×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,528 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Polcompball Wiki
2,528Articles
  Recent changes
in:
Pages using Tabber parser tag, Self-Insert, Ideologies,
and 10 more

Baxism: Difference between revisions

VisualWikitext
Line 322: Line 322:
==={{Bold|Books I am writing}}===
==={{Bold|Books I am writing}}===
*[[File:DirecteddSoc.png]] ''«Patria y Dirección»''<ref group="n">I'm writing it with my friend Rodrigo “DrasThe”.</ref> (''“Nation and Direction”'')
*[[File:DirecteddSoc.png]] ''«Patria y Dirección»''<ref group="n">I'm writing it with my friend Rodrigo “DrasThe”.</ref> (''“Nation and Direction”'')
*[[File:InsCom.png]] ''«Comunismo Insurreccionario: Obras Escogidas»'' (''“Inserructionary Communism: Selected Writings”'')<ref gruop="n">I only translate the book, I do not say that the works are mine. In fact, I will put the names of those who wrote the works. I specify that I only translated them from English.</ref>
==={{Bold|Books I wrote}}===
==={{Bold|Books I wrote}}===
*[[File:UltimateIdeal.png]] ''«El Ideal Máximo»''<ref group="n">I wrote it with my friend Rodrigo “DrasThe”.</ref> (''“The Ultimate Ideal”'')
*[[File:UltimateIdeal.png]] ''«El Ideal Máximo»''<ref group="n">I wrote it with my friend Rodrigo “DrasThe”.</ref> (''“The Ultimate Ideal”'')

Revision as of 03:56, 2 February 2024

Work in Progress
"I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism

This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details.

Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent Bak Bax's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.


Thanks for the protrait, Hysteria! I love it!

My book: Baxist Manifesto. Shit. My book is shit.


“They Says.”



“My Victory is Our Victory.”



“And?”



“It is like a scorpion — it defends itself with its tail.”



“God Bless Satan!”



“I am literally Mishima.”



The  Baxism is my ideology. I am a  Left Unity to  AuthLeft and I am a  Culturally Revolutionary. I love the Jacobinism and the Paetelism.

I am Bisexual.

So, this is the ideology of Julius Maximus Étikus.

Add template:  Baxism (Optional) 

{{Bax}}

My icons: 

([[File:PostRousseau.png|link=Enlightenment]]/[[File:Natcom.png|link=National Communism]]/[[File:FreeJacobin.png|link=Jacobinism]]/[[File:DirecteddSoc.png|link=Directed Socialism]])

This will look like this: Baxism (///).

I’M USING FAKE SMALL CAPS HERE. LOL.






Political Journey

(Irredentism/Liberalism/Nationalism/Kakistocracy/Social Liberalism).

I was a type of a "Nationalist Liberal" and a stupid boy. I hated the revolution, the philosophy, the economy and the reaction. I was apolitic.

(Marxism-Leninism/State Capitalism/Trotskyism/Nationalism/Police Statism).

I was a stupid Marxist-Leninist. I was a Stalinist-Trotskyist who hated every "nazi" and "fascist" (people who I hated). I was a great fan of every communist, like Pol Pot (💀), Karl Marx, Stalin, Lenin, Kruschev, Trotsky, Gorbachev, and every communist leader or every leader of the USSR.

(Anarcho_Egoism)
and

Books

Want to Read

  • « De l'Esprit des loix ou du Rapport que les Loix doivent avoir avec la Constitution de chaque Gouvernement, les Moeurs, le Climat, la Religion, le Commerce, &c. à quoi l'Auteur a ajouté Des recherches nouvelles sur les Loix Romaines touchant les Successions, sur les Loix Françoises, & sur les Loix Féodales » - Charles Louis de Secondat
  • „Mein Kampf“ – Adolf Hitler

Have Read

Reading

Suggestions

Other

Books I translated into Spanish

Books I am translating into Spanish

  • “Prussianism and Socialism” – Oswald Spengler
  • “Folkish Syndicalism Manifesto” – Iefan Alstud
  • “Violence and Autonomy” – Jefferson Bolcheque

Books I am writing

  • «Patria y Dirección»[n 2] (“Nation and Direction”)
  • «Comunismo Insurreccionario: Obras Escogidas» (“Inserructionary Communism: Selected Writings”)Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many

Books I wrote

  • «El Ideal Máximo»[n 3] (“The Ultimate Ideal”)

The Translation of Books

People Who Influenced Me

Note: The author of this page does not necessarily agree with all the beliefs of the people listed below. This is simply a list of people who have influenced the author’s beliefs in some way or another.

  1. Diogenes (406-323 BC), Athens
  2. William Shakespeare (1564-1616), England
  3. Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778), France
  4. Marquis de Sade (1740-1814), France
  5. Jean-Paul Marat (1743-1793), France
  6. Maximilien Robespierre (1758-1794), France
  7. François-Noël "Gracchus" Babeuf (1760-1797), First French Republic
  8. José Gaspar Rodríguez de Francia (1766-1840), Paraguay
  9. Ludwig van Beethoven (1770-1827), Austria
  10. Manuel Bulnes (1799-1866), Chile
  11. Max Stirner (1806-1856), Kingdom of Bavaria / German Confederation
  12. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1809-1865), France
  13. Richard Wagner (1813-1883), Germany[n 4]
  14. Karl Marx (1818-1883), Germany
  15. Friedrich Engels (1820-1895), Germany
  16. Georges Sorel (1847-1922), France
  17. Nikola Tesla (1856-1943), Serbia
  18. Oswald Spengler (1880-1936), Germany
  19. Panait Istrati (1884-1935), Romania
  20. Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937), Italy
  21. Josip Broz Tito (1892-1980), Yugoslavia
  22. Marcel Déat (1894-1955), France
  23. Ernst Jünger (1895-1998), Germany
  24. Juan Domingo Perón (1895-1974), Argentina
  25. Otto Strasser (1897-1974), Germany
  26. Severino Di Giovanni (1901-1931), Italy / Argentina
  27. Jorge Eliécer Gaitán (1903-1948), Colombia
  28. George Orwell (1903-1950), United Kingsom
  29. Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980) France
  30. Ramiro Ledesma Ramos (1905-1936), Spanish Republic
  31. Karl Otto Paetel (1906-1975), Germany
  32. Salvador Allende Gossens (1906-1973), Chile
  33. J. Posadas (1912-1981), Argentina
  34. Michel Foucault (1926-1984), France
  35. Eduard Limonov (1943-2020), Russia
  36. Eduardo Antonio Artés Brichetti (1951-), Chile
  37. Nicolás Maduro (1962-), Venezuela
  38. Yegor Letov (1964-2008), Russia
  39. Grandpa Ricardo (1967-), Chile
  40. Mark Fisher (1968-2017), UK
  41. Johnny Knoxville (1971-), United States of America
  42. Sword Comrade (?-) ???
  43. Gerotypus (2005-), Argentina
  44. Daniel Sansón (2008-), Argentina
  45. Rocksmanylobsters (?-), ??? ???
  46. Christian Schumacher (?-), United States of America
  47. Matteo A. G. (?-), Argentina

