×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,525 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Polcompball Wiki
2,525Articles
  Recent changes
in:
Pages using Tabber parser tag, Self-Insert, Ideologies,
and 10 more
Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent Bak Bax's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.


Thanks for the protrait, Hysteria! I love it!


“They Says.”


“My Victory is Our Victory.”


“And?”


“It is like a scorpion — it defends itself with its tail.”


“God Bless Satan!”


“I am literally Mishima.”


The  Baxism is my ideology. I consider myself a revolutionary and economically I am a socialist. I believe that socialism should lead the State. I believe in direct democracy based on decentralized Workers' Councils that equally govern the State. I think that through these Councils, presidents, ministers, and politicians in general should be elected.

Add template:  Baxism (Optional) 

{{Bax}}

My icons: 

([[File:PostRousseau.png|link=Enlightenment]]/[[File:Natcom.png|link=National Communism]]/[[File:FreeJacobin.png|link=Jacobinism]]/[[File:DirecteddSoc.png|link=Directed Socialism]])

This will look like this: Baxism (///).



Political Journey

(Irredentism/Liberalism/Nationalism/Kakistocracy/Social Liberalism).

I was a type of a "Nationalist Liberal" and a stupid boy. I hated the revolution, the philosophy, the economy and the reaction. I was apolitic.

(Marxism-Leninism/State Capitalism/Trotskyism/Nationalism/Police Statism).

I was a stupid Marxist-Leninist. I was a Stalinist-Trotskyist who hated every "nazi" and "fascist" (people who I hated). I was a great fan of every communist, like Pol Pot (💀), Karl Marx, Stalin, Lenin, Kruschev, Trotsky, Gorbachev, and every communist leader or every leader of the USSR.

(Anarcho_Egoism)
and

Books

Want to Read

  • « De l'Esprit des loix ou du Rapport que les Loix doivent avoir avec la Constitution de chaque Gouvernement, les Moeurs, le Climat, la Religion, le Commerce, &c. à quoi l'Auteur a ajouté Des recherches nouvelles sur les Loix Romaines touchant les Successions, sur les Loix Françoises, & sur les Loix Féodales » - Charles Louis de Secondat
  • „Mein Kampf“ – Adolf Hitler
  • “Brave New World” – Aldous Huxley
  • “Chapter on Social Nationalism” – Hubert Ziółkowki
  • “Utopia” – Thomas Moore
  • “Émile; or, on Education” – Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Have Read

Reading

  • “Animal Farm” – Eric Blair
  • “The Communist Manifesto” – Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels
  • “The Empire of the Techno-Peróns” – Mario Japaz
  • “The Fourth Political Theory” – Aleksandr Dugin[n 1]

Suggestions

Other

Books I want to translate into Spanish

Books I translated into Spanish

Books I am translating into Spanish

  • “Folkish Syndicalism Manifesto” – Iefan Alstud
  • “Violence and Autonomy” – Jefferson Bolcheque

Books I am writing

  • «Patria y Dirección»[n 3] (“Nation and Direction”)
  • «Comunismo Insurreccionario: Obras Escogidas» (“Insurrectionary Communism: Selected Writings”)[n 4]
  • «Falange del Amor: Ramiro Ledesma y José Antonio Primo de Rivera» (“Falange of Love: Ramiro Ledesma and José Antonio Primo de Rivera”)[n 5]
  • «¿Cómo, Chile?» (“How, Chile?”)[n 6]

Books I wrote

  • «El Ideal Máximo»[n 7] (“The Ultimate Ideal”)

The Translation of Books

People Who Influenced Me

Note: The author of this page does not necessarily agree with all the beliefs of the people listed below. This is simply a list of people who have influenced the author’s beliefs in some way or another.

Note: The people shown here are ordered by the year they were born, from oldest to youngest.


  1. Diogenes (406-323 BC), Athens
  2. William Shakespeare (1564-1616), England
  3. Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778), France
  4. Marquis de Sade (1740-1814), France
  5. Jean-Paul Marat (1743-1793), France
  6. Maximilien Robespierre (1758-1794), France
  7. François-Noël "Gracchus" Babeuf (1760-1797), First French Republic
  8. José Gaspar Rodríguez de Francia (1766-1840), Paraguay
  9. Ludwig van Beethoven (1770-1827), Austria
  10. Bernardo O'Higgins (1778-1842), Chile
  11. Manuel Bulnes (1799-1866), Chile
  12. Max Stirner (1806-1856), Kingdom of Bavaria / German Confederation
  13. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1809-1865), France
  14. Richard Wagner (1813-1883), Germany[n 8]
  15. Karl Marx (1818-1883), Germany
  16. Friedrich Engels (1820-1895), Germany
  17. Francisco Bilbao (1823-1865), Chile
  18. Georges Sorel (1847-1922), France
  19. Nikola Tesla (1856-1943), Serbia
  20. Oswald Spengler (1880-1936), Germany
  21. Benito Mussolini (1883-1945), Italy
  22. Panait Istrati (1884-1935), Romania
  23. Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937), Italy
  24. Gregor Strasser (1892-1934), Germany
  25. Josip Broz Tito (1892-1980), Yugoslavia
  26. Marcel Déat (1894-1955), France
  27. Ernst Jünger (1895-1998), Germany
  28. Juan Domingo Perón (1895-1974), Argentina
  29. Otto Strasser (1897-1974), Germany
  30. Severino Di Giovanni (1901-1931), Italy / Argentina
  31. Alberto Hurtado (1901-1952), Chile
  32. Jorge Eliécer Gaitán (1903-1948), Colombia
  33. George Orwell (1903-1950), United Kingsom
  34. Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980) France
  35. Ramiro Ledesma Ramos (1905-1936), Spanish Republic
  36. Karl Otto Paetel (1906-1975), Germany
  37. Salvador Allende Gossens (1906-1973), Chile
  38. J. Posadas (1912-1981), Argentina
  39. Michel Foucault (1926-1984), France
  40. Franco Freda (1941-), Italy
  41. Jacobo Grinberg Zylberbaum (1946-), Mexico
  42. Eduardo Antonio Artés Brichetti (1951-), Chile
  43. Charly García (1951-), Argentina
  44. Nicolás Maduro (1962-), Venezuela
  45. Yegor Letov (1964-2008), Russia
  46. Grandpa Ricardo (1967-), Chile
  47. Mark Fisher (1968-2017), UK
  48. Johnny Knoxville (1971-), United States of America
  49. Hubert Ziółkowki (2004-), Poland
  50. Gerotypus (2005-), Argentina
  51. Daniel Sansón (2008-), Argentina
  52. Rocksmanylobsters (?-), ??? ???
  53. Christian Schumacher (?-), United States of America
  54. Matteo A. G. (?-), Argentina
  55. “Toño Fox”[9] (???-???), Mexico

Critiques

“1984”

“1984” is a good novel. A very good plot, but a lot of filler. I find the concept interesting, but the book has too much filler. It's a good book with a good plot, and I admit it; but sometimes there are insignificant parts that don't contribute anything to the book. Also, there are the typical moderates who say, “Have you read Orwell?”, as if Orwell were the only author who has written dystopias. Although I think it's a good story. It annoys me, yes, that stupid kids say, “READ ORWELL!! READ 1984!!”, thinking that 1984 demonstrates communism without knowing that the book explains that there is a market and that they are not truly socialists and that their economy is based on the black market.

