×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,529 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Polcompball Wiki
2,529Articles
  Recent changes
in:
Pages using Tabber parser tag, Self-Insert, Ideologies,
and 10 more

Baxism: Difference between revisions

VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Line 423: Line 423:
I believe this is completely utopian simply because it is impossible for two individuals to collaborate, as both are different and believe in different things.
I believe this is completely utopian simply because it is impossible for two individuals to collaborate, as both are different and believe in different things.


==Ultimate Ideal==


My idea of an Ideal Government is based on socialism, Jacobin government, and dictatorship. I believe that to achieve the ultimate ideal, one must go through four stages:
# '''Unitary Republic:''' The state should first be centralized in order to implement socialism and the nationalist revolutionary spirit.
# '''Federal Republic:''' After socialism, there should be a federal republic to eliminate inequalities and decentralize the economy.
# '''Tyranny by the Majority:''' Everyone would live in an ochlocracy finally. This would be the penultimate step to reach the Ultimate Ideal.
# '''Ultimate Ideal:''' I define the Ultimate Ideal as a communist utopia where there is no prohibition, as dialectics would be the law. Everyone could express their opinions freely. Rules would be chosen democratically and directly. There would be no need to worry about a nation since you already live in the world, not in your homeland. The Ultimate Ideal is when humans are truly human and do not belong to anyone.


=Personality=
=Personality=

Revision as of 19:33, 10 December 2023

Work in Progress
"I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism

This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details.


Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent Bak Bax's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.



“They Says.”



“My Victory is Our Victory.”



“And?”



“The liberty comes from authority.”



“Totalitarianism harbors a hatred for something they want to portray as their ‘own idea.’”


The  Baxism is my ideology. I am a  Left Unity to  AuthLeft and I am a  Culturally Revolutionary. I love the Jacobinism and the Paetelism.

I am Bisexual.

Add template:  Baxism (Optional) 

{{Bax}}

My icons: 

([[File:Altru Ego.png|link=Anarcho-Egoism]]/[[File:Enlightenment.png|link=Enlightenment]]/[[File:FreeJacobin.png|link=Jacobinism]]/[[File:Paetel.png|link=Paetelism]])

This will look like this: Baxism (///).

Books

Have Read

Reading

Suggestions

Beliefs

National Revolution

Personally, I believe in the National Revolution. This idea was influenced by Karl Otto Paetel and Maximilien Robespierre, although, obviously, it was more influenced by the Jacobins. I began to develop the idea of the National Revolution.

I believe in the National Revolution because it is NECESSARY in Chile. Reforms are not enough — We need a revolution, a nationalist one. I am a nationalist out of love for my nation, and I am a socialist out of love for the people of my nation. If being a Nazi means loving your nation and its people, then I consider myself a Nazi. I do not believe in racism or ethnic nationalism.

Furthermore, I believe the reason there hasn't been a National Revolution in Chile is the fault of the reactionaries or counter-revolutionaries. That's why I support the guillotine and its use against the counter-revolutionaries, as they prevent the National Revolution from happening. And not only the counter-revolutionaries but also the current socialists, who are, obviously, social democrats and Pseudocialists.

I am a nationalist. I love my nation because without it, I am nothing. However, that is not the problem. The problem lies with the bourgeoisie, Jews, Catholics, Muslims—every kind of religious person. It doesn't matter which religion they follow; as long as it's not neopagan, they won't be nationalists. It doesn't matter what they do; if they are bourgeoisie, they deserve the guillotine.

And I not only hate religion for its bourgeoisie nature but also for its anti-nationalist and globalist nature. Furthermore, religion is an oppression, and if we want a communist society, we must put an end to religion and its oppression.

Philosophy

I personally consider myself an Optimistic Nihilist because I believe in the idea that once we are dead, life will repeat itself, and it will continue in a constant cycle. So, if you live well, why fear repeating this life? I believe it doesn't matter how you live because we will live again and again.

I, in addition to being an optimistic nihilist—in my view—am a cynic as it is one of my philosophical influences, as well as nihilism and egoism. Although I am more cynical and more nihilistic, I do not like rules being violated, although I am obviously against morality.