Critiques

Ethnic Pluralism

About Ethnic Pluralism, I will say that it is something for larger nations. Clearly, for nations like Chile or Argentina, it is not suitable. Why do I say this? Well, because they are small nations that are a sea of ethnicities. While I want ethnic groups and indigenous peoples to have their own nation, I do not see Ethnic Pluralism as a “good” idea. Furthermore, it is for large nations with few ethnicities like Norway or Germany, not for small nations like Chile, Peru, or Argentina. That's why I am not an Ethnic Pluralist.


Eduardo Artés

I say that Eduardo Artés is the best candidate for Chile. He had to be the president of Chile. Artés is a courageous person: he went to Hoxha's Albania illegally. In addition, Artés is so brave that he stands up to Yankee imperialism. Artés fought against the Pinochet dictatorship. Artés is the best politician in Chile and is the legacy of Salvador Allende.


Jean-Jacques Rousseau

See also: Baxist Manifesto. Chapter: “Jean-Jacques Rousseau”.


Karl Marx

Strasserism

I sympathize with Strasserism, but find it to be quite reactionary. It also has strong “ethnic and racial” undertones that I find somewhat bourgeois and conservative. While I appreciate some aspects of “Germany Tomorrow”, particularly its economic and state-related ideas, I dislike the proposed elective monarchy outlined in the book.

Gregor Strasser

Otto Strasser

Marquis de Sade

Juan Domingo Perón

Note: Comment if you want me to critique you.

Dokevism

I don't know how to begin criticizing you, Zaik, because I consider you my friend, and I know you take criticism very literally, but well.

To start, I detest your transhumanism, as it is very unserious. Damn, I am very utopian, but I don't reach that level. While I envision a utopian society based on communism, I acknowledge that it is utopian, unlike you, who insults those who contradict your transhumanist point of view. I know I'll sound “Reactionary” or “Anprim” in your eyes, but it's true: humans are being consumed by machines. What I don't understand is that you wanted to block me just for thinking differently from you, something that civilized people, who understand how to coexist with others holding different ideologies, don't do. You want a society where the Machine decides the tyrant and where the Machine rules. This is very dystopian, don't you think?

I detest that you don't understand the problems of the current democracy in Chile, and I detest that you support a system like capitalism, as it is IMPOSSIBLE to regulate in your utopia because, if you want total transhumanism, you must eliminate protectionism. Also, you don't understand that capitalism, whether “welfare” or not, commodifies people.

The problem is that you didn't understand the Ultimate Ideal, and that's why you oppose it because, according to you, it is “too primitivist.” Is it primitive to want to control the Machine so that it doesn't consume us? No! No, no, no, and a thousand times no! You didn't understand: we want to control the Machine; otherwise, it will take away our humanity. Don't you understand that the Machine destroys nature? You are very foolish, honestly. The Machine must be controlled, not destroyed. You should read more and get closer to the socialist perspective. Also, your stupid meritocracy should be emphasized. The reward for the proletariat is bread, not money that only commodifies people.

Alstūdism

I really feel quite good with Alstūdism.

There are things about Alstūdism that I don't like, such as Futurism (a bit) or halfway homophobia. I don't like the traditionalist and religious focus much either. I don't like Centralism either, but I like it too much to detest it. I support its universal nationalism, but I prefer a universal nationalism where all peoples have their nations. I don't like its ethnic focus, but well, I really like Alstūdism.

Neocarlism

Really, he's a very pleasant person.

As for your ideology, well, I don't like the Reaction or Reactionaries, as I don't get along with them, but I like you. I detest monarchism, and I'm not a fan of the idea of ethnicity. Although, we share something in common: authoritarianism and economics. While your economy is somewhat corporatist, it's still more or less socialist. I suppose you resemble the Conservative Revolution in Germany.

Brazilian Liberalism

I don't appreciate this ideology.

Firstly, I criticize your foolishness, as you claim that "Autism is a philosophy," which is not true unless you are schizophrenic. You probably only read people's alignments and influences to criticize their ideology, as I'm sure you haven't read about Dokev's or mine, and you just say, "oh, I dislike it because it's communist" or "I like it because it's like me." Furthermore, neoliberalism is a disease similar to leprosy, and neoliberalism excessively commodifies people.

Additionally, it's worth noting that you seem to know nothing about spelling, as you fail to understand that words following a period should begin with a capital letter.

Gualguainism

Very good art!

About your ideology, well, I see that there's a bit of "absence." I like your art, even though I'm not a big fan of futurism. Nevertheless, I think your art is too good. I see "potential" in it, so to speak. You should strive more, and who knows, maybe you'll become very famous.

Romantic Egoism

Wipi

Golden Iron Doctrine Thoughtism

Beliefs

National Revolution

Personally, I believe in the National Revolution. This idea was influenced by Karl Otto Paetel and Maximilien Robespierre, although, obviously, it was more influenced by the Jacobins. I began to develop the idea of the National Revolution.