My honest opinion is that 1984 is good, but it shouldn't be in the hands of liberals and children (6/10).

“The Social Contract”

W.I.P

“Germany_Tomorrow”

“Germany Tomorrow” by Otto Strasser seems like a very good book to me. I love how he writes, and I loved the idea of a confederation in Europe. The downside is that the book also proposes an elective monarchy and advocates for an Ethno-Pluralist State in Europe, which is problematic. Additionally, it glorifies Gregor Strasser, which isn't necessarily bad, but it literally puts him on a pedestal. Although I enjoyed the book, there are several things I don't like about it (9.5/10).

Ethnic Pluralism

About Ethnic Pluralism, I will say that it is something for larger nations. Clearly, for nations like Chile or Argentina, it is not suitable. Why do I say this? Well, because they are small nations that are a sea of ethnicities. While I want ethnic groups and indigenous peoples to have their own nation, I do not see Ethnic Pluralism as a “good” idea. Furthermore, it is for large nations with few ethnicities like Norway or Germany, not for small nations like Chile, Peru, or Argentina. That's why I am not an Ethnic Pluralist.


Eduardo Artés

I say that Eduardo Artés is the best candidate for Chile. He had to be the president of Chile. Artés is a courageous person: he went to Hoxha's Albania illegally. In addition, Artés is so brave that he stands up to Yankee imperialism. Artés fought against the Pinochet dictatorship. Artés is the best politician in Chile and is the legacy of Salvador Allende.


Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Karl Marx

Strasserism

I sympathize with Strasserism, but find it to be quite reactionary. It also has strong “ethnic and racial” undertones that I find somewhat bourgeois and conservative. While I appreciate some aspects of “Germany Tomorrow”, particularly its economic and state-related ideas, I dislike the proposed elective monarchy outlined in the book.

Gregor Strasser

Otto Strasser

Marquis de Sade

Juan Domingo Perón

Sanatimea

When I commented on the "Social Contract" in the Sanatimea channel, it's clear she didn't understand it. Literally, she believed it was a contract to be signed. It's evident she doesn't grasp Rousseau, who is one of the easiest philosophers to understand. Literally, Wikipedia explains the concept of the social contract proposed by Rousseau.

Note: Comment if you want me to critique you.

Dokevism

I don't know how to begin criticizing you, Zaik, because I consider you my friend, and I know you take criticism very literally, but well.

To start, I detest your transhumanism, as it is very unserious. Damn, I am very utopian, but I don't reach that level. While I envision a utopian society based on communism, I acknowledge that it is utopian, unlike you, who insults those who contradict your transhumanist point of view. I know I'll sound “Reactionary” or “Anprim” in your eyes, but it's true: humans are being consumed by machines. What I don't understand is that you wanted to block me just for thinking differently from you, something that civilized people, who understand how to coexist with others holding different ideologies, don't do. You want a society where the Machine decides the tyrant and where the Machine rules. This is very dystopian, don't you think?

I detest that you don't understand the problems of the current democracy in Chile, and I detest that you support a system like capitalism, as it is IMPOSSIBLE to regulate in your utopia because, if you want total transhumanism, you must eliminate protectionism. Also, you don't understand that capitalism, whether “welfare” or not, commodifies people.

The problem is that you didn't understand the Ultimate Ideal, and that's why you oppose it because, according to you, it is “too primitivist.” Is it primitive to want to control the Machine so that it doesn't consume us? No! No, no, no, and a thousand times no! You didn't understand: we want to control the Machine; otherwise, it will take away our humanity. Don't you understand that the Machine destroys nature? You are very foolish, honestly. The Machine must be controlled, not destroyed. You should read more and get closer to the socialist perspective. Also, your stupid meritocracy should be emphasized. The reward for the proletariat is bread, not money that only commodifies people.

Alstūdism

I really feel quite good with Alstūdism.

There are things about Alstūdism that I don't like, such as Futurism (a bit) or halfway homophobia. I don't like the traditionalist and religious focus much either. I don't like Centralism either, but I like it too much to detest it. I support its universal nationalism, but I prefer a universal nationalism where all peoples have their nations. I don't like its ethnic focus, but well, I really like Alstūdism.

Neocarlism

Really, he's a very pleasant person.

As for your ideology, well, I don't like the Reaction or Reactionaries, as I don't get along with them, but I like you. I detest monarchism, and I'm not a fan of the idea of ethnicity. Although, we share something in common: authoritarianism and economics. While your economy is somewhat corporatist, it's still more or less socialist. I suppose you resemble the Conservative Revolution in Germany.

Brazilian Liberalism

I don't appreciate this ideology.

Firstly, I criticize your foolishness, as you claim that "Autism is a philosophy," which is not true unless you are schizophrenic. You probably only read people's alignments and influences to criticize their ideology, as I'm sure you haven't read about Dokev's or mine, and you just say, "oh, I dislike it because it's communist" or "I like it because it's like me." Furthermore, neoliberalism is a disease similar to leprosy, and neoliberalism excessively commodifies people.

Additionally, it's worth noting that you seem to know nothing about spelling, as you fail to understand that words following a period should begin with a capital letter.

Gualguainism

Very good art!

About your ideology, well, I see that there's a bit of "absence." I like your art, even though I'm not a big fan of futurism. Nevertheless, I think your art is too good. I see "potential" in it, so to speak. You should strive more, and who knows, maybe you'll become very famous.

Romantic Egoism

Wipi

Golden Iron Doctrine Thoughtism

Champi[10]

First of all, I don't like your toxic personality when it comes to politics. I don't like how instead of debating, you just insult the person you're "debating" with. I dislike that attitude of "Well...," "Have you read...?" that childish attitude. Secondly, I detest your spelling mistakes. I tell you and try to help you, but you get angry. You have a huge ego, and if you're a distributist (as you claim to be), you shouldn't be proud of yourself. Thirdly, I detest your lack of knowledge about politics, economics, and philosophy. I don't like how you only read a few authors. For example, I detest capitalism, and yet I've read Christian Schumacher. Fourthly, I detest your lack of understanding. You don't understand communism or my ideology. You can tell you're someone who criticizes based on superficiality. (As Zaik does) Fifthly, I detest your distributism. It's clear you don't understand it and you think distributism is just about sharing wealth. Distributism is more complex than that. Sixthly, I detest your emphasis on supporting the Enlightenment. I myself am enlightened and yet I criticize the Enlightenment. You can tell Champi thinks the Enlightenment is just liberalism and nothing else. Seventhly, Champi criticized a philosopher for being anti-egalitarian. Maybe Champi doesn't understand his points? I myself am an egalitarian and a welfare advocate, but if someone explained to me why they're anti-egalitarian, I'd appreciate it because I do support freedom of expression. Eighthly, Champi criticizes other ideas for being "racist" when Champi has expressed hateful comments towards indigenous people (What did the Mapuches do to him?). Ninthly, Champi doesn't structure his thoughts well. He doesn't read what is recommended to him. Tenth and finally, Champi doesn't take criticism well, and that's why he's somewhat reactionary in the sense that he detests criticism towards him, whether constructive or destructive, which shows clear intolerance. Furthermore, Champi himself has said that he doesn't believe criticism will change him. You can tell he doesn't understand the concept of criticism and thinks criticism must necessarily change you. That's why I call him a "Social Illiterate."