In my view, cynicism represents the extreme of nihilism or hedonistic nihilism. I don't see material things as having much value, philosophically speaking. Additionally, I am a Post-Marxist, as I believe in the idea that Marx and his theory must be destroyed for a superior form of Marxism to emerge. This is what I mean when I say "The Old Rock is sung by the grandparents, the New Rock is sung by the grandchildren."

I consider myself a hedonist because, in my view, hedonism is the pursuit of pleasure for welfare, as long as it respects the rules.

Despite being influenced by various reactionaries, I consider myself a revolutionary.

I certainly contradict myself a lot — that's what makes me a philosopher.

To be a philosopher, you must question everything. And to question it, you must think. And to think, you must suffer. And to suffer, you must love. And to love, you must live.

Colectivization of our Ego

I believe that the ego should be fully collectivized. In other words, everyone should have their ego equally, merging the egos of all, making each person selfish. Therefore, everyone would think about the ego of others. Thus, it would be OUR EGO, not YOUR EGO, but OURS. And, by being OUR EGO, we would all be self-sufficient, but for the well-being of everyone.

Our Ego

I believe that Egoism should be shared. If you enjoy your ego, you should share that ego. I believe in Altruistic Egoism.

I think you should share YOUR property to favor your ego and not only yours but also contribute to others. Help to be helped.

The Destruction of Humanity

I believe that humanity is destroying itself. That is our punishment — death by our own hands.

Suicide is nothing more than an advance payment for our punishment. Death will eventually come at our own hands. The world is crumbling because of humans. Humans have destroyed, murdered, violated, and mutilated the Earth. Not even a single ash will remain in the world. Our punishment will endure. We live constantly. Every time we die, we will be reborn to die again and be punished once more.

Death is humanity's eternal punishment for what it has done to the Earth. There will be no more water or enough food.

The Question of Love

I started questioning what love is. I reached a point of questioning it so much that I began to feel a love for what is mine. I started developing a love for what is mine and my belongings. I detest the idea of sharing love with other people—unless it benefits my ego. I began developing a love for things like my land, my blood, my home, my property, my nation, and my books.

I love my Nation. I love my Blood. I love my Land. I love my Home. I love my Property. I love myself. I love my being, and that's why I am selfish. I adore my body; my face; my arms, my legs. I love myself.

It was after emotionally dying (I no longer cry or laugh, and I laugh very rarely) that I developed a love for the self. I no longer want to be with more people because, what right do I have to love? What right do I have to greet, kiss, hug, and speak to someone? What right do I have to say "I love you" to someone? So, after pondering that, my heart started racing at a thousand kilometers per minute. I wanted to run and jump and shout and hit and kick and harm. Now, I have learned to love myself and cherish my solitude.

The Human Perfection

I believe in human perfection. I want to improve humanity, not the race. The concept of race is stupid. It's better to enhance all humans.

I support voluntary eugenics, and I believe that, for example, the brains of pedophiles and criminals should be researched to discover why they committed those crimes and to investigate further with the aim of creating more perfect future generations.

Literally "A Brave New World".

Economy

I believe that, in terms of the economy, Chile should be socialist. Although I like socialism, and I don't hate dirigisme.

I think the economy should be either dirigisme or market socialism. It's not that I hate common socialism; it's just that I believe socialism in Chile should be similar to Tito's.

Furthermore, I believe that if Chile were to replicate the Yugoslav system, we could prove that socialism does work, although I theorize that after Market Socialism, it should be succeeded by common socialism.

Sexuality

Regarding sexuality, I am bisexual, and I believe that everyone should be whatever they want to be, as long as it's something legal.

I support the idea that everyone is free in terms of their sexuality.

Suicide

About suicide, I believe that it's inherently wrong, and those individuals need urgent help. However, of course, who am I to interfere with their individual freedom and decision? I mean, what they do shouldn't have to concern me. Nevertheless, those people need serious and immediate assistance.

