BoldText|[[File:Ethnat.png]] Defining the Nation [[File:Religious.png]]}}===
National Wodenism embraces a [[file:Volknat.png]] [[Volkish Nationalism|classical interpretation of nationalism]], defining it as a combination of various characteristics including [[File:Ethnat.png]] ethnicity, [[File:Cultnat.png]] culture, [[File:Lingnat.png]] language, as well as [[File:PagNat.png]] religion. National Wodenism summarises the English nation in three points:
National Wodenism embraces a [[file:Volknat.png]] [[Volkish Nationalism|classical interpretation of nationalism]], defining it as a combination of various characteristics including [[File:Ethnat.png]] ethnicity, [[File:Cultnat.png]] culture, [[File:Lingnat.png]] language, as well as [[File:PagNat.png]] religion. National Wodenism summarises the English nation in three points:
#The Faith, being [[File:Fyrnsidu.png]] {{PCBA|Norse Theocracy|Fyrnsidu}}, "Old Customs" in Old English - the English strand of Germanic Paganism.
#The Faith, being [[File:Fyrnsidu.png]] [[Norse Theocracy|Fyrnsidu]], "Old Customs" in Old English - the English strand of Germanic Paganism.
# The Blood, being the English, an admixture of Celtic Britons and Germanic invaders.
# The Blood, being the English, an admixture of Celtic Britons and Germanic invaders.
# The Soil, that being England, nothing greater, and nothing lesser.
# The Soil, that being England, nothing greater, and nothing lesser.
Line 274: Line 294:
Today, an aura of fear surrounds the term  Anglo-Saxon. It is widely considered racist, not just to describe the [[File:Ethnat.png]] English national identity and heritage, but even among so-called [[File:Intelligentsia.png]] “intellectuals” of the school of [[File:Feud.png]] mediaevalism referring to [[File:Cball-AngloSaxons.png]] [[w:Anglo Saxons|historical Anglo-Saxons]]. It is said that the English are truly a [[File:PanCelt.png]] [[w:Celts|Celtic people]], in truth, 25-50% of the English gene pool is derived from the 5th century Germanic invaders and the modern Englishman is a unique mix of Briton and Angle/Saxon/Jute. The [[File:Res_Publica.png]] [[w:Roman people|Romans]] and [[File:Cball-Normandy.png]] [[w:Normans|Normans]] both left little to no genetic trace; their impact was entirely cultural and linguistic. As for the Celtic Britons, they left little cultural impact as they melted into the Anglo-Saxon culture, from which  [[File:Lingnat.png]] English language, [[File:Consti.png]] laws, [[File:Cultnat.png]] customs and so on are based in.  
Today, an aura of fear surrounds the term  Anglo-Saxon. It is widely considered racist, not just to describe the [[File:Ethnat.png]] English national identity and heritage, but even among so-called [[File:Intelligentsia.png]] “intellectuals” of the school of [[File:Feud.png]] mediaevalism referring to [[File:Cball-AngloSaxons.png]] [[w:Anglo Saxons|historical Anglo-Saxons]]. It is said that the English are truly a [[File:PanCelt.png]] [[w:Celts|Celtic people]], in truth, 25-50% of the English gene pool is derived from the 5th century Germanic invaders and the modern Englishman is a unique mix of Briton and Angle/Saxon/Jute. The [[File:Res_Publica.png]] [[w:Roman people|Romans]] and [[File:Cball-Normandy.png]] [[w:Normans|Normans]] both left little to no genetic trace; their impact was entirely cultural and linguistic. As for the Celtic Britons, they left little cultural impact as they melted into the Anglo-Saxon culture, from which  [[File:Lingnat.png]] English language, [[File:Consti.png]] laws, [[File:Cultnat.png]] customs and so on are based in.  


National Wodenism asserts the Anglo-Saxon identity of the English nation, calling for a [[File:NatRevBork.png]] [[National Palingenesis|national palingenesis for England]] [[File:AngloRev.png]] to do so. The most important aspect of this is the instatement of [[File:Fyrnsidu.png]] {{PCBA|Norse Theocracy|Fyrnsidu as the state religion}} and into many areas of public life. A cultural and [[File:Schoolicon.png]] [[Ultranationalism|educational focus on celebrating the importance]] of the Anglo-Saxons will be greatly valued, and efforts to [[File:Lingcon2.png]] {{PCBA|Linguistic Conservatism|de-romanticise the English language}} would be undertaken.
National Wodenism asserts the Anglo-Saxon identity of the English nation, calling for a [[File:NatRevBork.png]] [[National Palingenesis|national palingenesis for England]] [[File:AngloRev.png]] to do so. The most important aspect of this is the instatement of [[File:Fyrnsidu.png]] [[Norse Theocracy|Fyrnsidu as the state religion]] and into many areas of public life. A cultural and [[File:Schoolicon.png]] [[Ultranationalism|educational focus on celebrating the importance]] of the Anglo-Saxons will be greatly valued, and efforts to [[File:Lingcon2.png]] [[Linguistic Conservatism|de-romanticise the English language]] would be undertaken.


==={{BoldText|[[File:Sep.png]] Dismantling Britain [[File:Anti-British.png]]}}===
==={{BoldText|[[File:Sep.png]] Dismantling Britain [[File:Anti-British.png]]}}===
First and foremost, the prerequisite to a [[File:NatRevBork.png]] [[National Palingenesis|reborn English nation]] will be the dismantling of the [[File:Multicult.png]] [[Multiculturalism|multinational entity]] that is the [[File:Cball-UK.png]] United Kingdom, and the concept of a British "nation". With its origins entrenched in [[File:React.png]] [[Reactionarism|reactionary institutions]] as its very name states, the United Kingdom has worked not just to erode the culture and identity of the Celtic nations, but the English nation too, particularly in how it perceives itself. Call a Scot a Brit, and you better run as fast as you can, call an Englishman a Brit and he won't bat an eye. The idea of Britain is posited as a [[File:Civnat.png]] [[Civic Nationalism|shared identity]], yet it merely serves as the [[file:Imp.png]] [[Imperialism|vehicle of Anglicisation]] of the whole British Isles. If other members of the Union reject the label, why should the English accept it? An [[File:Sep.png]] [[Separatism|independent English state]] is evidently necessary to maintain and revive the distinct English national identity.
First and foremost, the prerequisite to a [[File:NatRevBork.png]] [[National Palingenesis|reborn English nation]] will be the dismantling of the [[File:Multicult.png]] [[Multiculturalism|multinational entity]] that is the [[File:Cball-UK.png]] United Kingdom, and the concept of a British "nation". With its origins entrenched in [[File:Reactcross2.png]] [[Reactionarism|reactionary institutions]] as its very name states, the United Kingdom has worked not just to erode the culture and identity of the Celtic nations, but the English nation too, particularly in how it perceives itself. Call a Scot a Brit, and you better run as fast as you can, call an Englishman a Brit and he won't bat an eye. The idea of Britain is posited as a [[File:Civnat.png]] [[Civic Nationalism|shared identity]], yet it merely serves as the [[file:Imp.png]] [[Imperialism|vehicle of Anglicisation]] of the whole British Isles. If other members of the Union reject the label, why should the English accept it? An [[File:Sep.png]] [[Separatism|independent English state]] is evidently necessary to maintain and revive the distinct English national identity.