Now that I've criticized his personality, I'll critique his thinking.

  1. His Quasi-Vanguardism — Champi, before being a supporter of the PS (Socialist Party of Chile), was a supporter of the PPD (Party for Democracy). He had an almost religious love for the PPD until he changed for perhaps some reason. Now he has an almost religious love for the PS. This is why I call him an "Almost-Vanguardist." I mean, vanguardism is the love for a single party, turning it into a single party. In vanguardism, the party (or "vanguard") directs the state and others. Lenin theorized vanguardism, and while I like Lenin, I detest his idea of vanguardism.
  2. His Utopian Keynesianism — While I am utopian, at least I am idealistic, as economically I have a more pragmatic idea. The problem with Champi is that he believes his Keynesianism could be combined with distributism. The problem arises when you discover this error: Champi doesn't understand distributism. We're talking about someone toxic, closed-minded, who thinks liberal socialism is socialist. The reason it's utopian is for two reasons:
    1. His distributist idealism. While he declares himself a distributist, his economy is more neoliberal-protectionist.
    2. His fanaticism for poverty. This is evident when you realize he is a fanatic of Pedro Sánchez. Furthermore, Champi believes that the PSOE is good, and neither VOX nor the PP nor the PSOE are good. They are garbage, but the PP is less trash than the PSOE.
  3. His reaction. Champi is a reformist, but I also consider him reactionary since he is against any revolution. I don't consider Zaik a counter-revolutionary because he himself supports a revolution if there is a crisis, but I do consider Champi a reactionary because he opposes any kind of revolution.
Conclusion: Everything I've expressed here is to avoid becoming like Champi and criticizing him.

Beliefs

National Revolution

Personally, I believe in the National Revolution. This idea was influenced by Karl Otto Paetel and Maximilien Robespierre, although, obviously, it was more influenced by the Jacobins. I began to develop the idea of the National Revolution.

I believe in the National Revolution because it is NECESSARY in Chile. Reforms are not enough — We need a revolution, a nationalist one. I am a nationalist out of love for my nation, and I am a socialist out of love for the people of my nation. If being a Nazi means loving your nation and its people, then I consider myself a Nazi. I do not believe in racism or ethnic nationalism.

Furthermore, I believe the reason there hasn't been a National Revolution in Chile is the fault of the reactionaries or counter-revolutionaries. That's why I support the guillotine and its use against the counter-revolutionaries, as they prevent the National Revolution from happening. And not only the counter-revolutionaries but also the current socialists, who are, obviously, social democrats and Pseudocialists.

I am a nationalist. I love my nation because without it, I am nothing. However, that is not the problem. The problem lies with the bourgeoisie, Jews, Catholics, Muslims—every kind of religious person. It doesn't matter which religion they follow; as long as it's not neopagan, they won't be nationalists. It doesn't matter what they do; if they are bourgeoisie, they deserve the guillotine.

And I not only hate religion for its bourgeoisie nature but also for its anti-nationalist and globalist nature. Furthermore, religion is an oppression, and if we want a communist society, we must put an end to religion and its oppression.


Esoteric Revolution

With “Esoteric Revolution”, I mean literally an Esoteric Revolution.

The meaning of the word “Esoteric” is: something hidden, something reserved. So the Esoteric Revolution would be a hidden revolution, esoteric. A silent revolution. A revolution where the “elites” (revolutionary people with power) rebel. It's like a silent revolution, like a revolution from the shadows, from the hidden.

I see this revolution as highly unlikely and more like a joke. However, if the worker does not cooperate...

A New Age of Enlightenment

Just as I say that the Enlightenment generated problems, I say that these problems would be resolved with a New Era of the Enlightenment. Just as the Enlightenment generated problems (such as Totalitarianism, Nazism, and other offspring of the Enlightenment), I want to start anew. I want a New Enlightenment that is not the Neoiluminismo spoken of in Brazil. I want one that resolves and corrects the errors of the first Enlightenment.

Because I want a new Hegel, a new Kant, a new Rousseau, a new Voltaire, and a new Sade. I want the New Era of the Enlightenment to “enlighten” new minds. I want this New Enlightenment to correct liberalism and the other offspring of the Enlightenment.

Philosophy

Despite being influenced by various reactionaries, I consider myself a revolutionary.

I certainly contradict myself a lot — that's what makes me a philosopher.

To be a philosopher, you must question everything. And to question it, you must think. And to think, you must suffer. And to suffer, you must love. And to love, you must live.


Altruistic Egoism

I'm not egoist. Personally, I live as an altruistic egoist, though I don't want a society based on altruistic egoism. I want an altruistic society. And as I said before, altruistic egoism is more personal to me because I live as one.

Optimistic Nihilism

I personally consider myself an Optimistic Nihilist because I believe in the idea that once we are dead, life will repeat itself, and it will continue in a constant cycle. So, if you live well, why fear repeating this life? I believe it doesn't matter how you live because we will live again and again.

Post-Rousseauism

I am a Post-Rousseauian because I reinterpret Rousseau.

Rousseau seems somewhat outdated to me, so I reinterpret his ideas. What I value most from Rousseau is his idea that humans are inherently good and that there should be direct democracy, although I specifically advocate for a direct democracy based on workers’ councils. Additionally, I lean more towards nationalism. Here's how I reinterpret Rousseau’s ideas:

  1. Man is born free and good, but society corrupts him — I reinterpret this as: Man is born free and good, but society and capitalism corrupt him. Capitalism corrupts humanity and its goodness. We must destroy private property so that humans do not continue to corrupt themselves in this way.
  2. Society should be virtuous and avoid vices — I reinterpret this as: Society should be virtuous, loving, and steer clear of vices. Vices corrupt, and it's better to have a society based on love and emotions. A society based on altruism and love for others to prevent corruption in both individuals and society.
  3. Humans share two things in common with animals: empathy and love — I reinterpret this in a more naturalistic way: Humans share two things in common with animals: freedom, goodness, and love. Man is born to love and it should be so, as a society based on love would eliminate theft and other issues. Humans corrupt themselves because society is not based on emotions.

With this, I declare myself a Post-Rousseauian. I want a society based on emotions, empathy, altruism, goodness, and love. While it may sound utopian, it is what I desire the most.

Post-Marxism

“Marx is starting to bore, like Rousseau”, writes Oswald Spengler. But to that I respond: “That’s why we need a new Marx and a new Rousseau”. Marx is dead: we know that. I reinterpret Marx, and I see him from a more modern perspective. I want to modernize Marx and Rousseau.