Negative IQ

The concept of “Negative IQ” initially emerged as a silly joke among friends on Discord, but I later realized that there are people who genuinely exhibit a “Negative IQ,” such as Diego Arturo Silva Beltrán and those referred to as “Reactionary Socialists.” Of course, even I contradict myself, but not to the extent of Reactionary Socialism. Additionally, individuals who are not reactionary socialists, such as neoliberals and others, can also display a Negative IQ.

In Chile, there are several examples of Negative IQ, including figures like Pedro Aguirre Cerda, Dokev or Augusto Pinochet. Even José Antonio Kast and his followers are considered to have a Negative IQ. It's worth noting that Negative IQ is not exclusive to individuals on the right-wing, as Michelle Bachelet, a left-wing figure, is mentioned to have a Negative IQ. Gabriel Boric, another left-wing figure, is also associated with a Negative IQ. Pedro Aguirre Cerda, despite being on the left, is mentioned as having a Negative IQ. Negative IQ can be attributed to both left-wing and right-wing individuals.

The concept of "Negative IQ," for those who didn't understand, refers to people who act without thinking. In fact, when I mentioned that Dokev had a Negative IQ, Dokev got upset and demonstrated having a Negative IQ. That's the problem: people act without thinking. Therefore, it could be said that people who lack reading comprehension suffer from a Negative IQ.

Autism

About autism, I believe that in reality, individuals with autism don't deserve discrimination, as autism is something normal. Even my parents suspected that I might have autism — which is funny. I think people with autism need more support and less discrimination. After all, they are people.


Racism

Regarding racism and ethnonationalism, I believe they are wrong (but I do not hate Ethnonationalism) because a nation should not separate races from others. I see a nation as a family, and excluding races from it is like excluding a child.

Nationalism

I disdain civic nationalism, as I consider it false nationalism. Nationalism, to me, should be the love for your country, the love for your homeland. I believe that every nation should be sovereign, no matter which one, it should be sovereign. No nation should be without sovereignty.

I advocate for letting people have their own states. I want every people to have their own state. I want to put an end to imperialism. Nevertheless, I want Latin America to come together in a federation.

Foreign Policy

Regarding foreign policy, I'm somewhat of an universal nationalist, I believe, because I think that everyone should respect each other, and while I don't hate immigration, I believe that border controls should be stricter and tougher. Furthermore, I believe that stronger border controls could help protect our nation better.

Also, I believe that if Latin America were to unite in a federation, it would be better, and even better if it were socialist.

War

About war, I believe that wars only serve to benefit the bourgeoisie, who exploit us and get excited when they see a proletarian dead. In wars, sometimes one comes back without a part of their body, and sometimes they don't come back at all. Wars only exist to make us kill each other. Wars are only for the arousal of the bourgeoisie. Imagine your father going to war and not coming back; Imagine your son going to war and not coming back — Wars are foolish and are for foolish people. Militarism is the cause of our problems.

Religion

As for religion, I am an atheist; I don't have a God or master, in my view. Although I support religious freedom, in my opinion, religion is rubbish.


Taxes

Regarding taxes, I believe they are not theft, obviously as long as they make sense. Taxes are necessary for the welfare of the people.

About Nations

Chile

Government

“We are the first country of Chile. The first country of Chile. [Unintelligible Sounds] The first country of the World.”


Regarding the Government of Chile , I believe it should take more authoritarian measures. For example, on September 4th, when the Rechazo won with 62 percent. The problem is not the government but the people. The people are foolish and don't realize it. Moreover, the majority of those who voted against it did so because they believed their houses would be taken away—yes, seriously. Imagine believing without reading. But not reading is not the only problem; the other is a lack of reading comprehension. Now, with the proposal for a new constitution—which really gonna will take away your water, bread, and house—the people will choose it just because José Antonio Kast proposed it. And this is a big problem because the people don't understand.

The “Democracy” is the refuge of the bourgeois, the refuge of the weak and the plutocrats. Sometimes, I wish the proletariat knew what is good and what is not. I want to destroy democracy, praise war, death, hatred, and suffering. I want to kill; I love war, I love metal, I love chains and bullets because of the people. I am anti-war, but sometimes, I wish for a war.