National Wodenism too supports [[File:Ethplur.png]] [[Ethnopluralism|self-determination for the rest of the British Isles]], supporting [[File:Cball-Scotland.png]] [[w:Scottish independence|Scottish]] and [[File:Cball-Wales.png]] [[w:Welsh independence|Welsh independence]] as well as [[File:Cball-Ireland.png]] [[w:United Ireland|Irish reunification]]. As for the [[File:Cball-Cornwall.png]] [[w:Cornish people|Cornish]] and [[File:Cball-IsleOfMan.png]] [[w:Manx people|the Manx]], due to their small population and their assimilation, National Wodenism instead wants them to be recognised as native minorities within England and give them some degree of autonomy.
National Wodenism too supports [[File:Ethplur.png]] [[Ethnopluralism|self-determination for the rest of the British Isles]], supporting [[File:Cball-Scotland.png]] [[w:Scottish independence|Scottish]] and [[File:Cball-Wales.png]] [[w:Welsh independence|Welsh independence]] as well as [[File:Cball-Ireland.png]] [[w:United Ireland|Irish reunification]]. As for the [[File:Cball-Cornwall.png]] [[w:Cornish people|Cornish]] and [[File:Cball-IsleOfMan.png]] [[w:Manx people|the Manx]], due to their small population and their assimilation, National Wodenism instead wants them to be recognised as native minorities within England and give them some degree of autonomy.


=={{BoldText|[[File:Isolationist.png]] England on the World Stage [[File:Antiimp.png]]}}==
=={{BoldText|[[File:Isolationist.png]] England on the World Stage [[File:Antiimp.png]]}}==
The [[File:Cball-England.png]] [[w:England|English state]] will have to, first and foremost, focus on its survival. Much like the [[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] [[w:North Korea|DPRK]], the new England would be an [[File:Anti-Americanism.png]] {{PCBA|Anti-Americanism|anti-American}}, [[File:Anticap.png]] [[Anti-Capitalism|anti-Capitalist]] [[File:Ultranat.png]] [[Nationalism|nationalist]] state surrounded and threatened greatly by [[File:Cball-USA.png]] [[w:American imperialism|American influence]], as such [[File:Songun.png]] [[w:Songun|similar policies]] would have to be implemented. The state, upon establishing itself, would begin programs of [[File:Strato.png]] [[w:Militarization|militarisation]], driven by political and revolutionary fervour.
The [[File:Cball-England.png]] [[w:England|English state]] will have to, first and foremost, focus on its survival. Much like the [[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] [[w:North Korea|DPRK]], the new England would be an [[File:Anti-Americanism.png]] [[Anti-Americanism|anti-American]], [[File:Anticap.png]] [[Anti-Capitalism|anti-Capitalist]] [[File:Ultranat.png]] [[Nationalism|nationalist]] state surrounded and threatened greatly by [[File:Cball-USA.png]] [[w:American imperialism|American influence]], as such [[File:Songun.png]] [[w:Songun|similar policies]] would have to be implemented. The state, upon establishing itself, would begin programs of [[File:Strato.png]] [[w:Militarization|militarisation]], driven by political and revolutionary fervour.


England would remain neutral in most foreign affairs that don't directly concern it. The state would be unwilling to establish or join any international alliance, unless other nations move in the [[File:Fash.png]] [[Fascism|same ideological direction]]. The idea of a [[File:Fash.png]] [[w:1934 Montreux Fascist conference|Fascist International Congress]], as was attempted in Montreux, 1934, based purely as a network of solidarity and support between states sharing the same struggle against the liberal system would be considered, especially if said like-minded states were on the [[File:Cball-FolkSyndScotland.png]] [[File:Cball-FolkSyndWales.png]] [[w:British Isles|same archipelago]] [[File:Cball-FolkSyndIreland.png]].
England would remain neutral in most foreign affairs that don't directly concern it. The state would be unwilling to establish or join any international alliance, unless other nations move in the [[File:Fash.png]] [[Fascism|same ideological direction]]. The idea of a [[File:Fash.png]] [[w:1934 Montreux Fascist conference|Fascist International Congress]], as was attempted in Montreux, 1934, based purely as a network of solidarity and support between states sharing the same struggle against the liberal system would be considered, especially if said like-minded states were on the [[File:Cball-FolkSyndScotland.png]] [[File:Cball-FolkSyndWales.png]] [[w:British Isles|same archipelago]] [[File:Cball-FolkSyndIreland.png]].
Line 290: Line 310:
*[[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Ukrainians are not a nation, rather Ruthenians are;  [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia is in the right as much of southeastern "Ukraine" is, well, Russian.
*[[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Ukrainians are not a nation, rather Ruthenians are;  [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia is in the right as much of southeastern "Ukraine" is, well, Russian.
*[[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] The Democratic People's Republic of Korea is the legitimate state on the Korean Peninsula and should annex the [[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] Republic of Korea as soon as possible.
*[[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] The Democratic People's Republic of Korea is the legitimate state on the Korean Peninsula and should annex the [[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] Republic of Korea as soon as possible.
=={{BoldText|[[File:Fyrnsidu.png]] The Old Customs [[File:NorseTheo.png]]}}==
 
=={{BoldText|[[File:Corptism.png]] The Corporate State [[File:Totalitarian.png]]}}==
[[File:FargothJacobin.png]] National Wodenism, like any [[File:Fash.png]] [[Fascism|Fascist]] ideology, seeks to establish a [[File:Totalitarian.png]] [[Totalitarianism|totalitarian]] and [[Corporatism|corporate state]]. It opposes the [[File:Autotheism.png]] [[Absolute Monarchism|divine right of kings]], especially one claimed to be given by a [[File:Christy.png]] [[Christian Theocracy|foreign god]] and defending the rule of a foreign house. National Wodenism believes that the [[File:Monarch.png]] [[Monarchism|monarchy]] is an [[File:Reactcross2.png]] [[Reactionarism|obsolete]] and [[File:Conmon.png]] [[Constitutional Monarchism|lobotomised institution]], a drain on the nation which must be abolished, and the royalty, much like the [[File:Arist.png]] [[Aristocracy|aristocracy]] and [[File:Cap.png]] [[Capitalism|bourgeoisie]], are a privileged class with care only for their sectional interests that any true [[File:Nati.png]] [[Nationalism|nationalist]] will want to rid the nation of.
 
National Wodenism advocates for a bicameral [[File:Parl.png]] [[Parliamentarianism|parliamentary system]], with the lower house being reformed, into one of [[File:Corptism.png]] [[Corporatism|Corporations]], filled with [[File:Natsynd.png]] [[National Syndicalism|representatives of industries]], occupations and sciences, each governing their particular sphere and in a [[File:Merit.png]] [[Meritocracy|meritocratic]] and [[File:Technocracy.png]] [[Technocracy|technocratic]] structure. Parliamentary elections and [[File:FashParti.png]] [[Particracy|other political parties]] would be abolished, instead, a form of [[File:OrgDem.png]] [[Authoritarian Democracy|syndical and organic democracy]] would be established, voting by occupation as opposed to locality, for your representative in the lower chamber. In place of the archaic [[File:Arist.png]] [[Aristocracy|House of Lords]], the new upper house would be composed of candidates selected from the Chamber of Corporations, serving as the closest advisors of the [[File:Dictatorship.png]] [[Autocracy|Chancellor]].
 