I believe in the National Revolution because it is NECESSARY in Chile. Reforms are not enough — We need a revolution, a nationalist one. I am a nationalist out of love for my nation, and I am a socialist out of love for the people of my nation. If being a Nazi means loving your nation and its people, then I consider myself a Nazi. I do not believe in racism or ethnic nationalism.

Furthermore, I believe the reason there hasn't been a National Revolution in Chile is the fault of the reactionaries or counter-revolutionaries. That's why I support the guillotine and its use against the counter-revolutionaries, as they prevent the National Revolution from happening. And not only the counter-revolutionaries but also the current socialists, who are, obviously, social democrats and Pseudocialists.

I am a nationalist. I love my nation because without it, I am nothing. However, that is not the problem. The problem lies with the bourgeoisie, Jews, Catholics, Muslims—every kind of religious person. It doesn't matter which religion they follow; as long as it's not neopagan, they won't be nationalists. It doesn't matter what they do; if they are bourgeoisie, they deserve the guillotine.

And I not only hate religion for its bourgeoisie nature but also for its anti-nationalist and globalist nature. Furthermore, religion is an oppression, and if we want a communist society, we must put an end to religion and its oppression.

Philosophy

I personally consider myself an Optimistic Nihilist because I believe in the idea that once we are dead, life will repeat itself, and it will continue in a constant cycle. So, if you live well, why fear repeating this life? I believe it doesn't matter how you live because we will live again and again.

Philosophically, of course, I am an Ego-Communist, albeit more altruistic. If sharing enhances my ego, that's fine with me. I consider myself "Rousseauian," but I distort Rousseau, as I believe that while man is born good, he is actually corrupted by ignorance. It is thanks to these ideas that my friend and I created the Ultimate Ideal, as I am a kind of Rousseauian who dislikes the idea of transhumanism. I am a post-Marxist Rousseauian. I am someone "different." I am an "unorthodox" egoist, as I distort things. I am a changing being.

I believe that as humans become corrupted, animals are the ones who should be liberated and should rule, as, to me, they are not corrupt. An animal is inherently good and empathetic, and therefore, superior to humans, as it does not become corrupted like humans do. It is because of this idea that I consider myself a "Distinct Rousseauian" or a Post-Rousseauian.

Despite being influenced by various reactionaries, I consider myself a revolutionary.

I certainly contradict myself a lot — that's what makes me a philosopher.

To be a philosopher, you must question everything. And to question it, you must think. And to think, you must suffer. And to suffer, you must love. And to love, you must live.

Colectivization of our Ego

I believe that the ego should be fully collectivized. In other words, everyone should have their ego equally, merging the egos of all, making each person selfish. Therefore, everyone would think about the ego of others. Thus, it would be OUR EGO, not YOUR EGO, but OURS. And, by being OUR EGO, we would all be self-sufficient, but for the well-being of everyone.

Our Ego

I believe that Egoism should be shared. If you enjoy your ego, you should share that ego. I believe in Altruistic Egoism.

I think you should share YOUR property to favor your ego and not only yours but also contribute to others. Help to be helped.

The Destruction of Humanity

I believe that humanity is destroying itself. That is our punishment — death by our own hands.

Suicide is nothing more than an advance payment for our punishment. Death will eventually come at our own hands. The world is crumbling because of humans. Humans have destroyed, murdered, violated, and mutilated the Earth. Not even a single ash will remain in the world. Our punishment will endure. We live constantly. Every time we die, we will be reborn to die again and be punished once more.

Death is humanity's eternal punishment for what it has done to the Earth. There will be no more water or enough food.

The Question of Love

I started questioning what love is. I reached a point of questioning it so much that I began to feel a love for what is mine. I started developing a love for what is mine and my belongings. I detest the idea of sharing love with other people—unless it benefits my ego. I began developing a love for things like my land, my blood, my home, my property, my nation, and my books.

I love my Nation. I love my Blood. I love my Land. I love my Home. I love my Property. I love myself. I love my being, and that's why I am selfish. I adore my body; my face; my arms, my legs. I love myself.

It was after emotionally dying (I no longer cry or laugh, and I laugh very rarely) that I developed a love for the self. I no longer want to be with more people because, what right do I have to love? What right do I have to greet, kiss, hug, and speak to someone? What right do I have to say "I love you" to someone? So, after pondering that, my heart started racing at a thousand kilometers per minute. I wanted to run and jump and shout and hit and kick and harm. Now, I have learned to love myself and cherish my solitude.

The Human Perfection

I believe in human perfection. I want to improve humanity, not the race. The concept of race is stupid. It's better to enhance all humans.

I support voluntary eugenics, and I believe that, for example, the brains of pedophiles and criminals should be researched to discover why they committed those crimes and to investigate further with the aim of creating more perfect future generations.

Literally "A Brave New World".

Why Federalism?

Because it's almost impossible for more independent states like a Mapuche state to exist, I believe federalism in Chile is the most "pragmatic" idea or the "first step" towards states like the Mapuche.

I think that, if it's not possible to grant independence to various peoples, all countries should be a federation, which is, as I mentioned before, the most "pragmatic" option or the "first step" towards universal nationalism.

Economy

Main article: Directed Socialism.

So, I am a Directed Socialist. Definition of Directed Socialism:

Directed Socialism emerges as a synthesis of dirigisme, socialism, and federalism. The creators of Directed Socialism adhere to the idea of Universal Nationalism and socialism. They believe in having a federalist form of socialism, as the decentralization of the economy and states would allow each community to have its own nation. Directed Socialism embraces the notion that each state and community should have its nation representing it, making it a federalist and nationalist socialism that synthesizes dirigisme, federalism, and Universal Nationalism.

Directed Socialism advocates for the nationalization of large and medium-sized industries. It upholds the idea of Patria y Dirección ("Homeland and Direction"). The principles of this ideology include:

  1. Homeland: Homeland, for Directed Socialism, is the love for one's people, regardless of ethnicity or race, as Directed Socialism is nationalist rather than ethnic, believing in a single people.
  2. Direction: Direction, for Directed Socialism, involves directing the economy, forming a synthesis between socialism and dirigisme, as mentioned earlier.