I will praise war, terrorism, death, suffering, murder, theft, lies, dictatorship, bullets, anything as long as it ends with democracy.

Apruebo or Rechazo?

In my opinion, the 1980 Constitution in Chile is clearly designed for the proletariat to suffer since it was created by aristocrats for aristocrats, not for the people. That's why I criticize the 1980 Constitution. Furthermore, it's important to emphasize that it was created by the right-wing, and they are the only ones benefiting from it, leaving the proletariat with nothing. Additionally, the 1980 Constitution was very lacking in nationalism, heavily capitalist, and bourgeois.

I believe that the constitution proposed by Boric was alright, but it should have been more nationalist and revolutionary. Therefore, I view Boric as a common pseudocialist and a traitor to the proletariat because he is a moderate socialist, in many quotes.

Furthermore, the constitution proposed by Kast is an abusive nonsense. We are not cattle but proletarians. We are the people of Chile, and therefore, we are nationalists. But Kast is not a nationalist; he is a false nationalist and a false populist. José Antonio Kast is not right — his followers are just sycophants who enjoy being trampled.

Chile is everything — the rest is nothing.

About the Political Parties

"I no longer believe in any idea, in any party, in any man. By logical consequence: there is nothing that would determine me to take on the role of a militant for any doctrine or program. I AM THE ETERNAL OPPONENT."


Regarding the political parties in Chile, I believe that they are primarily a method to control the proletariat, as, by nature, the proletariat doesn't think much. That's why I think they should be banned in Chile because every individual is different, and every proletarian is different. Furthermore, I believe that the worst left-wing political parties are the Communist Party of Chile and the Socialist Party, as they never stop stealing from the proletariat, constantly claiming to be “the legacy of Salvador Allende.” The right-wing parties are even worse, as they profit, lie, and deprive us of our individual freedom. And the worst right-wing political parties are the UDI, Renovación Nacional, and the Partido Republicano.

Guns

On the topic of gun legalization in Chile, I think it's a bad idea, especially because of the radical libertarians. Goodness, can you imagine a libertarian coming to kill you? If libertarians are already crazy and violent, imagine one with a firearm. Furthermore, here are my other reasons for hating guns:

  1. Murders: If we legalize guns, some CRAZIES will use them, and just think about a reactionary like Kast with a rifle.
  2. Extremism: Extremists, especially reactionaries or people like Guz or Hans Hindenburg, would use them to eliminate their opponents.

Also, Guns are stupid.


Political Movements

Good Party

Mixed

  • Apruebo Dignidad - I appreciate your expression of gratitude and satisfaction with the idea of changing Augusto Pinochet's constitution. However, if only they had been more authoritarian...

Bad Party

Argentina

“Che, boludo.”


About Argentina, I think it's a great and beautiful country. I believe that we should help our sister nation, Argentina. Chile should unite with Argentina in a federation, as I think that together, we could address the inflation issues in both countries. Additionally, we could work together on the matter of the Falkland Islands.

I LOVE TRANSLATE BOOKS FOR THE UJAN!!

Perú

Bolivia

Why I hate Bolivia?

Cambodia

Pol Pot

Adolf Pol Potler

The Revolutionary Society

Finally, we arrive at my most idealistic part: The Revolutionary Society.

I envision—much like Marx envisioned his communism—a revolutionary society based on the dictatorship of the proletariat, not like Stalin's dictatorship, but as the real dictatorship of the people. There would be no unions because they would be the government, since, without bosses or leaders, there shouldn't be unions. Everyone works for themselves, for the ego of all, for the ego of the community.

There are clearly laws, but each one chosen by the community in a crowd-like manner. There is no money as it would be unnecessary, since everyone would share their things.

I believe this is completely utopian simply because it is impossible for two individuals to collaborate, as both are different and believe in different things.