=={{BoldText|Miscellaneous Opinions}}==
*Similar to the DPRK, National Wodenism wants to introduce a nationally mandated operating system based on Linux called White Dragon OS, along with a national intranet replacing the internet.
*National Wodenism wants to renationalise the railways, including bringing back regional liveries based on historical ones and named locomotives (like some Class 40s and many steam locomotives were) for no reason other than it would be pretty hecking cool


=={{BoldText|Relations}}==
=={{BoldText|Relations}}==
Line 298: Line 326:
{{BoldText|Everything here is solely based on political opinions, not personal}}
{{BoldText|Everything here is solely based on political opinions, not personal}}
=== [[File:Yes.png]] Good (7-10) ===
=== [[File:Yes.png]] Good (7-10) ===
*[[File:Alstudism1.png]] [[Alstūdism]] ([[File:Sansepolcrismo.png|link=Fascism]]/[[File:Natsynd.png|link=National Syndicalism]]/[[File:OrgDem.png|link=Authoritarian Democracy]]/[[File:NorseTheo.png|link={{PCBA|Norse Theocracy}}]]/[[File:Republicanismpix.png|link=Republicanism]]) - Quite happy I helped push you in this direction, I didn't think I would agree with someone politically this much. It's cool that we share [[File:FolkishSyndicalism.png]] [[Folkish Syndicalism|the same ideology]], everything you say is very agreeable and you're an excellent writer and debater. The only difference really is that you're an irredentist and I'm a separatist, but that merely stems from the different circumstances of our countries. (10/10)
*[[File:Alstudism1.png]] [[Alstūdism]] ([[File:Sansepolcrismo.png|link=Fascism]]/[[File:Natsynd.png|link=National Syndicalism]]/[[File:OrgDem.png|link=Authoritarian Democracy]]/[[File:NorseTheo.png|link=[[Norse Theocracy]]]]/[[File:Republicanismpix.png|link=Republicanism]]) - Quite happy I helped push you in this direction, I didn't think I would agree with someone politically this much. It's cool that we share [[File:FolkishSyndicalism.png]] [[Folkish Syndicalism|the same ideology]], everything you say is very agreeable and you're an excellent writer and debater. The only difference really is that you're an irredentist and I'm a separatist, but that merely stems from the different circumstances of our countries. (10/10)
*[[File:ImprovedCitizenIcon.png]] [[Improved Citizenism]] ([[File:Leftfash.png|link=Fascism]]/[[File:Natsynd.png|link=National Syndicalism]]/[[File:Totdem.png|link=Authoritarian Democracy]]/[[File:Ethplur.png|link=Ethnopluralism]]/[[File:TradPrgess.png|link=Progressive Conservatism]]) - You've gone from being the embodiment of all that I oppose to being extremely similar to myself. If I recall correctly you went from being a right-libertarian to an Agrarian socialist Jose Antonioite - rejecting Fascism for its totalitarianism - and as of recently you've entirely embraced Fascism. The biggest differences between us I believe is in religion and your agrarianism. (9/10)
*[[File:Agricoetism_icon.png]] [[Agricoetism]]  ([[File:Natsynd.png|link=National Syndicalism]]/[[File:Homofash.png|link=Homofascism]]/[[File:Progcon.png|link=Progressive Conservative]]/[[File:Agsoc.png|link=Agrarian Socialism]]/[[File:Authdem.png|link=Authoritarian Democracy]]) - A fellow syndicalist and a Pagan, there's quite a lot of common ground, the main disagreements between are us is on the extent of the state, centralisation of the economy, ethnic nationalism and industrialism, but apart from those I consider you rather ideologically close to myself (8/10)
*[[File:Agricoetism_icon.png]] [[Agricoetism]]  ([[File:Natsynd.png|link=National Syndicalism]]/[[File:Homofash.png|link=Homofascism]]/[[File:Progcon.png|link=Progressive Conservative]]/[[File:Agsoc.png|link=Agrarian Socialism]]/[[File:Authdem.png|link=Authoritarian Democracy]]) - A fellow syndicalist and a Pagan, there's quite a lot of common ground, the main disagreements between are us is on the extent of the state, centralisation of the economy, ethnic nationalism and industrialism, but apart from those I consider you rather ideologically close to myself (8/10)
=== [[File:Meh.png]] Mixed (4-6)===
=== [[File:Meh.png]] Mixed (4-6)===
*[[File:Immatureicon.png]] [[Immature Thought]] ([[File:PanMed.png|link=Pan-Nationalism]]/[[File:WPatriot.png|link=White Nationalism]]/[[File:Eugen.png|link=Eugenicism]]/[[File:Agrnac.png|link=National Agrarianism]]/[[File:Ethplur.png|link=Ethnopluralism]]) - I'm not too much a fan of your pan-nationalist and white nationalist tendencies, nor your eugenicism which I assume encompasses more than just the positive form. Our biggest areas of agreement are probably with ethnopluralism and on economics, you seem to be a third positionist of some kind, though i still take issue with permitting small business (5/10)
*[[File:Cosmic.png.png]] [[Cosmic Legionarism]] ([[File:Nazi.png|link=National Socialism]]/[[File:EsoHitler.png|link=Esoteric Fascism]]/[[File:SpiritualRacism.png|link=Racial Nationalism]]/[[File:Natsynd.png|link=National Syndicalism]]/[[File:Euronaticon.png|link=Pan-Nationalism]]) - There's much held in common ground, especially in being both Pagan third positionists; your economics, civics, social views are generally good, however we have major disagreements when it comes to your white (inter)nationalism and tripartism. While you have good takes on Abrahamic religion, I don't like your syncretism and occultism much. You are, I believe the only self-described National Socialist in this community who isn't a reactionary larper and that's respectable.  (5/10)
*[[File:Cosmic.png.png]] [[Cosmic Legionarism]] ([[File:Nazi.png|link=National Socialism]]/[[File:EsoHitler.png|link=Esoteric Fascism]]/[[File:SpiritualRacism.png|link=Racial Nationalism]]/[[File:Natsynd.png|link=National Syndicalism]]/[[File:Euronaticon.png|link=Pan-Nationalism]]) - There's much held in common ground, especially in being both Pagan third positionists; your economics, civics, social views are generally good, however we have major disagreements when it comes to your white (inter)nationalism and tripartism. While you have good takes on Abrahamic religion, I don't like your syncretism and occultism much. You are, I believe the only self-described National Socialist in this community who isn't a reactionary larper and that's respectable.  (5/10)
*[[File:Panth.png]] [[Pantheonism]] ([[File:Monarch.png|link=Monarchism]]/[[File:World_Federalism2.png|link=World Federalism]]/[[File:Guildsoc.png|link=Guild Socialism]]/[[File:Demsocstar.png|link=Democratic Socialism]]/[[File:Progcon.png|link=Progressive Conservatism]]) - You're not the worst, but some of your points such as world federalism, monarchism and sympathy to Israel are quite bad. Your economics are alright though. (4/10)
*[[File:Panth.png]] [[Pantheonism]] ([[File:Monarch.png|link=Monarchism]]/[[File:World_Federalism2.png|link=World Federalism]]/[[File:Guildsoc.png|link=Guild Socialism]]/[[File:Demsocstar.png|link=Democratic Socialism]]/[[File:Progcon.png|link=Progressive Conservatism]]) - You're not the worst, but some of your points such as world federalism, monarchism and sympathy to Israel are quite bad. Your economics are alright though. (4/10)
*[[File:Vistula3.png]] [[Vistulism]] ([[File:Marketsoc.png|link=Market Socialism]]/[[File:Tito.png|link=Titoism]]/[[File:SyndieSam.png|link=Syndicalism]]/[[File:Fed.png|link=Federalism]]/[[File:ArcitectReact.png|link=Architectural Reactionarism]]) - When it comes to your economics, you are well a market socialist and rather moderate, but they are okay I suppose. The fact that you want to maintain the House of Lords and want to establish a third house instead of replacing the archaic aristocratic house is silly. I like that you too also want an independent England, but this being out of wanting to satiate other separatisms and not English nationalism is depressing. (4/10)