Directed Socialism is essentially an ideology of Authoritarian Left and nationalism.

Sexuality

Regarding sexuality, I am bisexual, and I believe that everyone should be whatever they want to be, as long as it's something legal.

I support the idea that everyone is free in terms of their sexuality.

Suicide

About suicide, I believe that it's inherently wrong, and those individuals need urgent help. However, of course, who am I to interfere with their individual freedom and decision? I mean, what they do shouldn't have to concern me. Nevertheless, those people need serious and immediate assistance.

Negative IQ

The concept of “Negative IQ” initially emerged as a silly joke among friends on Discord, but I later realized that there are people who genuinely exhibit a “Negative IQ,” such as Diego Arturo Silva Beltrán and those referred to as “Reactionary Socialists.” Of course, even I contradict myself, but not to the extent of Reactionary Socialism. Additionally, individuals who are not reactionary socialists, such as neoliberals and others, can also display a Negative IQ.

In Chile, there are several examples of Negative IQ, including figures like Pedro Aguirre Cerda, Dokev or Augusto Pinochet. Even José Antonio Kast and his followers are considered to have a Negative IQ. It's worth noting that Negative IQ is not exclusive to individuals on the right-wing, as Michelle Bachelet, a left-wing figure, is mentioned to have a Negative IQ. Gabriel Boric, another left-wing figure, is also associated with a Negative IQ. Pedro Aguirre Cerda, despite being on the left, is mentioned as having a Negative IQ. Negative IQ can be attributed to both left-wing and right-wing individuals.

The concept of “Negative IQ,” for those who didn't understand, refers to people who act without thinking. In fact, when I mentioned that Dokev had a Negative IQ, Dokev got upset and demonstrated having a Negative IQ. That's the problem: people act without thinking. Therefore, it could be said that people who lack reading comprehension suffer from a Negative IQ.

Autism

About autism, I believe that in reality, individuals with autism don't deserve discrimination, as autism is something normal. Even my parents suspected that I might have autism — which is funny. I think people with autism need more support and less discrimination. After all, they are people.


Racism

Regarding racism and ethnonationalism, I believe they are wrong (but I do not hate Ethnonationalism) because a nation should not separate races from others. I see a nation as a family, and excluding races from it is like excluding a child.

Nationalism

About my nationalism, I am a Universal Nationalist: I detest imperialism and want everyone to have their own nation. As a Universal Nationalist, I must oppose irredentism. I abhor that imperialistic idea of "Irredentism for me, and not for others" that Kultokrat and Borker have. While I like Kultokrat and Borker, I detest that idea.

I don't like the concept of ethno-pluralism because, if you're going to be a nationalist, you should love your country and be more interested in nationality. I wouldn't want to divide Chile into states based on ethnicities; instead, I would prefer states based on peoples and similar distinctions.

For instance, I believe the United States should dissolve, and all its states should become independent entities coexisting despite their differences. Furthermore, if this were to happen, there would be no Yankee imperialism.

For example, if a Mapuche and others want their own state, why not grant it? In other words, if an ethnic majority (how ironic) wants their state, why not give it to them? I want nations and future nations to be separate, yes, but I don't want them to be chauvinistic and isolate themselves from the rest of the world.

Foreign Policy

War

About war, I believe that wars only serve to benefit the bourgeoisie, who exploit us and get excited when they see a proletarian dead. In wars, sometimes one comes back without a part of their body, and sometimes they don't come back at all. Wars only exist to make us kill each other. Wars are only for the arousal of the bourgeoisie. Imagine your father going to war and not coming back; Imagine your son going to war and not coming back — Wars are foolish and are for foolish people. Militarism is the cause of our problems.

Religion

As for religion, I am an atheist; I don't have a God or master, in my view. Although I support religious freedom, in my opinion, religion is rubbish.


Taxes

Regarding taxes, I believe they are not theft, obviously as long as they make sense. Taxes are necessary for the welfare of the people.

About Nations

Chile

Government

“We are the first country of Chile. The first country of Chile. [Unintelligible Sounds] The first country of the World.”


Regarding the Government of Chile , I believe it should take more authoritarian measures. For example, on September 4th, when the Rechazo won with 62 percent. The problem is not the government but the people. The people are foolish and don't realize it. Moreover, the majority of those who voted against it did so because they believed their houses would be taken away—yes, seriously. Imagine believing without reading. But not reading is not the only problem; the other is a lack of reading comprehension. Now, with the proposal for a new constitution—which really gonna will take away your water, bread, and house—the people will choose it just because José Antonio Kast proposed it. And this is a big problem because the people don't understand.

The “Democracy” is the refuge of the bourgeois, the refuge of the weak and the plutocrats. Sometimes, I wish the proletariat knew what is good and what is not. I want to destroy democracy, praise war, death, hatred, and suffering. I want to kill; I love war, I love metal, I love chains and bullets because of the people. I am anti-war, but sometimes, I wish for a war.

I will praise war, terrorism, death, suffering, murder, theft, lies, dictatorship, bullets, anything as long as it ends with democracy.

Apruebo or Rechazo?

In my opinion, the 1980 Constitution in Chile is clearly designed for the proletariat to suffer since it was created by aristocrats for aristocrats, not for the people. That's why I criticize the 1980 Constitution. Furthermore, it's important to emphasize that it was created by the right-wing, and they are the only ones benefiting from it, leaving the proletariat with nothing. Additionally, the 1980 Constitution was very lacking in nationalism, heavily capitalist, and bourgeois.

I believe that the constitution proposed by Boric was alright, but it should have been more nationalist and revolutionary. Therefore, I view Boric as a common pseudocialist and a traitor to the proletariat because he is a moderate socialist, in many quotes.

Furthermore, the constitution proposed by Kast is an abusive nonsense. We are not cattle but proletarians. We are the people of Chile, and therefore, we are nationalists. But Kast is not a nationalist; he is a false nationalist and a false populist. José Antonio Kast is not right — his followers are just sycophants who enjoy being trampled.