Marx and Engels were great men, it’s just that they’re very old and need modernizing. They need to “expand”, to “rejuvenate” themselves. Marx and Engels are very much dead, and we need to renew and modernize them.

Brief Analysis About Sansón

Civics

Republicanism

I detest monarchies. Monarchy is an oppressive invention and, as Borker said, a reactionary institution. I prefer a socialist and democratic republic. I would choose a republic with a president a thousand times over a government where you must obey a king who tells you, for example, to greet them. For instance, in Britain, when the queen died (RIP Bozo), there were 10 days of mourning for her. That demonstrates the totalitarianism behind parliamentary systems. That's why not only monarchy is bad, but also parliaments. That's why I prefer a republic without a parliament and with direct democracy.

Welfare State

Secularism

Personally, I'm an atheist. I live as an atheist and don't believe in a god, but I don't believe in State Atheism either. In fact, I reject this idea. While I am an atheist, I prefer a secular state where all citizens can have their own religion, but they don't try to impose it on others.

Social Contract

“Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servilium.”


I'm referring to what Rousseau called the "Social Contract": a contract between individuals that involves the surrender of all rights to the community and creates a "general will"; by obeying it, the individual would be obeying themselves. I mean: individuals would vote for the laws they themselves propose and would obey them. This would be for the collective. Thus, civilians would participate in all decision-making processes in the country.

Social Contract!

Why Federalism?

Because it's almost impossible for more independent states like a Mapuche State to exist, I believe federalism in Chile is the most "pragmatic" idea or the "first step" towards states like the Mapuche.

I think that, if it's not possible to grant independence to various peoples, all countries should be a federation, which is, as I mentioned before, the most "pragmatic" option or the "first step" towards universal nationalism.

The Human Perfection

I believe in human perfection. I want to improve humanity, not the race. The concept of race is stupid. It's better to enhance all humans.

I support voluntary eugenics, and I believe that, for example, the brains of pedophiles and criminals should be researched to discover why they committed those crimes and to investigate further with the aim of creating more perfect future generations.

Literally "A Brave New World".

Education

I believe education should be more like a natural-based education. I want children to learn what they need to learn in their own time, comprehensively. I mean, children should learn what they need to learn. Then they'll learn what they want to learn. All of this comprehensively.

Additionally, I'd like an education based on what the child wants. I mean, educating the child in what they want after teaching them the basics. The basics would be: how to read, how to write, spelling, and grammar.

Economy

„Wir müssen von der Rechten Nationalismus ohne Kapitalismus und von der Linken Sozialismus ohne Internationalismus übernehmen.“


The Gregor Strasser quote I placed here is because I agree with him: we must have a nationalist socialism. I'm not suggesting “Nazism”, but rather a nationalist socialism. This leads to Directed Socialism: a synthesis between the French idea of dirigisme and the idea of socialism. Although they don't differ much, there is one difference: the State.

In Directed Socialism, it is the people who direct the State (that's why Directed), because we reject the State Socialism. We believe in the State, but it should be directed by Decentralized Workers' Councils.

Diplomacy

I am a Universal Nationalist. As a Universal Nationalist, I must oppose all forms of imperialism, whether from the West or the East. Even if my homeland commits an imperialist act, I must condemn that act, because while I am a nationalist, I oppose all forms of imperialism. And since I oppose all forms of imperialism, I am also a pacifist. I oppose wars, because they are imperialistic.

I prefer to maintain peaceful diplomacy, like a type of Geopolitical Non-Alignment, meaning I am not aligned with any side. I like the Non-Aligned Movement. I am Non-Aligned because, as I said before, I oppose imperialism, no matter where it comes from.

Foreign Policy

I believe that borders are necessary and should be strong. The only issue I have with immigrants is when they are illegal and don't even assimilate into our culture. If an illegal immigrant comes, they should at least assimilate into our culture, and that's coming from someone who is extremely progressive. I have no issue with legal immigrants because they are legal. While I am not conservative or traditionalist, I prefer legal immigrants who assimilate into my culture, meaning Chilean culture.

Social Alignments

Negative IQ

The concept of “Negative IQ” initially emerged as a silly joke among friends on Discord, but I later realized that there are people who genuinely exhibit a “Negative IQ,” such as Diego Arturo Silva Beltrán and those referred to as “Reactionary Socialists.” Of course, even I contradict myself, but not to the extent of Reactionary Socialism. Additionally, individuals who are not reactionary socialists, such as neoliberals and others, can also display a Negative IQ.

In Chile, there are several examples of Negative IQ, including figures like Pedro Aguirre Cerda, Dokev or Augusto Pinochet. Even José Antonio Kast and his followers are considered to have a Negative IQ. It's worth noting that Negative IQ is not exclusive to individuals on the right-wing, as Michelle Bachelet, a left-wing figure, is mentioned to have a Negative IQ. Gabriel Boric, another left-wing figure, is also associated with a Negative IQ. Pedro Aguirre Cerda, despite being on the left, is mentioned as having a Negative IQ. Negative IQ can be attributed to both left-wing and right-wing individuals.

The concept of “Negative IQ,” for those who didn't understand, refers to people who act without thinking. In fact, when I mentioned that Dokev had a Negative IQ, Dokev got upset and demonstrated having a Negative IQ. That's the problem: people act without thinking. Therefore, it could be said that people who lack reading comprehension suffer from a Negative IQ.

About Nations

Chile

Government

“We are the first country of Chile. The first country of Chile. [Unintelligible Sounds] The first country of the World.”


Regarding the Government of Chile , I believe it should take more authoritarian measures. For example, on September 4th, when the Rechazo won with 62 percent. The problem is not the government but the people. The people are foolish and don't realize it. Moreover, the majority of those who voted against it did so because they believed their houses would be taken away—yes, seriously. Imagine believing without reading. But not reading is not the only problem; the other is a lack of reading comprehension. Now, with the proposal for a new constitution—which really gonna will take away your water, bread, and house—the people will choose it just because José Antonio Kast proposed it. And this is a big problem because the people don't understand.

The “Democracy” is the refuge of the bourgeois, the refuge of the weak and the plutocrats. Sometimes, I wish the proletariat knew what is good and what is not. I want to destroy democracy, praise war, death, hatred, and suffering. I want to kill; I love war, I love metal, I love chains and bullets because of the people. I am anti-war, but sometimes, I wish for a war.

I will praise war, terrorism, death, suffering, murder, theft, lies, dictatorship, bullets, anything as long as it ends with democracy.

Apruebo or Rechazo?

In my opinion, the 1980 Constitution in Chile is clearly designed for the proletariat to suffer since it was created by aristocrats for aristocrats, not for the people. That's why I criticize the 1980 Constitution. Furthermore, it's important to emphasize that it was created by the right-wing, and they are the only ones benefiting from it, leaving the proletariat with nothing. Additionally, the 1980 Constitution was very lacking in nationalism, heavily capitalist, and bourgeois.