Ultimate Ideal

My idea of an Ideal Government is based on socialism, Jacobin government, and dictatorship. I believe that to achieve the ultimate ideal, one must go through four stages:

  1. Unitary Republic: The state should first be centralized in order to implement socialism and the nationalist revolutionary spirit.
  2. Federal Republic: After socialism, there should be a federal republic to eliminate inequalities and decentralize the economy.
  3. Tyranny by the Majority: Everyone would live in an ochlocracy finally. This would be the penultimate step to reach the Ultimate Ideal.
  4. Ultimate Ideal: I define the Ultimate Ideal as a communist utopia where there is no prohibition, as dialectics would be the law. Everyone could express their opinions freely. Rules would be chosen democratically and directly. There would be no need to worry about a nation since you already live in the world, not in your homeland. The Ultimate Ideal is when humans are truly human and do not belong to anyone.

Personality

How to Draw

Flag of Baxism
  1. Draw a ball;
  2. Color the ball with black;
  3. Draw Group of Social Revolutionary Nationalists design in the middle in white;
  4. Add the glasses;

You're done!


Color Name HEX RGB
Teal #036A66 3, 106, 102
White #FFFFFF 255, 255, 255
Black #141414 20, 20, 20
Dark Blue #003869 0, 56, 105
Red #D40000 212, 0, 0
Blue #0043D4 0, 67, 212


Relationships

Best

  • Flexism - My brother that I love!
  • Anarcho-Egoism - Stirner was one of my most influences.
  • Anti-Nazism - Down with the Nazis and Fascists.
  • Jacobinism - Guillotine aux bourgeois! The only thing I don't agree with Jacobinism about is its centralism.
  • Ochlocracy - IF THE MOB WANTS, YOU DIE!
  • Social Authoritarianism - We need a Welfare Strong State.
  • Authoritarian Egoism - I’m not an Anarcho-Egoism.
  • Republicanism - We are true republicans.
  • Post-Marxism - Marx is dead.
  • Paetelism - Except for the Counter-Enlightenment, and Reactionarism, Karl Otto Pætel was Based. I hate the anti-fascism, but I support the Anti-Nazism, cause the nazis was a fake nationalists.
  • Enlightenment - Down with the reactionaries.
  • Contrarianism - One must know what to take from what to what extent and why. We are all contradictory and we contradict ourselves, we are an “ideological salad”, as Daniel Sansón said.
  • Fictional Nationalism - The Best Nationalism!
  • Titoism - Very based.
  • Federalism - Even though the Jacobins were centralists, and I hate the Girondists, I support federalism.
  • Crusade of Romanianism - WE ARE THE ETERNAL OPPONENTS!
  • Falangism - ¡Viva, viva la Revolución! ¡Viva, viva Falange de las J.O.N.S!
  • Marxism - Yes, you might be a Jew but you are /OURJEW/ I absolutely love your ideas and writings!
  • Eugenicism - Human Perfection.

Good

  • UJANism - Great Ideas, some bad members. Ignore the fact that Matteo says that he is "el Comandante" and that makes me laugh.
  • National Liberalism - You are the true liberalism, not like the modern liberalism.
  • De Francism - The only thing I hate about you is your hatred towards Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay.
  • National Anarchism - Obviously after the state and the nation there will be a globalist anarchy, but before the globalist anarchist utopia there will be a nationalist anarchy. Also, I love Ernst Jünger.
  • Neosocialism - Your only mistake was collaborating with the fascists who betrayed you. Also, how come you can affiliate with the Strasserists? Still, you are better than Strasserism.
  • Allendism - Be more Revolutionary!
  • Kaczynskism - The Uncle Ted was based, but I hate neoluddism.

Meh

  • Classical Conservatism - The only good thing of you is Manuel Bulnes.
  • Classical Liberalism - You were better before than now. Still, I see you as a fake revolutionary.
  • La Plaineism - Maybe...
  • Reactionaryism - Only Ernst Jünger and the Conservative Revolution is based.
  • National Bolshevism - In my opinion, current national Bolshevism, of course, is wrong. However, despite that, I can't help but be influenced by Eduard Limonov. He was a great man and leader. He knew how to handle the national Bolshevik party. He, in my opinion, was a great leader.
  • Fascism - Fascism had to be revolutionary and socialist.

Bad

  • Humanism - Human rights should not be defended by the proletariat.