Chile is everything — the rest is nothing.

About the Political Parties

"I no longer believe in any idea, in any party, in any man. By logical consequence: there is nothing that would determine me to take on the role of a militant for any doctrine or program. I AM THE ETERNAL OPPONENT."


Regarding the political parties in Chile, I believe that they are primarily a method to control the proletariat, as, by nature, the proletariat doesn't think much. That's why I think they should be banned in Chile because every individual is different, and every proletarian is different. Furthermore, I believe that the worst left-wing political parties are the Communist Party of Chile and the Socialist Party, as they never stop stealing from the proletariat, constantly claiming to be “the legacy of Salvador Allende.” The right-wing parties are even worse, as they profit, lie, and deprive us of our individual freedom. And the worst right-wing political parties are the UDI, Renovación Nacional, and the Partido Republicano.

Guns

On the topic of gun legalization in Chile, I think it's a bad idea, especially because of the radical libertarians. Goodness, can you imagine a libertarian coming to kill you? If libertarians are already crazy and violent, imagine one with a firearm. Furthermore, here are my other reasons for hating guns:

  1. Murders: If we legalize guns, some CRAZIES will use them, and just think about a reactionary like Kast with a rifle.
  2. Extremism: Extremists, especially reactionaries or people like Guz or Hans Hindenburg, would use them to eliminate their opponents.

Also, Guns are stupid.


Political Movements

Good Party

Mixed

  • Apruebo Dignidad - I appreciate your expression of gratitude and satisfaction with the idea of changing Augusto Pinochet's constitution. However, if only they had been more authoritarian...

Bad Party

Argentina

“Che, boludo.”


About Argentina, I think it's a great and beautiful country. I believe that we should help our sister nation, Argentina. Chile should unite with Argentina in a federation, as I think that together, we could address the inflation issues in both countries. Additionally, we could work together on the matter of the Falkland Islands.

I LOVE TRANSLATE BOOKS FOR THE UJAN!!

Perú

Palestine

I support the opinion of Matteo:

«Jews and Arabs have inhabited the region of Palestine for centuries. However, from 1291 to 1920 (629 years), Palestine was under Muslim rule, and even during the British Mandate of Palestine, Muslims constituted over 93% of the population.[9] The Jewish population in Israel is largely descended from Ashkenazi immigrants, who have little or no Hebrew blood. The immigrant population effectively exercises Jewish supremacy in the country,[10] treating the Arab residents as second-class citizens[11] and violating their rights. Israel establishes Jewish settlements in Palestinian territory, progressively encroaching upon Palestine until its disappearance.[12] There is even abuse and discrimination towards black Jews,[13] with about half of Israelis viewing them as a threat,[14] including Benjamin Netanyahu, who stated that Africans constituted a threat to the character and future of Israel.[15] The 50% decline in the birth rate of Ethiopians in Israel was attributed to a secret sterilization program against them.[16]

United States has served Israel in these factors:

  • Military and Economic Aid: Since World War II, Israel has been the largest overall recipient of U.S. foreign aid.[17] According to a report from the U.S. Congressional Research Service in November 2001, American aid to Israel in the past half-century amounted to a staggering $81.3 billion.
  • Sale and Donation of Weapons: Israel is one of the most significant importers of weapons from the United States. In the past decade alone, the U.S. has sold $7.2 billion worth of weaponry and military equipment to Israel.
  • Arms: Israel has made significant efforts to prevent the proliferation of weapons in the region, including what it terms "preventive attacks," such as the bombing of the nuclear reactor in Iraq in 1981[18] and an alleged nuclear reactor in Syria in 2007.[19]
  • Nuclear Weapons: Israel not only developed nuclear weapons but possesses an arsenal of between 100 and 200 nuclear weapons[20]. Israel began its nuclear weapons program in the 1950s, creating a sophisticated nuclear arsenal larger than the British arsenal. The technology to develop this arsenal was the result of collaboration with France, a country that Israel allegedly deceived by claiming it would only use the technology for peaceful purposes.[21]

A survey sponsored by the Jewish Defense League in 2009 found that 66% of Jews in Israel would view an Israeli airstrike against Iran as positive or very positive, suspecting Iran of wanting to build a nuclear bomb.

  • Chemical and Biological Weapons: This technology began to develop in the late '60s, funded with U.S. capital and the collaboration of foreign companies.
  • Conventional Weapons: The U.S. has also supported the Israeli arms industry by providing $1.3 billion to develop Lavi aircraft, $625 million to develop and deploy Arrow anti-missile missiles, $200 million to develop Merkava tanks, and $130 million to develop a high-energy laser missile defense system.
  • Free Weapons: The U.S. also gives away arms and ammunition as part of the Excess Defense Articles (EDA) program, providing these items at no cost. Between 1994 and 2001, the U.S. supplied the majority of Israel's weapons through this program.

It's worth noting that unlike Western countries, Israel maintains some state policies or recommendations for the "racial" preservation of the Jewish people, which might be considered racist if implemented by a Western country (and indeed, Jews are often associated with immigration in Europe).

In 2013, the Israeli Prime Minister's office announced that potential immigrants from the former Soviet Union might be asked to prove their Jewish lineage through a DNA test.[22] In 2015, Israel banned a novel from schools depicting a love story between an Arab and a Jew, citing concerns about potential intermingling between the two "races."[23]»



Bolivia

Why I hate Bolivia?

Cambodia

Pol Pot

Adolf Pol Potler

The Revolutionary Society

Finally, we arrive at my most idealistic part: The Revolutionary Society.

I envision—much like Marx envisioned his communism—a revolutionary society based on the dictatorship of the proletariat, not like Stalin's dictatorship, but as the real dictatorship of the people. There would be no unions because they would be the government, since, without bosses or leaders, there shouldn't be unions. Everyone works for themselves, for the ego of all, for the ego of the community.

There are clearly laws, but each one chosen by the community in a crowd-like manner. There is no money as it would be unnecessary, since everyone would share their things.