I believe that the constitution proposed by Boric was alright, but it should have been more nationalist and revolutionary. Therefore, I view Boric as a common pseudocialist and a traitor to the proletariat because he is a moderate socialist, in many quotes.

Furthermore, the constitution proposed by Kast is an abusive nonsense. We are not cattle but proletarians. We are the people of Chile, and therefore, we are nationalists. But Kast is not a nationalist; he is a false nationalist and a false populist. José Antonio Kast is not right — his followers are just sycophants who enjoy being trampled.

Chile is everything — the rest is nothing.

About the Political Parties

"I no longer believe in any idea, in any party, in any man. By logical consequence: there is nothing that would determine me to take on the role of a militant for any doctrine or program. I AM THE ETERNAL OPPONENT."


Regarding the political parties in Chile, I believe that they are primarily a method to control the proletariat, as, by nature, the proletariat doesn't think much. That's why I think they should be banned in Chile because every individual is different, and every proletarian is different. Furthermore, I believe that the worst left-wing political parties are the Communist Party of Chile and the Socialist Party, as they never stop stealing from the proletariat, constantly claiming to be “the legacy of Salvador Allende.” The right-wing parties are even worse, as they profit, lie, and deprive us of our individual freedom. And the worst right-wing political parties are the UDI, Renovación Nacional, and the Partido Republicano.

Guns

On the topic of gun legalization in Chile, I think it's a bad idea, especially because of the radical libertarians. Goodness, can you imagine a libertarian coming to kill you? If libertarians are already crazy and violent, imagine one with a firearm. Furthermore, here are my other reasons for hating guns:

  1. Murders: If we legalize guns, some CRAZIES will use them, and just think about a reactionary like Kast with a rifle.
  2. Extremism: Extremists, especially reactionaries or people like Guz or Hans Hindenburg, would use them to eliminate their opponents.

Also, Guns are stupid.


Political Movements

Good Party

Mixed

  • Apruebo Dignidad - I appreciate your expression of gratitude and satisfaction with the idea of changing Augusto Pinochet's constitution. However, if only they had been more authoritarian...

Bad Party

Argentina

“Che, boludo.”


About Argentina, I think it's a great and beautiful country. I believe that we should help our sister nation, Argentina. Chile should unite with Argentina in a federation, as I think that together, we could address the inflation issues in both countries. Additionally, we could work together on the matter of the Falkland Islands.

I LOVE TRANSLATE BOOKS FOR THE UJAN!!

Perú

Palestine

I support the opinion of Matteo:

«Jews and Arabs have inhabited the region of Palestine for centuries. However, from 1291 to 1920 (629 years), Palestine was under Muslim rule, and even during the British Mandate of Palestine, Muslims constituted over 93% of the population.[11] The Jewish population in Israel is largely descended from Ashkenazi immigrants, who have little or no Hebrew blood. The immigrant population effectively exercises Jewish supremacy in the country,[12] treating the Arab residents as second-class citizens[13] and violating their rights. Israel establishes Jewish settlements in Palestinian territory, progressively encroaching upon Palestine until its disappearance.[14] There is even abuse and discrimination towards black Jews,[15] with about half of Israelis viewing them as a threat,[16] including Benjamin Netanyahu, who stated that Africans constituted a threat to the character and future of Israel.[17] The 50% decline in the birth rate of Ethiopians in Israel was attributed to a secret sterilization program against them.[18]

United States has served Israel in these factors:

  • Military and Economic Aid: Since World War II, Israel has been the largest overall recipient of U.S. foreign aid.[19] According to a report from the U.S. Congressional Research Service in November 2001, American aid to Israel in the past half-century amounted to a staggering $81.3 billion.
  • Sale and Donation of Weapons: Israel is one of the most significant importers of weapons from the United States. In the past decade alone, the U.S. has sold $7.2 billion worth of weaponry and military equipment to Israel.
  • Arms: Israel has made significant efforts to prevent the proliferation of weapons in the region, including what it terms "preventive attacks," such as the bombing of the nuclear reactor in Iraq in 1981[20] and an alleged nuclear reactor in Syria in 2007.[21]
  • Nuclear Weapons: Israel not only developed nuclear weapons but possesses an arsenal of between 100 and 200 nuclear weapons[22]. Israel began its nuclear weapons program in the 1950s, creating a sophisticated nuclear arsenal larger than the British arsenal. The technology to develop this arsenal was the result of collaboration with France, a country that Israel allegedly deceived by claiming it would only use the technology for peaceful purposes.[23]

A survey sponsored by the Jewish Defense League in 2009 found that 66% of Jews in Israel would view an Israeli airstrike against Iran as positive or very positive, suspecting Iran of wanting to build a nuclear bomb.

  • Chemical and Biological Weapons: This technology began to develop in the late '60s, funded with U.S. capital and the collaboration of foreign companies.
  • Conventional Weapons: The U.S. has also supported the Israeli arms industry by providing $1.3 billion to develop Lavi aircraft, $625 million to develop and deploy Arrow anti-missile missiles, $200 million to develop Merkava tanks, and $130 million to develop a high-energy laser missile defense system.
  • Free Weapons: The U.S. also gives away arms and ammunition as part of the Excess Defense Articles (EDA) program, providing these items at no cost. Between 1994 and 2001, the U.S. supplied the majority of Israel's weapons through this program.

It's worth noting that unlike Western countries, Israel maintains some state policies or recommendations for the "racial" preservation of the Jewish people, which might be considered racist if implemented by a Western country (and indeed, Jews are often associated with immigration in Europe).

In 2013, the Israeli Prime Minister's office announced that potential immigrants from the former Soviet Union might be asked to prove their Jewish lineage through a DNA test.[24] In 2015, Israel banned a novel from schools depicting a love story between an Arab and a Jew, citing concerns about potential intermingling between the two "races."[25]»



Bolivia

Why I hate Bolivia?

Cambodia

Pol Pot

Adolf Pol Potler

User Test

I do not know what is this. Also, sorry, Borker.

Note: I made this calculation starting with the number 1000. If they are wrong, please comment.