Ultra-Bad

Best

  • DrasThe Thought - Long live DrasThe.
  • SwordComradism - Personally, I feel influenced by you, SwordComrade, since, by reading about your ideology, Paetelism, and so on, I started thinking more about what I am. I understand your dissatisfaction with certain of my opinions, such as Jacobinism and so on, but I also have disagreements with you, for example, ethnic nationalism and anarchism, and it's understandable because each individual is different, and it's understandable. That's the absurdity of life: no one is content with anyone, and everyone is content with everyone.
  • Vistulism - You are good, don’t change.
  • Hoodism - Very Based Revolutionary.

    • Good

    • Alstūdism - Actually, although I am not a fascist, I support several of your points, such as the economy. Personally, I sympathize with your ideology. I like your nationalism and neo-paganism, and your socialism and corporatism too.
    • Ziółkowskiizm - Very based in my opinion.
    • Proletariat Builderism - The only thing about your ideology that I don't like is terrorism, religion, conservatism and anarchism. Even so, your philosophy is actually good.
    • Serbian Socialism - Very well, I love Market Socialism.
    • Hispanic Reactionary Bourbonism - Me but CultRight and Reactionary.
    • Meadowsin's Basilisk - WIP

    Meh

    • Dokevism - Kinda based, but why Democracy? Why Capitalism? You are a good candidate for the Baxist radicalization. You says that "I want a 'welfare capitalism'", but the capitalism can not be welfarist.
    • Daniel Sansón Thought - I don't like the fact that you are counter-enlightened and reactionary. Also, why do you say you are "Paetelist" when you support fascism? You are truly an “Ideological Salad”. Furthermore, your poor understanding of Paetel makes me doubt that you are a true National Bolshevik.
    • Neo-MugiKotobuki8814ism - I am not an totalitarian, but SOMETIMES we need totalitarianism. I love socialism, but, for me, socialism IS progressive. Also, I don’t believe in the races. Also, you are a nice person, but nazism is bad.
    • Agricoetism - Paganism is good. I am so close to falangism. I love the hedonism, but be more Revolutionary.
    • ⠀ism - WIP
    • Nurulisme - You are the Fourth Theory with more shit.

    Bad

    • Champi - Honestly, I must say that the fact that you are a capitalist is terrible. Of course, I believe in a state capitalism, which will later be replaced by a completely planned economy, but you simply try to pretend to be something you are not. I also have to say that you are a pseudocialist who wants a false welfare state. I know I may sound authoritarian by saying this, but often, force is necessary, especially in Chile, because the Chilean people are very foolish. Moreover, it seems like you're trying to blame me for everything. The fact that you support illiberal democracy is not my problem. Furthermore, you support parties that lie and steal from the proletariat. “La verdad no encuentro palabras para expresar el arrepentimiento que tengo a sí que soy directo y te pido perdón por burlame de ti y hablar mal en tus espaldas tal vez ni me aceptes las disculpas por que dijiste con tu multi que no me perdonarás pero no me importa sólo quiero que sepas esto y nada más. También no me importa si usas mis disculpas en broma.”
    • Anarcho-Dokevism - 💀💀💀💀💀

    Ultra-Bad

    Further Information

    Glossary

    Influences Glossary


    1. S&G: Socially and Governmentally.
    2. GEN: Genetically.
    3. ECN: Economically.
    4. PPL: People.
    5. PHIL: Philosophically.

    Other


    1. Pseudocialist: Pseudocialism or Pseudocialism (In Spanish, «Falsocialista» and «Falsocialismo», from the spanish, falso, "Fake", "Pseudo", and Socialismo, Socialista, "Socialist, Socialism"), is a term created by me. The Pseudocialism is the fake socialism.


    References

    1. ↑ In my opinion, eugenics is necessary to achieve human perfection. I believe that humans must be perfect in order to put an end to criminals; rapists and more.
    2. ↑ The only liberals I don't support are the modern liberals.

    Gallery

    Political Tests

    • DozenValues

      DozenValues

    • Sapply Values

      Sapply Values

    • 8Values

      8Values

    Navigation



    Retrieved from "https://pcbwiki.net/index.php?title=Baxism&oldid=456739"