I believe this is completely utopian simply because it is impossible for two individuals to collaborate, as both are different and believe in different things.

Ultimate Ideal

See also: Ultimate Ideal

My idea of an Ideal Government is based on socialism, Jacobin government, and dictatorship. I believe that to achieve the ultimate ideal, one must go through four stages:

  1. Unitary Republic: The state should first be centralized in order to implement socialism and the nationalist revolutionary spirit.
  2. Federal Republic: After centralized socialism, there should be a federal republic to eliminate inequalities and decentralize the economy.
  3. Tyranny by the Majority: Everyone would live in an ochlocracy finally. This would be the penultimate step to reach the Ultimate Ideal.
  4. Ultimate Ideal: I define the Ultimate Ideal as a communist utopia where there is no prohibition, as dialectics would be the law. Everyone could express their opinions freely. Rules would be chosen democratically and directly. There would be no need to worry about a nation since you already live in the world, not in your homeland. The Ultimate Ideal is when humans are truly human and do not belong to anyone. It is like Democracy but it works.

I consider that when the Ultimate Ideal is achieved, there would be no need to fear reactionaries, as they would be eliminated during the first stage (the Unitary Republic). There is no need to fear reactionaries because they would not have the opportunity to react again.

Baxist Society

The Vision

Under triumphal arches, the military who fought pass through. Victory! We have won against Revanchist Bolivia. And although we have finished with Bolivia, we will not finish with our Sister Homeland Argentina.


Everyone raises their fists in honor of the military who died in the war and never returned.


“To Bolivia!” shout some soldiers.


Chile is a federation, and direct democracy has been achieved. There is no more parliament! Glory to the people who choose and decide!


Later in Santiago, the grand statue of Julius Maximus Étikus is seen, holding a sickle and hammer, and below a plaque reads, “For the Power of Reason.” Behind the statue, the Mint is clearly visible.


Counter-revolutionaries were purged. The Permanent Revolution has been achieved!


Inside the houses, there is no lack of bread, and there is no one sick, as health, housing, and education are free and of high quality.


Private property has been abolished.


The Mapuches are respected, as Chile, being a federation, grants autonomy to the Mapuche people.

User Test

I do not know what is this. Also, sorry, Borker.

Pick only one from each category :] (Code stolen from Borker. Sorry, Borker)

  • Civic Axis
    • Chaoist (-50)
    • Anarchist (-7)
    • Minarchist (-5)
    • Libertarian (-5)
    • Civically Moderate (+0)
    • Statist (+15)
    • Dictablanda (+10)
    • Authoritarian (+25)
    • Totalitarian (+40)
    • Orwellian (-50)
  • Type of Rule Axis
    • (Anarchist) Anti-Democracy (-10)
    • Direct Democracy (+50)
    • Semi-Direct Democracy (-50)
    • Representative Democracy (-10)
    • Authoritarian Democracy (+25)
    • Totalitarian Democracy (+20)
    • (Authoritarian) Anti-Democracy (-5)
  • If none above apply...
    • Organic Centralism (+5)
    • Kultokratic System (+2)
  • Economic Axis
    • Marxist Communist (+50)
    • Socialist (+40)
    • Welfarist/Gift Economy (+5)
    • Mixed (-10)
    • Liberal Economics (-100)
    • Capitalist (-50)
    • Darwinist (-100)
  • If none above apply...
    • Third Positionism (-50)
    • Anti-Economy (-25)
    • Non-Marxist Communist (+20)
    • Fiscal Federalism (-5)
  • Economic Freedom
    • Anti-Economy (-20)
    • Dirigisme (+50)
    • Regulationism (+10)
    • Mixed (-5)
    • Liberal Economics (-25)
    • Free Market (-50)
    • Laissez-Faire (-100)
  • If none above apply...
    • Central Planned (+5)
    • Decentral Planned (+50)
    • Directed Socialism (+100)
  • Diplomatic Axis
    • Autarchy (-25)
    • Autarky (+50)
    • (Alter-) Globalist (+0)
    • Universal Nationalist (+100)
    • World Federalist (-25)
    • Cosmopolitan (-10)
    • Internationalist (-25)
    • Moderate (-5)
    • Patriotic (+5)
    • Nationalist (+25)
    • Chauvinist (-25)
    • Racial Nationalist (or similar broad category) (-10)
    • Ethno-Nationalist (or similar narrow category) (+10)
  • Geopolitics
    • Western (-100)
    • Western Adjacent (-10)
    • Non-Aligned (+50)
    • East Adjacent (+25)
    • Eastern (+10)
  • If none above apply...
    • Anarchistic Unaligned (+5)
  • Cultural Axis
    • Revolutionary (+100)
    • Progressive (-50)
    • Reformist (-5)
    • Syncretic (-50)
    • Conservative (-25)
    • Traditionalist (-10)
    • Reactionary (-50)
  • Technological Axis
    • Primal (-100)
    • Primitivist (-50)
    • Pre-Industrial (-25)
    • Deceleration (+10)
    • Moderate (+25)
    • Acceleration (+50)
    • Automated (+25)
    • Transhumanist (-50)
    • Posthumanist (-100)
  • If none of the above apply...
    • Post-Civ (-25) [and/or] Archeofuturism (+25)
  • Environmental Axis
    • Human Extinction (-50)
    • Radical Environmentalism (+25)
    • Eco-Fascism (+50)
    • Ecocentrism (+10)
    • Environmentalist (+10)
    • Moderate (+0)
    • Post-Industrialism (+0)
    • Industrialist (-25)
    • Anthropocentric (-25)
    • Anti-Environmentalism (-100)
  • Neurological Axis
    • Anti-Praxis (+0)
    • Utopian (+25)
    • Dogmatic (+25)
    • Idealist (+50)
    • In Between (+0)
    • Realist (-5)
    • Pragmatic (-10)
    • Rational (-20)
    • Dystopian (-25)
    • Anti-Theory (-5)
  • War Axis
    • Pacifism (+100)
    • Non-engagement (+50)
    • De-escalation (+20)
    • Intervention (-50)
    • Irredentism (-100)
    • Revachism (-100)
    • Jingoism (-100)
  • If none above apply...
    • Class Warfare (+5)
  • Praxis
    • Insurrectionism (+25)
    • Revolutionism (+100)
    • Moderatism (-5)
    • Reformism (-25)
    • Stagnationism (-50)
  • Ethnic Axis Optional
    • Chinese (+100)
    • Indian (+100)
    • Other Asian (+100)
    • Other Southeast Asian(+100)
    • Western European (+100)
    • Northen European (+100)
    • Celtic (+100)
    • Eastern European (+100)
    • Southern European (+100)
    • American (-100)
    • South American (+100)
    • African (+100)
    • Arabian (+100)
    • Jewish (+50)
    • Indonesian (+100)
    • Korean (+100)
  • Religious Axis Optional
    • Original Paganism (+5)
    • Zoroastrianism (+10)
    • Buddhism (-5)
    • Hinduism (-5)
    • Orthodoxy (-5)
    • Catholicism (-5)
    • Islam (-5)
    • Judaism (-25)
    • Protestantism (-5)
    • Neo-Paganism (+10)
    • Wicca (-50)
    • Irreligion (+5)
    • Satanism (either atheistic or theistic) (+0)
    • Shinto (-5)
    • Syncretic (-50)