Pick only one from each category :] (Code stolen from Borker. Sorry, Borker)

  • Civic Axis
    • Chaoist (-50)
    • Anarchist (-7)
    • Minarchist (0)
    • Libertarian (-5)
    • Civically Moderate (+0)
    • Statist (+15)
    • Dictablanda (+10)
    • Authoritarian (+25)
    • Totalitarian (0)
    • Orwellian (-50)
  • Type of Rule Axis
    • (Anarchist) Anti-Democracy (-10)
    • Direct Democracy (+100)
    • Semi-Direct Democracy (-50)
    • Representative Democracy (-10)
    • Authoritarian Democracy (+1)
    • Totalitarian Democracy (0)
    • (Authoritarian) Anti-Democracy (-5)
  • If none above apply...
    • Directed Councils (100)
    • Kultokratic System (0)
  • Economic Axis
    • Marxist Communist (+50)
    • Socialist (+40)
    • Welfarist/Gift Economy (+5)
    • Mixed (-10)
    • Liberal Economics (-100)
    • Capitalist (-50)
    • Darwinist (-100)
  • If none above apply...
    • Third Positionism (-50)
    • Anti-Economy (-25)
    • Non-Marxist Communist (+20)
    • Fiscal Federalism (-5)
  • Economic Freedom
    • Anti-Economy (-20)
    • Dirigisme (+50)
    • Regulationism (+10)
    • Mixed (-5)
    • Liberal Economics (-25)
    • Free Market (-50)
    • Laissez-Faire (-100)
  • If none above apply...
    • Central Planned (+5)
    • Decentral Planned (+50)
    • Directed Socialism (+100)
  • Diplomatic Axis
    • Autarchy (-25)
    • Autarky (+50)
    • (Alter-) Globalist (+0)
    • Universal Nationalist (+100)
    • World Federalist (-25)
    • Cosmopolitan (-10)
    • Internationalist (-25)
    • Moderate (-5)
    • Patriotic (+5)
    • Nationalist (+25)
    • Chauvinist (-25)
    • Racial Nationalist (or similar broad category) (-10)
    • Ethno-Nationalist (or similar narrow category) (+10)
  • Geopolitics
    • Western (-100)
    • Western Adjacent (-10)
    • Non-Aligned (+100)
    • East Adjacent (0)
    • Eastern (0)
  • If none above apply...
    • Anarchistic Unaligned (+5)
  • Cultural Axis
    • Revolutionary (+100)
    • Progressive (+50)
    • Reformist (-5)
    • Syncretic (-50)
    • Conservative (-25)
    • Traditionalist (-10)
    • Reactionary (-50)
  • Technological Axis
    • Primal (-100)
    • Primitivist (-50)
    • Pre-Industrial (-25)
    • Deceleration (+10)
    • Moderate (+25)
    • Acceleration (+50)
    • Automated (+25)
    • Transhumanist (-50)
    • Posthumanist (-100)
  • If none of the above apply...
    • Post-Civ (-25) [and/or] Archeofuturism (+25)
  • Environmental Axis
    • Human Extinction (-50)
    • Radical Environmentalism (20)
    • Eco-Fascism (10)
    • Ecocentrism (+10)
    • Environmentalist (+30)
    • Moderate (+0)
    • Post-Industrialism (+0)
    • Industrialist (-25)
    • Anthropocentric (-25)
    • Anti-Environmentalism (-100)
  • Neurological Axis
    • Anti-Praxis (0)
    • Utopian (+25)
    • Dogmatic (0)
    • Idealist (+50)
    • In Between (0)
    • Realist (-5)
    • Pragmatic (5)
    • Rational (5)
    • Dystopian (-25)
    • Anti-Theory (-5)
  • War Axis
    • Pacifism (+100)
    • Non-engagement (+50)
    • De-escalation (+20)
    • Intervention (-100)
    • Irredentism (-100)
    • Revachism (-100)
    • Jingoism (-100)
  • If none above apply...
    • Class Warfare (+5)

Personality

How to Draw

Flag of Baxism
  1. Draw a ball;
  2. Draw a Drak Blue Phrygian cap on the top;
  3. Draw a Chilean cockade on the cap;
  4. Color the ball with black;
  5. Draw 2 intertwined branches in white in the ball design in the middle in white;

You're done!


Color Name HEX RGB
Dark Blue #424584 66, 69, 132
White #FFFFFF 255, 255, 255
Black #141414 20, 20, 20
Dark Blue #1A193A 26, 25, 58
Red #D40000 212, 0, 0
Blue #0043D4 0, 67, 212


Relationships

Best

  • Jacobinism
    • The Jacobins are an example to follow. True revolutionaries. Chile should imitate the Jacobins and return to that old nationalist left. We need a national revolution in Chile to establish democracy.
  • Directed Socialism
    • Directed Socialism is the only option to save Americas. We must establish a direct democracy based on workers' councils to lead our nation.
  • Republicanism
    • We must end the monarchy through a nationalist revolution to establish republics worldwide. We must abolish that reactionary government that opposes democracy.
  • Fictional Nationalism
    • I love fiction! That's why I love Fictional Nationalism. I enjoy creating fictional nations and having fun with them. What would the world be without fiction? Plus, a little roleplay never hurts.
  • Federalism
    • Federalism is the only way to guarantee autonomy to the people and others. I would like a federation in Chile. The downside is that leaders from both the right and left would centralize power, due to their corruption. That's why I want to prevent them from becoming corrupt through eugenics.
  • Eugenicism
    • Eugenics is the only way to improve humans without harming nature. I would like to perfect humans so that they do not become corrupt and do not generate pedophiles, murderers, psychopaths, etc. I want to perfect humans so that they do not become corrupted by vices.
  • UJANism
    • The UJAN seems to me one of the best communities. They are young revolutionaries (although some are reactionary, etc., etc.) who fight for their country. They know about politics, economics, and social issues. I love the UJAN, and I like it, especially Matteo and Sansón.

Good

  • Enlightenment
    • The Enlightenment had good ideas, but it generated problems that must be addressed with a New Age of Enlightenment that repairs the damage caused by the first Enlightenment.
  • Falangism
    • I like Falangism. The downside is its economy and conservative social policies. However, I like Ramiro Ledesma and José Antonio Primo de Rivera.
  • Marxism
    • I like Marxism, economically speaking. Also, I like its revolutionary ideas. The downside is the lack of nationalism, which is why I have become a national communist.
  • Universal Nationalism
    • I like the concept of Universal Nationalism because one should liberate their own people and all others. Although Universal Nationalism is clearly unrealistic, hence why I come up with federalism.
  • National Liberalism
    • National Liberalism seems better to me than common liberalism. Also, I like Bernardo O’Higgins and Manuel Rodríguez.
  • De Francism
    • Dr. De Francia seems like a good leader to me. I really liked what I read about him and his government. Definitely reminiscent of Robespierre's legacy. It's just that De Francia was very irredentist, which is bad.
  • Neosocialism
    • I like France's Neosocialism. The bad thing was that they collaborated with the Nazis (the worst scum of Europe). Also, I don't like their idea of a “revolution from above”. However, I still like it.
  • Allendism
    • Salvador Allende was a good leader for Chile. The downside was that he wasn't very revolutionary, and I didn't like that. However, I like his idea of “Cybersyn”. However, Allende was somewhat bourgeois or aristocratic, in my opinion. I didn't like that. Nevertheless, he didn't deserve that coup d'état which established a bourgeois and liberal dictatorship.