*[[File:Vistula3.png]] [[Vistulism]] ([[File:Marketsoc.png|link=Market Socialism]]/[[File:Tito.png|link=Titoism]]/[[File:SyndieSam.png|link=Syndicalism]]/[[File:Fed.png|link=Federalism]]/[[File:ArcitectReact.png|link=Architectural Reactionarism]]) - When it comes to your economics, you are well a market socialist and rather moderate, but they are okay I suppose. The fact that you want to maintain the House of Lords and want to establish a third house instead of replacing the archaic aristocratic house is silly. I like that you too also want an independent England, but this being out of wanting to satiate other separatisms and not English nationalism is depressing. (4/10)
=== [[File:No.png]] Bad (0-3)===
=== [[File:No.png]] Bad (0-3)===
*[[File:galaxy.png]] [[Galaxaism]]([[File:IllibDem.png]]/[[File:AuthNatCon.png]]/[[File:PatConAuth.png]]/[[File:Statecap.png]]/[[File:Ultranat.png]]) - I hope this is still accurate to your views as I am typing this; while you are a corporatist, your capitalism discounts me from looking upon your economics views positively. Despite identifying as a Canadian ultranationalist you are hesitant to reject the [[File:Cball-US.png]] sole threat to Canadian independence and embrace hawkish foreign policy. When it comes to your philosophy, I find much of it quite evil and I'm not sure if you actually believe in a lot of it. (3/10)
*[[File:galaxy.png]] [[Galaxaism]]([[File:IllibDem.png]]/[[File:AuthNatCon.png]]/[[File:PatConAuth.png]]/[[File:Statecap.png]]/[[File:Ultranat.png]]) - I hope this is still accurate to your views as I am typing this; while you are a corporatist, your capitalism discounts me from looking upon your economics views positively. Despite identifying as a Canadian ultranationalist you are hesitant to reject the [[File:Cball-US.png]] sole threat to Canadian independence and embrace hawkish foreign policy. When it comes to your philosophy, I find much of it quite evil and I'm not sure if you actually believe in a lot of it. (3/10)
*[[File:Murb.png]] [[Nurulisme]] ([[File:Orth.png|link=Orthodox Theocracy]]/[[File:Councom.png|link=Council Communism]]/[[File:PostMarxism.png|link=Marxism]]/[[File:Sukarno.png|link=Pancasila]]/[[File:StateMarkSoc-Alt.png|link=Market Socialism]]) - I call you a [[File:LeftQuark.png]] "Left Quarkist" because like with Quark, I'm too retarded to understand your more esoteric takes, which share the subject of Capital. I'm not too into philosophy, but as that's a rather large part of your page, I can say it isn't very agreeable. Your Marxism is very much contradicted by your adherence to religion and nationalism (the latter being really one of the few things I appreciate about your ideology, even if a very moderate form of it). (3/10)
*[[File:Bbbbbbbbbbbbbb.png]] [[Distributist Reactionarism]] ([[File:Reactcross2.png|link=Reactionarism]]/[[File:Unimon.png|link=Universal Monarchism]]/[[File:TradCath.png|link=Catholic Theocracy]]/[[File:DistributistPFP.png|link=Distributism]]/[[File:Cdem.png|link=Christian Democracy]]) - Not really anything we can agree on, I am a modernist, pagan, nationalist while you are a reactionary, christian globalist. You have a few silly takes about synthesising liberal democracy with reactionaryism and other than that you're just a standard reactionary, only maybe a tiny bit of overlap in corporatist economics. (3/10)
*[[File:Nurisk.png]] [[Nuriskianism]] ([[File:Euras.png|link=Fourth Theory]]/[[File:Panc.png|link=Pancasilam]]/[[File:PostMarxism.png|link=Marxism]]/[[File:Trad.png|link=Traditionalism]]/[[File:Natcom.png|link=National Communism]]) - I call you a [[File:LeftQuark.png]] "Left Quarkist" because like with Quark, I'm too retarded to understand your more esoteric takes, which share the subject of Capital. I'm not too into philosophy, but as that's a rather large part of your page, I can say it isn't very agreeable. Your Marxism is very much contradicted by your adherence to religion and nationalism (the latter being really one of the few things I appreciate about your ideology, even if a very moderate form of it). (3/10)
*[[File:Caladanism2.png]] [[Caladanism]] ([[File:PanAsian.png|link=Racial Nationalism]]/[[File:Edelismpixel.png|link=Edelexianism (Disambiguation)]]/[[File:Mat-0.png|link=Matriarchy]]/[[File:ReactFash.png|link=Reactionarism]]/[[File:Sillyism.png|link=Sillyism]]) - Your civics are fine, though the presidential election aspect is a little odd. Economically there isn't too much to comment on, other than I'm against tripartism. Your pan-nationalism is pretty dislikable, and goes without saying I do not at all like your anti-Anglo sentiment with very silly and flimsy justifications. Socially, your views on women and marriage are gross and unreasonable and overall your sillyness is beyond comprehension (3/10)
*[[File:Mishismicon.png]] [[Mishism]] ([[File:Anin.png|link=Anarcho-Individualism]]/[[File:Mutalist.png|link=Mutalism]]/[[File:LeftRothbardianismPix.png|link=Left-Rothbardianism]]/[[File:Panarchy.png|link=Panarchism]]/[[File:Agorismf.png|link=Agorism]]) - There's not much I can say I like about your ideology, it's a combination of some of the worse kinds of anarchism. You're a chill dude and I would say the most agreeable sections are on social views and environmentalism. (2/10)
*[[File:Mishismicon.png]] [[Mishism]] ([[File:Anin.png|link=Anarcho-Individualism]]/[[File:Mutalist.png|link=Mutalism]]/[[File:LeftRothbardianismPix.png|link=Left-Rothbardianism]]/[[File:Panarchy.png|link=Panarchism]]/[[File:Agorismf.png|link=Agorism]]) - There's not much I can say I like about your ideology, it's a combination of some of the worse kinds of anarchism. You're a chill dude and I would say the most agreeable sections are on social views and environmentalism. (2/10)
*[[File:TIIKKET.png]] [[TIIKKETMASTER Thought]] ([[File:Neobert.png|link=Neo-Libertarianism]]/[[File:Rural.png|link=Ruralism]]/[[File:InfRevolutionaryism.png|link=Revolutionary Progressivism]]/[[File:Darwinist.png|link=Social Darwinism ]]/[[File:Hay.png|link=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hay]]) - Most of the stuff I see on your page is quite evil, I wasn't aware your influence from Kaczynski had moved away from luddism to just plain ruralism, but becoming a transhumanist is quite vile. Really the only part of your page I could find agreeable were some of the enviromentalist parts. (1/10)
*[[File:TIIKKET.png]] [[TIIKKETMASTER Thought]] ([[File:Neobert.png|link=Neo-Libertarianism]]/[[File:Rural.png|link=Ruralism]]/[[File:InfRevolutionaryism.png|link=Revolutionary Progressivism]]/[[File:Darwinist.png|link=Social Darwinism ]]/[[File:Hay.png|link=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hay]]) - Most of the stuff I see on your page is quite evil, I wasn't aware your influence from Kaczynski had moved away from luddism to just plain ruralism, but becoming a transhumanist is quite vile. Really the only part of your page I could find agreeable were some of the enviromentalist parts. (1/10)
*[[File:Lankathought.png]] [[Lankajori Thought]] ([[File:Minarchist.png|link=Minarchism]]/[[File:AustrianSchool.png|link=Austrian School]]/[[File:Parl.png|link=Parliamentarianism]]/[[File:Rural.png|link=Ruralism]]/[[File:Hcon.png|link=Homoconservatism]]) - Not much to agree on really, you're extremely capitalist libertarian and Christian which are things I am certainly no fan of, and I also don't like your ruralism either. The NAP is very very silly and your idea for a parliament is interesting. (1/10)
*[[File:Brazlib.png]] [[Brazilian Liberalism]] ([[File:3way.png|link=Third Way]]/[[File:Libhawk.png|link=Neoconservatism]]/[[File:Humanismpix.png|link=Humanism]]/[[File:CivUltranat.png|link=Civic Nationalism]]/[[File:Zio.png|link=Zionism]]) - You are the final boss of liberalism; your political views in just about every way are vile and there's really nothing I could say I agree with (0/10)
*[[File:Brazlib.png]] [[Brazilian Liberalism]] ([[File:3way.png|link=Third Way]]/[[File:Libhawk.png|link=Neoconservatism]]/[[File:Humanismpix.png|link=Humanism]]/[[File:CivUltranat.png|link=Civic Nationalism]]/[[File:Zio.png|link=Zionism]]) - You are the final boss of liberalism; your political views in just about every way are vile and there's really nothing I could say I agree with (0/10)
|-|
|-|
Line 319: Line 349:


===[[File:Kinda_Yes.png]] Alright [[File:Kinda_Yes.png]]===
===[[File:Kinda_Yes.png]] Alright [[File:Kinda_Yes.png]]===
*[[File:Mussolini.png]] [[Fascism|Benito Mussolini]] ([[File:Classfash.png|link=Moderatism]]/[[File:Unitary.png|link=Centralism]]/[[File:Gentile.png|link=Fascism]]/[[File:OrgDem.png|link=Authoritarian Democracy]]/[[File:Corptism.png|link=Corporatism]])  
*[[File:Mussolini.png]] [[Fascism|Benito Mussolini]] ([[File:Classfash.png|link=Moderatism]]/[[File:Unitary.png|link=Centralism]]/[[File:Gentile.png|link=Fascism]]/[[File:OrgDem.png|link=Authoritarian Democracy]]/[[File:Corptism.png|link=Corporatism]]) An obviously important figure in Fascism and a major influence, you were a great leader for Italy and put Fascism into practice, but still made too many compromises with the monarchists, conservatives and later on the Germans.
*[[File:OswaldMosley.png]] [[British Fascism|Oswald Mosley]] ([[File:BritFash.png|link=British Fascism]]/[[File:Corptism.png|link=Corporatism]]/[[File:Isolationist.png|link=Isolationism]]/[[File:Monarch.png|link=Monarchism]]/[[File:Protfash.png|link=Clerical Fascism]])  
*[[File:OswaldMosley.png]] [[British Fascism|Oswald Mosley]] ([[File:BritFash.png|link=British Fascism]]/[[File:Corptism.png|link=Corporatism]]/[[File:Isolationist.png|link=Isolationism]]/[[File:Monarch.png|link=Monarchism]]/[[File:Protfash.png|link=Clerical Fascism]]) Despite being a really good writer and a big influence on me getting into Fascism, you were entrenched in an aristocratic background, and unlike the Italian Fascists who merely compromised their republicanism with the monarchy, your movement from the getgo were its staunchest defenders. Your defeatism in the face of the Germans is also quite negative.
===[[File:Meh.png]] Middling [[File:Meh.png]]===  
===[[File:Meh.png]] Middling [[File:Meh.png]]===
*[[File:EricCampbell.png]] [[Monarcho-Fascism|Eric Campbell]] ([[File:NewGuard.png|link=Monarcho-Fascism]]/[[File:Corptism.png|link=Corporatism]]/[[File:Monarch.png|link=Monarchism]]/[[File:Imp.png|link=Imperialism]]/[[File:Antisoc.png|link=Anti-Socialism]]) - You were the forefront advocate of the Corporate State in Australia; your movement was closely tied to the British Union of Fascists and as such your views are inadequete in many of the same ways - defending the monarchy for example. What makes you worse than him is your economics being even more moderate than his and some of the absolutely retarded things you said, like denouncing the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Australia_Party United Australia Party] as "socialist" as well as claiming [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Lang_(Australian_politician) Lang Labor], the radically anti-Communist faction of the already succ-y Labor Party, had a "marxian mind".
*[[File:EricCampbell.png]] [[Monarcho-Fascism|Eric Campbell]] ([[File:NewGuard.png|link=Monarcho-Fascism]]/[[File:Corptism.png|link=Corporatism]]/[[File:Monarch.png|link=Monarchism]]/[[File:Imp.png|link=Imperialism]]/[[File:Antisoc.png|link=Anti-Socialism]]) You were the forefront advocate of the Corporate State in Australia; your movement was closely tied to the British Union of Fascists and as such your views are inadequete in many of the same ways - defending the monarchy for example. What makes you worse than him is your economics being even more moderate than his and some of the absolutely retarded things you said, like denouncing the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Australia_Party United Australia Party] as "socialist" as well as claiming [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Lang_(Australian_politician) Lang Labor], the radically anti-Communist faction of the already succ-y Labor Party, had a "marxian mind".
*[[File:PRStephensen.png]] [[National Socialism|P.R. Stephensen]] ([[File:National Socialism.png|link=National Socialism]]/[[File:Isolationist.png|link=Isolationism]]/[[File:Native.png|link=Indigenism]]/[[File:Monarch.png|link=Monarchism]]/[[File:Anti-British.png|link=Anglophobia]]) Pretty interesting figure, the idea of national socialists advocating for aboriginal rights is rather amusing, and the idea of a palingenesis surrounding their traditions is interesting. You are better than Campbell in terms of wanting to break from the British Empire, however the sympathy for Japan damages how I view your foreign policy. You and your movement were of communist roots and from what I can gather, your economics would probably be superior to Campbell's. No idea however how you are still a monarchist considering your foreign policy. Overall, between you and Campbell, I can't really pick one over the other, you both have quite significant flaws.
===[[File:Kinda_No.png]] Inadequate [[File:Kinda_No.png]]===
===[[File:Kinda_No.png]] Inadequate [[File:Kinda_No.png]]===