Personality

How to Draw

Flag of Baxism
  1. Draw a ball;
  2. Draw a Drak Blue Phrygian cap on the top;
  3. Draw a Chilean cockade on the cap;
  4. Color the ball with black;
  5. Draw 2 intertwined branches in white in the ball design in the middle in white;

You're done!


Color Name HEX RGB
Teal #036A66 3, 106, 102
White #FFFFFF 255, 255, 255
Black #141414 20, 20, 20
Dark Blue #1A193A 26, 25, 58
Red #D40000 212, 0, 0
Blue #0043D4 0, 67, 212


Relationships

Best

Good

  • UJANism - Great Ideas, some bad members. Ignore the fact that Matteo says that he is "el Comandante" and that makes me laugh.
  • National Liberalism - You are the true liberalism, not like the modern liberalism.
  • De Francism - The only thing I hate about you is your hatred towards Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay.
  • National Anarchism - Obviously after the state and the nation there will be a globalist anarchy, but before the globalist anarchist utopia there will be a nationalist anarchy. Also, I love Ernst Jünger.
  • Neosocialism - Your only mistake was collaborating with the fascists who betrayed you. Also, how come you can affiliate with the Strasserists? Still, you are better than Strasserism.
  • Allendism - Be more Revolutionary!
  • Kaczynskism - The Uncle Ted was based, but I hate neoluddism.

Meh

  • Classical Conservatism - The only good thing of you is Manuel Bulnes.
  • Classical Liberalism - You were better before than now. Still, I see you as a fake revolutionary.
  • La Plaineism - Maybe...
  • Reactionaryism - Only Ernst Jünger and the Conservative Revolution is based.
  • National Bolshevism - In my opinion, current national Bolshevism, of course, is wrong. However, despite that, I can't help but be influenced by Eduard Limonov. He was a great man and leader. He knew how to handle the national Bolshevik party. He, in my opinion, was a great leader.
  • Paetelism - Except for the Counter-Enlightenment, and Reactionarism, Karl Otto Paetel was Based. I hate the anti-fascism, but I support the Anti-Nazism, because the nazis was a fake nationalists. From Karl Otto Paetel, I embrace national Bolshevism as I consider myself a type of national Bolshevik, without traditionalism and without being reactionary.
  • Fascism - Fascism had to be revolutionary and socialist.

Bad

  • Humanism - Human rights should not be defended by the proletariat.

Ultra-Bad

Best

  • DrasThe Thought - Long live DrasThe.
  • SwordComradism - Personally, I feel influenced by you, SwordComrade, since, by reading about your ideology, Paetelism, and so on, I started thinking more about what I am. I understand your dissatisfaction with certain of my opinions, such as Jacobinism and so on, but I also have disagreements with you, for example, ethnic nationalism and anarchism, and it's understandable because each individual is different, and it's understandable. That's the absurdity of life: no one is content with anyone, and everyone is content with everyone.
  • Caatinguism - You are too good. I hate a bit the Trotskyism, but in general, you are too based.
  • Vistulism - You are good, don’t change.
  • Abacusism - Looks like my idealism. But I prefer a more Individualist Anarcho-Communism.
  • Hoodism - Very Based Revolutionary.
  • Daniel Sansón Thought - Now, much better!
  • Neocarlism - I can send you in the guillotine, but youre a very good person. You are literally me if I were a Reactionary! Ignore the fact that you are Carlist and I am an Anti-Carlist because I lov the Falangism.
  • Romantic Egoism - I like you, even if we don't agree on something, you seem like a good guy.
  • Rocksism - Very good ideology. I love your "pragmatism". You are a good ideology!
  • Dankeism - You are too much similar to me!
  • Ultroneism - Very good ideology. I love your analysis on the religion and Epistemology.
  • Iberian Directorialism - Perfect! But Corporatism is too bourgeois.

    • Good

    • Alstūdism - Actually, although I am not a fascist, I support several of your points, such as the economy. Personally, I sympathize with your ideology. I like your nationalism and neo-paganism, and your socialism and corporatism too.
    • Ziółkowskiizm - Very based in my opinion.
    • Hysteria Thought - Even though I disagree with most things about you, you have a very good theory. Also, you are a real artist!
    • Proletariat Builderism - The only thing about your ideology that I don't like is terrorism, religion, conservatism and anarchism. Even so, your philosophy is actually good.
    • Serbian Socialism - Very well, I love Market Socialism.
    • Meadowsin's Basilisk - I have really fallen in love with your ideology. I loved how you expressed yourself. I like that you are so "pure", so to speak. Your critical analysis of today's society is fascinating. You are simply wonderful. I love your ideology, your way of expressing yourself. You are someone impressive, especially in speaking like that: in that tone. Not only in the FPCB do you express yourself in a beautiful way, but when I was reading about you I also felt good, because you express yourself very well and in a "beautiful" way. It is understood?
    • Schumacherianism - Very bad ideas! But I love your book!
    • Neo-Robespierrisme - Like Alstud, but more "leftist". I love your ideology, but ethnic-pluralism isn't based.
    • Neosyndicalism - Very based Syndicalist. Futurism is meh; Corporatism is shit. But you are very good!
    • Golden Iron Doctrine Thoughtism - Georgism is bad and bourgeois. Capitalism is shit, but your democracy is good. Also, Federalism is based.