Meh

  • Classical Liberalism
    • I dislike classical liberalism. Maybe liberalism was okay before, but now they're like “Uhhh, Parliament, Democracy” and they bother a lot with their idiocies. They confuse liberalism with democracy, which should never be done.
  • Paetelism
    • Karl Otto Paetel certainly seems revolutionary to me. The downside is his conservative approach. Also, Germany's Conservative Revolution was very conservative, as I mentioned before. I would have liked Karl Otto Paetel to have governed Germany. However, I don't really like his ideas.
  • Fascism
    • I like Fascism a bit. The downside was that Mussolini and Gregor Strasser were very allied with Hitler. Adolf Hitler killed fascism. Also, fascism is very centralist. I prefer a Sansepolcrismo instead of a fascism like Mussolini's. Although I like Ramiro Ledesma.
  • Crusade of Romanianism
    • The Crusade of Romanianism seems revolutionary to me, and I prefer a Stelescu over a Codreanu in Romania. I like Panait Istrati, but the Crusade seems too chauvinistic to me.

Bad

  • National Anarchism
    • The 'National Anarchism' has nothing national about it. It's undoubtedly stupid. Nationalism arises from the Enlightenment, so national anarchism, being reactionary, shouldn't be either anarchist or nationalist. National Anarchism is shit, especially Troy Southgate. Southgate imitates Ernst Jünger, but fails. Ernst Jünger is better than Troy because Jünger develops his ideas, unlike Troy who is like 'Oh, Bad State Good Nation.' Ernst Jünger was good, Troy wasn't.
  • Classical Conservatism
    • Classical Conservatism seems like garbage to me. It's very reactionary and very stupid. However, I express my liking for Manuel Bulnes. I liked how he governed, but he was very bourgeois and reactionary.
  • Fictional Micronationalism
    • MyF is nothing but trash. They mistreat their members, and the administrator is very corrupt. Their admin and admins are nothing but kids trying to “beat” NF. It used to be me who was defamed, now it’s them. They defamed both me and DrasThe. Wilhelm perhaps is salvageable. But not Maxtom and the others. Wilhelm told us that everyone in MyF reported us, leading to our Discord accounts being deleted. I believe him, because I know Maxtom. But what can we do? What happened happened.
  • Distributism
    • Distributism is nothing but the delusions of Chesterton. Chesterton was in love with Belloc. While I like the idea of distributing wealth and I like its localism, it's nothing more than a reactionary and theocratic ideology. It's dogma.
  • Reactionaryism
    • I dislike reactionaries. But I like Spengler, Jünger, and the Conservative Revolution. However, reactionaries are trash.
  • Anarcho-Egoism
    • I like Max Stirner, but he's nothing more than Engels in disguise. Also, I don't like Stirner's extreme individualism. I like several of his ideas, but he's not to my taste.

Ultra-Bad

  • Capitalism
    • Capitalism arises from human corruption. It dehumanizes and commodifies us. Capitalism is literally an unfair competition, because it depends on where you were born. It's a stupid competition that commodifies us and makes us inhuman.
  • Nazism
    • Nazism killed fascism. Race is a stupid concept that only idiots believe in.
  • Girondism
    • The Girondins are perhaps the worst traitors to the revolution. There are modern Girondins (neoliberals and reactionaries) who try to sabotage us, such as Kast or all the Pinochet supporters.
  • Feudalism
    • Feudalism is a reactionary idea. Just like monarchism. Feudalism is a impoverishing ideology also arising from human corruption. “Go work from the age of 12 to feed a king”, Gerotypus once said.
  • Monarchism
    • Monarchism and monarchy are reactionary ideas based on a cult towards a corrupt king who tells you what to do, how, and where. Imagine being a monarchist.
  • Centralism
    • Centralism doesn't give us the autonomy we want. Centralism is stupid and old.
  • Reactionary Socialism
    • Socialism cannot and should not be reactionary. While I like Spengler and Jünger, a socialism based on a feudal economy seems like garbage to me. It's old and outdated.
  • National Capitalism
    • The so-called “National” Capitalism is not nationalist. It's impossible to commodify people and be nationalist. Commodifying people and leaving the country in the hands of a market is simply anti-national because it depletes national resources.
  • Reactionary Liberalism
    • Reactionary liberalism is garbage from its inception. Kast and all the Pinochet supporters to the guillotine.
  • Pinochetism
    • Augusto Pinochet and his followers are nothing but blind people who refuse to see. They are idiots who love being crushed by the same person with a different face.

Best

  • DrasThe Thought - You literally helped me in my worst moments and I share several ideas with you. Wait… Why are you homophobic and Anti-Semitic? I understand Anti-Semitism, but homophobia is reactionary.
  • Caatinguism - You are too good. I hate a bit the Trotskyism, but in general, you are too based.
  • Vistulism - I like your idea about Britain, Ireland and so on. I liked your guild socialism, since it is not as reactionary as others. I like that you differentiate between Liberalism and Democracy. I liked how you talked about West and East, and I think the same. Plus, we both hate Jews.
  • Neocarlism - I can send you in the guillotine, but youre a very good person. You are literally me if I were a Reactionary! Ignore the fact that you are Carlist and I am an Anti-Carlist because I love the Falangism.
  • Rocksism - Very good ideology. I love your "pragmatism". You are a good ideology!
  • Dankeism - You are too much similar to me!
  • Iberian Directorialism - Perfect! But Corporatism is too bourgeois.

    • Good

    • Hysteria Thought - Even though I disagree with most things about you, you have a very good theory. Also, you are a real artist!
    • Meadowsin's Basilisk - I have really fallen in love with your ideology. I loved how you expressed yourself. I like that you are so "pure", so to speak. Your critical analysis of today's society is fascinating. You are simply wonderful. I love your ideology, your way of expressing yourself. You are someone impressive, especially in speaking like that: in that tone. Not only in the FPCB do you express yourself in a beautiful way, but when I was reading about you I also felt good, because you express yourself very well and in a "beautiful" way. It is understood?
    • Schumacherianism - Very bad ideas! But I love your book!
    • Neosyndicalism - Very good Syndicalist. Futurism is meh; Corporatism is shit. But you are very good!
    • Golden Iron Doctrine Thoughtism - Georgism is bad and bourgeois. Capitalism is shit, but your democracy is good. Also, Federalism is based.
    • Philosophical Nuggets thought - I like your analysis of Strasser and National Socialism and Maoism. I like your ideology, honestly. It's just that you're weird.
    • Hyperfascism - I like several things, but you are very imperialist. Still, you are curious.