Line 462: Line 493:
<gallery>
<gallery>
File:NatWodconor.png| By Conor :)
File:NatWodconor.png| By Conor :)
File:(⁠。⁠・⁠ω⁠・⁠。⁠).png| By Hysteria :)
File:Hallo Borker.png| Hallo Borker, by [[File:Brazlib.png]] [[Brazilian Liberalism|Killer Kitty]]
File:Hallo Borker.png| Hallo Borker, by [[File:Brazlib.png]] [[Brazilian Liberalism|Killer Kitty]]
File:Fargoth_Bounce.gif| By Quark :)
File:Fargoth title.png| By Darkegg :)
</gallery>
</gallery>
|-|
|-|
Line 469: Line 503:
File:FargothDzvGif.gif| GIF of all my DozenValues results
File:FargothDzvGif.gif| GIF of all my DozenValues results
File:FargothSapplyComp.png| Compilation of my Sapplyvalues, darkest is oldest, lightest is newest
File:FargothSapplyComp.png| Compilation of my Sapplyvalues, darkest is oldest, lightest is newest
File:Fargoth8V.png| 8Values
File:Fargoth4O.png| 4Orbs
File:FargothDV.png| DozenValues
File:FargothPS.png| PolitiScales
File:Fargoth9A.png| 9Axes
File:FargothLV.png| LeftValues
</gallery>
</gallery>
</tabber>
</tabber>

Latest revision as of 08:22, 31 October 2024

Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent FargothGares's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

Work in Progress
"I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism

This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details.


National Wodenism or Fargothism, are the politics of FargothGares. It is a Fascist ideology catered towards English nationalism and separatism, influenced by the Spanish, British and Italian Fascists with its technocratic, corporatist and organic system of government. It is also economically far-left, espousing an economy formed on National Syndicalist principles. Its core goals are the creation of an English Republic and a revival in Fyrnsidu. It stands staunchly opposed to Abrahamic reaction as well as Secular progressivism .

Political Journey

I wasn't very political but I definitely leaned very very moderately left, had a favourable opinion of the monarchy and disliked religion.

Social Democrat

  • Secularism
  • Monarchism

I became to be more politically aware, and I took a great disliking to the Liberal Party, the USA and the Murdoch media, and believed authoritarian measures were justified in curbing their influence, while also becoming rabidly Reddit religion-wise. My love for the monarchy moved from just liking the aesthetics to thinking it was something that gave Australia identity, and I felt that republicanism would Americanise Australia. Don't ask how the house of Windsor would co-exist with state atheism btw

Proto-Fargothism

  • Social Authoritarian
  • State Atheist
  • Monarchism
  • Bi-Cultural Nationalism
  • Australian Nationalism
  • Ultra Anti-Americanism

Really my transitionary phase to Fascism, I just called myself a third positionist because I thought fascism was inherently christian (??????????)

I became a Republican and a Pagan towards the end of this phase
Third Position

  • Bi-Cultural Nationalism
  • Monarchism
  • Australian Nationalism

I had come to realise that I shared much in common with Fascism and reading into it I began to find it rather agreeable. Becoming a Pagan helped to push me in the direction of English diaspora nationalism.

I was mostly the same as I am now, the biggest difference is that I am for class conflict rather than collaboration. My worst takes from this period was that I used to be sympathetic to zionism and electoralism.
Fascism

  • Mosleyism
  • State Fyrnsidu
  • Republicanism
  • English Nationalism

I realised that electoralism as a path to fascism was unreasonable, and this also influenced my economic views and I embraced a revolutionary, working class-oriented Fascism.

Left Fascism

  • National Syndicalism
  • State Fyrnsidu
  • Republicanism
  • English Nationalism

England a Nation

Defining the Nation

National Wodenism embraces a classical interpretation of nationalism, defining it as a combination of various characteristics including ethnicity, culture, language, as well as religion. National Wodenism summarises the English nation in three points:

  1. The Faith, being Fyrnsidu, "Old Customs" in Old English - the English strand of Germanic Paganism.
  2. The Blood, being the English, an admixture of Celtic Britons and Germanic invaders.
  3. The Soil, that being England, nothing greater, and nothing lesser.

National Wodenism critcises New World states, products of European imperialism for being unable to form a national identity the same way Old World nations can. Supporting ethnopluralism and universal nationalism, it believes that peoples should stick to their native faiths and native lands, and that there is an explicit lack of connection between the descendents of colonists and the land they reside - in contrast to the Native Americans or Australians who have lived on that land and formed nations for thousands of years. National Wodenism rejects the idea of Anglosphere unity and posits that the only homeland of the English is England.

Anglo-Saxon?

Today, an aura of fear surrounds the term Anglo-Saxon. It is widely considered racist, not just to describe the English national identity and heritage, but even among so-called “intellectuals” of the school of mediaevalism referring to historical Anglo-Saxons. It is said that the English are truly a Celtic people, in truth, 25-50% of the English gene pool is derived from the 5th century Germanic invaders and the modern Englishman is a unique mix of Briton and Angle/Saxon/Jute. The Romans and Normans both left little to no genetic trace; their impact was entirely cultural and linguistic. As for the Celtic Britons, they left little cultural impact as they melted into the Anglo-Saxon culture, from which English language, laws, customs and so on are based in.

National Wodenism asserts the Anglo-Saxon identity of the English nation, calling for a national palingenesis for England to do so. The most important aspect of this is the instatement of Fyrnsidu as the state religion and into many areas of public life. A cultural and educational focus on celebrating the importance of the Anglo-Saxons will be greatly valued, and efforts to de-romanticise the English language would be undertaken.

Dismantling Britain

First and foremost, the prerequisite to a reborn English nation will be the dismantling of the multinational entity that is the United Kingdom, and the concept of a British "nation". With its origins entrenched in reactionary institutions as its very name states, the United Kingdom has worked not just to erode the culture and identity of the Celtic nations, but the English nation too, particularly in how it perceives itself. Call a Scot a Brit, and you better run as fast as you can, call an Englishman a Brit and he won't bat an eye. The idea of Britain is posited as a shared identity, yet it merely serves as the vehicle of Anglicisation of the whole British Isles. If other members of the Union reject the label, why should the English accept it? An independent English state is evidently necessary to maintain and revive the distinct English national identity.