    Meh

    • Dokevism - Kinda based, but why Democracy? Why Capitalism? You are a good candidate for the Baxist radicalization. You says that "I want a 'welfare capitalism'", but the capitalism can not be welfarist.
    • Neo-MugiKotobuki8814ism - I am not an totalitarian, but SOMETIMES we need totalitarianism. I love socialism, but, for me, socialism IS progressive. Also, I don’t believe in the races. Also, you are a nice person, but nazism is bad.
    • Agricoetism - Paganism is good. I am so close to falangism. I love the hedonism, but be more Revolutionary.
    • ⠀ism - WIP
    • Nurulisme - You are the Fourth Theory with more shit, but good shit.
    • HelloThere314ism - WIP. I'm reading about you.
    • Philosophical Nuggets thought - WIP
    • Iktaism - I agree with some things. But why reactionaryism?

    Bad

    • Champi - Honestly, I must say that the fact that you are a capitalist is terrible. Of course, I believe in a state capitalism, which will later be replaced by a completely planned economy, but you simply try to pretend to be something you are not. I also have to say that you are a pseudocialist who wants a false welfare state. I know I may sound authoritarian by saying this, but often, force is necessary, especially in Chile, because the Chilean people are very foolish. Moreover, it seems like you're trying to blame me for everything. The fact that you support illiberal democracy is not my problem. Furthermore, you support parties that lie and steal from the proletariat. “La verdad no encuentro palabras para expresar el arrepentimiento que tengo a sí que soy directo y te pido perdón por burlame de ti y hablar mal en tus espaldas tal vez ni me aceptes las disculpas por que dijiste con tu multi que no me perdonarás pero no me importa sólo quiero que sepas esto y nada más. También no me importa si usas mis disculpas en broma.”
    • Anarcho-Dokevism - 💀💀💀💀💀
    • Modern Secular Zionism - Zionism is ZZZ. Market Socialism is based.

    Ultra-Bad

    Further Information

    Glossary


    1. Pseudocialist: Pseudocialism or Pseudocialism (In Spanish, «Falsocialista» and «Falsocialismo», from the spanish, falso, "Fake", "Pseudo", and Socialismo, Socialista, "Socialist, Socialism"), is a term created by me. The Pseudocialism is the fake socialism.


    References

    1. ↑ I am a great fan of this philosophy.
    2. ↑ My pen name when I want to write some reactiocucks things.
    3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 From Julius to Emily F. I have fallen poisoned by the deadly venom called 'love,' and it is you who poisoned me. To you, I give my eternal love; my eternal secret.
    4. ↑ In my opinion, eugenics is necessary to achieve human perfection. I believe that humans must be perfect in order to put an end to criminals; rapists and more.
    5. ↑ The only liberals I don't support are the modern liberals.
    6. ↑ Some, because I have reactionary influences.
    7. ↑ Sympathetic
    8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Book translated for UJAN.
    9. ↑ https://primera-linea.com.ar/2023/11/08/origenes-desposesion-palestina-mandato-britanico-1920-1948
    10. ↑ https://www.sinpermiso.info/textos/israel-democracia-sionismo-supremacia-discriminacion-dossier
    11. ↑ https://youtu.be/pTPhUB2kiXo?si=jCeOmfMeVV_zYumz
    12. ↑ https://www.lejournalinternational.fr/Israel-la-caza-de-negros_a986.html
    13. ↑ https://www.europapress.es/internacional/noticia-israel-ofrece-pagar-inmigrantes-africanos-ilegales-abandonen-voluntariamente-pais-20180103145644.html
    14. ↑ https://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/contratapa/13-212234-2013-01-20.html ?
    15. ↑ https://www.aa.com.tr/es/mundo/el-primer-ministro-de-israel-dice-que-los-inmigrantes-africanos-son-una-amenaza-real-para-el-pa%C3%ADs/2982527
    16. ↑ https://amecopress.net/Africanas-victimas-de-pruebas-de-farmacos-israeli-estadounidenses
    17. ↑ https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-57226981
    18. ↑ http://www.laguia2000.com/medio-oriente/ataque-de-israel-a-la-central-nuclear-iraqui-de-osirak
    19. ↑ http://www.elsiglodetorreon.com.mx/noticia/347688.niega-siria-que-sitio-bombardeado-fuera-un-re.html
    20. ↑ http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=70201&sectionid=351020202
    21. ↑ http://www.mundoarabe.org/israel_nuclear_3.htm
    22. ↑ https://www.timesofisrael.com/russian-speakers-who-want-to-immigrate-could-need-dna-test/
    23. ↑ http://archive.is/YISqm

    Notes

    1. ↑ Technically I did not translate it, because I actually bought the book from EDITORIAL ERCILLA and digitized it at home.
    2. ↑ I'm writing it with my friend Rodrigo “DrasThe”.
    3. ↑ I wrote it with my friend Rodrigo “DrasThe”.
    4. ↑ Music only.

    Gallery

    Political Tests

    • DozenValues

      DozenValues

    • Sapply Values

      Sapply Values

    • 8Values

      8Values

    Navigation



    Retrieved from "https://pcbwiki.net/index.php?title=Baxism&oldid=476769"

    Recent changes

  • Socialist World Republic
    SocialistWorldRepublic • 1 hour ago
  • Venatrixism
    TIIKKETMASTER • 00:06
  • Cosmic Vanguardism
    TIIKKETMASTER • Yesterday at 23:50
  • Anti-N.Brioism
    Kradölf • Yesterday at 19:25