    Meh

    • Dokevism - Kinda based, but why Democracy? Why Capitalism? You are a good candidate for the Baxist radicalization. You says that “I want a ‘welfare capitalism’”, but the capitalism can not be welfarist.
    • Romantic Egoism - I don't like that you are too reactionary, and that individualism and mutualism are meh. However, I like your criticism of capitalism. That's why I call you “El Profe”, as a joke.
    • Ultroneism - Very good ideology and philosophy. I like what you wrote, especially your analysis on epistemology and religion. The downside is that individualism and egoism.
    • Venatrixism - I don't like that you change your thoughts too often. Your page will end up very empty if you continue like this. Although I like you, I just don't like that much of your post-leftism and individualism. Although I don't dislike you much.
      • Venatrixism - I haven't changed my beliefs in two months cope harder :Yawn:, I keep my page empty because I don't wanna be consumed by the monster called shopping something you've went to far into.
      •  Baxism - By changing your beliefs, I mean that Z/ACC, Freudianism, etc. were strange. Furthermore, I said that your page was empty because, being empty, I had no way of understanding your thoughts.
        • Venatrixism - nigha I was always z/acc(altought you could say that I wasn't since I didn't have it on my page for a while, but I literally didn't even have a page during it)? anyways the freudinaism was literally me looking at page names and icons on philosophyball, which would be clear if you had realized I had it on my page for a minute or two. I had a empty page because I wasn't gonna do anything with it(and still ain't) because I don't really give a shit about bolas that much anymore that was merid me(which you weren't really around to see), you still can't "understand" my thoughts without reading text made by the people how made the ideas I believe in.
        •  Baxism - No, thanks. I don't want to read communizers.
    • Agricoetism - Paganism is good. I am so close to falangism. I love the hedonism, but be more Revolutionary.
    • ⠀ism - I like your philosophy, although it's clear I need to read more about you.
    • Nurulisme - You are the Fourth Theory with more shit, but good shit. Idk.
    • HelloThere314ism - I like your post-structuralism, your insurrectionism, and more. I just don't l yike that individualism and selfishness. However, I do like your writings.
    • Iktaism - I agree with some things, but you looks like a Feudalist.
    • Alstūdism - Actually, although I am not a fascist, I support several of your points, such as the economy. Personally, I sympathize with your ideology. I like your nationalism and neo-paganism, and your socialism and corporatism too. But that ethnicist shit...
    • Leerderism - I like that separatism and cultural nationalism, but you are not to my taste.

    Bad

    • Champi Thought - Champi is nothing but a right-wing opportunist who likes red. He's a guy who doesn't understand fascism or Keynes. He believes that liberal socialism is true socialism, when it's not. It's clear that he's a social illiterate who wants a parliamentary republic. That's why I call him “Social Illiterate”. It's clear that he doesn't want to learn and can't stand criticism. If only he read a little more... Dokev >>> Champi
    • Modern Secular Zionism - Zionism is ZZZ. Market Socialism is meh.
    • Cosmic Vanguardism - I like Irrationalism. I like that leadership and, to be honest, that aristocracy. I don't like racialism or homophobia nor do I like Nietzsche that much. I must study Nietzschean philosophy and hermeticism. I don't like imperialism or transhumanism. You're neither very good nor very bad, honestly. You're like a middle ground between meh and bad.

    Ultra-Bad

    Further Information

    Glossary


    1. Pseudocialist: Pseudocialism or Pseudocialism (In Spanish, «Falsocialista» and «Falsocialismo», from the spanish, falso, "Fake", "Pseudo", and Socialismo, Socialista, "Socialist, Socialism"), is a term created by me. The Pseudocialism is the fake socialism.


    References

    1. ↑ My pen name when I want to write some reactiocucks things.
    2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 From Julius to Emily F. I have fallen poisoned by the deadly venom called 'love,' and it is you who poisoned me. To you, I give my eternal love; my eternal secret.
    3. ↑ In my opinion, eugenics is necessary to achieve human perfection. I believe that humans must be perfect in order to put an end to criminals; rapists and more.
    4. ↑ The only liberals I don't support are the modern liberals.
    5. ↑ I'm not kidding, MangoBall (mamo balls (Literally "I Suck Balls")) thinks he's Adolf Hitler, although MangoBall is Peruvian and dark-skinned.
    6. ↑ Some, because I have reactionary influences.
    7. ↑ Sympathetic
    8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Book translated for UJAN.
    9. ↑ Toño Fox is known for seeming like a madman [1][2] who talks to himself [3]. Furthermore, he says meaningless things like "My penis has grown" [4] or "WE ARE FRIENDS, AND WE ARE FRIENDS."[5] He says he was threatened by drug traffickers and television channels. He also says that his father is Vicente Fox.[6]
    10. ↑ His personality and ideology.
    11. ↑ https://primera-linea.com.ar/2023/11/08/origenes-desposesion-palestina-mandato-britanico-1920-1948
    12. ↑ https://www.sinpermiso.info/textos/israel-democracia-sionismo-supremacia-discriminacion-dossier
    13. ↑ https://youtu.be/pTPhUB2kiXo?si=jCeOmfMeVV_zYumz
    14. ↑ https://www.lejournalinternational.fr/Israel-la-caza-de-negros_a986.html
    15. ↑ https://www.europapress.es/internacional/noticia-israel-ofrece-pagar-inmigrantes-africanos-ilegales-abandonen-voluntariamente-pais-20180103145644.html
    16. ↑ https://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/contratapa/13-212234-2013-01-20.html ?
    17. ↑ https://www.aa.com.tr/es/mundo/el-primer-ministro-de-israel-dice-que-los-inmigrantes-africanos-son-una-amenaza-real-para-el-pa%C3%ADs/2982527
    18. ↑ https://amecopress.net/Africanas-victimas-de-pruebas-de-farmacos-israeli-estadounidenses
    19. ↑ https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-57226981
    20. ↑ http://www.laguia2000.com/medio-oriente/ataque-de-israel-a-la-central-nuclear-iraqui-de-osirak
    21. ↑ http://www.elsiglodetorreon.com.mx/noticia/347688.niega-siria-que-sitio-bombardeado-fuera-un-re.html
    22. ↑ http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=70201&sectionid=351020202
    23. ↑ http://www.mundoarabe.org/israel_nuclear_3.htm
    24. ↑ https://www.timesofisrael.com/russian-speakers-who-want-to-immigrate-could-need-dna-test/
    25. ↑ http://archive.is/YISqm

    Notes

    1. ↑ I forgot I was reading this, so I'll pick it up again.
    2. ↑ Technically I did not translate it, because I actually bought the book from EDITORIAL ERCILLA and digitized it at home.
    3. ↑ I'm writing it with my friend Rodrigo “DrasThe”.
    4. ↑ I only translate the book, I do not say that the works are mine. In fact, I will put the names of those who wrote the works. I specify that I only translated them from English.
    5. ↑ A homosexual novel dedicated to my Falangist friend Matteo. 😍😍😍 (Matteo isn't gay)
    6. ↑ I also plan to translate this into German, Italian and French. (German: „Wie, Chile?“. I think I'll need help from native German speakers for this. Italian: «Come, Cile?». French: « Comment, Chili ? ». I think I'll need help from native French speakers)
    7. ↑ I wrote it with my friend Rodrigo “DrasThe”.
    8. ↑ Music only.

    Gallery

    • By Hysteria!

      By Hysteria!

    • Old Flag

      Old Flag

    • Directed Socialism in Dozen Values.

      Directed Socialism in Dozen Values.

    • Cartoonish self-portrait with a Phrygian cap.

      Cartoonish self-portrait with a Phrygian cap.

    • Baxman

      Baxman

    • Baxist Symbol

      Baxist Symbol

    Political Tests

    • DozenValues

      DozenValues

    • Sapply Values

      Sapply Values

    • 8Values

      8Values

    Navigation


    Retrieved from "https://pcbwiki.net/index.php?title=Baxism&oldid=485689"