National Wodenism too supports self-determination for the rest of the British Isles, supporting Scottish and Welsh independence as well as Irish reunification. As for the Cornish and the Manx, due to their small population and their assimilation, National Wodenism instead wants them to be recognised as native minorities within England and give them some degree of autonomy.

England on the World Stage

The English state will have to, first and foremost, focus on its survival. Much like the DPRK, the new England would be an anti-American, anti-Capitalist nationalist state surrounded and threatened greatly by American influence, as such similar policies would have to be implemented. The state, upon establishing itself, would begin programs of militarisation, driven by political and revolutionary fervour.

England would remain neutral in most foreign affairs that don't directly concern it. The state would be unwilling to establish or join any international alliance, unless other nations move in the same ideological direction. The idea of a Fascist International Congress, as was attempted in Montreux, 1934, based purely as a network of solidarity and support between states sharing the same struggle against the liberal system would be considered, especially if said like-minded states were on the same archipelago .

Of the conflicts that National Wodenism does take a stance on:

  • Israel, a settler-colonial state actively genociding and eroding the Palestinian people, dictating western states to follow its will, must be wiped off the face of the earth, along with all of its financiers and shills.
  • Ukrainians are not a nation, rather Ruthenians are; Russia is in the right as much of southeastern "Ukraine" is, well, Russian.
  • The Democratic People's Republic of Korea is the legitimate state on the Korean Peninsula and should annex the Republic of Korea as soon as possible.

The Corporate State

National Wodenism, like any Fascist ideology, seeks to establish a totalitarian and corporate state. It opposes the divine right of kings, especially one claimed to be given by a foreign god and defending the rule of a foreign house. National Wodenism believes that the monarchy is an obsolete and lobotomised institution, a drain on the nation which must be abolished, and the royalty, much like the aristocracy and bourgeoisie, are a privileged class with care only for their sectional interests that any true nationalist will want to rid the nation of.

National Wodenism advocates for a bicameral parliamentary system, with the lower house being reformed, into one of Corporations, filled with representatives of industries, occupations and sciences, each governing their particular sphere and in a meritocratic and technocratic structure. Parliamentary elections and other political parties would be abolished, instead, a form of syndical and organic democracy would be established, voting by occupation as opposed to locality, for your representative in the lower chamber. In place of the archaic House of Lords, the new upper house would be composed of candidates selected from the Chamber of Corporations, serving as the closest advisors of the Chancellor.

Miscellaneous Opinions

  • Similar to the DPRK, National Wodenism wants to introduce a nationally mandated operating system based on Linux called White Dragon OS, along with a national intranet replacing the internet.
  • National Wodenism wants to renationalise the railways, including bringing back regional liveries based on historical ones and named locomotives (like some Class 40s and many steam locomotives were) for no reason other than it would be pretty hecking cool

Relations

Everything here is solely based on political opinions, not personal

Good (7-10)

  • Alstūdism (////) - Quite happy I helped push you in this direction, I didn't think I would agree with someone politically this much. It's cool that we share the same ideology, everything you say is very agreeable and you're an excellent writer and debater. The only difference really is that you're an irredentist and I'm a separatist, but that merely stems from the different circumstances of our countries. (10/10)
  • Agricoetism (////) - A fellow syndicalist and a Pagan, there's quite a lot of common ground, the main disagreements between are us is on the extent of the state, centralisation of the economy, ethnic nationalism and industrialism, but apart from those I consider you rather ideologically close to myself (8/10)

Mixed (4-6)

  • Immature Thought (////) - I'm not too much a fan of your pan-nationalist and white nationalist tendencies, nor your eugenicism which I assume encompasses more than just the positive form. Our biggest areas of agreement are probably with ethnopluralism and on economics, you seem to be a third positionist of some kind, though i still take issue with permitting small business (5/10)
  • Cosmic Legionarism (////) - There's much held in common ground, especially in being both Pagan third positionists; your economics, civics, social views are generally good, however we have major disagreements when it comes to your white (inter)nationalism and tripartism. While you have good takes on Abrahamic religion, I don't like your syncretism and occultism much. You are, I believe the only self-described National Socialist in this community who isn't a reactionary larper and that's respectable. (5/10)
  • Pantheonism (////) - You're not the worst, but some of your points such as world federalism, monarchism and sympathy to Israel are quite bad. Your economics are alright though. (4/10)
  • Vistulism (////) - When it comes to your economics, you are well a market socialist and rather moderate, but they are okay I suppose. The fact that you want to maintain the House of Lords and want to establish a third house instead of replacing the archaic aristocratic house is silly. I like that you too also want an independent England, but this being out of wanting to satiate other separatisms and not English nationalism is depressing. (4/10)

Bad (0-3)

  • Galaxaism(////) - I hope this is still accurate to your views as I am typing this; while you are a corporatist, your capitalism discounts me from looking upon your economics views positively. Despite identifying as a Canadian ultranationalist you are hesitant to reject the sole threat to Canadian independence and embrace hawkish foreign policy. When it comes to your philosophy, I find much of it quite evil and I'm not sure if you actually believe in a lot of it. (3/10)
  • Distributist Reactionarism (////) - Not really anything we can agree on, I am a modernist, pagan, nationalist while you are a reactionary, christian globalist. You have a few silly takes about synthesising liberal democracy with reactionaryism and other than that you're just a standard reactionary, only maybe a tiny bit of overlap in corporatist economics. (3/10)
  • Nuriskianism (////) - I call you a "Left Quarkist" because like with Quark, I'm too retarded to understand your more esoteric takes, which share the subject of Capital. I'm not too into philosophy, but as that's a rather large part of your page, I can say it isn't very agreeable. Your Marxism is very much contradicted by your adherence to religion and nationalism (the latter being really one of the few things I appreciate about your ideology, even if a very moderate form of it). (3/10)
  • Caladanism (////) - Your civics are fine, though the presidential election aspect is a little odd. Economically there isn't too much to comment on, other than I'm against tripartism. Your pan-nationalism is pretty dislikable, and goes without saying I do not at all like your anti-Anglo sentiment with very silly and flimsy justifications. Socially, your views on women and marriage are gross and unreasonable and overall your sillyness is beyond comprehension (3/10)
  • Mishism (////) - There's not much I can say I like about your ideology, it's a combination of some of the worse kinds of anarchism. You're a chill dude and I would say the most agreeable sections are on social views and environmentalism. (2/10)
  • TIIKKETMASTER Thought (////) - Most of the stuff I see on your page is quite evil, I wasn't aware your influence from Kaczynski had moved away from luddism to just plain ruralism, but becoming a transhumanist is quite vile. Really the only part of your page I could find agreeable were some of the enviromentalist parts. (1/10)
  • Lankajori Thought (////) - Not much to agree on really, you're extremely capitalist libertarian and Christian which are things I am certainly no fan of, and I also don't like your ruralism either. The NAP is very very silly and your idea for a parliament is interesting. (1/10)
  • Brazilian Liberalism (////) - You are the final boss of liberalism; your political views in just about every way are vile and there's really nothing I could say I agree with (0/10)

Brilliant

Good

Alright

  • Benito Mussolini (////) An obviously important figure in Fascism and a major influence, you were a great leader for Italy and put Fascism into practice, but still made too many compromises with the monarchists, conservatives and later on the Germans.
  • Oswald Mosley (////) Despite being a really good writer and a big influence on me getting into Fascism, you were entrenched in an aristocratic background, and unlike the Italian Fascists who merely compromised their republicanism with the monarchy, your movement from the getgo were its staunchest defenders. Your defeatism in the face of the Germans is also quite negative.

Middling

  • Eric Campbell (////) You were the forefront advocate of the Corporate State in Australia; your movement was closely tied to the British Union of Fascists and as such your views are inadequete in many of the same ways - defending the monarchy for example. What makes you worse than him is your economics being even more moderate than his and some of the absolutely retarded things you said, like denouncing the United Australia Party as "socialist" as well as claiming Lang Labor, the radically anti-Communist faction of the already succ-y Labor Party, had a "marxian mind".
  • P.R. Stephensen (////) Pretty interesting figure, the idea of national socialists advocating for aboriginal rights is rather amusing, and the idea of a palingenesis surrounding their traditions is interesting. You are better than Campbell in terms of wanting to break from the British Empire, however the sympathy for Japan damages how I view your foreign policy. You and your movement were of communist roots and from what I can gather, your economics would probably be superior to Campbell's. No idea however how you are still a monarchist considering your foreign policy. Overall, between you and Campbell, I can't really pick one over the other, you both have quite significant flaws.

Inadequate

Bad

Disastrous

Literature

Have Read

  • - The Doctrine of Fascism
  • - Fascism: 100 Questions Asked and Answered
  • - Fascism for the Million
  • - The Land and the People
  • - The New Road

Reading

  • - Anthology of Ramiro Ledesma Ramos

Movements

Countries and movements that I support and would align myself with, modern or historical.

Comrades

  • Levellers & Diggers (Great Britain, 1646-1651)
  • French Revolution (France, 1789 –1799)
  • Kingdom of Italy (Italy, 1922-1943)
  • Councils of National-Syndicalist Offensive (Spain, 1931-1934)
  • British Union of Fascists (Great Britain, 1932-1940)
  • Pērkonkrusts (Latvia, 1933-1944)
  • Falange de las JONS (Spain, 1934-1937)
  • Italian Social Republic (Italy, 1943-1945)
  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea (Korea, 1948-)
  • 26th of July Movement (Cuba, 1955-1962)

Mixed

  • Crusade of Romanianism (Romania, 1934-1937)
  • CasaPound Italia (Italy, 2003-)

Enemies

How I Would’ve Voted

Social Democracymaxxing

  • 1901 - - No leader (Labor)
  • 1903 - - Chris Watson (Labor)
  • 1906 - - Chris Watson (Labor)
  • 1910 - - Andrew Fisher (Labor)
  • 1913 - - Andrew Fisher (Labor)
  • 1914 - - Andrew Fisher (Labor)
  • 1917 - - Frank Tudor (Labor)
  • 1919 - - Frank Tudor (Labor)
  • 1922 - - Matthew Charlton (Labor)
  • 1925 - - Matthew Charlton (Labor)
  • 1928 - - James Scullin (Labor)
  • 1929 - - James Scullin (Labor)
  • 1931 - - Jack Lang (Lang Labor)
  • 1934 - - Jack Lang (Lang Labor)
  • 1937 - - John Curtin (Labor)
  • 1940 - - Jack Lang (Lang Labor)
  • 1943 - - John Curtin (Labor)
  • 1946 - - Jack Lang (Lang Labor)
  • 1949 - - Ben Chifley (Labor)
  • 1951 - - Ben Chifley (Labor)
  • 1954 - - H. V. Evatt (Labor)
  • 1955 - - H. V. Evatt (Labor)
  • 1958 - - H. V. Evatt (Labor)
  • 1961 - - Arthur Calwell (Labor)
  • 1963 - - Arthur Calwell (Labor)
  • 1966 - - Arthur Calwell (Labor)
  • 1969 - - Gough Whitlam (Labor)
  • 1972 - - Gough Whitlam (Labor)
  • 1974 - - Gough Whitlam (Labor)
  • 1975 - - Gough Whitlam (Labor)
  • 1977 - - Gough Whitlam (Labor)
  • 1980 - - Bill Hayden (Labor)
  • 1983 - - Bob Hawke (Labor)
  • 1984 - - Bob Hawke (Labor)
  • 1987 - - Bob Hawke (Labor)
  • 1990 - - Bob Hawke (Labor)
  • 1993 - - Paul Keating (Labor)
  • 1996 - - Paul Keating (Labor)
  • 1998 - - Kim Beazley (Labor)
  • 2001 - - Kim Beazley (Labor)
  • 2004 - - Mark Latham (Labor)
  • 2007 - - Kevin Rudd (Labor)
  • 2010 - - Julia Gillard (Labor)
  • 2013 - - Bob Katter (KAP)
  • 2016 - - Bob Katter (KAP)
  • 2019 - - Bob Katter (KAP)
  • 2022 - - Bob Katter (KAP)

Social Democracymaxxing 2

  • 1892- - Henry Hyndman (Social Democratic Federation)
  • 1895- - Henry Hyndman (Social Democratic Federation)
  • 1900 - - Keir Hardie (Labour Representation Committee)
  • 1906 - - Keir Hardie (Labour Representation Committee)
  • Jan 1910 - - Arthur Henderson (Labour)
  • Dec 1910 - - George Barnes (Labour)
  • 1918 - - Henry Hyndman (National Socialist)
  • 1922 - - No Leader (National Socialist)
  • 1923 - - No Leader (National Socialist)
  • 1924 - - No Leader (National Socialist)
  • 1929 - - Abstain
  • 1931 - - Oswald Mosley (New)
  • 1935 - - Abstain
  • 1945 - - C. A. Smith (Common Wealth)
  • 1950 - - David Gibson (Independent Labour)
  • 1951 - - Fred Barton (Independent Labour)
  • 1955 - - Annie Maxton (Independent Labour)
  • 1959 - - Oswald Mosley (Union Movement)
  • 1964 - - John Bean (British National)
  • 1966 - - Oswald Mosley (Union Movement)
  • 1970 - - John O'Brien (National Front)
  • Feb 1974 - - John Davis (National Independence)
  • Oct 1974 - - John Kingsley Read (National Front)
  • 1979 - - John Tyndall (National Front)
  • 1983 - - Andrew Fountaine (Nationalist)
  • 1987 - - John Tyndall (BNP)
  • 1992 - John McAuley (National Front)
  • 1997 - - Ian Anderson (National Democrats)
  • 2001 - - Nick Griffin (BNP)
  • 2005 - - Nick Griffin (BNP)
  • 2010 - - Nick Griffin (BNP)
  • 2015 - - Robin Tilbrook (English Democrats)
  • 2017 - - Robin Tilbrook (English Democrats)
  • 2019 - - Robin Tilbrook (English Democrats)


  • Gallery

    Comments

    If you would like to be added to relations, add a comment here :3


    Navigation